Re: DBI development release ready to ship
2010/6/16 Tim Bunce : > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:10:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: >> Hi Tim, >> >> from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped >> as next development release. > > Not in MANIFEST: t/51dbm_file.t > Not in MANIFEST: t/52dbm_complex.t > > Should they be in the MANIFEST? They should, my fault. I'll do it now. > > Because it should be uploaded together with the development release of > > SQL::Statement, we should synchronize our uploads. > > Please tell me more about this. Why synchronize? DBI has test-depends (and recommendation) for SQL::Statement 1.28 and S::S has test-depends on DBI 1.612. Some tests in DBI work only with SQL::Statement (and vice versa). > Tim. >
Re: DBI development release ready to ship
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:10:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Hi Tim, > > from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped > as next development release. Not in MANIFEST: t/51dbm_file.t Not in MANIFEST: t/52dbm_complex.t Should they be in the MANIFEST? Tim.
Re: DBI development release ready to ship
Also, FYI, please don't use tim.bu...@gmail.com - I use it as a read-only archive and (occasionally) route outbound smtp through it. Any email sent only there is very unlikely to be seen. Tim.
Re: DBI development release ready to ship
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:10:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Hi Tim, > > from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped > as next development release. Great. > Because it should be uploaded together with the development release of > SQL::Statement, we should synchronize our uploads. Please tell me more about this. Why synchronize? Tim.
DBI development release ready to ship
Hi Tim, from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped as next development release. Because it should be uploaded together with the development release of SQL::Statement, we should synchronize our uploads. Jens
