Re: Google Exposes Web Surveillance Cams
Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >with the discovery that a pair of simple Google searches permits I love how all of the coverage leaves out the actual search strings, as if it's hard to discover what they are at this point. http://www.google.com/search?q=inurl%3A%22ViewerFrame%3FMode%3D%22 http://www.google.com/search?q=inurl%3A%22MultiCameraFrame%3FMode%3D%22 Perhaps there are others as well; this is what 10 seconds of googling revealed. (There's something strangely meta about using google to discover a google search string.) -- Riad S. Wahby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Google Exposes Web Surveillance Cams
Riad S. Wahby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I love how all of the coverage leaves out the actual search strings, as > if it's hard to discover what they are at this point. A fairly comprehensive list of search strings per camera/manufacturer can be found here: http://www.i-hacked.com/Computer-Components/Software-Internet/Finding-Online-Webcams!.html A! -- == anton l. raath http://raath.org/ == Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light. -- Dylan Thomas ==
Re: Google Exposes Web Surveillance Cams
At 02:20 PM 1/9/05 -0600, Riad S. Wahby wrote: >I love how all of the coverage leaves out the actual search strings, as >if it's hard to discover what they are at this point. I'm similarly annoyed that articles omit the URLs of "terrorist web sites", being forced to check ogrish.com, even if I couldn't read the language. But government and its presses know best.