[Deathpenalty] death penalty news-----TEXAS, FLA., USA

2008-06-29 Thread Rick Halperin




June 29



TEXAS:

Locals react on death penalty ruling


Barely a year after Texas Gov. Rick Perry signed into law this state's
version of Jessica's Law  last year's legislation that brought the death
penalty into play for repeat child sexual predators  a Supreme Court
ruling on a Louisiana case has nullified the death penalty as punishment
for crimes that do not cause the death of the victim.

The Texas bill, House Bill 8, was supported by this county's legislative
delegation and by local law enforcement officials, including Sheriff
Arnold Zwicke and District Attorney Vicki Pattillo.

It set a minimum 25 years to life sentence for a new category of crime
continual sexual abuse of a child or children under age 14  and made the
sexual assault of a child subsequent to a previous conviction for the same
offense a capital crime punishable by death or by life in prison without
parole.

No one has been executed for sexual assault in the United States since
1964, and opponents questioned the constitutionality of the law because
the federal laws that reimposed the death penalty did not include sexual
assault as a death penalty offense. The Louisiana case decided Wednesday
on a split 5-4 vote was widely anticipated to test such laws in several
states.

In his majority opinion which called the death penalty cruel and unusual
punishment in child sex assault cases, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote, 
... the death penalty is not a proportional punishment for the rape of a
child.

But the decision does not totally overturn Jessica's Law in Texas. When
House Bill 8 was passed last year, it included a fallback penalty of life
without parole if capital punishment was outlawed for child sexual
assault.

In anticipation of an adverse decision, the legislature included as a
safety valve that, should the Supreme Court invalidate the death penalty,
then these people are just going to be sentenced to life without parole,
said Shannon Edmonds, staff attorney with the Texas District and County
Attorneys Association. It certainly invalidates the death penalty for any
of these cases that does not result in a childs death, but 'Jessica's Law'
was a 75-page bill, and this was just one part of it. There are still a
lot of provisions in 'Jessica's Law that are useful to prosecutors and are
not affected by this opinion.

Edmonds said he was aware of no prosecutions in Texas where a district
attorney had so far sought the death penalty in a sexual assault case
since House Bill 8 took effect last September.

I think everyone was waiting for this decision, Edmonds said.

Pattillo expressed scant surprise at the Supreme Court outcome.

I didn't expect the U.S. Supreme Court to expand the death penalty for
sexual assault cases, Pattillo said. But I still think that our
'Jessica's Law' is a big step in the right direction to get repeat sex
offenders locked up forever. The Texas Legislature passed a law that
provides for life without parole as an option in certain cases even if the
death penalty provision is overturned. I have long believed that Texas
needed an option for life without parole in egregious cases. We must take
strong measures to protect the children in our communities and to ensure
that violent sex offenders do not have the opportunity to repeat their
heinous crimes against our defenseless children.

Sheriff Arnold Zwicke supported the death penalty for child sexual
predators when the law passed, and he supports it today.

I know I'll offend some people, Zwicke said. But I was very
disappointed that they did not uphold the death penalty simply because the
victim serves an automatic life sentence, and I get very frustrated to see
sex offenders get off with probation or deferred adjudication probation.
The sentence should be at least as severe for the perpetrator as it is for
the victim.

Life without parole would be more suitable to the offense, in Zwicke's
mind  and in terms of protecting the public.

Many sex offenders offend again, Zwicke pointed out, and the public  and
especially children  should be protected from repeat sex offenders.

I'd rather see them stay in jail than have them out on the street where
they could find their next victim, Zwicke said.

For his part, Perry said Texas would continue to seek the toughest
sanctions possible against repeat child predators  whatever that
punishment is.

In my opinion, laws should be strong enough to deter these unspeakable
offenses or, in the least, prevent these lowest of criminals from harming
any child again, Perry said. I believe the vast majority of Texans agree
that the death sentence is the appropriate punishment for someone
convicted of raping a child.

Even still, Perry said Texas would follow the law of the land.

While today's opinion does not directly address Texas law, we recognize
that our state is guided by the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court,
Perry said. That said, Texas will continue to seek the toughest
punishment allowable for the predators who commit 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----CALIF., N.Y., ILL.

2008-06-29 Thread Rick Halperin




June 27


CALIFORNIA:

Widow pleads for death penaltyShe says home is cold and silent after
husband, 2 sons slain in S.F.


Danielle Bologna can't go back home.

Just a week ago, her 2-story house on a quiet street in San Francisco's
Excelsior district was a bustling place, crammed with sports gear and
trophies and team portraits, where she and her husband of 21 years were
raising their 4 children.

But in just seconds on Sunday, her family was torn apart: Her husband,
Tony, 48, and the couple's sons Michael, 20, and Matthew, 16, were shot
and killed as they drove home from a family barbecue in Fairfield.

