Re: [Dbmail-dev] SORT Problem - OpenGroupware

[Sanjiv Bawa]

Leif,
 
>From the RFC it does not appear that SORT will be too hard to implement. 
>THREAD appears to be much more hairy. I will be happy to help testing SORT if 
>you can get it written. I am not familiar with the code at all
 
Thanks.

SB

Leif Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This observation was made before :)
>
> SORT and THREAD will have to be implemented for version 2.1

Or as a patch to 2.0 if I can get it done shortly, I really need it for
our application which is a web based mail desktop system. So my client is
asking for this almost every day. I hope to have something by next week:)

-leif

>
> Ilja
>
>
> Sanjiv Bawa wrote:
>
>> I tried a larger mailbox in OpenGroupware. It is way to slow
>>
>> It takes 8-10 seconds for a mailbox 200 messages. Cyrus does it
>> instantaneously. It makes sense. OpenGroupware does not have a local
>> repository (just as SquirrelMail does not - or any other web mail
>> program).
>>
>> Folks, the SORT problem seems to be a show stopper for web mail
>> implementations. I cant imagine this would be difficult to implement.
>> Ultimately it is an ORDER BY on the SQL statement. I dont know what is
>> involved on the IMAP side.
>>
>> This does not appear to be a big deal for Outlook/Express since they
>> have local repositories and sorts can be done locally efficiently.
>>
>> Do you Yahoo!?
>> Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster.
>> 
> ___
> Dbmail-dev mailing list
> Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
> http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
>

___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam

Re: [Dbmail-dev] SORT Problem - OpenGroupware

[Sanjiv Bawa]

Yay!!! You are a life saver Leif.

SB

Leif Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This observation was made before :)
>
> SORT and THREAD will have to be implemented for version 2.1

Or as a patch to 2.0 if I can get it done shortly, I really need it for
our application which is a web based mail desktop system. So my client is
asking for this almost every day. I hope to have something by next week:)

-leif

>
> Ilja
>
>
> Sanjiv Bawa wrote:
>
>> I tried a larger mailbox in OpenGroupware. It is way to slow
>>
>> It takes 8-10 seconds for a mailbox 200 messages. Cyrus does it
>> instantaneously. It makes sense. OpenGroupware does not have a local
>> repository (just as SquirrelMail does not - or any other web mail
>> program).
>>
>> Folks, the SORT problem seems to be a show stopper for web mail
>> implementations. I cant imagine this would be difficult to implement.
>> Ultimately it is an ORDER BY on the SQL statement. I dont know what is
>> involved on the IMAP side.
>>
>> This does not appear to be a big deal for Outlook/Express since they
>> have local repositories and sorts can be done locally efficiently.
>>
>> Do you Yahoo!?
>> Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster.
>> 
> ___
> Dbmail-dev mailing list
> Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
> http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
>

___
Dbmail-dev mailing list
Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam

Re: [Dbmail-dev] SORT Problem - OpenGroupware

[Leif Jackson]

> This observation was made before :)
>
> SORT and THREAD will have to be implemented for version 2.1

Or as a patch to 2.0 if I can get it done shortly, I really need it for
our application which is a web based mail desktop system. So my client is
asking for this almost every day. I hope to have something by next week:)

-leif

>
> Ilja
>
>
> Sanjiv Bawa wrote:
>
>> I tried a larger mailbox in OpenGroupware. It is way to slow
>>
>> It takes 8-10 seconds for a mailbox 200 messages. Cyrus does it
>> instantaneously. It makes sense. OpenGroupware does not have a local
>> repository (just as SquirrelMail does not - or any other web mail
>> program).
>>
>> Folks, the SORT problem seems to be a show stopper for web mail
>> implementations. I cant imagine this would be difficult to implement.
>> Ultimately it is an ORDER BY on the SQL statement. I dont know what is
>> involved on the IMAP side.
>>
>> This does not appear to be a big deal for Outlook/Express since they
>> have local repositories and sorts can be done locally efficiently.
>>
>> Do you Yahoo!?
>> Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster.
>> 
> ___
> Dbmail-dev mailing list
> Dbmail-dev@dbmail.org
> http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
>

Re: [Dbmail-dev] SORT Problem - OpenGroupware

[Ilja Booij]

This observation was made before :)

SORT and THREAD will have to be implemented for version 2.1

Ilja


Sanjiv Bawa wrote:


I tried a larger mailbox in OpenGroupware. It is way to slow
 
It takes 8-10 seconds for a mailbox 200 messages. Cyrus does it 
instantaneously. It makes sense. OpenGroupware does not have a local 
repository (just as SquirrelMail does not - or any other web mail program).
 
Folks, the SORT problem seems to be a show stopper for web mail 
implementations. I cant imagine this would be difficult to implement. 
Ultimately it is an ORDER BY on the SQL statement. I dont know what is 
involved on the IMAP side.
 
This does not appear to be a big deal for Outlook/Express since they 
have local repositories and sorts can be done locally efficiently.


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster. 

[Dbmail-dev] SORT Problem - OpenGroupware

[Sanjiv Bawa]

I tried a larger mailbox in OpenGroupware. It is way to slow
 
It takes 8-10 seconds for a mailbox 200 messages. Cyrus does it 
instantaneously. It makes sense. OpenGroupware does not have a local repository 
(just as SquirrelMail does not - or any other web mail program).
 
Folks, the SORT problem seems to be a show stopper for web mail 
implementations. I cant imagine this would be difficult to implement. 
Ultimately it is an ORDER BY on the SQL statement. I dont know what is involved 
on the IMAP side.
 
This does not appear to be a big deal for Outlook/Express since they have local 
repositories and sorts can be done locally efficiently.


-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster.