Re: CCC/CXX installation
see http://www.physik.tu-cottbus.de/~george/unix/ccc.html for my experience on using alien on the compaq .rpm's. It is tricky, especially if you use gcc 3.x, but it works. And you get your .deb. Regards, Ionut On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:04:55PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 07:49:59PM +0100, Juraj Holtak wrote: > > its time for: > > rpm -ivh --no-deps ccc_blabla > > rpm -ivh --no-deps cpml_blabla > > Well, you should at least use alien. > > -- John > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- *** * Ionut Georgescu * http://www.physik.tu-cottbus.de/~george/ * Registered Linux User #244479 * * "In Windows you can do everything Microsoft wants you to do; in Unix you *can do anything the computer is able to do."
Re: CCC/CXX installation
--- Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ccc is complaining that > > <<< > > ./compile speed.c > > cc: Error: /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h, line 71: Invalid declarator. > > (declarator) > > __pthread_cond_align_t __align; > > -^ > > >>> > > > > Which is being pulled in via . > > See bug #212233. As a workaround, rename __align to __align_ or > whatever. Thanks Falk. <<< Bug#212233: Member named "__align" causes conflict with Compaq C builtin >>> Conflict with Compaq C? It's in direct conflict with the ANSI/ISO C standard! 7.1.3 of n869 <<< All identifiers that begin with an underscore and either an uppercase letter or another underscore are always reserved for any use. >>> It's not big, and it's not clever. Phil = When inserting a CD, hold down shift to stop the AutoRun feature In the Device Manager, disable the SbcpHid device. http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~jhalderm/cd3/ __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/
Re: [tulip] tulip and alpha error kernel 2.4.22
On 27 Nov 2003, Martin Arrieta wrote: > i have one alpha lx164 with debian (woody) and kernel 2.4.22. > > #uname -a > Linux alpha 2.4.22 #7 Thu Nov 27 07:13:47 UYT 2003 alpha unknown .. > 00:05.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21140 > [FasterNet] (rev 22) > Subsystem: Netgear FA310TX Fast Ethernet ... > when i start the interface with linux tulip driver i get > > Nov 27 07:40:55 alpha kernel: eth0: (1) System Error occured (1) > Nov 27 07:40:55 alpha last message repeated 16 times > Nov 27 07:40:55 alpha kernel: eth0: (2) System Error occured (1) > Nov 27 07:40:55 alpha last message repeated 15 times ... > with scyld tulip driver i get the same error. That message isn't in the Scyld driver. A similar message is printk(KERN_ERR "%s: PCI Fatal Bus Error, %8.8x.\n", dev->name, csr5); The exact numbers in the output are critical for understanding the problem. What is the driver detection message? -- Donald Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com 914 Bay Ridge Road, Suite 220 Scyld Beowulf cluster system Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993
Re: CCC/CXX installation
Phil Carmody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I noticed the same problem recently. Go into the create-comp-config.sh
> > file and move the -v so it comes after the -V {GCC_PATH} thing.
>
> Yup, I tried that hack myself! It kinda-sorta seemed to work.
>
> > Also, I hacked it to call gcc instead of gcc-2.95. You may need to make
> > a few other minor adjustments to GCC_PATH.
>
> OK, I've not noticed anything that I can be sure is caused by that yet, but I
> am unable to build what I was trying to build :-(
>
> ccc is complaining that
> <<<
> ./compile speed.c
> cc: Error: /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h, line 71: Invalid declarator.
> (declarator)
> __pthread_cond_align_t __align;
> -^
> >>>
>
> Which is being pulled in via .
See bug #212233. As a workaround, rename __align to __align_ or
whatever.
