[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, PENN., VA., S.C., FLA., LA., ILL.

2015-09-16 Thread Rick Halperin





Sept. 16



TEXAS:

An Unfinished Prison Story


In 1967, Danny Lyon, a young photographer from New York who had spent the 
beginning of his career documenting the civil-rights movement, was granted 
permission by the Texas Department of Corrections to photograph freely inside 
the state's penitentiaries. He spent the next 14 months among the inmates at 6 
institutions, producing a raw and revealing portrait of prison life that was 
published, in 1971, in the volume "Conversations with the Dead." Lyon wrote, in 
the book's foreword, that he had tried "to make a picture of imprisonment as 
distressing as I knew it to be."


Several of the inmates Lyon had met in the jails stood out as the book's main 
characters, especially Billy McCune, a prisoner who was convicted of raping and 
beating a woman in a Fort Worth parking lot, in 1950. Originally condemned to 
die in the electric chair - at the time, rape cases were eligible for the death 
penalty - McCune had his sentence commuted to life, in 1952, after he cut off 
his own penis on death row. Diagnosed as psychotic, he lived in a 9-by-5-foot 
cell in a prison psych ward. However, after meeting Lyon, McCune began mailing 
the photographer a series of letters and colorful drawings that revealed him to 
be a person of artistic sensitivity and intelligence. In his book - which 
included facsimiles of McCune's art and transcriptions of his letters, along 
with mug shots and prison reports on him and other inmates - Lyon wrote, 
"Sometimes I would get as many as 3 envelopes a week, and sometimes only two in 
a month. But inside there was always something incredible, something beautiful, 
something a man had painted or written from a place where nothing should grow 
 In the letters and drawings of a supposed madman, I have found someone 
much more eloquent than I to explain to the free world what life in prison is 
like."


In the afterword to a new version of "Conversations with the Dead," just 
reissued by Phaidon, Lyon tells the chapters of McCune's story that unfolded 
after the book's initial publication. Released from prison in 1974, McCune 
visited Lyon at his home in Bernalillo, New Mexico, once, in 1982, then 
"vanished" from his life for the next 20 years. In 2000, though, Lyon received 
a letter from a nun at a homeless shelter in Kansas City, saying that McCune, a 
regular visitor to the shelter, was old and frail and hoped to see Lyon once 
more before he died. The 2 reunited in Kansas City several months later; McCune 
died in October, 2007. Reflecting on the decades since he made his remarkable 
body of work, Lyon writes, "If, back in 1968, I thought I could bring down the 
mighty walls of the Texas prison system by publishing 'Conversations with the 
Dead' and the work of Billy McCune, then those years of work are among the 
greatest failures of my life. . . . Prison is part and parcel of America, part 
of the American way. It's like a cancer inside us."


(source; The New Yorker)

**

Man convicted in 1970s Tyler killing seeks to clear name


Attorneys for a man convicted in the murder of an East Texas woman have filed 
paperwork to declare their client's innocence.


Kerry Max Cook was convicted in the 1977 killing of Linda Jo Edwards, 21, of 
Tyler. Though originally sentenced to death, Cook maintained his innocence and 
a court overturned the verdict, spurring 2 subsequent trials. The 2nd ended in 
a mistrial and the 3rd sent him back to death row.


Facing a 4th trial in 1999, with the State again pursuing the death penalty, 
Cook pleaded no contest and was granted a sentence of time served after 
spending more than 20 years on death row.


On Tuesday, Cook's lawyers, Cheryl Wattley and Steven Rosen, sought to clear 
his name based on 5 different grounds:


--That he is innocent of the rape and murder of Linda Jo Edwards

--New scientific evidence requires that Cook's conviction be vacated

--The State suppressed exculpatory evidence it possessed prior to entry of 
Cook's no-contest plea


--Cook's due process rights were violated by the State's alleged destruction of 
exculpatory evidence


--Cook's due process rights were violated by the presentation of false 
testimony from James Mayfield


The documents were filed with the 114th Judicial District Court of Smith 
County.


According to the documents, Edwards lived in the same apartment complex as Cook 
at the time of her death. Lawyers called the original accusations against him 
"bizarre and wholly unsupported," saying prosecutors' theory was that "Mr. Cook 
(who is heterosexual) was a closeted gay man who brutally raped, mutilated and 
murdered his female neighbor in an act of 'lust' and rage over his own 
so-called 'sexual ambivalence.'"


