Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-07 Thread Charley Musselman
yeah, spying is a much more sensible rationale than these stupid 
microgravity experiments for big infrastructure investments in low earth 
orbit...

I debated a Boeing representative, gee, back in 89 or thereabouts at a 
AAAS meeting about payoffs of space station.  (I had long been a NASA 
Technology Transfer contractor, after managing numerous R&D planning and 
mission selection programs for OART and ERC.)  "Structural steel has 
better characteristics if annealed in zero G."  (We used to call it 
"zero G.")  "Oh, yeah?  Maybe.  Where would this better steel find 
application?"  "Everywhere, bridges, buildings.."  "Not at $50K per 
pound, it won't!"

Why do I love NASA?
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/index.html

and nary a "furry weavol" in sight!

R. A. Hettinga wrote:
--- begin forwarded text


Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 17:40:55 -0800
Subject: Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade
  your  body!"
From: Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: R

On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 04:11  PM, Sunder wrote:



Far more than likely, the truth is closer that the Space Shuttles have
been performing ultra sensitive spy work - launching new spy
satelites, or
repairing them, and may have pieces of spy satelites on them.

Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
gravity... uh huh.




But, but, but the Israeli Payload Specialist, the Colonel in the IDF
who was on the bombing mission to take out the Osirak reactor in Iraq
in 1981, certainly was not involved with any kind of surveillance
satellite work!

His sole duty was to investigate the effects of gamma rays on
man-in-the-moon marigolds.

That's NASA's story...and they're sticking to it.

"Pay no attention to the Israeli Defense Forces spy behind the DOD
curtain!"

(Several times in the past we have only been told long after the fact
that what had been billed as a "scientific mission" by NSA, er, NASA,
was actually a military mission. Given that missions are very, very
expensive and usually have somewhat-justifiable mission goals, the fact
that this mission had no publically-disclosed goals except "science
fair projects" suggests strongly why the Israeli pilot was on this
particular mission. And Pakistan may be wondering what the Indian woman
was doing.)

--Tim May

--- end forwarded text





--
Charley Musselman
43 Kent Street
Somerville,  MA  02143
617-718-9722




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Tim May
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 09:18  AM, Thomas Shaddack wrote:


...and some very, very tiny fraction may have actually touched
some component which made them slightly ill.


Tf they ingested a part made of beryllium alloy, it could make them 
pretty
sick...



First, if they are eating shuttle debris, think of it as evolution in 
action.

Second, beryllium is not much used in the mostly-aluminum shuttle. Web 
sites say some of the brake assemblies use beryllium and its alloys.

Third, it would take longer for someone who ate a shuttle part to feel 
sick, due to Be or any other metal poisoning, than we saw on Saturday. 
I vote for the "sympathetic magic" theory.

(As it happens, one of my first engineering assignments, in 1974, was 
working on a BeO alternative to Al2O3/alumina for packages. Berylliosis 
was a concern for the _manufacturing_ of the packages from pressed 
powder, but touching or licking or whatever the finished packages was 
not an issue.)

--Tim May



Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Meyer Wolfsheim
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Thomas Shaddack wrote:

> > ...and some very, very tiny fraction may have actually touched
> > some component which made them slightly ill.
>
> Tf they ingested a part made of beryllium alloy, it could make them pretty
> sick...

Gee golly! I'm so glad that CNN told me that the space shuttle confetti
was bad for me, or I would have gnawed on that chunk of metal in my front
yard!

Honestly.




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Thomas Shaddack
> ...and some very, very tiny fraction may have actually touched
> some component which made them slightly ill.

Tf they ingested a part made of beryllium alloy, it could make them pretty
sick...




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Sunder
Sigh, for the nth time already: While it's likely that bare boards,
replacement and replaced parts, manuals, access codes to tell the satelite
it's being worked on, etc... would burn up, pieces that were shielded
would survive.  Think!