--
Falk
Re: CCC/CXX installation
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:54:40AM -0800, Phil Carmody wrote: > John - would the 'gcc' rather than 'gcc-2.95' hack fix this? Should I > uninstall > the current installation and reinstall again? Unknown. It worked for me. I'm only about 3 days older at ccc than you are :-) -- John
Re: CCC/CXX installation
On Thursday 04 December 2003 19:54, Phil Carmody wrote: > <<< > ./compile speed.c > cc: Error: /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h, line 71: Invalid declarator. > (declarator) > __pthread_cond_align_t __align; > -^ > nope never seen that :-// > = > When inserting a CD, hold down shift to stop the AutoRun feature > In the Device Manager, disable the SbcpHid device. > http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~jhalderm/cd3/ > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > http://companion.yahoo.com/
Re: CCC/CXX installation
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 07:49:59PM +0100, Juraj Holtak wrote: > its time for: > rpm -ivh --no-deps ccc_blabla > rpm -ivh --no-deps cpml_blabla Well, you should at least use alien. -- John
Re: CCC/CXX installation
--- John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed the same problem recently. Go into the create-comp-config.sh
> file and move the -v so it comes after the -V {GCC_PATH} thing.
Yup, I tried that hack myself! It kinda-sorta seemed to work.
> Also, I hacked it to call gcc instead of gcc-2.95. You may need to make
> a few other minor adjustments to GCC_PATH.
OK, I've not noticed anything that I can be sure is caused by that yet, but I
am unable to build what I was trying to build :-(
ccc is complaining that
<<<
./compile speed.c
cc: Error: /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h, line 71: Invalid declarator.
(declarator)
__pthread_cond_align_t __align;
-^
>>>
Which is being pulled in via .
Juraj - this is the speed.c that you compiled for me last week - did you meet
anything like this?
John - would the 'gcc' rather than 'gcc-2.95' hack fix this? Should I uninstall
the current installation and reinstall again?
Phil
=
When inserting a CD, hold down shift to stop the AutoRun feature
In the Device Manager, disable the SbcpHid device.
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~jhalderm/cd3/
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/
Re: CCC/CXX installation
grab the rpms
shit on the debian way of installing
its time for:
rpm -ivh --no-deps ccc_blabla
rpm -ivh --no-deps cpml_blabla
it works under stable
dunno about testing
but hey! who wants to run testing software on alpha???...
:-)
cheers,
juraj
On Thursday 04 December 2003 19:44, John Goerzen wrote:
> I noticed the same problem recently. Go into the create-comp-config.sh
> file and move the -v so it comes after the -V {GCC_PATH} thing.
>
> Also, I hacked it to call gcc instead of gcc-2.95. You may need to make
> a few other minor adjustments to GCC_PATH.
>
> -- John
>
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:01:01AM -0800, Phil Carmody wrote:
> > OK, I grabbed the latest rpms, and have a key.
> > I noticed that the cxx rpm's version number is higher than the one in the
> > .deb, so decied to not try installing cxx, and just restrict myself to
> > ccc.
> >
> > However, when it comes to me and ccc, it was the same old same old:
> > <<<
> > Setting up ccc (6.5.9.001-1) ...
> > Error: gcc -V 2.95.4 failed to compile and link "int main(int argc, char
> > **argv) {return 0;}".
> >The ccc installation expects a working installation of GCC.
> > gcc: `-V' must come at the start of the command line
> > Aborting
> >
> > If you can correct the problem, you can rerun this script manually
> > by entering a command in the following format:
> >
> > create-comp-config.sh ccc-version [gcc-path]
> >
> > The current invocation of create-comp-config.sh was:
> >
> > /usr/lib/compaq/ccc-6.5.9.001-6/alpha-linux/bin/create-comp-config.sh
> > ccc-6.5.9.001-6 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/2.95.4
> > dpkg: error processing ccc (--configure):
> > subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> >
> >
> > Now, sure,
> > <<<
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:rpm$ gcc -V 2.95.4
> > gcc: couldn't run `alpha-linux-gcc-2.95.4': No such file or directory
> >
> > seems to fail, but why can _I_ quite happily run 2.95.4 if there's a
> > problem with it?
> > <<<
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:rpm$ gcc-2.95 -v
> > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/2.95.4/specs
> > gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:rpm$ gcc-2.95 -E -
> > # 1 ""
> >
> >
> > I even had a peek to see what alpha-linux-gcc-2.95.4 was likely to be,
> > and created what appeared to be the missing symbolic link:
> > <<<
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:bin$ sudo ln -s gcc-2.95 alpha-linux-gcc-2.95.4
> >
> > However, I still got exactly the same error as above.
