[Deathpenalty] Urgent Action 207/15 - USA: Missouri Execution Set as Innocence Claimed

2015-09-24 Thread Rick Halperin





MISSOURI EXECUTION SET AS INNOCENCE CLAIMED

Kimber Edwards is due to be executed in Missouri on 6 October. He was sentenced 
to death in 2002 for
the murder-for-hire of his former wife. The man who shot the victim and who is 
serving a life

sentence now claims that Kimber Edwards was not involved.

Click here to view the full Urgent Action in Word or PDF format, including case 
information,

addresses and sample messages.

The body of Kimberly Cantrell was found in her apartment in University City, 
Missouri on 23 August
2000, a day after she was last seen alive. She had been shot in the head. She 
had been in a
prolonged dispute with her ex-husband, Kimber Edwards, over child support. 
Police arrested Orthell
Wilson after he was identified as the man who had been seen outside Kimberly 
Cantrell’s apartment on
22 August. He was charged with first-degree murder and also gave a statement 
implicating Kimber
Edwards. The latter denied any involvement in the murder but when the police 
said that they would
bring in his wife and children for interrogation, he said that he had paid a 
man named Michael US
$1,600 to kill Kimberly Cantrell. When the police officers told him that 
Orthell Wilson had said
that “Michael” did not exist, Kimber Edwards told them that Wilson had demanded 
payment for his role

in the killing.

At his trial, Kimber Edwards denied that he had any connection to the murder 
and that he had given
statements to the police so that they would leave his family alone. Orthell 
Wilson did not testify,
but statements he had given to the police were heard by the jury. The jury 
found Kimber Edwards
guilty of first-degree murder and voted for the death penalty after a 
sentencing hearing that lasted
less than a day. Orthell Wilson pleaded guilty in exchange for not facing the 
death penalty. He was

sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

On 8 May 2015, Orthell Wilson signed an affidavit recanting his statements 
implicating Kimber
Edwards, claiming he made them under police pressure and the threat of the 
death penalty, and that
“I alone killed Kimberly Cantrell… Kimber Edwards is completely innocent and 
was not involved in any
way in the murder”. He stated that in 2000 he was in a “secret romantic 
relationship” with Kimberly
Cantrell and that he had shot her in the context of an argument over his “drug 
addiction and
constant need for money”. Three of his neighbors from that time have signed 
affidavits stating that

they knew of the relationship between Orthell Wilson and Kimberly Cantrell.

In 2004, a psychiatrist concluded that Kimber Edwards has Asperger’s Disorder 
and that this
“adversely affected the reliability of his statement to detectives during 
interrogation as well as
his ability to knowingly waive his rights”. The psychiatrist also concluded 
that Kimber Edwards’
“odd” reaction to the death of his former wife, which the jury heard described 
as “nonchalant”,
“relaxed” and “carefree”, could be explained by the defendant’s Asperger’s 
Disorder. The jury heard

no such explanation for this “damaging characterization” of his demeanor.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

At jury selection for a US capital trial, the defense and prosecution will 
question prospective
jurors and can exclude certain people, either for a stated reason (for cause) 
or without giving a
reason (a peremptory challenge). Those citizens who would be “irrevocably 
committed” to vote against
the death penalty can be excluded for cause by the prosecution, under a 1968 US 
Supreme Court
ruling. In 1985, the Court relaxed the standard, thereby expanding the class of 
potential jurors who
could be dismissed for cause during jury selection.  Under this standard, a 
juror can be dismissed
for cause if his or her feelings about the death penalty would “prevent or 
substantially impair the
performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and 
his oath”. In 1986, the
Supreme Court acknowledged research showing that the “death qualification” of 
capital jurors
“produces juries somewhat more ‘conviction-prone’ than ‘non-death-qualified’ 
juries”. In 2008, the
then most senior judge on the Court, Justice John Paul Stevens, wrote that “the 
process of obtaining
a ‘death qualified jury’ is really a procedure that has the purpose and effect 
of obtaining a jury

that is biased in favor of conviction”.