Lawyers argue that new post-conviction DNA testing supports Cook's claim of 
innocence, saying that of the tests conducted on dozens of samples and cuttings 
from evidence at the scene, none yielded a trace of his DNA.


Instead, 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide

2015-09-16 Thread Rick Halperin





Sept. 16



IRANexecution

Prisoner hanged in western Iran


Iran's fundamentalist regime on Wednesday hanged a prisoner in the Kurdish city 
of Sanandaj, western Iran.


The prisoner, identified as Raouf Hosseini, was hanged at dawn in Sanadaj's 
central prison.


He had been on death row for the past 13 years.

The mullahs' regime on Saturday hanged 2 other prisoners, aged 34 and 45, in 
the northern city of Rasht. Their names were withheld by the authorities. Last 
week a 32-year-old prisoner was hanged in the eastern town of Birjand. Also 
last Wednesday 5 prisoners were hanged collectively in the central prison of 
Tabriz, north-west Iran.


A statement by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human 
Rights Zeid Ra???ad Al Hussein on August 5 said: "Iran has reportedly executed 
more than 600 individuals so far this year. Last year, at least 753 people were 
executed in the country."


(source: NCR-Iran)






SRI LANKA:

Ranjan wants death penalty for child rapists


Social Empowerment and Welfare Deputy Minister Ranjan Ramanayake said yesterday 
he was taking measures to move a motion in Parliament on September 22 to urge 
the members to take action to implement the death penalty especially for child 
rapists. He said he intends to obtain instructions from President Maithripala 
Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe before moving the motion in 
Parliament.


Ramanayake said he also intends to urge to formulate laws to implement the 
death penalty, a matter within the judiciary.


He said he has to get instructions to decide as to how this motion be moved in 
Parliament. The deputy minister said however he will take steps to develop a 
dialogue on the matter of the increasing sexual assaults on under aged 
children.


He said the public are outraged at the incidents that took place in the recent 
past and it was time to bring about such laws to put a full stop to such grave 
crimes.


Ramanayake said he was planning to compel parliamentarians to take action to 
implement the death penalty for the convicts of heroin traffickers as well.


He added that the death penalty had been implemented even after independence.

(source: dailynews.lk)

*

SL reaffirms in Geneva its commitment to abolishing capital 
punishmentPresident under pressure to have killers of children hanged



Amidst calls for the re-implementation of the death penalty in the wake of a 
5-year-old girl being sexually abused and strangled to death at Kotadeniyawa, 
the government of Sri Lanka has assured the international community of its 
intention to abolish death penalty.


Last judicial execution took place in 1976.

On behalf of the Maithripala Sirisena-Wickremesinghe administration, Foreign 
Minister Mangala Samaraweera told Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights 
Council (UNHRC) that Sri Lanka would maintain the moratorium on the death 
penalty leading to its eventual abolition. Minister Samaraweera was 
participating in the general debate of the 30th Geneva session on Monday 
(Sept.14).


The assurance was in accordance with an understanding between Sri Lanka, 
beginning with Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga's presidency and the European 
Union.


Villagers launched protests demanding death penalty for the perpetrators of 
Kotadeniyawa child killing. Some protestors demanded the guilty being hanged 
outside Negombo hospital where the post-mortem conducted by the Negombo 
Judicial Medical Officer (JMO) on Seya Sadewmi Bakmeedeniya of Akkarangaha, 
Kotadeniyawa revealed that she had been sexually abused and throttled.


Well informed sources told The Island that the EU had told successive 
governments that judicial executions shouldn't be resumed under any 
circumstance. Since the change of government in January, President Maithripala 
Sirisena and Justice Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe publicly declared their 
readiness to resume judicial executions.


Senior university lecturer Ven. Dambara Amila urged President Maithripala 
Sirisena to execute at least child murderers at a state function held under the 
President's patronage. The appeal was made at the 151 Anagarika Dharmapala 
commemorations at Dharmapala College, Pannipitiya, on Monday. Ven. Amila 
affiliated to the JVP said that the government couldn't turn a blind eye to 
Kotadeniyawa killing.


The 5-year-old victim's father is also a prime suspect in the killing.

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, too, refrained from resuming judicial 
executions though some clamoured for immediate implementation of death penalty.


Former President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga on three separate occasions 
before the Parliamentary Elections in April 2004 announced that she would 
resume judicial executions though her threat was never carried out.