--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
 + ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
  \|/  :and didn't stop 9-11|share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\
<--*-->:Instead of rewarding|monitor, or under your keyboard, you   \/|\/
  /|\  :their failures, we  |don't email them, or put them on a web  \|/
 + v + :should get refunds! |site, and you must change them very often.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sunder.net 

On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Mikko Sdreld wrote:

> On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Sunder wrote:
> > Far more than likely, the truth is closer that the Space Shuttles have
> > been performing ultra sensitive spy work - launching new spy satelites, or
> > repairing them, and may have pieces of spy satelites on them.
> >
> > Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
> > shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
> > gravity... uh huh.
> 
> Now why would they have spy satellites on board still when they are coming
> _down_? One might think that if such things were part of the mission
> they'd leave them up to spy, rather than bring them back down.
> 
> -- 
> Mikko"One Ring to rule them all,
>   One Ring to find them,
>   One Ring to bring them all
>   And in the Darkness bind them."




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Mikko Särelä
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Sunder wrote:
> Far more than likely, the truth is closer that the Space Shuttles have
> been performing ultra sensitive spy work - launching new spy satelites, or
> repairing them, and may have pieces of spy satelites on them.
>
> Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
> shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
> gravity... uh huh.

Now why would they have spy satellites on board still when they are coming
_down_? One might think that if such things were part of the mission
they'd leave them up to spy, rather than bring them back down.

-- 
Mikko"One Ring to rule them all,
  One Ring to find them,
  One Ring to bring them all
  And in the Darkness bind them."




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread David Howe
at Monday, February 03, 2003 3:48 AM, Sunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
seen to say:
> Think upgrading of circuit boards.  Remove old board, insert new
> board for example.  Leaving the old board circling around may not be
> a good thing.  Just for example.
Yeah, makes sense. ok, I withdraw my objections to the conspiracy theory
:)




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Tim May
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:07  PM, John Kelsey wrote:

A real journalist would just roll his eyes and say "Look, folks, NASA 
wants these pieces to be aid in reconstructing the accident. There 
are no traces of liquid propellants and deadly chemicals on these 
pieces. And they certainly didn't stay hot for long. NASA is trying 
to get us to feed you jive so you'll be properly frightened and won't 
touch them.?"

I recall a guy on NPR saying something like this, a bit more politely. 
 Something like "The pieces surely aren't going to be dangerous, but 
moving them is going to mess up the investigation of the crash."  
Which presumably is what everyone with any technical background and 
common sense was thinking when they heard the original warning, right?

The last laugh may be from the lawsuits. Yahoo reports "hundreds" of 
people reporting sickness, blah blah, from contact with the debris. 
Almost certainly all either bullshit or sympathetic magic, but the 
obvious result of the news outlets widely reporting "the space debris 
may make you very sick!"

Some fraction actually think they are sick, some fraction hope to share 
in a possible payout of billions by a backed-into-a-corner space 
agency, and some very, very tiny fraction may have actually touched 
some component which made them slightly ill.

Dumb fucks, all.



--Tim May
"The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any 
member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm 
to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient 
warrant." --John Stuart Mill



Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread John Kelsey
At 10:19 AM 2/2/03 -0800, Tim May wrote:
...

Speaking of journalists, why does Wolf Blitzer repeat this obvious lie 
about the metal bits and pieces being tainted by evil spirits? Because 
these so-called journalists are stooges for the state.

Well, the bit about "18 times the speed of light," and other mistakes I've 
seen through the years, make me suspect that Wolf and company simply don't 
have the technical background and built-in BS detectors necessary to catch 
things like this.  (For some reason I've never been able to fathom, many 
journalists seem to be remarkably gullable, when they're told something 
from the right kind of source, especially a government agency or other 
official source.)

A real journalist would just roll his eyes and say "Look, folks, NASA 
wants these pieces to be aid in reconstructing the accident. There are no 
traces of liquid propellants and deadly chemicals on these pieces. And 
they certainly didn't stay hot for long. NASA is trying to get us to feed 
you jive so you'll be properly frightened and won't touch them.?"

I recall a guy on NPR saying something like this, a bit more 
politely.  Something like "The pieces surely aren't going to be dangerous, 
but moving them is going to mess up the investigation of the crash."  Which 
presumably is what everyone with any technical background and common sense 
was thinking when they heard the original warning, right?