What is left at home, for Danielle Bologna, is only stark silence.

I went back there one time, she said Thursday. It was extremely cold.
It was empty. It was the cold, the silence.

It was hard seeing my kids' things all over ... my husband's shoes, his
work stuff, his clothes, jackets all over.

Danielle Bologna says she wants San Francisco District Attorney Kamala
Harris - who has pledged never to seek the death penalty - to understand a
little of what she must endure and to seek the death penalty for her
family's killer.

The district attorney really needs to pay attention - she doesn't have
kids, she doesn't know what this means, Bologna said.

Prosecutors filed 3 counts of murder and other charges Thursday against
Edwin Ramos, 21, of El Sobrante, an alleged street gang member who police
say opened fire on the Bolognas after their car briefly blocked Ramos from
completing a left turn down a narrow street. The charges include special
circumstances that could carry the death penalty.

But Harris had long promised to not seek the death penalty in the city.
After taking strong criticism for quickly ruling out the death penalty
against the gang member ultimately convicted of killing San Francisco
police Officer Isaac Espinoza in 2004, Harris has since delegated such
decisions to a committee of prosecutors in her office. Capital punishment,
however, has yet to be sought.

On Thursday, Harris' office said that no decision has been made on the
issue in the Bologna slayings. This is a horrific tragedy most painfully
felt by the family and friends of these innocent victims and shared by our
entire city, the office said in a statement.

Danielle Bologna, 47, an educational adviser and coach at Rooftop
Elementary, recalled how her husband spent his days coaching sports with
his 4 kids and nights as a supervisor at Draeger's market in San Mateo.

Michael, a standout athlete, was their eldest son at 20 and was attending
the College of San Mateo. Matthew, their youngest son, was 16 and
attending Lincoln High in San Francisco.

On Sunday, the Bolognas - she, her husband and their three sons and a
daughter - joined other relatives and friends for a barbecue in Fairfield.
It was the last time the family was together.

Encounter on street

She said the family parted at the gathering because Tony wanted to get
some sleep before work. He was driving on Congdon Street only blocks from
home, police said, when he encountered a Chrysler 300 as it was trying to
get by his car after making a left turn. Tony backed up, but soon shots
were fired, fatally wounding him and two sons, who were riding with him in
the car.

There was no altercation between this maniac man and my husband, she
said. My husband would never put his own children in jeopardy.

My husband moved back to let the guy go. Instead, he had blocked my
husband and opened fire. There was not a peep or a word out of my
husband's mouth.

With the help of a tip from a man arrested after the slayings, police
quickly made an arrest of a member of a notoriously violent street gang,
MS-13.

This animal, Danielle Bologna said. I just feel that I can't even give
him a name - who can just drive around looking for victims to take out. He
has no conscience. Just to kill people when you feel like it?

Widow's plea to D.A.

Danielle Bologna said the district attorney needs to realize the enormity
of the crime in this case.

Seeking the death penalty, this will make a statement so people won't
just kill families for no reason, said Bologna, who is left to raise a
son and daughter on her own. They have the power to stop this. They have
to stop with the excuses - this is not her family, this is my family. '

Violence in the city, Bologna said, has gone too far. Nothing is getting
done. Why did we put her here, if she is not going to stop this? This is
huge. I have lost a husband and 2 kids.

Danielle Bologna thanked the police for their efforts. She says she prays
that justice will be done. I'm going to let the courts do their job. I'm
going to let the police officers, who have been fabulous, do their job. I
just feel the district attorney needs to do her the job.

She said she is still stunned by what happened.

'A senseless crime'

All I can tell you - this was a senseless crime. I never in a million
years thought I would have to live this life and lose my family.

To be 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news-----worldwide

2008-06-29 Thread Rick Halperin




June 27



PAKISTAN:

Pakistani militants hold public execution of 2 Afghans


Pakistani militants publicly executed 2 Afghans before thousands of
cheering supporters on Friday, saying that the men spied for U.S. forces
and helped orchestrate a suspected U.S. missile strike that killed 14
people in a border village last month.

The execution in front of 5,000 people in the Bajur region - 1 man was
decapitated and the other shot - underscored the power of the local
Taliban forces in the lawless tribal areas near the Afghan border.

Celebratory gunfire after the executions killed 2 bystanders and wounded
6, said Fazal Rabbi, a local official.

The new government of Pakistan has supported negotiations for peace talks
with militants and the military's efforts to calm restive areas. The
United States says those agreements will only allow Taliban and Al Qaeda
forces in the border region to regroup for more attacks on neighboring
Afghanistan.

