Hello Richard,
Saturday, December 7, 2002, 6:12:51 AM, you wrote:
RB Just my opinion, but I guess that's not really the market that dbmail is
aimed
RB at? If the complexity/overhead of pgsql or mysql is too much, why not just
stick
RB with regular mail spools?
Because they are slow, many are buggy, require too much work for setup, etc.
Dbmail is so much nicer... don't you think ?
The idea behind SQLite is having a quick and easy setup; a version
working out of the box and that would be just ok for MANY
installations. I'm not in any way thinking in replacing MySQL or
PostgreSQL.
RB OTOH, the dbmail facilitates adding other dbms easy enough, so why not
investigate
RB further. A Sleepycat Berkeley DB (Transactional Data Store version,
possibly)
RB system could be worth looking at too.
Do they support SQL ? If they do, might be worth investigating.
Also SQLite is a fraction of their size...
RB One thing tho': After reading the SQLLite page, I'm not too sure if it would
RB play nice with all the server processes... ?
It should be, unless you have thousands of transactions per second.
But if you do, you'll be better using a full RDBMS anyway.
-
Best regards,
Steve Howe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
