[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----worldwide

2019-08-13 Thread Rick Halperin





August 13



JAPAN:

Hanged spree killer still provoking human rights debate



Half a century since his arrest in 1969, and 22 years since his execution, 
Norio Nagayama, a repentant juvenile spree killer who became a prolific writer 
behind bars, is still provoking debate on issues surrounding capital 
punishment, poverty and the rights of children.


The most concrete legacy left by Nagayama, who was just 19 when he carried out 
his 4 killings over a period of several weeks, is a fund set up to donate the 
royalties from his books to poor children in Peru, with the hope that none 
follow the path he did from a broken family and crushing poverty to crime.


But events held around the anniversary each year of his execution on Aug. 1, 
1997, by the Nagayama Children Fund to raise further money for Peruvian 
children have also become a forum for discussions surrounding how society 
should treat juvenile offenders, drawing lawyers, psychiatrists and others 
involved in the debate.


According to the Tokyo Bar Association, which recently bestowed a human rights 
award on the fund, it has, through its activities, "raised issues concerning 
how the judiciary should face juvenile crimes and if the death penalty should 
be maintained" given the circumstances of Nagayama's case.


Born into an extremely poor family in a rural northeastern town, Nagayama was 
abandoned by his mother at age 5 and also had to overcome both an abusive 
brother and the death of his gambling-addict father whose life ended in 
destitution.


In 1965, Nagayama moved to Tokyo at a time when Japan was experiencing an era 
of high economic growth. His killings took place between mid-October and early 
November of 1968, with Nagayama robbing his last 2 victims of money. When he 
was arrested the following year, he was still 19 and thus considered a minor 
under Japanese law.


Initially given the death penalty, the Tokyo High Court commuted the sentence 
to a life term, arguing the government had failed to rescue him from his 
deprived surroundings and that it would be "unfair to ignore the lack of proper 
welfare policies and lay all the responsibilities on the defendant."


The Supreme Court, however, finalized the death sentence in 1990.

At this year's event organized by the fund in Tokyo in late July, with some 200 
people attending, the guest speaker was Tadaari Katayama, who lost his 
8-year-old son in a traffic accident in 1997.


"We have rather taken the side of the perpetrator, while Mr. Katayama has 
worked on the side of victims," said Kyoko Otani, Nagayama's former defense 
lawyer who also heads the fund. "I wanted his participation in our event to 
promote mutual understanding, so each of us could expand the capacities of our 
activities."


A believer, despite his own bereavement, in the need to rehabilitate criminals 
rather than punish them, Katayama visits prisons and juvenile reformatories 
across Japan to talk with inmates in his capacity as a victim's family member.


"(Criminals) should have opportunities to feel someone's pain, and they should 
be imprisoned only if they must be isolated in the process of their 
rehabilitation," he said during the event.


"I have been involved in educational programs at detention facilities, with 
expectations that the inmates will be able to become happy (as a result of 
rehabilitation)," he said. "It will make me happy, too, if they could lead 
happy lives."


Katayama received the human rights award of the association together with the 
children's fund, and the lawyer's group praised his effort to promote 
"restorative justice," which aims to rehabilitate criminals and bring closure 
to victims through dialogue between them as well as with communities.


Those he meets at juvenile reformatories are often the less fortunate, just 
like Nagayama, he said, adding that he "wonders what society and the older 
people around them have done for them...I think they must feel lonely."


His disavowal of retribution in criminal justice also makes him a firm opponent 
of the death penalty. "It should not be accepted that the power of the state 
can be used to forcibly take someone's life...We need to end the cycle of 
retribution," he said.


His stance on rehabilitation, however, particularly as someone representing 
victims, stands in contrast to growing voices calling for tougher punishments 
of crimes.


While more than 2/3 of states around the world have abolished the death 
penalty, Japan has been reluctant to follow suit, partly because of high public 
support for it. A 2014 opinion poll by the Cabinet Office showed only 9.7 % 
believed the death penalty "should be abolished" while 80.3 % said its 
existence "cannot be helped".


The latest executions came this month, bringing the number carried out under 
the government of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who took office in 2012, to 38.


Some proponents of abolishing capital punishment have suggested replacing it 
with a life sentence 

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----COLO., UTAH, ARIZ., ORE., USA

2019-08-13 Thread Rick Halperin





August 13




COLORADO:

Money well spent? Death penalty stance means big bucks for La Junta DA’s office



Prosecuting the death penalty case for an inmate accused of murdering Colorado 
Department of Corrections Sgt. Mary Ricard and wounding another officer during 
a Sept. 24, 2012, attack is costing Coloradans big bucks, but taxpayers may 
never know just how much.