Before the executions, Waliur Rehman, a local Taliban commander, told the
crowd that the two men had confessed to aiding in the May 14 missile
attack on a house in the town of Damadola that killed 14 people. The
Pakistani Army lodged a formal protest over the strike, which has been
blamed on U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

These 2 men admitted they led the Americans in the attack in Damadola and
they have given us names of more spies, Rehman said. He promised the
cheering crowd he would catch and kill others involved in the attack.

Taliban militants wielding daggers stabbed one of the men, identified as
Jan Wali, 36, cut off his head and waved it to the crowd. The militants
then argued over how to kill the other man, before one Taliban lost his
patience and shot him with his assault rifle. The crowd erupted in cheers
of God is great.

(source: International Herald Tribune)






CHINA:

China executes 6 more drug dealers


China executed 6 more drug dealers on the International Day Against Drug
Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, vowing to continue the country's tough
anti-narcotics campaign.

The dealers accused of producing, trading and smuggling drugs in Yunnan
and Henan provinces and Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region were sentenced to
death by local courts, while the Supreme People's Court (SPC) upheld their
verdicts.

Early this week, China had executed 3 drug dealers and sentenced 5 more to
death in a mass sentencing aimed at turning the spotlight on drug abuse
and to reflect China's determination to battle drug-related crimes.

SPC spokesman Ni Shouming was quoted by official Xinhua news agency as
saying it would firmly support the crackdown on drug dealings and would
approve any verdicts of lower courts which would provide enough evidence
for death penalty.

Under the law, dealing in a minimum of 50 grams of heroin warrants death
penalty in some provinces in China, but it differs in some others.

The number of drug-related cases have been growing with more gangs,
families and organisations involved, Ni said, adding, the country's
anti-drug campaign would remain tough, according to state-run China Daily.

The SPC, the Supreme People's Procuratorate and Ministry of Public
Security issued new judicial interpretation and penalties to be imposed
for drugs such as ketamine and methadone, last year.

A person smuggling, trading, transporting, manufacturing or possessing one
kg of drugs is liable to a minimum of 7 years imprisonment or capital
punishment, depending on the severity of the case.

The transportation of drugs is becoming more complex as pregnant women or
nursing mothers are being used, Ni said.

The SPC would not change its stance on drug crimes and punishment, he
said, with reference to review of death penalties, a function that was
returned to the SPC in January last year.

Beijing has often come under criticism of human right groups for resorting
to death penalty frequently but China maintains that it is being used
sparingly and judiciously with public support in its favour.

(source: Express India)

*

China's top court overturns 15% of death sentences


CHINA'S supreme court overturned 15 % of all death sentences handed down
by lower courts in the 1st 1/2 of 2008, state media said today.

Gao Jinghong, presiding judge of the supreme court's Third Criminal Law
Court, said most of the sentences were overturned because they were
inappropriate or lacked sufficient evidence, the China Daily reported,
without further detail.

The report said the reversals showed China was following the global trend
of reducing the number of death sentences, after the supreme court was
permitted in 2007, after a hiatus of almost 20 years, to review capital
punishment cases.

China is not yet prepared to abolish the death penalty, officials and
experts say, citing public pressure and high violent crime rates.

Some people are strong believers in 'the man who kills shall die'. In
many cases they call for immediate execution of the murderers, Gao said.

High courts 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news-----FLA., USA, CALIF.

2008-06-29 Thread Rick Halperin




June 28



FLORIDA:

Warden on death penalty: This is wrong


Murderer Pedro Medina was strapped into Old Sparky shortly after
midnight on March 25, 1997, at Florida State Prison.

Warden Ron McAndrew stood nearby as a guard placed a wet sponge to conduct
more than 2,000 volts of electricity onto Medina's shaved head.

The executioner pulled the switch. Within seconds, an arm's length from
McAndrew, 6-inch flames leaped out the side of the mask on Medina's head.

The cramped chamber immediately filled with smoke and a putrid, acrid
odor.

The executioner, wearing oversize insulated gloves that protect linemen
working on electrical wires, sought advice from the warden.

He looked at me with this big question on his face, and he said,
'Continue?'  McAndrew recalled recently. I said, 'Continue. Continue.'
There's no way we could stop at that point.

Medina's searing death and two executions before it led McAndrew down an
unlikely path since he quit prison work: He is a working opponent of the
death penalty.

All three executions ignited a fire of thought, McAndrew said. Each
time I carried out one of those executions, I certainly was asking myself
why I was there and is this necessary.

Witness entire process, ex-warden says

On Tuesday, Florida plans to execute by lethal injection Mark Dean Schwab,
who raped and strangled 11-year-old Junny Rios-Martinez of Cocoa. McAndrew
opposes the execution.

During his time at Florida State Prison, McAndrew earned the moniker The
Walking Warden because he spent more time outside his office walking the
grounds than behind his desk.

He said he visited death row every day.

McAndrew said he supported the death penalty during his 20-plus years with
the Department of Corrections.