Click here to view the full Urgent Action in Word or PDF format.

Name: Kimber Edwards (m)
Issues: Imminent execution, Unfair trial, Legal concern
UA: 207/15
Issue Date: 24 September 2015
Country: USA

Please let us know if you took action so that we can track our impact!

EITHER send a short email to u...@aiusa.org with "UA 207/15" in the subject 
line, and include in the

body of the email the number of letters and/or emails you sent,

OR fill out this short online form to let us know how you took action.

Thank you for taking action! Please check with the AIUSA Urgent Action Office 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----PENN., FLA., USA

2015-09-24 Thread Rick Halperin





Sept. 24



PENNSYLVANIA:

Quarryville man faces death penalty in double murder trial


Leeton Thomas, who is accused of killing an East Drumore mother and daughter to 
silence their testimony against him in a sex-assault case, will face the death 
penalty when the case goes to trial.


The 38-year-old Quarryville man is charged with killing Lisa Scheetz, 44, and 
her 16-year-old daughter Hailey on June 11.


Police allege Thomas murdered the women to make sure they couldn't testify on 
charges that he had molested Hailey and her sister in December 2013.


Thomas was out on bail, awaiting formal arraignment on the molestation charges, 
when he allegedly broke into Scheetz's basement-level apartment at 2 a.m. and 
stabbed the woman and 2 of her daughters multiple times with a knife.


Lisa and Hailey Scheetz died at the scene. The sister, 15, was critically 
injured in the attack - officials said she suffered multiple stab wounds to the 
chest, shoulder and back - but was able to flee the scene and seek help from a 
neighbor.


Scheetz's 3rd daughter, age 13, was not at home at the time of the attacks.

District Attorney Craig Stedman in June called it a 'premeditated 
assassination."


Assistant District Attorney Christine Wilson, who is prosecuting the case with 
ADA Christopher Larsen, filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty on 
Thursday, according to a release issued Thursday by the District Attorney's 
office.


Wilson, in her filing, outlined 5 aggravating factors that she says make the 
case death-penalty eligible.


They are:

-- The victims were killed to prevent them from testifying in the sex-assault 
case.


-- The killings happened during the course of a felony (burglary).

-- Thomas created a grave risk of danger to another person (the sister who 
survived).


-- Thomas is charged with multiple counts of homicide.

-- Thomas broke a no-contact order in place regarding the victims.

Thomas is at Lancaster County Prison, without bail, on charges of homicide (2 
counts), attempted homicide and burglary.


He waived a preliminary hearing in August. Brett Hambright, with the District 
Attorney's office, said Thomas has also waived his arraignment, which was 
scheduled for Friday.


The trial will not be held before 2016, Hambright said.

(source: lancasteronline.com)






FLORIDA:

State to seek death penalty against Green Cove Springs murder suspect


The State Attorney's Office has filed a motion to seek the death penalty 
against a man accused of murdering a woman in Green Cove Springs last month, a 
spokesperson for the Fourth Judicial Circuit told First Coast News Thursday.


Victor Lamar Cruger, 25, was indicted on charges of premeditated murder and 
attempted murder.


He is currently being held in the Clay County Jail without bond.

According to the Green Cove Springs Police Department, Cruger shot a woman 
named Ernestine Griner Hines Aug. 23.


Hines later died from her injuries at a hospital, police said.

Authorities said that the shooting took place in the back of a vehicle on the 
300 block of Washington Lane before Cruger Jr. ran off into the woods.


The daughter of the victim was then able to drive to another location and call 
police, according to GCSPD.


Police said all 3 were acquaintances.

Cruger was on the run until he was located in Gainesville, Fla. several days 
later on Aug. 28. He was arrested several days later in Clay County.


His next court date is scheduled for Oct. 7.