The pledge to implement the death penalty in the aftermath of High Court Judge 
Ambepitiya's assassination was the 4th instance since Parliament, in1995, 
adopted a private 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----NEB., WYO., CALIF., USA

2015-09-16 Thread Rick Halperin






Sept. 16



NEBRASKA:

Judge considers whether Lotter keeps attorneys during death penalty legal limbo


A federal judge hasn't ruled yet on whether a man on Nebraska's death row can 
keep his court-appointed counsel.


But the question isn't whether John Lotter remains under a sentence of death 
despite the Legislature's repeal of the death penalty earlier this year or the 
current legal limbo while the Secretary of State???s office works to verify 
petition signatures expected to put the question to Nebraska voters next year.


Both sides agree he does, for now.

"We believe Mr. Lotter's sentence should be reformed to life imprisonment once 
the repeal bill goes into effect," attorney Rebecca Woodman of the Death 
Penalty Litigation Clinic in Kansas City said at a hearing Tuesday in U.S. 
District Court in Lincoln.


"If it does," Senior U.S. District Judge Richard Kopf said.

A petition drive has presented enough signatures to put the repeal on hold 
before the vote, if enough are found to be valid. That should be known by mid- 
to late October.


The question Kopf seemed more interested in at Tuesday's hearing was whether 
Lotter has a right to counsel for anything but a request for clemency, which he 
hasn't filed in the year and a half he's had attorneys federally appointed to 
represent him.


Kopf ruled previously that Lotter has exhausted all other federal and state 
remedies, but Woodman argued that it's too early for the court to make that 
determination. She said her office needs more time first to investigate other 
constitutional issues that could be raised in the case.


"The question whether those remedies are going to be successful or not remains 
to be seen," Woodman said.


Woodman also asserted that Lotter's execution should be barred, even if the 
petition is put on the ballot in 2016 because Gov. Pete Ricketts "is attempting 
to illegally procure lethal injection drugs."


Under the circumstances, she said, it's imperative that they be allowed to 
continue working on Lotter's behalf.


Assistant Nebraska Attorney General James Smith said the state's position 
remains the same: Regardless of what happens with the death penalty repeal, 
Lotter only is entitled to court-appointed counsel in the case to seek 
clemency.


"Mr. Lotter remains under a penalty of death, and Mr. Lotter will remain under 
a penalty of death," he said.


By law, Smith said, only the Nebraska Board of Pardons can commute a sentence 
from death to life imprisonment.


Kopf asked if, once the petition signatures are verified, the state would seek 
an execution warrant to carry out Lotter's sentence whether death penalty 
supporters have enough to prevent the repeal from going into effect or not.


Smith said if there are enough signatures to stay the repeal, his office still 
would have to show that the state has the drugs to carry it out.


It does not.

Once it does, Smith said, it is the attorney general office's position there 
would be no reason not to seek an execution warrant.


But Woodman said many state and federal claims will arise if a death warrant is 
issued within the next year.


Kopf ended the public portion of the hearing, then went into a closed hearing 
to confer with Lotter's attorneys about budgetary issues.


Outside the courtroom later, Woodman said a lot of questions with the death 
penalty repeal remain unanswered.


"Time will tell about what issues might arise," she said.

Lotter was convicted for killing Teena Brandon, Lisa Lambert and Philip DeVine 
at a rural Humboldt farmhouse in 1993.


At trial, Thomas Nissen testified against Lotter as part of a deal with 
prosecutors, saying he stabbed Brandon but Lotter fired the shots that killed 
all 3.


Nissen got a life sentence, and a 3-judge panel sentenced Lotter to death.

Nissen since has changed his story and said he, not Lotter, fired the fatal 
shots. Lotter appealed, but his appeals were rejected by the Nebraska Supreme 
Court, the U.S. District Court of Nebraska and the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of 
Appeals.


(source: Journal Star)

***

Attorneys debate Neb. death row inmate's legal options  Attorneys for John 
Lotter said in federal court Tuesday that there are unanswered legal questions



Attorneys for a Nebraska death row inmate say the state's recent struggle over 
capital punishment has raised new legal questions that they need to explore, 
while a state attorney says the prisoner has exhausted all options except for 
clemency.