One day I just sat down and said, 'This is wrong. This is wrong. We have
no business killing people,'  he said, except in self-defense, in defense
of someone else or in defense of the nation.

Not everyone agrees.

Proponents of the death penalty, including some families of murdered
children such as Rios-Martinez, argue that the execution helps them deal
with their loss.

That will not serve as a substitute for getting our son back, but it is
as close as we can get to justice in this rather imperfect world we live
in, said Don Ryce, whose 9-year-old son Jimmy was raped, murdered and
dismembered in Miami-Dade County in 1995. Juan Carlos Chavez was convicted
of the crime.

Ryce said Chavez's execution would bring his wife, Claudine, and him as
close to a feeling of peace to that chapter of our life that we're ever
going to get. He said he supports the death penalty, although he may not
live to witness Chavez die because of the lengthy appeals process.

He'll probably outlive us because of our screwed-up system, Ryce said.
But if we're still alive, we'll be there for the execution. And we have
had some people promise us if we don't make it, they'll be there for us.

From the standpoint of not only myself but Claudine, we feel the death
penalty is appropriate in this case, knowing that won't bring our child
back. Knowing there's no such thing as closure. Knowing that justice has
been done. We don't feel that way yet, said Ryce, of Vero Beach.

Although McAndrew understands the feeling of the victims' families, the
executions he witnessed still haunt him.

Schwab's will be the 1st execution since former Gov. Jeb Bush put a
moratorium on executions in 2006 pending a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on
lethal injection. The court ruled recently that lethal injection is not
cruel and unusual punishment.

McAndrew, a slow-spoken activist, grows agitated when talking about lethal
injection and the likelihood that executions will resume in Florida.

The most recent inmate executed by lethal injection, Angel Diaz, took more
than 30 minutes to die because the needles had been pushed through his
veins into his flesh.

But none of the 26 witnesses on the other side of the glass window looking
into the execution chamber knew that because, when the curtains behind the
window were opened, Diaz was already on a gurney with IVs in his arms.

If they're going to be honest and forthcoming about what's going on in
the death chamber, then from the second the condemned walks into the
chamber until the body is placed in a body bag, all 26 witnesses should be
there, McAndrew said.

Opponents welcome an insider's voice

Other death penalty opponents tell him that he's an invaluable resource.

They say only someone who's been that close to it can speak about it in
the way that you do, McAndrew said, his voice growing soft.

The former Air Force sergeant began his career in corrections after
returning to the United States following a 15-year stint living and
traveling throughout France and Asia as a manager for an international
exporter.

He never imagined then that, less than 2 decades later, he would be the
warden of one of the state's toughest institutions, landing in 1996 at
Florida State Prison.

There, he oversaw 3 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide

2008-06-29 Thread Rick Halperin




June 28



PAKISTAN:

Murderer gets death penalty


Additional District and Sessions Judge Malik Muhammad Iqbal on Friday
awarded death sentence to a murderer, Irfan Amin, for killing a friend of
his wife last year.

According to the case, Amin killed Farah Rehana and also attempted to
murder his wife Ruqiya Sultana. The court also imposed Rs 0.1 million fine
on him. In case of non-payment he would have to go for 1-year extra
imprisonment.

The court also awarded Amin seven-year imprisonment for attempting to kill
his wife. Saddar Barooni police had registered first information report
(FIR) against him under section 302/324.

Meanwhile, Additional District and Sessions Judge Rana Muhammad Ali
awarded eight-month imprisonment to a drug pusher, Hameedullah, who was
arrested by Airport police for possessing over 1 kg of hashish.

The court also imposed Rs 25,000 fine on him. In case of non-payment he
would have to go one-month extra imprisonment.

(source: Daily Times)






GERMANY:

Germans Disappointed in Obama's Stance on Death Penalty


German politicians across the political spectrum have responded with
surprise and harsh criticism to comments by US presidential candidate
Barack Obama calling for the death penalty for child rapists.

Despite their immense adoration and support for the Democratic
presidential candidate, German politicians and the media were quick to
attack Obama for his comments in favor of extending the death penalty for
child rapists.

The death penalty is the ultimate violation of human rights and the right
to life, Green party leader Claudia Roth told the Bild newspaper. Obama
should be working for abolishing the death penalty in the United States,
not for expanding it, she added.

Earlier in the week Obama criticized a US Supreme Court decision declaring
the execution of child rapists unconstitutional. Speaking out against the
ruling, which struck down a Louisiana law allowing capital punishment for
people convicted of raping children under 12, Obama argued that states
should have the right to consider the death penalty for such a heinous
crime.

The death penalty should be applied in very narrow circumstances for the
most egregious of crimes, he said.

The court had ruled 5 to 4 that applying the death penalty in such cases
violated the US Constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Since
1964, the death penalty has only been applied to those convicted of
murder.