> >
> > I'm very confused. Maybe I should just go into hibernation for 6 months
> > and try it again in spring, like I did last year.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > =
> > When inserting a CD, hold down shift to stop the AutoRun feature
> > In the Device Manager, disable the SbcpHid device.
> > http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~jhalderm/cd3/
> >
> > __
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
> > http://companion.yahoo.com/
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCC/CXX installation
I noticed the same problem recently. Go into the create-comp-config.sh
file and move the -v so it comes after the -V {GCC_PATH} thing.
Also, I hacked it to call gcc instead of gcc-2.95. You may need to make
a few other minor adjustments to GCC_PATH.
-- John
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:01:01AM -0800, Phil Carmody wrote:
> OK, I grabbed the latest rpms, and have a key.
> I noticed that the cxx rpm's version number is higher than the one in the
> .deb,
> so decied to not try installing cxx, and just restrict myself to ccc.
>
> However, when it comes to me and ccc, it was the same old same old:
> <<<
> Setting up ccc (6.5.9.001-1) ...
> Error: gcc -V 2.95.4 failed to compile and link "int main(int argc, char
> **argv) {return 0;}".
>The ccc installation expects a working installation of GCC.
> gcc: `-V' must come at the start of the command line
> Aborting
>
> If you can correct the problem, you can rerun this script manually
> by entering a command in the following format:
>
> create-comp-config.sh ccc-version [gcc-path]
>
> The current invocation of create-comp-config.sh was:
>
> /usr/lib/compaq/ccc-6.5.9.001-6/alpha-linux/bin/create-comp-config.sh
> ccc-6.5.9.001-6 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/2.95.4
> dpkg: error processing ccc (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> >>>
>
> Now, sure,
> <<<
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:rpm$ gcc -V 2.95.4
> gcc: couldn't run `alpha-linux-gcc-2.95.4': No such file or directory
> >>>
> seems to fail, but why can _I_ quite happily run 2.95.4 if there's a problem
> with it?
> <<<
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:rpm$ gcc-2.95 -v
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/2.95.4/specs
> gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:rpm$ gcc-2.95 -E -
> # 1 ""
> >>>
>
> I even had a peek to see what alpha-linux-gcc-2.95.4 was likely to be, and
> created what appeared to be the missing symbolic link:
> <<<
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:bin$ sudo ln -s gcc-2.95 alpha-linux-gcc-2.95.4
> >>>
> However, I still got exactly the same error as above.
>
> I'm very confused. Maybe I should just go into hibernation for 6 months and
> try
> it again in spring, like I did last year.
>
> Phil
>
> =
> When inserting a CD, hold down shift to stop the AutoRun feature
> In the Device Manager, disable the SbcpHid device.
> http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~jhalderm/cd3/
>
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
> http://companion.yahoo.com/
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Re: CCC/CXX installation
OK, I grabbed the latest rpms, and have a key.
I noticed that the cxx rpm's version number is higher than the one in the .deb,
so decied to not try installing cxx, and just restrict myself to ccc.
However, when it comes to me and ccc, it was the same old same old:
<<<
Setting up ccc (6.5.9.001-1) ...
Error: gcc -V 2.95.4 failed to compile and link "int main(int argc, char
**argv) {return 0;}".
The ccc installation expects a working installation of GCC.
gcc: `-V' must come at the start of the command line
Aborting
If you can correct the problem, you can rerun this script manually
by entering a command in the following format:
create-comp-config.sh ccc-version [gcc-path]
The current invocation of create-comp-config.sh was:
/usr/lib/compaq/ccc-6.5.9.001-6/alpha-linux/bin/create-comp-config.sh
ccc-6.5.9.001-6 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/2.95.4
dpkg: error processing ccc (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
>>>
Now, sure,
<<<
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:rpm$ gcc -V 2.95.4
gcc: couldn't run `alpha-linux-gcc-2.95.4': No such file or directory
>>>
seems to fail, but why can _I_ quite happily run 2.95.4 if there's a problem
with it?