(source: First Coast News)

*

State Will Seek Death Penalty For Girl In Machete Murder


State prosecutors have announced that they plan to seek the death penalty for a 
teenage girl accused of taking part in the grisly machete murder of a Homestead 
student.


Desiray Strickland, 18, has been indicted on 1st degree murder. On Thursday, 
her attorney entered a plea of not guilty and said they would go to trial.


Also charged with 1st degree murder in the June 2015 murder of 17-year-old Jose 
Guardado are 23-year old Joseph Cabrera, 20-year-old Kaheem Arbelo, 18-year-old 
Jonathan Lucas and 19-year-old Christian Colon.


Strickland and the others were students at Homestead Job Corps, a live-in 
school and vocational training program for at-risk students run by the U.S. 
Department of Labor.


The group allegedly spent 2 weeks planning Guardado's death. A few days before 
they actually carried it out, they went into the woods near the school and 
allegedly dug a shallow grave.


On Sunday, June 28th, they lured Guardado into the woods and Arbelo ambushed 
him with a machete as the others watched, according to Strickland's arrest 
report. As Guardado lay dying on the ground, the group reportedly ordered him 
to crawl into the grave they had dug.


When Guardado made 1 last attempt to fight back, Arbelo struck him repeatedly 
until his face caved in, according to the arrest report.


They then placed him in the grave and buried him. Noticing all the blood, they 
burned Guardad

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----IND., USA

2015-09-24 Thread Rick Halperin





Sept. 24



INDIANA:

Indiana Supreme Court upholds death penalty for William Clyde Gibson


The Indiana Supreme Court has upheld a judge's ruling that serial killer 
William Clyde Gibson receive the death penalty, according to an opinion issued 
by the court.


Gibson was sentenced to death in 2013 for the April 19, 2012 murder of family 
friend, 75-year-old Christine Whitis. He killed Whitis, sexually assaulted her 
and mutilated her corpse.


"We find the nature of Gibson's offense to be beyond horrendous," the court 
wrote in its opinion, which was filed Thursday morning. "He brutally murdered 
an elderly woman, sexually assaulting her in the process, even after she was 
dead, then dismembering her body. As for his character, Gibson has an extensive 
criminal history. And although we understand he is afflicted with various 
mental disorders and grief over his mother's death, no one testified he was 
unable to appreciate the severity of his crime. Gibson's jury heard this 
evidence and more, determined the State proved all four aggravators beyond a 
reasonable doubt, and found those aggravators outweighed the mitigating 
evidence presented."


"In light of the horrific manner in which Gibson took Whitis's life and his 
lack of redeeming character traits, we find this is not the kind of exceptional 
case that warrants appellate modification of a sentence," the court continued. 
"Finding Gibson's sentence of death was not inappropriate, we decline to revise 
it."


Gibson has also pleaded guilty to the murder of Stephanie Kirk. Kirk's body was 
found buried in the backyard of Gibson's New Albany home in April 2012. He was 
sentenced to death in that case as well.


In April 2014, Gibson received a 65-year sentence for the murder of Karen 
Hodella. Police say Hodella is the 1st person Gibson killed: a 44-year-old 
Florida woman, found stabbed to death near the Ohio River in Clarksville, Ind.


(source: WDRB news)






USA:

Pope calls on US to abolish death penalty


Speaking to Congress, Pope Francis is calling for an end to the death penalty 
in the U.S. and across the world.


Francis says that every life is sacred and society can only benefit from 
rehabilitating those convicted of crimes.


The pope noted that U.S. bishops have renewed their call to abolish capital 
punishment. That idea is unpopular, however, with many American politicians.


The pontiff did not specifically mention abortion - a particularly contentious 
issue in Congress at the moment that threatens to force the shutdown of the 
U.S. government next week.


Still, his remarks referred to the Catholic church's opposition to abortion. He 
urged lawmakers and all Americans to "protect and defend human life at every 
stage of its development."


"Let us remember the Golden Rule: "Do unto others as you would have them do 
unto you" (Mt 7:12).