World-wide abolishment of death penalty

Obama's comments, which observers say were designed to counter any
perception that the Democratic candidate is soft on crime and bring him
more in line with the views of the American middle, were harshly rejected
across the political spectrum in Germany, where the candidate enjoys more
popularity than anywhere else in Europe.

The head of the conservative, Bavaria-based Christian Social Union, Erwin
Huber, said that although child rape is one of the most heinous crimes,
the ban on the death penalty must be absolute.

The death penalty is banned in all European Union member states. Former
Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger of the Free Democrats
echoed that position, arguing that the death penalty should be abolished
world-wide.

The death penalty is just as inhuman as the crime of child rape, she
told the Bild newspaper.

The foreign policy spokesperson for the Union bloc of conservatives in the
German parliament, Eckart von Klaeden, cautioned against upholding a false
Obama image in Europe. With all the Obamania in Europe, many make the
mistake of believing they can measure Obama on European standards, he
said.

Obama falls out of favor in Europe

German media took Obama to task in several editorials over the weekend,
but some also urged their readers to see Obama for what he is, a
short-lived darling of the European political salon, as the Dsseldorf
Rheinische Post described the candidate's fall from favor.

The Berlin-based newspaper Tagesspiegel appealed to Germans and Europeans
in general to wake up from their Obamania trance and recognize the truth
behind the democratic candidate's comments.

Obama campaigned on the slogan Change we can believe in So often
Europeans told themselves: we are not against America only against George
W. Bush. Now that the left-leaning Obama has removed his mask to become a
president-in-waiting, many in Europe are beginning to realize that the
negative aspects they eagerly attributed to Bush are in fact deeply
embedded in the land itself: the death penalty, gun ownership, moral
conservatism and a dogmatic belief in its own righteousness.

The Saarbrcker Zeitung questioned how much still unites Europe with
America. Among the western democracies, the US is the only country that
still applies the death penalty and allows for widespread ownership of
guns. This is the America Europeans always regarded as the America of
George Bush. Now we know that this America will hardly change under a
President Barack Obama.

(source: 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news-----TEXAS, USA, OHIO, CALIF.

2008-06-29 Thread Rick Halperin




June 29



TEXAS:

Locals react on death penalty ruling


Barely a year after Texas Gov. Rick Perry signed into law this state's
version of Jessica's Law  last year's legislation that brought the death
penalty into play for repeat child sexual predators  a Supreme Court
ruling on a Louisiana case has nullified the death penalty as punishment
for crimes that do not cause the death of the victim.

The Texas bill, House Bill 8, was supported by this county's legislative
delegation and by local law enforcement officials, including Sheriff
Arnold Zwicke and District Attorney Vicki Pattillo.

It set a minimum 25 years to life sentence for a new category of crime
continual sexual abuse of a child or children under age 14  and made the
sexual assault of a child subsequent to a previous conviction for the same
offense a capital crime punishable by death or by life in prison without
parole.

No one has been executed for sexual assault in the United States since
1964, and opponents questioned the constitutionality of the law because
the federal laws that reimposed the death penalty did not include sexual
assault as a death penalty offense. The Louisiana case decided Wednesday
on a split 5-4 vote was widely anticipated to test such laws in several
states.

In his majority opinion which called the death penalty cruel and unusual
punishment in child sex assault cases, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote, 
... the death penalty is not a proportional punishment for the rape of a
child.

But the decision does not totally overturn Jessica's Law in Texas. When
House Bill 8 was passed last year, it included a fallback penalty of life
without parole if capital punishment was outlawed for child sexual
assault.

In anticipation of an adverse decision, the legislature included as a
safety valve that, should the Supreme Court invalidate the death penalty,
then these people are just going to be sentenced to life without parole,
said Shannon Edmonds, staff attorney with the Texas District and County
Attorneys Association. It certainly invalidates the death penalty for any
of these cases that does not result in a childs death, but 'Jessica's Law'
was a 75-page bill, and this was just one part of it. There are still a
lot of provisions in 'Jessica's Law that are useful to prosecutors and are
not affected by this opinion.

Edmonds said he was aware of no prosecutions in Texas where a district
attorney had so far sought the death penalty in a sexual assault case
since House Bill 8 took effect last September.

I think everyone was waiting for this decision, Edmonds said.

Pattillo expressed scant surprise at the Supreme Court outcome.

I didn't expect the U.S. Supreme Court to expand the death penalty for
sexual assault cases, Pattillo said. But I still think that our
'Jessica's Law' is a big step in the right direction to get repeat sex
offenders locked up forever. The Texas Legislature passed a law that
provides for life without parole as an option in certain cases even if the
death penalty provision is overturned. I have long believed that Texas
needed an option for life without parole in egregious cases. We must take
strong measures to protect the children in our communities and to ensure
that violent sex offenders do not have the opportunity to repeat their
heinous crimes against our defenseless children.

