Re: Any reason not to make a new DBI release?
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:51:50AM +0100, demerphq wrote: > On 30 January 2012 00:16, David E. Wheeler wrote: > > On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote: > > > >> I'd be happy with that as I'm looking forward to asking people to use > >> DBI_TRACE=DBD. > >> > >> I've had no problems with the lastest releases and subversion trunk. > > > > I’d like to see a statement about Unicode support in the docs, and any > > recommendations for how drivers should behave. Too late for 1.617 I'm afraid. It's on CPAN already. > I just joined the list and I don't have the original mail in this > thread to reply to, but I am wondering will this release include Dave > M's work? I guess not. Assuming I am right, how long until the next > release? Probably not long after Dave's finished his work ;-) Which also gives a distinct window of opportunity for those interested in Unicode support to thrash out what the docs should say... [starting in a new thread please] Tim.
Re: Any reason not to make a new DBI release?
On 30 January 2012 00:16, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote: > >> I'd be happy with that as I'm looking forward to asking people to use >> DBI_TRACE=DBD. >> >> I've had no problems with the lastest releases and subversion trunk. > > I’d like to see a statement about Unicode support in the docs, and any > recommendations for how drivers should behave. I just joined the list and I don't have the original mail in this thread to reply to, but I am wondering will this release include Dave M's work? I guess not. Assuming I am right, how long until the next release? cheers, Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
Re: Any reason not to make a new DBI release?
On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote: > I'd be happy with that as I'm looking forward to asking people to use > DBI_TRACE=DBD. > > I've had no problems with the lastest releases and subversion trunk. I’d like to see a statement about Unicode support in the docs, and any recommendations for how drivers should behave. Best, David
Re: Any reason not to make a new DBI release?
On 28/01/2012 10:41, Tim Bunce wrote: I'd like to make a formal DBI release soon. DBI-1.616_901 tested well and I've just uploaded DBI-1.616_902. Any reason I shouldn't upload as DBI-1.617 soon? Tim. I'd be happy with that as I'm looking forward to asking people to use DBI_TRACE=DBD. I've had no problems with the lastest releases and subversion trunk. Martin
Re: Any reason not to make a new DBI release?
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:41:56 +, Tim Bunce wrote: > I'd like to make a formal DBI release soon. > > DBI-1.616_901 tested well and I've just uploaded DBI-1.616_902. > > Any reason I shouldn't upload as DBI-1.617 soon? No objections from me. -- H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/ using perl5.00307 .. 5.14 porting perl5 on HP-UX, AIX, and openSUSE http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/http://www.test-smoke.org/ http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