And prosecutors’ insistence on pursuing the death penalty - even though 
Colorado has not executed a criminal since 1997; the governor of the state 
opposes capital punishment; and Ricard’s family opposes execution for the 
killer - has added more than $1.6 million to the coffers of the District’s 
Attorney’s Office in Colorado’s 16th Judicial District in La Junta.


Miguel Contreras-Perez, now 40, has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity to 
first-degree murder in the stabbing death of Ricard, 55, at the Arkansas Valley 
prison in Ordway. Contreras-Perez also faces charges of attempted 1st-degree 
murder and 1st-degree assault in the attack on Sgt. Lori Gann, who survived.


The case has been mired down in legal maneuverings for the past 7 years, slowed 
by competency evaluations and changes in attorneys representing 
Contreras-Perez.


"This case has had so many frustrations from start to finish," said James 
Bullock, the 16th Judicial District Attorney, who is prosecuting the case.


Bullock declined to comment any further as "this case is still currently 
pending," he said.


As a part of that process, Bullock is allowed by state law to bill the Colorado 
Department of Corrections for the cost of prosecuting Contreras-Perez. A 
Colorado Open Records Act Request filed by The Pueblo Chieftain on July 23 was 
fulfilled by the Colorado Department of Corrections and reveals the cost the 
taxpayers have had to shoulder for the prosecution.


From October of 2012 to July 1 of this year, the DOC has paid $1.665 million of 
taxpayers’ money to Bullock’s office. Billing’s notes indicate the fees have 
covered attorney, investigator, paralegal and support staff costs as well as 
supplies, service fees, transcript and postage costs associated with the case.


Currently, Denver Attorney David Lane and members of his staff are representing 
Contreras-Perez, who is held at the maximum-security section of Sterling 
Correctional Facility in Northern Colorado.


The Chieftain also made a Colorado Open Records request with the Colorado 
Office of Alternate Defense Council on Aug. 5, asking for documentation of the 
cost to state taxpayers to pay attorneys representing Contreras-Perez.


On Aug. 7, Deputy Director Darren Cantor denied the request based on a Colorado 
Supreme Court rule stating there are exceptions and limitations on access to 
records, and that agencies must deny inspection if the records have privileged 
information; confidential legal, commercial, financial, geological, or 
geophysical data; and confidential personal information.


"State lawmakers in 2015 killed a bill that would have made the State Public 
Defender’s Office and the Office of Alternate Defense Counsel subject to CORA. 
At the time, reporters were trying to get records from the public defender 
showing how much that office spent to keep James Holmes from the death 
penalty," said Jeffrey Roberts, executive director of the Colorado Freedom of 
Information Coalition. Holmes on July 20, 2012, killed 12 people and injured 70 
others when he opened fire in an Aurora movie theater.


"Since then, the judicial branch adopted the rules cited by Cantor."

Although the Chieftain did not seek any personal or confidential information, 
the request was denied.


"Yes, they seem to be interpreting that provision very broadly," Roberts said.

Crowley County District Court Judge Michael Schiferl was overseeing the case 
against Contreras-Perez and agreed to a change of venue last year, so Pueblo 
District Court Judge William Alexander took over the case last August. 
Currently, the case is set for a 6-month jury trial starting Jan. 6.


Conteras-Perez is scheduled to appear in court today for a status conference. 
The case involves hundreds of witnesses, 55,000 pages of evidence, hostile 
witnesses, El Salvadorian witnesses from Conteras-Perez’s native country, who 
Lane fears may encounter difficulty getting into the U.S. to testify.


During a February 2014 preliminary hearing spanning 3 days starting in December 
2013, videotaped interviews were played in the courtroom and Contreras-Perez 
talked of a relationship with Gann. He later recanted his statements.


He initially said the relationship involved her accepting love notes from him 
and letting him touch her without writing him up for breaking the rules. He 
told investigators that she halted the relationship, but at times would change 
her attitude and that had confused him.


Later, in letters he sent to the district attorney’s office, Contreras-Perez 
recanted about the relationship and said, "I tried to pass notes a

[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----TEXAS, FLA., TENN., ILL., MO.