Sheriff Arnold Zwicke supported the death penalty for child sexual
predators when the law passed, and he supports it today.

I know I'll offend some people, Zwicke said. But I was very
disappointed that they did not uphold the death penalty simply because the
victim serves an automatic life sentence, and I get very frustrated to see
sex offenders get off with probation or deferred adjudication probation.
The sentence should be at least as severe for the perpetrator as it is for
the victim.

Life without parole would be more suitable to the offense, in Zwicke's
mind  and in terms of protecting the public.

Many sex offenders offend again, Zwicke pointed out, and the public  and
especially children  should be protected from repeat sex offenders.

I'd rather see them stay in jail than have them out on the street where
they could find their next victim, Zwicke said.

For his part, Perry said Texas would continue to seek the toughest
sanctions possible against repeat child predators  whatever that
punishment is.

In my opinion, laws should be strong enough to deter these unspeakable
offenses or, in the least, prevent these lowest of criminals from harming
any child again, Perry said. I believe the vast majority of Texans agree
that the death sentence is the appropriate punishment for someone
convicted of raping a child.

Even still, Perry said Texas would follow the law of the land.

While today's opinion does not directly address Texas law, we recognize
that our state is guided by the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court,
Perry said. That said, Texas will continue to seek the toughest
punishment allowable for the predators who commit 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----FLA., USA, CALIF.

2008-06-29 Thread Rick Halperin




June 29


FLORIDA:

Florida prepares for 1st execution since foul up


Florida's new procedure for lethal injections could be tested Tuesday when
executioners strap down a condemned inmate for the 1st time since a
botched execution.

Mark Dean Schwab, 39, is scheduled to die exactly 16 years after he was
sentenced in the 1991 kidnapping, rape and murder of 11-year-old Junny
Rios-Martinez.

Florida officials say they have resolved problems with the December 2006
execution of Angel Diaz when needles were accidentally pushed through his
veins, causing the lethal chemicals to go into his muscles instead,
delaying his death for 34 minutes - twice as long as normal. Some experts
said that would cause intense pain.

Then-Gov. Jeb Bush stopped all executions after Diaz was killed, but
Florida and other states were also held up as they waited for the U.S.
Supreme Court to rule the three-drug method of lethal injection used by
Kentucky was constitutional. 34 other states, including Florida, use a
similar method.

Florida's new procedure requires the warden to make sure the inmate is
unconscious following the injection of the first chemical, sodium
pentothal. Then the executioner will inject pancuronium bromide to
paralyze his muscles and potassium chloride to stop his heart. It also
requires people with medical training to be involved in the process.

Schwab and his attorneys aren't so sure the problems are fixed. An
analysis done for Schwab's lawyers showed that nine of the 30 mock
executions performed by Florida's Department of Corrections between
September 2007 and May were failures, said one of his state-paid
attorneys, Mark Gruber.

The corrections department said its mock exercises have included
preparation for potential problems such as a combative inmate, the
incapacity of an execution team member, power failure and finding a vein.

Training for the unexpected is not a failed mock execution, said Gretl
Plessinger, a corrections department spokeswoman. We're planning for
contingencies.

Schwab's legal options are running out. On Friday, the Florida Supreme
Court rejected his latest appeal claiming the new procedure still carries
the risk of causing intense pain and suffering.

The state has argued successfully in several courts that the procedure
meets all constitutional tests against cruel and unusual punishment and
that Schwab cannot raise the issue again.

Schwab's attorneys did not return calls after the appeal was rejected
Friday, but they are expected to next turn to the federal courts. The U.S.
Supreme Court has allowed eight lethal injections to continue since
upholding the Kentucky case.

That ruling raised a lot of questions, said D. Todd Doss, an attorney in
northern Florida who has handled several death penalty cases but isn't
involved in Schwab's appeals.

I didn't think it cleared the legal landscape, Doss said, because it did
not determine whether there was a substantial risk that Schwab would
experience intense pain and suffering.

Senior Assistant Attorney General Kenneth S. Nunnelley said Schwab's
claims in 2 previous challenges to lethal injection have also been
rejected. He does not get another bite at the apple, he said.

Family of Schwab's victim are counting down the days to execution with a
timer on a Web site devoted to the boy. They've been through years of
appeals, and they decided not to comment on the latest.

The roller coaster has begun, and we don't want to get on, Vickie
Rios-Martinez, Junny's mother, said recently.

Schwab raped and killed Junny a month after he was released early from a
prison sentence he got for raping a 13-year-old boy, who was from Cocoa, a
small town on the Atlantic coast of Florida.

