[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS

2018-03-27 Thread Rick Halperin





March 27



TEXASexecution

Texas executes inmate who killed woman, stuffed body in a suitcase


Rosendo Rodriguez III, 38, was executed Tuesday evening in Huntsville for the 
2005 murder of a Lubbock woman whose battered naked body was found stuffed in a 
suitcase that had been dumped in the trash.


Summer Baldwin was a prostitute who was 10 weeks pregnant when she was raped 
and beaten to death, according to court records.


Landfill workers in Lubbock found her body in September 2005.

The suitcase purchase was tracked back to Rodriguez, who had been in Lubbock 
for Marine reserve training.


He was arrested at his parents' home in San Antonio.

Rodriguez, who became known as the “suitcase killer,” also confessed to killing 
a 16-year-old Lubbock girl and disposing of her body in a similar manner.


The U.S. Supreme Court refused without comment to block the execution less than 
30 minutes before Rodriguez was scheduled to be taken into the death chamber in 
Huntsville.


His lawyers had questioned the credibility of a medical examiner who testified 
at Rodriguez's trial about the fatal injuries Baldwin suffered.


Rodriguez becomes the 4th condemned inmate to be put to death this year in 
tTexas and the 549th overall since the state resumed executions on December 7, 
1982.


Rodriguez becomes the 7th condemned inmate to be put to death this year in the 
USA and the 1472nd overall since the nation resumed executions on Janaury 17, 
1977.


(sources: Associated Press & Rick Halperin)
___
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty


[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide

2018-03-27 Thread Rick Halperin





March 27



GREAT BRITAIN:

A brief history of capital punishment in BritainBetween the late 17th and 
early 19th century, Britain's 'Bloody Code' made more than 200 crimes - many of 
them trivial - punishable by death. Writing for History Extra, criminologist 
and historian Lizzie Seal considers the various ways in which capital 
punishment has been enforced throughout British history and investigates the 
timeline to its abolition in 1965




British forms of punishment

From as early as the Anglo-Saxon era, right up to 1965 when the death penalty 
was abolished, the main form of capital punishment in Britain was hanging. 
Initially, this involved placing a noose around the neck of the condemned and 
suspending them from the branch of a tree. Ladders and carts were used to hang 
people from wooden gallows, which entailed death by asphyxiation.


In the late 13th century the act of hanging morphed into the highly ritualised 
practice of 'drawing, hanging and quartering' - the severest punishment 
reserved for those who had committed treason. In this process, 'drawing' 
referred to the dragging of the condemned to the place of execution. After they 
were hanged, their body was punished further by disembowelling, beheading, 
burning and 'quartering' - cutting off the limbs. The perpetrator's head and 
limbs were often publicly displayed following the execution.


Later, the 'New Drop' gallows - first used at London's Newgate Prison in 1783 - 
could accommodate two or three prisoners at a time and were constructed on 
platforms with trapdoors through which the condemned fell. The innovation of 
the 'long drop' [a method of hanging which considered the weight of the 
condemned, the length of the drop and the placement of the knot] in the later 
19th century caused death by breaking the condemned's neck, which was deemed 
quicker and less painful than strangling.


Burning at the stake was another form of capital punishment, used in England 
from the 11th century for heresy and the 13th century for treason. It was also 
used specifically for women convicted of petty treason (the charge given for 
the murder of her husband or employer). Though hanging replaced burning as the 
method of capital punishment for treason in 1790, the burning of those 
suspected of witchcraft was practiced in Scotland until the 18th century.


For other - perhaps luckier - souls and for those of noble birth who were 
condemned to die, execution by beheading (which was considered the least brutal 
method of execution) was used until the 18th century. Death by firing squad was 
also used as form of execution by the military.


The 'Bloody Code'

Britain's 'Bloody Code' was the name given to the legal system between the 
late-17th and early-19th century which made more than 200 offences - many of 
them petty - punishable by death. Statutes introduced between 1688 and 1815 
covered primarily property offences, such as pickpocketing, cutting down trees 
and shoplifting.


Nevertheless, despite the 'mushrooming' of capital crimes, fewer people were 
actually executed in the 18th century than during the preceding 2 centuries. 
This paradox can be explained by the specificity of the capital statutes, which 
meant it was often possible to convict people of lesser crimes. For example, 
theft of goods above a certain value carried the death penalty, so the jury 
could circumvent this by underestimating the value of said goods.


Certain regions with more autonomy, including Scotland, Wales and Cornwall, 
were particularly reluctant to implement the Bloody Code and, by the 1830s, 
executions for crimes other than murder had become extremely rare.


Vocal critics of the Bloody Code included early 19th-century MP Sir Samuel 
Romilly, who worked for its reform. A barrister by profession, he was appointed 
solicitor general [a senior law officer of the crown] and entered the House of 
Commons in 1806. He succeeded in repealing the death penalty for some minor 
crimes and in ending the use of disembowelling convicted criminals while alive. 
Later, liberal MP William Ewart brought bills which abolished hanging in chains 
(in 1834) and ended capital punishment for cattle stealing and other minor 
offences (in 1837).


