Re: CVS activity
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Rich Bowen wrote: > > >Sometime this weekend I can make a tarball of what's in there if people > > >are interested. > > > > Periodic tarballs would be appreciated. > > Doesn't SF do a nightly tarball automatically? It always used to. Yep, it does. http://cvs.sf.net/cvstarballs/perl-date-time-cvsroot.tar.gz -dave /*=== House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com ===*/
Re: CVS activity
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 03:44:34 -0600 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Not that most people can see it with anonymous and web CVS down on SF, but > >there's been some activity lately. First, I checked in the first stab at > >DateTime::Formats::ICal, as well as removing all the ICal stuff from the > >DateTime.pm tests and core code. > > > >Second, I added a new top-level module docs/, which for now just contains > >my incomplete development-standards.pod document. > > > >Sometime this weekend I can make a tarball of what's in there if people > >are interested. > > Periodic tarballs would be appreciated. Doesn't SF do a nightly tarball automatically? It always used to. -- Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... and another brother out of his mind, and another brother out at New York (not the same, though it might appear so) Somebody's Luggage (Charles Dickens)
Re: CVS activity
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >Sometime this weekend I can make a tarball of what's in there if people > >are interested. > > Periodic tarballs would be appreciated. Web CVS and anonymous CVS are now available again for SF projects. -dave /*=== House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com ===*/
Re: CVS activity
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 03:44:34 -0600 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Not that most people can see it with anonymous and web CVS down on SF, but >there's been some activity lately. First, I checked in the first stab at >DateTime::Formats::ICal, as well as removing all the ICal stuff from the >DateTime.pm tests and core code. > >Second, I added a new top-level module docs/, which for now just contains >my incomplete development-standards.pod document. > >Sometime this weekend I can make a tarball of what's in there if people >are interested. Periodic tarballs would be appreciated.