<<<
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:rpm$ gcc-2.95 -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/2.95.4/specs
gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:rpm$ gcc-2.95 -E -
# 1 ""
>>>
I even had a peek to see what alpha-linux-gcc-2.95.4 was likely to be, and
created what appeared to be the missing symbolic link:
<<<
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:bin$ sudo ln -s gcc-2.95 alpha-linux-gcc-2.95.4
>>>
However, I still got exactly the same error as above.
I'm very confused. Maybe I should just go into hibernation for 6 months and try
it again in spring, like I did last year.
Phil
=
When inserting a CD, hold down shift to stop the AutoRun feature
In the Device Manager, disable the SbcpHid device.
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~jhalderm/cd3/
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/
Re: CCC/CXX installation
Hi Phil! http://h30097.www3.hp.com/linux/compaq_c/ is what u want! good hunt! Cheers, Juraj PS: i compiled with the beta version of ccc so it`s safe i think On Thursday 04 December 2003 17:12, Phil Carmody wrote: > It's probably time for my yearly attempt to install the Compaq C compiler, > and I'me hitting trouble before I even start (however, I'm not phased, it's > never worked i the past, and I'm desensitized now). > > I notice that I have the following files (downloaded from a previous > attempt) > > ccc-6.5.9.001-6.alpha.rpm.cryptcxx-6.5.9.28-1.alpha.rpm.crypt > > However, looking at my email records, it appears that I no longer have the > gpg key for the crypt files (almost certainly lost in a move between e-mail > providers). Are the downloads keyed to a particular user, or did everyone > get the same key? > > If the latter, I don't suppose one could mysteriously appear in my inbox, > could it? > > If the former, can anyone suggest a better search string than "compiler" on > the compaq (hp) alpha site. Getting _zero_ hits for "compiler" _really_ > isn't particularly impressive. > > Phil > > = > When inserting a CD, hold down shift to stop the AutoRun feature > In the Device Manager, disable the SbcpHid device. > http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~jhalderm/cd3/ > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > http://companion.yahoo.com/
Re: PCI Video Card?
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:44:59PM -, Peter Watkinson wrote: > > Is there any chance with a radeon 8500 agp? You mean in one of the API UP1x00 boxes? I'm not sure if it'll ever work in the older (UP1000 or UP1100) ones, but I think I've heard reports of success in the UP1500, which appears to have a newer SRM (and therefore newer BIOS emulator). > I have one in another computer. I tried it much earlier in the year with no > success. > > I bought it from the Crucial memory people. I don't think who made it really matters, it's the generic AGP BIOS code that causes the problems with the older BIOS emulators. --Jay++ - Jay A EstabrookHPTC - LINUX support Hewlett-Packard Company - MRO1-2/K15 (508) 467-2080 200 Forest Street, Marlboro MA 01752 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
CCC/CXX installation
It's probably time for my yearly attempt to install the Compaq C compiler, and I'me hitting trouble before I even start (however, I'm not phased, it's never worked i the past, and I'm desensitized now). I notice that I have the following files (downloaded from a previous attempt) ccc-6.5.9.001-6.alpha.rpm.cryptcxx-6.5.9.28-1.alpha.rpm.crypt However, looking at my email records, it appears that I no longer have the gpg key for the crypt files (almost certainly lost in a move between e-mail providers). Are the downloads keyed to a particular user, or did everyone get the same key? If the latter, I don't suppose one could mysteriously appear in my inbox, could it? If the former, can anyone suggest a better search string than "compiler" on the compaq (hp) alpha site. Getting _zero_ hits for "compiler" _really_ isn't particularly impressive. Phil = When inserting a CD, hold down shift to stop the AutoRun feature In the Device Manager, disable the SbcpHid device. http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~jhalderm/cd3/ __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/
Re: PCI Video Card?
