The current developments in international politics, mainly the advent of
rogue states attacking sovereign countries from air, causes a necessity of
proliferation of cheap air defense solutions. Key part of air defense is
the awareness, usually maintained by a network of ground radar stations.
In the end of 50's, Czech Republic developed a passive radar system called
PRP-1/Kopac (Korelacni Patrac, Correlation Seeker), which was later
replaced by more advanced system Ramona and even more advanced Tamara.
Then the Revolution came, bringing the inevitable international pressures
that led to the bankrupcy of the Tamara developer company, following false
indictments of its top managements which lead to revocation of the
company's arms sale licence. Shortly after this, articles in the world
press appeared about groundbreaking passive radar system being developed
by - guess who? Lockheed. (After 15 years of research, good part of
which consisted from reverse-engineering of seized shipment of I am not
sure if Ramonas or Tamaras.)
See also http://www.techtydenik.cz/tt1998/tt10/panoram5.htm
The system allows locating and identification of aerial, ground, and (when
installed on the shore) sea-based EM sources.
The passive radar system consists from four main parts. Three are wideband
receivers, listening for any characteristical transmitting activity. They
talk to the fourth one, where a correlator is located - an electronic
system calculating the position of the signal sources from the differences
of times when the listening posts received their signals.
The civilian sector electronics is developing fast; component prices fall
down, computing power goes up, anybody can buy a machine that just few
decades ago would make everyone in Pentagon salivating. Naturally, this
opens interesting possibilities.
The threat rogue states with overwhelming air force pose to other
countries makes it a necessity to develop a cheap, open passive radar
system, effectively bringing a key part of air defense down to easy
affordability on a municipiality level. Let's call it GNU/Radar.
We need the four stations: three listening ones, and the correlating one.
The correlating station (CS) may be built as a MOSIX or Beowulf cluster.
Its job is to handle signals from LPs, identifying the targets, and
tracking their position.
The listening posts (LPs) need a receiver - a suitably wideband one, a
digitizer (a fast ADC card), optionally a DSP board to take some
calculations off the shoulders of the CPU, a source of precise timebase
for synchronizations (may be a GPS, which also provides information about
the location of the listening post which is what the CS needs to know, or
may be a receiver of a time synchronization signal broadcasted from
somewhere if we want a backup for case of GPS being shut down. The
receiver may be possibly adapted from the GNU/Radio project. The timing
pulses can be also delivered optically, eg. by a modification in the Ronja
unit mentioned later.
The LPs crunch the received signals, isolate the interesting-looking ones,
mark the precise moments of their reception, and send their arrival times
and key characteristics to CS. The transmission channel may be anything
with sufficient bandwidth - from an Internet leased line to Ronja-based
10Mbps optical links in case of direct visibility between LPs and CS.
As an active twist, we can also use a separate unit, Illuminating
Transceiver (IT), periodically broadcasting a pulse of known
characteristics, easy to recognize by the LPs when it bounces from an
aerial target. This unit has to be cheap and expendable - it's easy to
locate and to destroy by a HARM missile. As a bonus, forcing the adversary
to waste a $250,000+ AGM-88 missile on a sub-$100 transmitter may be quite
demoralizing. There can be a whole hierarchy of ITs; when one of them
transmits, the other ones sleep - when the transmitting one is destroyed,
one of the sleeping units wakes up and continues in illuminating the
airspace. This is within reach of capabilities of a simple
microcontroller.
Even other sources can serve as involuntary ITs. The landscape is littered
with cellular base stations and civilian TV and radio transmitters. Just
pick the suitable frequency and listen on.
Remember that Kopac was built about 50 years ago, on vacuum tubes. It
should be far from impossible to replicate it with contemporary COTS
electronics.
Using lower frequencies than the gigahertz band usual for modern military
radars reduces accuracy, but also dramatically reduces the effectivity of
aircraft stealth features.
There are already prototype results in this field:
http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,16762,00.html
Some other sources:
http://ronja.twibright.com/
http://slashdot.org/articles/01/06/11/1617239.shtml
Opinions, comments, ideas?