--Tim May, Occupied America


John Kelsey, [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Sunder
Think upgrading of circuit boards.  Remove old board, insert new board for
example.  Leaving the old board circling around may not be a good
thing.  Just for example.

--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
 + ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
  \|/  :and didn't stop 9-11|share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\
<--*-->:Instead of rewarding|monitor, or under your keyboard, you   \/|\/
  /|\  :their failures, we  |don't email them, or put them on a web  \|/
 + v + :should get refunds! |site, and you must change them very often.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sunder.net 

On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Dave Howe wrote:

> Sunder wrote:
> > Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
> > shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
> > gravity... uh huh.
> Lothe though I am to shed doubt on your consipiracy theories - but the
> shuttle was on its way *down*. Why would they be bringing sooper Sekrit spy
> satellites back?




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Tim May
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 04:11  PM, Sunder wrote:



Far more than likely, the truth is closer that the Space Shuttles have
been performing ultra sensitive spy work - launching new spy 
satelites, or
repairing them, and may have pieces of spy satelites on them.

Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
gravity... uh huh.


But, but, but the Israeli Payload Specialist, the Colonel in the IDF 
who was on the bombing mission to take out the Osirak reactor in Iraq 
in 1981, certainly was not involved with any kind of surveillance 
satellite work!

His sole duty was to investigate the effects of gamma rays on 
man-in-the-moon marigolds.

That's NASA's story...and they're sticking to it.

"Pay no attention to the Israeli Defense Forces spy behind the DOD 
curtain!"

(Several times in the past we have only been told long after the fact 
that what had been billed as a "scientific mission" by NSA, er, NASA, 
was actually a military mission. Given that missions are very, very 
expensive and usually have somewhat-justifiable mission goals, the fact 
that this mission had no publically-disclosed goals except "science 
fair projects" suggests strongly why the Israeli pilot was on this 
particular mission. And Pakistan may be wondering what the Indian woman 
was doing.)

--Tim May



Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Eric Murray
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 10:19:27AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
 
> A real journalist would just roll his eyes and say "Look, folks, NASA 
> wants these pieces to be aid in reconstructing the accident. There are 
> no traces of liquid propellants and deadly chemicals on these pieces. 
> And they certainly didn't stay hot for long. NASA is trying to get us 
> to feed you jive so you'll be properly frightened and won't touch 
> them.?"

No one with the gumption to say the truth is allowed near a mic
at any major media outlet.  Instead they get marginalized as a
"conspiracy theorist" along with the UFO idiots, and the mass media
hire dolts who will read what they're told to read.

I'm not sure which is more irritating-- the obvious way in which
the govermedia manipulate the issue, or their automatic assumption that
americans are too stupid/criminal to turn in all the parts they
find if NASA just said "we need all the parts, please bring 'em in".


Eric




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Steve Thompson
 --- Eric Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 
> I'm not sure which is more irritating-- the obvious
> way in which
> the govermedia manipulate the issue, or their
> automatic assumption that
> americans are too stupid/criminal to turn in all the
> parts they
> find if NASA just said "we need all the parts,
> please bring 'em in".
 
In part it seems it is because such a vast number of
people in America have been so well served by the
education system that the most effective way to coerce
obedience is to invoke their fear of the unknown.  I'm
sure that the other part of the equation is that the
government officials responsible for the cleanup feel
they must take advantage of every oppourtunity to
assert their authority; to make it impicit to every
command/request.

It is an insult to the intelligence, but to speak out
in indignation invites the wrath of the low-level,
insecure powers that be.

Regards,

Steve

__ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Bill Stewart
At 10:19 AM 02/02/2003 -0800, Tim May wrote:

Journalists may as well be saying the above, saying that shuttle debris
has evil spirits which can come out if the debris is touched.


They're also saying that Feds will come and arrest you if you touch them.
You'll have to draw your own conclusions about equivalence classes there...

(A friend of mine likens cops to vampires -
they aren't supposed to come in your house unless someone invites them,
but if you are so foolish as to invite them in,
you won't be able to control what happens when they're there
or get them to leave when you want them to go.)




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Tim May
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 05:42  PM, Dave Howe wrote:


Sunder wrote:

Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
gravity... uh huh.

