Re: [darktable-dev] Wrong lens detected
It seems that some informations are from the right lens and other for the wrong one. Probably these informations ARE in the file. Maybe Sigma is trying to fool the Canon body to get some optical corrections from it? 2017-12-04 22:43 GMT+01:00 Marc Mascré: > That is completely crazy > > # exiv2 -pt IMG_4575.CR2 | grep Lens > Exif.CanonCs.LensTypeShort 1 Canon EF > 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM > Exif.CanonCs.LensShort 3 18.0 - 300.0 > mm > Exif.Canon.LensModel Ascii 74 18-300mm > Exif.Photo.LensSpecification Rational4 18/1 300/1 > 0/1 0/1 > Exif.Photo.LensModel Ascii 9 18-300mm > Exif.Photo.LensSerialNumber Ascii 11 00 > > exiftool version here is 10.45 I can try to update it but I became to ask > myself if the wrong lens type is not write in the .CR2 by the camera. > > Marc > > > > Le 04/12/2017 à 16:36, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) a écrit : > > Can you try: > > exiv2 -pt IMG_.cr2 | grep Lens > > I got that on an other lens: > > Exif.CanonCs.LensTypeShort 1 Canon EF > 24-70mm f/4L IS USM > Exif.CanonCs.LensShort 3 24.0 - 70.0 mm > Exif.Canon.LensModel Ascii 70 EF24-70mm > f/4L IS USM > > Maybe you can try also to update your exiftool-version (I've 10.67 here) > > Jean-Luc > > 2017-12-04 0:29 GMT+01:00 Marc Mascré : > >> Hi >> >> It seem to be exactly this model for my lens. But when I use exiftool on >> a .CR2 file from my camera, it detect my lens as a canon EF 75-300 too. >> (see file attached) >> >> How can I find the right exit informations ? >> >> Marc >> >> >> >> Le 03/12/2017 à 18:24, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> What is the exact model of your lens (from the exif)? >> Is it: "Sigma DT 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro" ? >> >> If yes, it is not in version_1 of lensfun database but it is in version_2. >> >> If you upgrade your database with the command "lensfun-update", it will >> create the following in your home directory: .local/share/lensfun/updates/v >> ersion_1/ >> And then the lens will be in the file: slr-sigma.xml >> >> Jean-Luc >> >> >> 2017-12-03 18:07 GMT+01:00 Marc Mascré : >> >>> Hello >>> >>> I have a lens, the sigma 18-300 f3.5-6.3 >>> >>> The problem is, it is detect by darktable as a canon EF 75-300 >>> >>> I see the link for raw.pixls.us but it seem to be only for camera, not >>> for lens. >>> >>> >>> How I can tell to darktable that my lens is a sigma 18-300 and not a >>> canon 75-300 ? >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> Marc >>> >>> ___ >>> darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to >>> darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org >>> >> >> >> ___ >> darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to >> darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org >> >> >> > > ___ > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > > > ___ > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-dev] Debugging of darktable.
Hi Roman, Thank you for your quick answer :-) On 2017-12-04 22:34, Roman Lebedev wrote: On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Jørn Villesen Christensenwrote: I have been trying to debug darktable (with gdb) but without any luck. It's not designed to be runnable without installation. Ok. Is there then something I am missing or doing wrong since gdb cannot debug into other files than main.c? Is there a special trick? ~Jørn ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-dev] Debugging of darktable.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Jørn Villesen Christensenwrote: > Hi there, > > I have been trying to debug darktable (with gdb) but without any luck. > My main problem of running darktable from the build directory is that it > will not load any modules. I have tried to play with --datadir, --moduledir, > and symlinks, but without any luck. I can get the UI up 'n' running - but no > modules are loaded. It's not designed to be runnable without installation. You may want to $ sudo mkdir -p /opt/darktable $ sudo chown youruser:yourgroup -R /opt/darktable And now when you do ./build.sh --install it will end up in there. (Of course, you can pick any other directory, but then you need to pass it e.g. via --prefix to build.sh) > Alternatively I have tried to install darktable in a temporary directory > next to the build dir, but that fails as well. It launches well, but then > gdb fails to debug any other files than main.c and I suspect it is due to > the changed file structure. > > So... is it possible for any of you to sketch up how you debug darktable? > > BR > Jørn Christensen Roman. > ___ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
[darktable-dev] Debugging of darktable.
Hi there, I have been trying to debug darktable (with gdb) but without any luck. My main problem of running darktable from the build directory is that it will not load any modules. I have tried to play with --datadir, --moduledir, and symlinks, but without any luck. I can get the UI up 'n' running - but no modules are loaded. Alternatively I have tried to install darktable in a temporary directory next to the build dir, but that fails as well. It launches well, but then gdb fails to debug any other files than main.c and I suspect it is due to the changed file structure. So... is it possible for any of you to sketch up how you debug darktable? BR Jørn Christensen ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-dev] Are OS X build instructions up to date? (i.e. are official darktable .dmg builds being produced as described in the wiki article?)
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/master/packaging/macosx/BUILD.txt On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 20:44:01 +0200 Sarge Borschwrote: > https://redmine.darktable.org/projects/darktable/wiki/Darktable_on_OS_X > I thought that I'd like to test darktable from the latest source code, but > I'm not sure… the article is last updated in 12/09/2016 according to edit > history (idk what month it is by the way), and I guess it's safe to assume > that a lot of things changed since that time? > Or it's still just fine? > (I'm on macOS 10.12.6 > currently).___ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-dev] darktable 2.4.0rc0 released
hi, On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Terry Duellwrote: > On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 03:10:51 +1100, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > >> we're proud to announce the first release candidate for the upcoming 2.4 >> series of darktable, 2.4.0rc0! >> >> the github release is here: https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/ >> releases/tag/release-2.4.0rc0. >> >> as always, please don't use the autogenerated tarball provided by github, >> but only our tar.xz. > > > The tar.xz builds here OK on Fedora 27 using rpmbuild, and an initial run > through doing my usual processes hasn't thrown up any problems. > I noted that the dir (inside the tar.xz) was 'darktable-2.4.0~rc0', I would > have expected 'darktable-2.4.0.rc0'. yes, the correct name is "~" due to naming conventions that will identify that as lower than 2.4.0 proper, so we can do release candidates with the same number but still prefer the final version. github very helpfully removes the ~ and replaces by . when you upload the archive. cheers, jo > > Cheers, > -- > Regards, > Terry Duell > > ___ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org