[Dbmail-dev] Future request on sieve scripts

2007-03-23 Thread Oleg Lapshin

Hello

I want to put incoming messages into folders, based on current year and month
Smth like this:

if  {
fileinto some-folder;
} else {
fileinto INBOX/$YEAR/$MONTH;
}

Can this be implemented?

Thanks.

-- 
Oleg Lapshin

___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev


Re: [Dbmail] The Future

2002-12-03 Thread Eelco van Beek - ICS

The autoconf fixes should have went in before 1.0, as it is now the
autconf stuff shipped with 1.0 doesn't coexist well with non autoconf
builds and is partially broken.  They definately need to go in botht he
1.0 and 1.1 branches.  They really should have went in at 1.0 or had
autoconf removed before 1.0.


Hi Ryan,

We tried to incorporate autoconf in 1.0 but unfortunatly our autoconf 
guy is on a 6 month leave and Roel and I are working on other stuff. To 
fill in for the miss we incorporated a build script which should be 
sufficient for now.
It would have taken too long to fully incorporate it in the main source 
tree before 1.0. We will however put it in 1.1.


Best regards,

Eelco



--
Ryan Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADI Internet Solutions
http://dbmail.adiis.net - dbmail patches

___
Dbmail mailing list
Dbmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail


_
E.J.A. van Beek
ICT Manager
ICS
T: +31 30 2322878
F: +31 30 2322305

PGP-key:
www.ic-s.nl/keys/eelco.txt



Re: [Dbmail] The Future

2002-12-03 Thread Ryan Butler
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 14:05, Eelco van Beek - ICS wrote:

 Hi Ryan,
 
 We tried to incorporate autoconf in 1.0 but unfortunatly our autoconf 
 guy is on a 6 month leave and Roel and I are working on other stuff. To 
 fill in for the miss we incorporated a build script which should be 
 sufficient for now.
 It would have taken too long to fully incorporate it in the main source 
 tree before 1.0. We will however put it in 1.1.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Eelco
 


I guess I'm really confused.  I wasn't aware you had an autoconf guy,
which is why I submitted the autoconf stuff that is currently in 1.0 and
cvs  Since then I've submitted a couple of patches which would have
allowed dbmail to use either the old style build, or the autoconf build
interchangeably on the source
(http://dbmail.adiis.net/files/Makefile_includes.patch) and some fixups
for autoconf bugs
(http://dbmail.adiis.net/files/dbmail_must_choose_sql_backend.patch).  

Had these been applied dbmail could have used either build system
interchangeably.  Instead, the 1.0 tarball contains a mostly broken
without tinkering autoconf system that most people will probably try
because they see ./configure :)  If you have an autoconf guy who is
going to redo the work currently there, or if you weren't planning on
using my work, I don't understand why it was distributed with 1.0, and
if you are planning to use the current autoconf system, I don't
understand why the two non code invasive patches that would have put a
working autoconf system weren't applied.


-- 
Ryan Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADI Internet Solutions
http://dbmail.adiis.net - dbmail patches