Schwab got close to the boy and his family by posing as a reporter who
promised to help the boy with his dream of becoming a professional surfer.

On the day of the rape and murder, Schwab called the boy's school posing
as his father, then picked him up there.

The case prompted Florida's Junny Rios-Martinez Act of 1992, which
prohibits sex offenders from early release from prison or getting credit
for good behavior.

The state is the one who is the biggest victimizer. They let him out.
They knew who he was, the boy's mother told The Associated Press in
November.

Schwab's execution is to be held at the state's death chamber in Starke,
which is about 40 miles southwest of Jacksonville.

On the Net: Junny Rios-Martinez's family MySpace page:
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseactionuser.viewprofilefriendid21

(source: Associated Press)

**

6 of 64 Fla. inmates executed were child killers


6 of the 64 inmates executed by Florida raped and killed children,
although others have been put to death for slaying children.

The most notable was serial killer Ted Bundy, who was executed in the
electric chair in 1989 for the 1978 rape and murder of 12-year-old
Kimberly Leach of Lake City. The confessed killer of 30 women was also on
death row for the 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news-----TEXAS, MO., USA, CALIF., S. DAK.

2008-06-29 Thread Rick Halperin




June 29



TEXASimpending execution

Days from execution, inmate pins hopes on woman's story


Lester Bower, at the Polunsky Unit in East Texas, has been on death row
since 1984. He acknowledges meeting 2 of the victims on the day they died
but has denied involvement in their slayings.

Witness says condemned man isn't responsible for 1983 slayings

Since 1984, Lester Leroy Bower Jr. has sat on Texas death row, convicted
for the 1983 massacre of 4 men in a Sherman airplane hangar.

The Arlington man now faces execution on July 22, and as time runs out,
his lawyers are fighting to save his life by trying to prove he was not
the killer after all.

One key witness, a woman who came forward years ago, says it was her
then-boyfriend and 3 other drug dealers who were responsible for the
slayings.

Though a prosecutor says she is certain that the right man has been
convicted, Bowers lawyers say their investigation has verified key details
of the woman's story.

But for Bower, will it be too late?



Witness says condemned man isn't responsible for 1983 slayings


Just a few paragraphs into the Star-Telegram story, the woman knew
something was terribly wrong. A man named Lester Leroy Bower Jr. was on
death row for the 1983 massacre of four men in a Sherman airplane hangar,
she read that morning in 1989. But the woman, who asked to be identified
by the pseudonym Pearl, had reason to believe that Bower wasn't the
killer at all  that it was her ex-boyfriend and three others who had
committed the crime.

The woman showed the story to her sister, the one person she had told of
her suspicions about the old boyfriend.

Theyre going to put that guy to death for that, she remembers her sister
saying.

Yeah, I know, Pearl replied.

But he didn't do it?

No, Pearl said.

You've got to do something, the sister said.

After a day of struggling with fears for her own life, Pearl did. The next
day, she contacted Bower's lawyers from Washington, D.C., told them her
story and signed a legal affidavit attesting to it.

Now, 19 years later, information she related is at the heart of an
increasingly urgent effort to save Bower's life. On July 22, after 24
years on Texas death row, Bower is scheduled to die by lethal injection.

Bower's lawyers say they have identified the 4 men whom Pearl alleges to
be the killers, have documented their long criminal records and have
confirmed other key parts of her story. In recent months, a defense
investigator has also located another witness, the wife of one of alleged
accomplices who said she heard the 4 men discussing the killings. The
names of the new suspects, though known to defense lawyers, have remained
sealed by court order.

I don't want Mr. Bower to die for something that he didn't do, said
Pearl, who broke up with her boyfriend shortly after the slayings and
remains fearful of him today. Since she signed the affidavit in 1989, her
identity has been concealed by court order. I know in my heart that he
didn't do it. I just could not in my conscience sit back and just go, 'Oh
well, sorry.'

(source for both: Fort Worth Stgar-Telegram)

**

Garland murders


No remorse here either

Re: Suspects say killings netted them 'just $2'  In interview, they say
they were out to rob someone, targeted music producers, Tuesday Metro.

James Broadnax claims he was in a bind and needed money. Too bad he
couldn't do what any other self-respecting and law-abiding citizen does
get a job.

And when asked if he was remorseful, he had the audacity to respond with
Do I look like I got remorse?

Here's hoping you and your cousin get the death penalty. I'm sure the
executioner won't have any remorse, either.

Steven Rhodes, Garland



A message to parents


After reading the commentary by the 2 individuals who are murder suspects
in the killing of two Garland men, I am truly disgusted with them.

I hope that this sends a clear message to parents in regard to
responsibility for their childrens' actions.

I would very much like to hear from the parents of these youths and see
where it went wrong for all involved.

I see this trend continuing, though, with all the freedoms that teenagers
are allowed these days. It is a sad world we live in when we allow our
children to become animals.

