dm6446 vs omap3530

2009-06-11 Thread zhenfeng ren
hi,everyone:

I see that dm6446 contains a 300Mhz ARM and a C64x+ DSP, while
omap3530 contains a 600Mhz ARM and a C64x+ DSP.
Dm6446's DSP is a little stronger than omap 3530.
DM6446 is much expensive than omap 3530, is it right? But I think
omap3530 is better than dm6446.
Could someone give me a explanation why dm6446 is better?

-- 
Thanks,
Zhenfeng Ren

___
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source


Re: dm6446 vs omap3530

2009-06-11 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:49:19PM +0800, zhenfeng ren wrote:
 hi,everyone:
 
 I see that dm6446 contains a 300Mhz ARM and a C64x+ DSP, while
 omap3530 contains a 600Mhz ARM and a C64x+ DSP.
 Dm6446's DSP is a little stronger than omap 3530.
 DM6446 is much expensive than omap 3530, is it right? But I think
 omap3530 is better than dm6446.
 Could someone give me a explanation why dm6446 is better?

Actually, DM6446 SoC is cheaper than OMAP3530, see for yourself:
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/tms320dm6446.html
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/omap3530.html

-- 
Denys

___
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source