This Rule points us in a clear direction. Let us treat others with the same 
passion and compassion with which we want to be treated. Let us seek for others 
the same possibilities which we seek for ourselves. Let us help others to grow, 
as we would like to be helped ourselves. In a word, if we want security, let us 
give security; if we want life, let us give life; if we want opportunities, let 
us provide opportunities. The yardstick we use for others will be the yardstick 
which time will use for us. The Golden Rule also reminds us of our 
responsibility to protect and defend human life at every stage of its 
development.


This conviction has led me, from the beginning of my ministry, to advocate at 
different levels for the global abolition of the death penalty. I am convinced 
that this way is the best, since every life is sacred, every human person is 
endowed with an inalienable dignity, and society can only benefit from the 
rehabilitation of those convicted of crimes. Recently my brother bishops here 
in the United States renewed their call for the abolition of the death penalty. 
Not only do I support them, but I also offer encouragement to all those who are 
convinced that a just and necessary punishment must never exclude the dimension 
of hope and the goal of rehabilitation."


(sources: Associated Press & International Business Times)

**

Is the Death Penalty Unconstitutional?Following a controversial ruling over 
lethal injections, Justice Breyer suggested that capital punishment may violate 
the 8th Amendment. It's time to bring that case to court.



In the past nine months, the State of Oklahoma has tried twice to execute 
Robert Glossip. Sentenced to death in 1998 for the murder of his boss, Glossip 
was 1 of 4 death-row inmates suing the state over its use of an unreliable drug 
cocktail that contributed to botched executions. In January, the Supreme Court 
issued a stay and agreed to hear his case; in a bitterly split 5-4 decision, 
the Court ruled that Oklahoma could continue to use the procedure. But when the 
state sought to execute Glossip on Septe

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide

2015-09-24 Thread Rick Halperin





Sept. 24



BARBADOS:

Death penalty and the law


Laws are prescribed as remedies for mischief. The remedies include punishment 
and penalty. The punishment for some mischief is loss of liberty by 
incarceration. The penalty in some cases is a fine. The penalty for murder on 
conviction is death.


As a penalty, it is an effective deterrent for the offender who will never 
commit murder again. That satisfies the law essentially as a remedy.


The judicial execution of the death penalty is not an unlawful killing and 
cannot be equated with murder in any form of reasonable definition. To say that 
a Privy Council's or any other final court of appeal's interpretation of 
pleadings before it prevents the execution of convicted murderers in Barbados 
is to place the judiciary at any level, above the legislature by which it was 
created.


None of the constitutional guarantees of fundamental freedom or international 
conventions are enforceable except as specific corresponding statute enacted by 
the legislature representative of a purported democracy of Barbados in the 
exercise of its powers of sovereignty.


Contrary to some opinions expressed, all that is necessary to resume execution 
as a penalty for murder in the jurisdiction of Barbados as a sovereign state, 
is for the legislature to prescribe unequivocally according to the will of a 
majority of the people, that the execution of the sentence of death for the 
crime of murder shall be carried out in the manner prescribed for the humane 
termination of the convict's life. If hanging is deemed to be inhumane, then 
alternatives should be prescribed to effect the execution.


To quibble about the Privy Council's interpretation of the clear intent of 
statute law is a form of sophistry that morality cannot condone. The 
interpretation by the judiciary at its highest level does not exceed the powers 
of the legislature to make laws for the remedy of mischief in the exercise of 
its powers to provide for the peace, order and good government of a sovereign 
Barbados.


The laws of Barbados should be "agreeable to the people of Barbados (living 
here) first".


Leonard St Hill

(source: Letter to the Editor, Nation News)






CHINA:

Panda killers in China may face death penalty for selling endangered animal 
meat



A Yunnan court in south-western China has ordered 3 of its citizens to be 
prosecuted for killing a female giant Panda in the wild and selling its meat in 
December 2014. Under Chinese law, killing protected animals such as pandas can 
result in a jail sentence of up to 10 years, and can even attract the death 
penalty.