2019-08-13 Thread Rick Halperin





August 13



TEXAS:

DA to seek death penalty for Cedric Marks



The Bell County District Attorney’s office will seek the death penalty for 
Cedric Marks if he is convicted.


"We have filed with the district clerk our notice that we will seek the death 
penalty in the Cedric Marks case, in connection with the murders of Michael 
Swearingin and Jenna Scott," Bell County District Attorney Henry Garza 
confirmed Monday.


(source: The Temple Daily Telegram)








FLORIDA:

State seeks death for man accused in Tampa bus driver's slaying  The 
Hillsborough State Attorney's Office filed a notice in the case of Justin Ryan 
McGriff, accused of slashing the throat of HART bus driver Thomas Dunn




Prosecutors will seek a death sentence for a man accused of stabbing to death a 
Tampa bus driver.


The office of Hillsborough State Attorney Andrew Warren filed a notice of 
intent to seek the death penalty late last month in the case of Justin Ryan 
McGriff, who is charged with 1st-degree murder in the May 18 killing of Thomas 
Dunn.


Surveillance videos captured the attack on Dunn, 46, whose throat was cut as he 
steered a Hillsborough Area Regional Transit bus along N Nebraska Avenue.


Photographs from the recording, which were used as evidence in a pretrial 
detetion hearing in May, show a man, whom police identified as McGriff sitting 
in the rear of the bus. He removes something from his pants pocket, according 
to court testimony, then walks forward and stands behind the driver.


"God bless you," McGriff said, according to court testimony.

"What was that?" Dunn asked.

"God bless you," he repeated.

"Thank you," Dunn said. "God bless you, too."

After that, McGriff lunged forward, slitting Dunn’s throat, according to 
police.


Dunn steered the bus to the right and hit the brakes as he collapsed. As 
passengers panicked, McGriff forced his way out the bus door, police said. 
Officers later spotted him nearby and arrested him.


In June, McGriff’s public defenders suggested that he may be mentally ill. One 
of McGriff’s roommates told police that his behavior in the days before his 
arrest was erratic, according to a court document.


A judge appointed 2 doctors to determine whether he is competent to proceed 
toward trial. If he is declared incompetent, he would likely spend time in a 
state hospital before the case against him could continue.


Warren, who became the county's top prosecutor in 2017, has been reluctant to 
seek death sentences in cases where a defendant’s mental health is in question.


If McGriff is ultimately convicted of murder, prosecutors will have to prove 
the existence of at least one "aggravating circumstance” before a jury weighs 
whether a death sentence is justified. Prosecutors cited 4 such circumstances 
in Dunn’s slaying, among them that the crime was "especially heinous, 
atrocious, or cruel" and that it was done in a “cold, calculated, and 
premeditated manner."


The law requires that a unanimous jury recommendation to impose a death 
sentence. Otherwise, the penalty is life in prison.


(source: tampabay.com)








TENNESSEEimpending execution Lawyers, Advocates Seek Halt to Execution of 
Stephen West in Tennessee




Advocates from a variety of backgrounds are urging Tennessee Governor Bill Lee 
to stop the August 15, 2019 execution of Stephen West (pictured), saying that 
West did not commit the murder and urging the governor not to execute a man who 
is severely mentally ill.


In a July clemency petition that is pending before the governor, West’s lawyers 
argue for mercy based upon his innocence of murder and his debilitating 
psychological vulnerabilities. Though they concede that West was present at the 
murders of Wanda Romines and her daughter, Sheila Romines, and that he raped 
Sheila, West’s lawyers maintain that his co-defendant, Ronnie Martin, fatally 
stabbed the victims. The petition says that because of the chronic extreme 
abuse and trauma he experienced as a child, "Steve was not psychologically 
equipped to deal with the terrible situation he found himself in" and 
disassociated when he saw Martin killing the women.


The clemency petition asks what it calls "[a]n important question"--if Steve 
did not intend for either victim to be killed, how could he just stand by and 
watch while Martin did? The answer to this question," the petition suggests, 
"lies in Steve’s own tragic background." The petition describes the relentless 
abuse and neglect West endured, which included his mother beating him so hard 
with a broom that it snapped, his parents denying him food, and ongoing 
beatings that resulted in his ankles being broken at least seven times. The 
extreme trauma, the petition says, caused or exacerbated West’s severe mental 
illnesses, including schizophrenia and post-traumatic stress disorder. West’s 
parents retained a lawyer to defend him at trial, but instructed counsel not to 
discuss or present evidence relating to his famil