Re: Private Homes may be taken for public good
Well, James Dobson (right wing Christian evangelical) is targeting some of these same judges, so I don't think the Democrat Republican division you're pointing to here is all that valid. In other words, some of those same judges are hated by the right. Thomas in particular is hated by the Right, but everyone, left, right, and center hates the majority decision in Kelo. Polls on major news sites indicate 1-3% support for the decision. The question is not whether there's a division -- of course there is -- but whether liberals are upset enough about this decision to turn against justices who mostly support the modern liberal paradigm. From: James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bill Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Private Homes may be taken for public good Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:09:31 -0700 -- Bush's favorite judges are radical activists when it comes to interference with most civil rights For the most part, it was conservative judges, judes hated by the democrats with insane extravagance, that voted for against this decision. Bush's favorite judge is probably Thomas, who voted against this decision.
Re: Private Homes may be taken for public good
Well, James Dobson (right wing Christian evangelical) is targeting some of these same judges, so I don't think the Democrat Republican division you're pointing to here is all that valid. In other words, some of those same judges are hated by the right. -TD From: James A. Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bill Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Private Homes may be taken for public good Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:09:31 -0700 -- Bush's favorite judges are radical activists when it comes to interference with most civil rights For the most part, it was conservative judges, judes hated by the democrats with insane extravagance, that voted for against this decision. Bush's favorite judge is probably Thomas, who voted against this decision. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG OATUYUUD6X16QdQnFd2ZgGItmw0TrkkNoR5SYYAZ 4HZTgkPgkgTwPSGrDGUeYo6QjGZU5psCanKPMN479
Live Free or Die
Ya' knew that had to happen! Funny but, reading it, it seems like it would be fairly easy to convince the Town board of 5 people that this is a good idea, and from an economic standpoint it just might be!. In much of New Hampshire any revenue at all from something like this is going to benefit the local township: The barrier to entry is very low. Funny to think that Souter has Live Free or Die on his license plates. -TD From: baudmax [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Private Homes may be taken for public good Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:23:19 -0400 The proposed taking through eminent domain, of S.C. Justice David Souter's home, for the more profitable use as a 'Lost Liberty Hotel' and 'Just Deserts Cafe'... http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html --- Secrecy is the cornerstone of all tyranny. Not force, but secrecy... censorship. When any government, or any church, for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know, the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives. Mightily little force is needed to control a man who has been hoodwinked; Contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; The most you can do is kill him. -Robert A. Heinlein, Revolt in 2100 --- Smash The State! mailing list home http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smashthestate ---