The perpetrators have been identified as brothers Wang Wenlin and Wang Wencai 
who shot the animal in a forest near Zhaotong in Yunnan province. Later they 
confessed to the police that they had mistaken the adult female panda for a 
more common species of bear. The brothers then proceeded to eat some of the 
animal's meat and sold the remaining, including its paws, to a 3rd man 
identified as Li Kequan for about $750.


Wan Wei, deputy director of the investigation department of the Yunnan 
prosecuting office said, "The Wang brothers have confessed to killing the 
animal on 4 December in the hills outside their village." The court said the 
investigation into the killing of the panda has concluded and the 3 accused 
have been remanded for prosecution.


Last December, police received a tip-off regarding the illegal sale of bear 
meat. When the house of the Wang brothers was raided, a bear-like skin, skull 
and liver were discovered along with 10kg of meat, China's state run news 
agency Xinhua reported. But further investigation and DNA tests proved the 
carcass was of a female panda.


Although there is a thriving black market for exotic animal parts in China, 
panda meat being sold in a country, where the animal is considered a national 
treasure is unusual, experts believe.


The International Union for the Conservation of Nature lists giant pandas as 
endangered and are only confined to south-central China. The latest census by 
the World Wildlife Federation (WWF) in 2014 found that there were only 1,864 
giant pandas alive in the wild.


(source: Yahoo News)






INDIA:

Law panel's 'Death Penalty' report sent to Home Ministry, govt unlikely to 
support it



The Law Commission's report supporting abolition of death penalty except in 
terror-related cases has been forwarded to the Home Ministry for a final 
decision, amid indications that government may not be inclined to support it.


The report 'Death Penalty' was submitted to the Law Ministry by the Law 
Commission on August 31.


"Recently, we have forwarded it to the Home Ministry as changes in the Indian 
Penal Code is its domain," a senior Law Ministry functionary said here.


He said while a final call on the subject will be taken by the Home Ministry, 
it can refer the report back to the Law Ministry for any clarifications it may 
require.


2 government ap

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----ID., ARIZ., CALIF., ORE., USA

2015-09-24 Thread Rick Halperin






Sept. 24



IDAHO:

The death penalty remains an option for triple murder suspect John Lee


It's still an option for the triple murder suspect John Lee.

The Latah County prosecutor wants more time to decide if he'll seek the harsh 
sentence. On Friday, a county judge granted the extension.


Thompson's original deadline for a decision was October, but now it's December 
1.


On August 4, Lee pleaded not guilty to 3 counts of 1st degree murder charges 
and 1 count of aggravated battery.


Moscow police say on January 10, Lee shot and killed his adoptive mother, 
landlord and an Arby's manager, and wounded a Seattle man.


If convicted, he faces life in prison or possibly the death penalty. His trial 
is set for May 2.


(source: KLEW TV news)






ARIZONAforeign national faces death penalty

Prosecutors to seek death penalty against Mesa QuickTrip murder suspect


Prosecutors intend to seek the death penalty against the undocumented immigrant 
charged with the murder of a Mesa gas station clerk.


Video evidence from the January incident shows Apolinar Altamirano, 30, shoot 
Grant Ronnebeck in the head inside the Quik Trip near Stapley Drive and 
Broadway Road, according to court documents.


One reason Altamirano shot Ronnebeck, 21, was to make a financial gain, in this 
case 2 boxes of cigarettes, according to documents filed by the Maricopa County 
Attorney's Office.


Altamirano pleaded not guilty to the charges against him.

He was awaiting deportation proceedings when he allegedly shot Ronnebeck, 
according to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).


A representative of the Mexican government has appeared at several of 
Altamirano's hearings, records show.


Aggravating factors that allow the prosecution to seek the death penalty 
include the "especially heinous, cruel or depraved manner" of the crime and 
that Altamirano gained financially from the crime (by taking the cigarettes), 
according to the prosecution's filing.