Oscar Galicia, Mesquite

**

In cold blood


Pure disgust and outrage are the emotions I felt reading the jailhouse
interviews of the 2 who admitted the Garland murders. What kind of
backgrounds produced these 2 animals?

The death penalty was designed for jerks like these. If it's administered,
society will be better off. For any who bemoan capital punishment, I say
this crime was random and in cold blood.

The victims could have been members of anyone's family.

L.W. Campbell, Red Oak

**

They deserve death penalty


As I sat horrified watching the heartless comments of James Broadnax, I
wondered how many will jump to their defense. These 2 deserve the death
penalty. Their total 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news-----USA

2008-06-29 Thread Rick Halperin




June 30


USA:

A Death Penalty PuzzleThe Murky Evidence for and Against Deterrence


Although the Supreme Court banned capital punishment for child rape last
week, the justices have made it clear that for homicide, states may
inflict the ultimate penalty. Last month, capital punishment resumed after
a seven-month moratorium. Rapid scheduling of executions followed the
Supreme Court's ruling in Baze v. Rees, reaffirming the constitutionality
of the death penalty in general and lethal injection in particular.

To support their competing conclusions on the legal issue, different
members of the court invoked work by each of us on the deterrent effects
of the death penalty. Unfortunately, they misread the evidence.

Justice John Paul Stevens cited recent research by Wolfers (with co-author
John Donohue) to justify the claim that there remains no reliable
statistical evidence that capital punishment in fact deters potential
offenders. Justice Antonin Scalia cited a suggestion by Sunstein (with
co-author Adrian Vermeule) that a significant body of recent evidence
shows that capital punishment may well have a deterrent effect, possibly
a quite powerful one.

What does the evidence actually say?

One approach notes that in states with the death penalty, the average
murder rate is about 40 % higher than in states without the death penalty.
Yet such comparisons are surely confounded by other influences, as those
states that impose the death penalty also have a historic culture of
violence, including lynching.

If we compare countries, the United States has higher execution and higher
homicide rates than nearly all other industrialized countries. Here, too,
many alternative explanations remain, making it hazardous to conclude that
the death penalty does not deter murder.

Other studies have evaluated changes in homicide rates over time. In the
1960s, as the death penalty fell into disuse, homicide rates rose sharply,
leading some studies to infer a deterrent effect. Moreover, a large-scale
decline in homicide in the past two decades coincided with renewed use of
the death penalty. Countering this, homicide and execution rates rose
together in the 1920s and early 1930s, then fell together through the
1940s and 1950s. Because conclusions are so sensitive to the time period
evaluated, these studies fail to provide much help.

More sophisticated studies compare the evolution of homicide rates across
jurisdictions. Over the past 6 decades, the homicide rate in Canada has
tracked that in the United States even as the countries' punishment
policies have diverged sharply. Similarly, the 12 states that have not
executed a prisoner since 1960 comprise a useful comparison group; murder
rates in these states have largely tracked those in states that
subsequently adopted or rejected the death penalty.

One might like to conclude that these latter studies demonstrate that the
death penalty does not deter. But this is asking too much of the data. The
number of homicides is so large, and varies so much year to year, that it
is impossible to disentangle the effects of execution policy from other
changes affecting murder rates. Moreover, execution policy doesn't change
often or much. Just as a laboratory scientist with too few experimental
subjects cannot draw strong conclusions, the best we can say is that
homicide rates are not closely associated with capital punishment. On the
basis of existing evidence, it is especially hard to justify claims about
causality.

Justice Stevens argues, In the absence of such evidence, deterrence
cannot serve as a sufficient penological justification for this uniquely
severe and irrevocable punishment. Perhaps. But the absence of evidence
of deterrence should not be confused with evidence of absence.

Justice Scalia relies on the suggestion by Sunstein and Vermeule that some
evidence suggests a possible deterrent effect. But that suggestion
actually catalyzed Donohue and Wolfers's study of available empirical
evidence. Existing studies contain significant statistical errors, and
slightly different approaches yield widely varying findings, a problem
exacerbated by researchers' tendency to report only those results
supporting their conclusions. This led Sunstein and Vermeule to
acknowledge: We do not know whether deterrence has been shown. . . . Nor
do we conclude that the evidence of deterrence has reached some threshold
of reliability that permits or requires government action.

In short, the best reading of the accumulated data is that they do not
establish a deterrent effect of the death penalty.

Why is the Supreme Court debating deterrence? A prominent line of
reasoning, endorsed by several justices, holds that if capital punishment
fails to deter crime, it serves no useful purpose and hence is cruel and
unusual, violating the Eighth Amendment. This reasoning tracks public
debate as well. While some favor the death penalty on retributive grounds,
many others (including President Bush)