In the 1840s, prominent figures including writers Charles Dickens and William 
Makepeace Thackeray highlighted what they believed to be the brutalising 
effects of public hanging. Far from encouraging solemnity, hangings were 
entertaining spectacles that whipped up the crowd's passions, they argued - and 
the presence of the crowd was a potential source of unruliness. Dickens 
attended the executions of Maria and Frederick Manning at Horsemonger Lane 
Gaol, south London, in 1849. The pair had been convicted of the murder of a 
customs official named Patrick O'Connor, whom they had killed and buried under 
the kitchen floorboards at their London home. Their case was nicknamed by the 
press: "the Bermondsey Horror". Dickens later 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----MO., NEB., COLO., CALIF., USA

2018-03-27 Thread Rick Halperin





March 27



MISSOURI:

May 2019 trial date set in 2016 Hannibal shooting death



A 2019 trial date was set Monday for the Hannibal man charged in the January 
2016 shooting death of a Hannibal woman and the shooting of her husband.


Court records show that Timothy M. Brokes is set to go to trial starting May 7, 
2019, which is expected to last 10 days. The jury will be brought in from 
Franklin County.


If Brokes is convicted, Marion County Prosecuting Attorney David Clayton said 
he will seek the death penalty.


Brokes, 36, has pleaded not guilty to charges of first-degree murder and armed 
criminal action in the Jan. 12, 2016, shooting death of 30-year-old Brittany S. 
Gauch and to 1st-degree assault and armed criminal action in the shooting of 
her husband, Aaron M. Gauch, the same day.


A ruling was not made regarding whether recorded statements Brokes made to 
police in the Marion County Jail after his arrest are admissible in court. His 
attorneys, Assistant Public Defenders David Kenyon and Charles Hoskins, argue 
that the statements, which included a private conversation Brokes had with his 
attorney, should not be admitted during the trial.


During a January hearing, Judge Rachel Bringer Shepherd said she would wait for 
a Missouri Supreme Court ruling on a similar case. SClBAlso Monday, Brokes' 
attorneys argued to suppress evidence collected during the search of 1104 
Summer St. in Hannibal, where Brittany Gauch was fatally shot, and the Bel-Air 
Motel in Monroe City, where Brokes allegedly stayed after the 
shootings.SClBPolice reportedly found bullet fragments, cellphones and other 
items in Hannibal, and a gun was recovered from the hotel.SClBClayton argued 
that Brokes' rights were not violated during the search.


Brokes is set to go to trial starting June 12 in Monroe County, where he faces 
charges of assault on a law enforcement officer, armed criminal action and 
hindering prosecution of a felony. A pretrial hearing in that case is set for 
May 15.


Brokes is being held in the Marion County Jail.

(source: The Herald-Whig)








NEBRASKA:

ACLU of Nebraska files new challenge to state's death penalty



The ACLU of Nebraska has filed a new legal challenge to the state's death 
penalty, claiming that the state adopted a flawed execution protocol without 
adequate public review in 2017.


The civil rights organization, which had a recent challenge to capital 
punishment dismissed, filed a new lawsuit Monday in Lancaster County District 
Court.


The lawsuit asked the court to block any pending executions until the state 
enacts a protocol that is in compliance with the state's Administrative 
Procedures Act, and has proper public input and review.


"The (Nebraska Department of Correctional Services) promulgated this very 
important protocol, upon which lives literally depend, on a single try and 
without making any drafts or working copies at all, and without consulting any 
public or private experts," the lawsuit states.


The new challenge comes as Nebraska is preparing for its 1st executions in more 
than 2 decades.


2 convicted murderers, Jose Sandoval and Carey Dean Moore, have been informed 
in recent months of the state's intention to seek execution dates for them.


That has prompted new challenges by the ACLU of the state's lethal injection 
protocol and of its procurement of new drugs needed to carry out executions.


The organization recently lost a lawsuit questioning the 2016 voter referendum 
that reinstated capital punishment. But two weeks ago, it asked the federal 
Drug Enforcement Administration to formally investigate how the state recently 
obtained a new supply of 4 execution drugs.


The new lawsuit on Monday was filed on behalf of State Sen. Ernie Chambers of 
Omaha, a leading opponent of the death penalty, and the Rev. Stephen Griffith, 
who said he was prevented from participating in the rule-making process in 2017 
that led to the execution protocol.


In January 2017, the state adopted a new lethal injection protocol designed to 
give the state corrections director wide latitude to choose the type and source 
of drugs being used and to keep that information confidential. 20 people 
testified at a public hearing over the change on Dec. 30, 2016.