Altamirano is at least the 2nd undocumented immigrant arrested in Maricopa 
County this year who could face the death penalty if convicted of 1st-degree 
murder.


(source: East Valley Tribune)






CALIFORNIA:

Retrial sought for Kevin Cooper, convicted in 1983 massacreAttorneys plan 
to present governor with report that says Kevin Cooper's rights were violated.



Attorneys for death row inmate Kevin Cooper announced plans to ask Gov. Jerry 
Brown to grant their client a retrial Wednesday, Sept. 23, after an 
international human rights advocacy group found "multiple violations of 
Cooper's human rights during his prosecution, conviction and sentencing."


The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, a branch of the Organization of 
American States, concluded in a 32-page report that if California executes 
Cooper, the state would be committing "a serious and irreparable violation of 
the basic right to life."


Cooper's attorneys from the Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe law firm plan to 
present the report to Brown in hopes that he will grant their client a new 
trial that will include forensic testing.


"Before an innocent man is executed, we urge Governor Brown to take the steps 
that the (report) recommends: to review Mr. Cooper's trial and sentence," 
Norman Hile, 1 of Cooper's attorneys, said in a news release. "Mr. Cooper 
deserves the chance to prove that he is innocent."


By Wednesday afternoon, Brown's office had not received the attorneys' 
petition, spokeswoman Deborah Hoffman said via email.


Cooper was convicted of killing 2 adults, their daughter and a neighbor boy 
during a knife-and-hatchet attack in Chino Hills in 1983. Throughout the trial 
and appeal process, Cooper has maintained that evidence was planted or 
contaminated, that he was framed, and that the real killer or killers have 
escaped justice.


State officials say Cooper has exhausted all his appeals. He could be among the 
first inmates put to death when California ends a years-long hiatus on 
executions.


In 2004, Cooper won a last-minute stay on his execution from the 9th U.S. 
Circuit Court of Appeals. However, additional hearings and forensic tests did 
not prove Cooper's claim of innocence, a judge ruled.


In 2009, the 9th Circuit denied him a rehearing, but multiple judges strongly 
dissented that ruling, including 1 who wrote, "the state of California may be 
about to execute an innocent man."


For the 10th time, he asked the U.S. Supreme Court to take his appeal, but 
justices declined to review the case.


In 2011, Cooper's attorneys petitioned the Inter-American Commission on Human 
Rights to review the case. The organization issued its report in July.


The commission found 8 instances of "the denial of Cooper's right to due 
process" during the trial and appeals processes, his attorneys said. Those 
instances include evidence mishandling, evidence destruction and evidence 
tampering by law enforcement and the prosecution, according to the news 
release

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----OHIO, TENN., ILL., OKLA.

2015-09-24 Thread Rick Halperin



Sept. 24



OHIO:

Ohio bill puts limits on post-trial death penalty evidence


An Ohio Senate committee has voted to allow limits on the ability of condemned 
killers to gather post-trial evidence in death penalty cases.


New language in the bill before the Senate Criminal Justice Committee allows 
judges to deny requests for evidence gathering if it would annoy, embarrass or 
unduly burden the person from whom the evidence is sought.


The Republican-controlled committee approved the change along party lines 
Wednesday but did not vote on the overall bill itself.


Republican Sen. Bill Seitz of Cincinnati says the bill is still an improvement 
over existing law which leaves the decision to allow post-trial evidence 
gathering up to judges.


Kari Underwood of the Ohio Public Defender's Office says such evidence limits 
are inappropriate in death penalty cases.


(source: Associated Press)






TENNESSEE:

Cellmate indicted in "Tattoo Eddie" slashing death


Notorious double-murderer Edward Leroy "Tattoo Eddie" Harris met his fate 
behind bars, repeatedly slashed and stabbed with a prison-made shank wielded by 
his cellmate, a Morgan County grand jury has determined.


