Note that you also [explicitly] waive your search and siezure rights (at
least this was the case the last time I looked at the forms for TS) - not a
nice thing :-(

On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Optimizzin Al-gorithym wrote:

> Another reason: once you get a clearance, you can't speak
> freely.  The latest _Tech Review_ interviews an MIT Prof Postol,
> who has been pointing out the lies behind Raytheon's Patriot
> missile and the anti-ballistic missile sham.  Reportedly,
> some friendly DoD folks came to him and asked him to read
> a classified report that would put some of his technical worries at
> ease.
> Postol refused, knowing that this is a scheme used to silence
> folks --having been exposed to classified info, you have to
> watch what you say.  If you figure it out from open data +
> general science, you can speak your mind.
> 
> (BTW The basic deception is, if our gizmo can't discriminate this kind
> of decoy, well, don't use that kind of decoy in the tests..)
> 
> 

-- 
Yours, 
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they
should give serious consideration towards setting a better example:
Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of
unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in
the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and 
elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire
populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate...
This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States
as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers,
associates, or others.  Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of
those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the
first place...
--------------------------------------------------------------------


Reply via email to