Re: In need of a few official prefixes
On 20/04/12 14:29, Brendan Byrd wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Tim Bunce wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:38:38PM -0500, Brendan Byrd wrote: (Sent this a while ago on a work account, but I guess it didn't go through.) I am nearing completion of the following modules: DBD::FusionTables - Mostly complete except for tests/docs; however Google is wanting to fix a lot of their bugs in Fusion Tables before they consider it worth using. DBD::TreeData - Needs docs/tests, but it is so far working great. Just used it to create a few schemas via Catalyst/DBIC. DBD::SNMP - Not quite as complete as it's read-only, but I'm actively working on this right now, so that I can create DBIC schemas from it. How can I get a prefix set up within DBI? These are the unofficial prefixes I’ve been using within the modules: fust, tree, snmp. Can I take these? fust and snmp seem fine. tree makes me pause for thought as it seems a bit too generic. On the other hand I can't think of anything better (treed_ or trd_ were the best I could come up with) so go ahead. Thanks. Release early, release often! Remind me to patch DBI once they're released. Pong. You can hold off on the fust one, but I still need snmp and tree. Done Martin -- Martin J. Evans Easysoft Limited http://www.easysoft.com
Re: In need of a few official prefixes
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:38:38PM -0500, Brendan Byrd wrote: >> (Sent this a while ago on a work account, but I guess it didn't go through.) >> >> I am nearing completion of the following modules: >> >> DBD::FusionTables - Mostly complete except for tests/docs; however Google >> is wanting to fix a lot of their bugs in Fusion Tables before they consider >> it worth using. >> >> DBD::TreeData - Needs docs/tests, but it is so far working great. Just >> used it to create a few schemas via Catalyst/DBIC. >> >> DBD::SNMP - Not quite as complete as it's read-only, but I'm actively >> working on this right now, so that I can create DBIC schemas from it. >> >> How can I get a prefix set up within DBI? These are the unofficial >> prefixes I’ve been using within the modules: fust, tree, snmp. Can I take >> these? > > fust and snmp seem fine. tree makes me pause for thought as it seems a > bit too generic. On the other hand I can't think of anything better > (treed_ or trd_ were the best I could come up with) so go ahead. > > Thanks. > > Release early, release often! > > Remind me to patch DBI once they're released. Pong. You can hold off on the fust one, but I still need snmp and tree. -- Brendan Byrd Brendan Byrd
Re: In need of a few official prefixes
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:38:38PM -0500, Brendan Byrd wrote: > (Sent this a while ago on a work account, but I guess it didn't go through.) > > I am nearing completion of the following modules: > > DBD::FusionTables - Mostly complete except for tests/docs; however Google > is wanting to fix a lot of their bugs in Fusion Tables before they consider > it worth using. > > DBD::TreeData - Needs docs/tests, but it is so far working great. Just > used it to create a few schemas via Catalyst/DBIC. > > DBD::SNMP - Not quite as complete as it's read-only, but I'm actively > working on this right now, so that I can create DBIC schemas from it. > > How can I get a prefix set up within DBI? These are the unofficial > prefixes I’ve been using within the modules: fust, tree, snmp. Can I take > these? fust and snmp seem fine. tree makes me pause for thought as it seems a bit too generic. On the other hand I can't think of anything better (treed_ or trd_ were the best I could come up with) so go ahead. Thanks. Release early, release often! Remind me to patch DBI once they're released. Tim.
In need of a few official prefixes
(Sent this a while ago on a work account, but I guess it didn't go through.) I am nearing completion of the following modules: DBD::FusionTables - Mostly complete except for tests/docs; however Google is wanting to fix a lot of their bugs in Fusion Tables before they consider it worth using. DBD::TreeData - Needs docs/tests, but it is so far working great. Just used it to create a few schemas via Catalyst/DBIC. DBD::SNMP - Not quite as complete as it's read-only, but I'm actively working on this right now, so that I can create DBIC schemas from it. How can I get a prefix set up within DBI? These are the unofficial prefixes I’ve been using within the modules: fust, tree, snmp. Can I take these? -- Brendan Byrd/SineSwiper Computer tech, PERL wizard, and all-around Internet guru