Gregory Smith, 34, serving a life sentence for a 2004 Dickson County murder 
conviction, has been indicted on a charge of 1st-degree murder.


Harris, 58, was serving concurrent life sentences for the murders nearly 30 
years ago of 2 employees of the Rocky Top Village Inn in Gatlinburg who were 
repeatedly stabbed and shot.


During the attack on him last March, Harris' aorta was slashed, and he bled to 
death.


Harris and Smith were "confirmed members of security threat groups," according 
to a news release from 9th Judicial District Attorney General Russell Johnson's 
office. The release doesn't specify which groups.


Harris's stabbing occurred March 10 in a housing unit lobby at Morgan County 
Correctional Complex, a state prison with about 2,400 inmates.


Tennessee Department of Correction video cameras captured the incident.

The Morgan County grand jury returned the indictment against Smith during its 
Monday session. He remains in the prison.


Harris and 3 cohorts were charged with the killings on Sept. 13, 1986, of clerk 
Melissa Hill, 21, and night guard Troy Valentine, 36. Each victim suffered 
repeated stab wounds and gunshot wounds in a robbery that netted $413 and the 
contents of Hill's purse. Harris was convicted in 1988.


Also convicted in separate trials were Kimberly Pelley and Joseph DeModica, of 
Gwinett County, Ga. They received concurrent life sentences.


A 4th defendant, Rufus Doby, a female impersonator also known as Ashley 
Silvers, pleaded guilty to 2nd-degree murder and received a 25-year prison 
sentence.


A jury in the Harris trial originally imposed the death penalty. But the state 
Court of Criminal Appeals reduced that punishment to life in prison without 
parole.


The court opined the death penalty couldn't be imposed because Harris' IQ was 
70. Under a change in the law, the death penalty isn't permitted when the 
defendant has an IQ of 70 or lower.


(source: Knoxville News Sentinel)

*

'Dead Man Walking' nun urges students to fight death penalty


Sister Helen Prejean could have been at the White House welcoming the pope. 
Instead the nun famous for writing "Dead Man Walking" chose to spend her day 
speaking to a group of Nashville college students about the death penalty.


Prejean has been the spiritual adviser to several death row prisoners, most 
recently Oklahoma's Richard Glossip. His execution was halted just hours before 
he was scheduled to die last week after a state appeals court agreed to hear 
new evidence.


That chain of events was largely set in motion by Prejean, who believes Glossip 
is innocent.


Prejean spoke Wednesday at Belmont University about the events in her life that 
led her to become one of the country's foremost death penalty opponents. And 
she urged the students to take a stand as well.


(source: Associated Press)






ILLINOIS:

IL Lawmakers propose to reinstate death penalty


Should the death penalty come back to Illinois? Some lawmakers say it should 
and have a bill they hope will make it to the floor for a debate.


Unlike the old death penalty, it would only be used in a few cases.

One of them is when is when a police officer or other law enforcement office is 
killed.


26 officers have been shot and killed this year and lawmakers say that's a 
wakeup call.


"I want to bring this back as a deterrent before you try to hurt somebody who's 
protecting us and our homes, you better think twice," said Rep.Bill Mitchell, 
101st district.


Lawmakers say Illinois made a mistake when it completely banned the death 
penalty 4 years ago.


They say it needs to be brought back, but in a different way.

"It's not the old death penalty that has some flaws. This is a totally new 
death penalty," said Rep. John Cabello, 68th district.


The new penal

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, VA., N.C., GA., FLA., LA.

2015-09-24 Thread Rick Halperin





Sept. 24



TEXASstay of impending execution

Execution date put off for Fort Worth killer


The execution of a convicted Fort Worth killer, scheduled for next month, has 
been called off while a state commission addresses concerns raised recently 
about DNA statistics and interpretation.


Tarrant County prosecutors filed a motion Monday in 297th District Court, 
asking the judge to recall the death warrant for Christopher Chubasco Wilkins, 
who was scheduled to be executed Oct. 28.