Lothe though I am to shed doubt on your consipiracy theories - but the
shuttle was on its way *down*. Why would they be bringing sooper 
Sekrit spy
satellites back?

You haven't been reading. Cf. the threads on the Chinese Shen Zou 
satellite, left in orbit less than a month ago. SZ-4 is of deep 
interest to the IDF (Payload Specialist Ramon, who is not Mexican) and 
to the NRO.

--Tim May
"You don't expect governments to obey the law because of some higher 
moral development. You expect them to obey the law because they know 
that if they don't, those who aren't shot will be hanged." - -Michael 
Shirley



Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Sunder
Far more than likely, the truth is closer that the Space Shuttles have
been performing ultra sensitive spy work - launching new spy satelites, or
repairing them, and may have pieces of spy satelites on them.

Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
gravity... uh huh.

--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
 + ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
  \|/  :and didn't stop 9-11|share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\
<--*-->:Instead of rewarding|monitor, or under your keyboard, you   \/|\/
  /|\  :their failures, we  |don't email them, or put them on a web  \|/
 + v + :should get refunds! |site, and you must change them very often.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sunder.net 

On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Tim May wrote:

> Journalists may as well be saying the above, saying that shuttle debris 
> has evil spirits which can come out if the debris is touched.

> A real journalist would just roll his eyes and say "Look, folks, NASA 
> wants these pieces to be aid in reconstructing the accident. There are 
> no traces of liquid propellants and deadly chemicals on these pieces. 
> And they certainly didn't stay hot for long. NASA is trying to get us 
> to feed you jive so you'll be properly frightened and won't touch 
> them.?"




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-03 Thread Dave Howe
Sunder wrote:
> Let's see, we're going into war with Iraq, and we're sending up the
> shuttle to do experiments on how furry weavols behave under zero
> gravity... uh huh.
Lothe though I am to shed doubt on your consipiracy theories - but the
shuttle was on its way *down*. Why would they be bringing sooper Sekrit spy
satellites back?




Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-02 Thread Tyler Durden
Tim May wrote...

"Last laugh: CNN is carrying (10:06 a.m. PST) an "information" slug at the 
bottom of a Wolf Blitzer interview: "Columbia was traveling 18 times faster 
than the speed of light."

Yes, "speed of light." "

Yo Choate! Want to take a crack at this? Please explain using your theories 
how the shuttle can be traveling 18 times faster than light!

-TD

"Ain't I a stinker?"
BB








From: Tim May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your  
body!"
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 10:19:27 -0800

Journalists may as well be saying the above, saying that shuttle debris has 
evil spirits which can come out if the debris is touched.

Part of the dumbing down of America, and of journalism. (I just heard one 
Fox News anchorbimbo referring to the Russian rocket launched today as 
"bringing supplies to the space station.)

The journalists are spouting the NASA line that shuttle debris may be "hot" 
and may have dangerous substances. Right. As if the heat and spinning and 
12000 mph turbulence hasn't scrubbed every surface of its volatiles.

What they want is for people not to collect the pieces and hang on to them 
on their fireplace mantles. Or to try to sell them at flea markets and 
EBay.

But the only way they think they can frighten people off is to utter 
obvious gibberish about how the pieces are "hot" and "may be toxic."

"DALLAS (AP) - From corrosive fuels to ammonia-like liquids, insulation and 
plastics, space shuttle Columbia carried a witch's brew of toxic and 
caustic materials designed to work in the hostile environment of space.

"Authorities warned the public to stay away from shuttle debris because it 
could be harmful.

"Perry said either liquid oxygen from the shuttle's fuel system or liquid 
nitrogen used to inflate the tires could be dangerous. "

Right. Those charred and warped pieces of metal are going to have liquid 
oxygen and/or liquid nitrogen on them...after the fall and after sitting on 
the ground (not to mentioned being so "hot," other NASA droids and 
reporters report).

(Needless to say, any look at the images of the designated officials 
picking up the bits of debris shows no HAZMAT suits, no welding gloves to 
deal with the "hot" debris. The pickup crews are just wearing ordinary 
coveralls and uniforms.)

Last laugh: CNN is carrying (10:06 a.m. PST) an "information" slug at the 
bottom of a Wolf Blitzer interview: "Columbia was traveling 18 times faster 
than the speed of light."