(source: Omaha World-Herald)








COLORADO:

3 Ways to Kill the Death Penalty in Colorado



The Colorado Supreme Court recently upheld a lower court's decision to reverse 
David Bueno's first-degree-murder conviction because evidence that might have 
helped him was withheld in his death-penalty case. Michael Radelet, a 
University of Colorado Boulder sociology professor and author of The History of 
the Death Penalty in Colorado, the definitive work on its subject, sees the 
Bueno case as a particularly compelling argument in favor of ending capital 
punishment in the state once and for all, and he sees multiple possibilities 
for how it might finally happen.


"There are 3 scenarios," says Radelet, 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, N.C., ALA., OHIO, ARK.

2018-03-27 Thread Rick Halperin





March 27



TEXASimpending execution

Lubbock's "suitcase killer" fights upcoming executionRosendo Rodriguez is 
set to die for killing a Lubbock prostitute and tossing her body in a dumpster 
in a suitcase. His final appeals claim the medical examiner's testimony that 
she was sexually assaulted before her death could be invalid.




The man dubbed Lubbock's "suitcase killer" is set for execution Tuesday 
evening, 1 day after his 38th birthday.


Rosendo Rodriguez was sentenced to death in the 2005 murder and sexual assault 
of Summer Baldwin, a newly pregnant prostitute, according to court records. 
Baldwin's body was found folded inside a suitcase at the city's landfill. 
Rodriguez was also implicated in the 2004 murder of 16-year-old Joanna Rogers, 
whose body was also found in a suitcase in the landfill after Baldwin was 
discovered.


He still has a final appeal pending in the U.S. Supreme Court questioning the 
credibility of the medical examiner's testimony and arguing that Baldwin wasn't 
sexually assaulted, but if it is rejected, Rodriguez will become the 4th person 
executed in Texas this year and the 7th in the nation.


Lubbock County Criminal District Attorney Matt Powell told the Texas Tribune 
Monday that he finds no joy in the execution but that Rodriguez is a man who 
deserves the ultimate punishment.


"Who sticks a human being in a suitcase and throws them out with the trash?" 
Powell questioned. "This was a guy that, left unchecked, was going to hurt 
somebody else again and was going to continue to terrorize women."


At the time of Baldwin's death, Rodriguez was in Lubbock training for the U.S. 
Marines, according to court opinions. He was tied to the murder after 
investigators found the suitcase she was in had been purchased with Rodriguez's 
debit card. Further investigation found Baldwin's blood and a tag for the 
suitcase in his hotel room.


Rodriguez told police the 2 had consensual sex but that when he fought with her 
over her drug use afterward, she lunged at him with knives and he put her in a 
chokehold, accidentally killing her. But the medical examiner, Sridhar 
Natarajan, said Baldwin's body showed injuries consistent with sexual assault, 
upping the charges and making the murder case eligible for the death penalty.


Prosecutors offered to accept a life sentence instead of the death penalty if 
Rodriguez also confessed to the murder of Rogers the year before and helped 
authorities find her body, according to court documents. He was already 
connected to her disappearance before Baldwin's murder based on internet chats 
and phone records. Rodriguez confessed to Rogers' murder and told investigators 
he had also put her body in a dumpster in a suitcase. She was eventually found 
in the same landfill as Baldwin.


But before the court appearance to finalize the plea deal, Rodriguez backed 
out, claiming he couldn't understand anything he was being told by his 
attorney. Though they couldn't use the Rogers confession, Lubbock County 
prosecutors decided to seek the death penalty in Baldwin's case.


He was found guilty of capital murder and, during his punishment trial, though 
attorneys presented evidence of an abusive, alcoholic father and his family 
portrayed Rodriguez as a prior Texas Tech student who could have become 
president, ex-girlfriends and other women said he raped or assaulted them. The 
jury chose death.


But Rodriguez's lawyers haven't given up on his life. His final appeals lay in 
the hands of the U.S. Supreme Court justices. The filing argues that a recent 
lawsuit calls into question the credibility of the medical examiner's testimony 
that defined the Baldwin case as sexual assault - which is what made the case a 
death penalty case. (Prosecutors at trial also argued Rodriguez's case could be 
death-penalty eligible because Baldwin was pregnant, but the argument was 
pushed aside in appeals because there was no indication Rodriguez knew she was 
pregnant.)


Last year, Natarajan and Lubbock County paid $230,000 in settling a wrongful 
termination lawsuit after a former employee claimed she was fired for speaking 
out on the medical examiner's habit of leaving the office and delegating 
autopsies to unqualified staff and then signing off on them. Rodriguez's 
lawyer, Seth Kretzer, said the lawsuit and settlement raise suspicion of 
Natarajan's testimony in Baldwin's case and should be evaluated in federal 
court.


"At the minimum, we should be allowed to take the good doctor's deposition and 
find out if he actually did the autopsy or not," Kretzer said, adding that 
he'll fight for his client until the last hour of the last day of his life.


Natarajan, who still serves as the county's chief medical examiner, did not 
return phone calls Monday. But Powell said the appeal is nonsense, adding that 
he was there while Natarajan performed Baldwin's autopsy.


"I have no trouble with his lawyers exhausting every avenue that they can, but