The prosecutors wrote that they were seeking the recall because the Texas 
Forensic Science Commission "is in the process of addressing emerging issues 
involving the calculation of DNA population statistics and DNA mixture 
interpretation."


"While the State has no reason to believe that these DNA issues are material to 
or have any effect on [Wilkins'] conviction and death sentence, the State 
believes that a stay of [Wilkins'] currently scheduled execution should be 
granted in order to allow the parties to more fully investigate these matters."


State District Judge David Hagerman signed an order that day, withdrawing the 
execution date and recalling the death warrant.


DNA, including mixed DNA, was among evidence presented at the 2008 trial of 
Wilkins, who was convicted of fatally shooting 2 men - Willie Freeman and Mike 
Silva - on Oct. 27, 2005.


Other evidence implicating Wilkins included fingerprints found inside and 
outside Silva's vehicle. A pentagram and the numbers 666 were carved into the 
hood of Silva's vehicle - matching tattoos on Wilkins.


But perhaps most damning was Wilkins' own testimony, in which he admitted to 
jurors that he killed Freeman out of revenge after Freeman ripped him off in a 
dope deal. He said he killed Silva, who had been with Freeman, simply because 
he was in the wrong place at the wrong time.


Wilkins also told jurors that he killed another man, Gilbert Vallejo, the day 
before outside a south Fort Worth bar during a dispute about a pay phone.


He told jurors that he didn't care whether he lived or died, and he said 
whatever they chose for him was fine.


"I am as undecided as you are," Wilkins told jurors. "You've got a job to do. 
You tell the judge, 'Get a rope' or not. ...


"Look, it is no big deal. It is no big deal."

The jury chose death, and prosecutors still intend to see that the sentence is 
delivered, said Sam Jordan, a spokeswoman for the Tarrant County district 
attorney's office.


In an email responding to questions from the Star-Telegram on Wednesday, Jordan 
said the office has had the DNA recalculated and has received an amended report 
that confirms compliance with current lab interpretation and reporting 
protocols.


Prosecutors hope to proceed with the Wilkins case after the state commission 
meets in October, when the DNA mixture issue is expected to be addressed.


"It is our intention to enforce the jury's decision in this case," Jordan said.

Hilary Sheard, Wilkins' attorney, said, "That funny sound you hear is heads 
being scratched across the state as people try to figure this out."


"It is clearly a major issue in many cases, and I think that the state acted 
entirely appropriately in choosing to withdraw, or asking the court to 
withdraw, the warrant in these circumstances."


Sheard said she hopes the delay will "allow sufficient time for other issues in 
the case to continue to be litigated."


DNA concerns arise

Concerns arose this spring when the FBI notified all Combined DNA Index System 
laboratories that minor discrepancies had been identified in the DNA 
statistical population database used by labs nationwide since 1999.


The discrepancies in the database, which is used to calculate DNA match 
statistics in criminal and human identification cases, were attributed to human 
error and technological limitations.


The FBI has since provided corrected data to labs.

"The immediate and obvious question for the criminal justice community was 
whether the discrepancies could have impacted the outcome of any criminal 
cases," the Texas Forensic Science Commission wrote as part of a letter and 
attached memo to the criminal justice community. The letter was posted on the 
commission's website Aug. 21.


Concerns arose this spring when the FBI notified all Combined DNA Index System 
laboratories that minor discrepancies had been identified in the DNA 
statistical population database used by labs nationwide since 1999.


"The widely accepted consensus among forensic DNA experts is the database 
corrections have no impact on the threshold question of whether a victim or 
defendant was included or excluded in any result."


Mixed DNA interpretation

But adding to the concerns is that many labs have interpreted DNA mixtures 
found on evidence differently over the years.


The scientific acceptability of some of those approaches has now been brought 
into question, and several labs are adopting a new standard of interpreting 
mixed DNA