Attorneys for John Lotter said in federal court Tuesday that there are 
unanswered legal questions stemming from the Legislature's vote to abolish 
capital punishment, a subsequent ballot measure to reinstate it and the 
governor's efforts to obtain lethal injection drugs.


Lotter and co-defendant Thomas Nissen were convicted in the 1993 slaying of 
Teena Brandon, a 21-year-old woman who lived briefly as a man, and two 
witnesses, Lisa Lambert and Philip DeVine, at a rural 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide

2015-09-16 Thread Rick Halperin





Sept. 16



JAPAN:

Public support for death penalty not overwhelming, researchers say  
Japanese may not be as enthusiastic about death row inmates being sent to the 
gallows as previously believed.



A recent study by researchers shows public support for the death penalty in 
Japan is not deeply entrenched, despite a government survey indicating more 
than 80 % accept the practice.


While Japan has cited the outcome of the survey to support its continuation of 
capital punishment amid a global trend to abolish it, Mai Sato, a lecturer of 
the University of Reading in Britain, said, "The majority of the public is in 
favor of the death penalty if asked in general, but how strongly or how 
unconditionally they want to retain it is a different matter.


"Our research indicates behind the supposed majority support lies a minority of 
respondents who are really committed to keeping the death penalty," she said in 
recent interview.


Sato, together with Paul Bacon, an associate professor at Waseda University in 
Tokyo, conducted a survey on the death penalty from February to March, shortly 
after the Cabinet Office carried out its own poll about the issue last 
November.


Between the 2 surveys, no inmates were hanged, while no heinous crimes were 
reported, which means there were no significant factors to influence the public 
view of capital punishment during the three-month period, making it possible to 
meaningfully compare their results.


The two surveys similarly asked respondents if they thought the death penalty 
was unavoidable or if they thought it should be abolished. Both found a similar 
tendency: around 80 % had a favorable attitude toward capital punishment.


Additionally, the researchers gave the respondents 5 options in their own poll 
to examine the how committed respondents were to the death penalty: whether 
capital punishment should definitely be kept, probably be kept, probably be 
abolished, definitely be abolished or cannot say.


The survey found respondents who chose the 1st option accounted for only 27 %.

The researchers also closely examined the 2014 Cabinet Office survey data to 
find only 34 % of respondents were staunchly in favor of the death penalty and 
would never approve its abolition.


"Headlines of the government survey's reports say '80 % support death penalty,' 
but our close study shows staunch supporters are the minority, standing at 
around 30 %," Sato said. "It is doubtful, given such an outcome, if the 
government has a sufficient rationale for executing inmates."


The researchers' survey also showed 71 % of respondents who wanted to retain 
the death penalty said they would accept the abolition of capital punishment, 
if the government took the initiative to end the practice.


"The outcome suggests a rather smooth road to abolition if the government 
exercises policy initiatives," said Sato, who was working at the Center for 
Criminology at the University of Oxford at the time of the survey. "We could 
say Japanese people possess the capacity and flexibility to embrace abolition."


The researchers' survey results also showed skepticism about whether 
introducing life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, alongside the 
death penalty, would ultimately lead to capital punishment being abolished.


It found only 12 % of those who wanted to retain the death penalty would accept 
life imprisonment without parole as an ultimate punishment.


"The majority of them consider the death penalty to be irreplaceable by life 
imprisonment without parole, and support the death penalty for the very reason 
that it is an ultimate form of atonement," Sato said.


The researchers also asked several questions to test the respondents' level of 
knowledge on the issue, given the government discloses little information about 
executions and it is still unknown how prisoners are chosen for the gallows or 
the cost of an execution.


One of the questions was the method of execution used in Japan, with 
respondents given options including lethal injection, gas and electric chair. 
Only 51 % selected the correct answer - hanging.


"The fact that only 1/2 of the respondents knew about the more than 
140-year-old, only execution method in Japan highlights the secrecy surrounding 
the death penalty," Sato said.


She also suggested it was paradoxical that while the government justified the 
death penalty based on public support, it did not provide people with 
sufficient information for making their decisions.


She concluded, "Japan has the death penalty not because the general public is 
clamoring for its retention, but rather because the government has not yet 
taken steps to understand fully the nature of public opinion on the subject.


"Were the government to change its stance on the death penalty, there is 
reliable evidence that its citizens would follow suit."


Last year, the U.N. Human Rights Committee urged Japan to "give due 
consideration to the 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----PENN., VA., OKLA.