Yes, "speed of light."

Speaking of journalists, why does Wolf Blitzer repeat this obvious lie 
about the metal bits and pieces being tainted by evil spirits? Because 
these so-called journalists are stooges for the state.

A real journalist would just roll his eyes and say "Look, folks, NASA wants 
these pieces to be aid in reconstructing the accident. There are no traces 
of liquid propellants and deadly chemicals on these pieces. And they 
certainly didn't stay hot for long. NASA is trying to get us to feed you 
jive so you'll be properly frightened and won't touch them.?"


--Tim May, Occupied America
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety 
deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759.


_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus



Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-02 Thread Bill Frantz
At 10:19 AM -0800 2/2/03, Tim May wrote:

>Last laugh: CNN is carrying (10:06 a.m. PST) an "information" slug at
>the bottom of a Wolf Blitzer interview: "Columbia was traveling 18
>times faster than the speed of light."
>
>Yes, "speed of light."

"Please mister spaceman, won't you please take me along for a ride."
  - J. McGuinn


-
Bill Frantz   | Due process for all| Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | used to be the Ameican | 16345 Englewood Ave.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | way.   | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA




"Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-02 Thread Tim May
Journalists may as well be saying the above, saying that shuttle debris 
has evil spirits which can come out if the debris is touched.

Part of the dumbing down of America, and of journalism. (I just heard 
one Fox News anchorbimbo referring to the Russian rocket launched today 
as "bringing supplies to the space station.)

The journalists are spouting the NASA line that shuttle debris may be 
"hot" and may have dangerous substances. Right. As if the heat and 
spinning and 12000 mph turbulence hasn't scrubbed every surface of its 
volatiles.

What they want is for people not to collect the pieces and hang on to 
them on their fireplace mantles. Or to try to sell them at flea markets 
and EBay.

But the only way they think they can frighten people off is to utter 
obvious gibberish about how the pieces are "hot" and "may be toxic."

"DALLAS (AP) - From corrosive fuels to ammonia-like liquids, insulation 
and plastics, space shuttle Columbia carried a witch's brew of toxic 
and caustic materials designed to work in the hostile environment of 
space.

"Authorities warned the public to stay away from shuttle debris because 
it could be harmful.

"Perry said either liquid oxygen from the shuttle's fuel system or 
liquid nitrogen used to inflate the tires could be dangerous. "

Right. Those charred and warped pieces of metal are going to have 
liquid oxygen and/or liquid nitrogen on them...after the fall and after 
sitting on the ground (not to mentioned being so "hot," other NASA 
droids and reporters report).

(Needless to say, any look at the images of the designated officials 
picking up the bits of debris shows no HAZMAT suits, no welding gloves 
to deal with the "hot" debris. The pickup crews are just wearing 
ordinary coveralls and uniforms.)

Last laugh: CNN is carrying (10:06 a.m. PST) an "information" slug at 
the bottom of a Wolf Blitzer interview: "Columbia was traveling 18 
times faster than the speed of light."

Yes, "speed of light."

Speaking of journalists, why does Wolf Blitzer repeat this obvious lie 
about the metal bits and pieces being tainted by evil spirits? Because 
these so-called journalists are stooges for the state.

A real journalist would just roll his eyes and say "Look, folks, NASA 
wants these pieces to be aid in reconstructing the accident. There are 
no traces of liquid propellants and deadly chemicals on these pieces. 
And they certainly didn't stay hot for long. NASA is trying to get us 
to feed you jive so you'll be properly frightened and won't touch 
them.?"


--Tim May, Occupied America
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759. 



Re: "Touching shuttle debris may cause bad spirits to invade your body!"

2003-02-02 Thread Tim May
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 10:19  AM, Tim May wrote:




Last laugh: CNN is carrying (10:06 a.m. PST) an "information" slug at 
the bottom of a Wolf Blitzer interview: "Columbia was traveling 18 
times faster than the speed of light."

Yes, "speed of light."


This same slug has since appeared several more times, suggesting only 
complete morons and scientific illiterates are manning the control 
rooms.

--Tim May