2015-09-16 Thread Rick Halperin




Sept. 16



PENNSYLVANIA:

DA to seek death penalty against ex-officer charged in death


Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty in the case of a former suburban 
Philadelphia police officer accused of killing his ex-girlfriend and wounding 
her daughter.


32-year-old Stephen Rozniakowski of Norwood is charged in Delaware County with 
criminal homicide murder, attempted murder and aggravated assault.


District Attorney Jack Whelan said Tuesday he would seek capital punishment if 
Rozniakowski is convicted of 1st-degree murder, citing a protection from abuse 
order, risk to another person and another felony at the time of the slaying.


Authorities alleged that the part-time Colwyn officer killed Valerie Morrow and 
shot her daughter in December in Glenolden before he was wounded by the 
victim's husband, a part-time Morton officer.


Whelan also said he believed the state Supreme Court would nullify the 
governor's moratorium on the death penalty.


(source: Associated Press)






VIRGINIA:

Jesse Matthew Charged in Connection to Death of Morgan Harrington


The man accused of capital murder in the death of Hannah Graham is now charged 
with the murder of Morgan Harrington.


An Albemarle County grand jury indicted Jesse Matthew last Friday on 1st-degree 
murder and abduction with intent to defile charges in connection with the death 
of Morgan Harrington.


Harrington left a Metallica concert at John Paul Jones Arena in Charlottesville 
back in October 2009 never to be seen again. Her remains were found months 
later on a southern Albemarle County farm. Matthew had been forensically linked 
to the case during 2 other investigations.


"After a series of discussions within the office and with the various law 
enforcement agencies involved with this, we decided a month or so ago that it 
was time to proceed and ask a grand jury what they thought," said Albemarle 
County Commonwealth's Attorney Denise Lunsford. "Really it was just a matter of 
looking at what we had over the course of the years, making a determination if 
now is the appropriate time, whether we should wait any longer for any reason."


Regarding the charges, Morgan Harrington's mother Gil said "it doesn't bring 
closure but there's some satisfaction. We have known in our hearts and believed 
very strongly that Mr. Matthew was responsible. It was very important and I 
don't know why it was so important for Dan, me, our son Alex to have some 
acknowledgment of the fact that Morgan's life was taken. She was robbed from 
us."


A search warrant NBC29 obtained in November says Morgan's t-shirt had multiple 
DNA stains on it that matched Matthew's DNA.


Matthew is accused of abducting University of Virginia student Hannah Graham 
from Charlottesville's Downtown Mall in September 2014 and killing her. Her 
body was found in a wooded area off of Old Lynchburg Road in southern Albemarle 
County. Matthew is facing a capital murder charge in her death, meaning he 
could face the death penalty.


Legal analyst Lloyd Snook says investigating the Graham case along with a 3rd 
case where Matthew attacked a woman in Fairfax likely helped the Harrington 
case.


"I'm guessing that they found some other things they've found in their other 
investigations of Jesse Matthew that they thought might add a little to this 
case. But sometimes cases get better but after a while if you don't get more 
evidence in, it's time to move," he said.


Matthew's trial in the Graham case is set for next summer. He's set to be 
sentenced for the Fairfax case next month.


He is due in court in connection with the Harrington case on Wednesday, Sept. 
16.




Press Release from Albemarle County Commonwealth's Attorney:

On September 11, 2015, an Albemarle County Grand Jury returned 2 Indictments 
against Jesse Leroy Matthew, Jr. in connection with the October 17, 2009 
disappearance and death of Morgan Dana Harrington. Matthew was charged with 
First Degree Murder of Morgan Harrington and Abduction with the Intent to 
Defile. The maximum penalty for each offense is life in prison.


These Indictments were received by the Court on September 15, 2015. An 
indictment is a charge and not evidence of guilt. A defendant is presumed 
innocent and entitled to a fair trial with the burden on the Commonwealth to 
prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.


Matthew was served with the Indictments on September 15, 2015. His 1st 
appearance before the Albemarle County Circuit Court will take place at 12:45 
p.m. on September 16, 2015. The indictments result from the dedicated 
investigative efforts over the past 6 years by the Virginia State Police, 
Albemarle County Police, Charlottesville Police, University of Virginia Police, 
and the FBI.


There will be no press conference. The Virginia State Bar's Rules of 
Professional Conduct for Attorneys Rule 3:6 contains prohibitions on 
extrajudicial