Hi Jay, Is there any chance with a radeon 8500 agp? I have one in another computer. I tried it much earlier in the year with no success. I bought it from the Crucial memory people. Kind regards, Peter Watkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Jay Estabrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kelledin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:12 PM Subject: Re: PCI Video Card? > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 04:01:49PM -0600, Kelledin wrote: > > > > Currently I'm using a Radeon 7500 on my LX164. It's a "mystery" > > branding--maybe ATI, maybe PowerColor, maybe something else--but > > it works. > > I've had good luck with: > > 1. ATI-branded 7500 > 2. VisionTek-branded XTACY 9100 > > Stay away from the 7000 (VE?), as it has caused oroblems with the > 4.3.0 driver, and is somewhat slow, especially when compared to the > 7500 and 9100. > > > Matrox is also pretty good with 2D accel, but DRI and XVideo > > don't work for Matrox PCI cards (at least not last time I knew). > > Matrox DRI support doesn't work on Alpha, period. > > For 2D stuff, they work great, though not blazingly fast. > > > nVidia cards...hmmm. Not great. It's very difficult to find a > > PCI nVidia card with any chipset faster than a TNT2. Even then, > > it's a bit of a crap shoot as to whether it will work with SRM. > > XVideo might work, you might get some 2D accel, but you > > definitely won't get DRI support. I'd avoid nVidia for Alpha > > systems. > > My sentiments also; a great many problems the with SRM consoles of > older Alphas. On those that do work (LX/SX, Miata), the 2D speed is > pretty good with the normal XFree86 "nv" driver, but there's no hope > of 3D support. > > > I'm told 3Dfx PCI cards (Voodoo3 or later, mind you) work pretty > > well. I haven't heard much about them though. > > Yes, they do work quite well in 2D and 3D; even though they don't > do "real" DRM, the 3D support is FAST, at least comparable to the > newer Radeons when using a V3 3000. The older Banshee is also quite > usable, though slower than the V3 cards. Note that the latest 4.3.0 > tdfx driver seems to demand more than 16MB of video RAM in order to > run at greater than 1024x768 resolution, a rather severe limitation, > IMHO, that the earlier 4.1.0 and 4.2.0 drivers don't share (IIRC). > > > Stay FAR AWAY from S3 cards. A lot of Alpha systems ship with > > these, but they're crap cards. A given S3 card might not even > > work at all for XFree86. > > This is (unfortunately) very true of the Trio64-based cards that were > shipped in many Alphas. However, at least the Savage4-based boards > (Diamond Stealth III 540, IIRC) did have a decent (2D) driver under > 4.1.0 and later, and could hold as much as 32MB of memory, but no 3D > support... > > --Jay++ > > -- --- > Jay A EstabrookHPTC - LINUX support > Hewlett-Packard Company - MRO1-2/K15 (508) 467-2080 > 200 Forest Street, Marlboro MA 01752 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- --- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: Installation problem on Miata PWS 500a
Giovanni Scudeller wrote: ok. the problem is : - - dont't install ? - - dont't boot ? - -- - Hello :) Very cryptical... For my experience PWS500 doesn't give any problem for Debian installation. Actually I installed Debian Potato and always ugraded since then! :) Actually I didn't read your previous messages, so I hope not to repeat something already said... You should: 1) switch to SRM console from AlphaBIOS advanced menu 2) power cycle and wait for SRM 3) break automatic boot is configured by pressing vigorously ^C 4) boot from floppy (boot dva0) or from cdrom (boot dqa0... emm... I think) 5) installation procedure should come on screen and is simple enough only to require you to repeat pressing Enter key until the end. If you have already installed debian you will be familiar with packages and could install only packages you like. There's no particular requirement for packages on PWS, apart from kernel-image-x.y.zz-generic being preferred to install. Be sure to compile a new optimized kernel to really enjoy the PWS! :) --- S.O. di Giovanni Scudeller fax 0331597174 e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] INFORMAZIONI STRETTAMENTE CONFIDENZIALI How many italian PWS500 users are we? We could even create an italian alphalinux user group! :) Ciao! Gianluca Bonetti Pesaro, Italy
Re: Installation problem on Miata PWS 500a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alle 22:41, mercoledì 3 dicembre 2003, Andrea Orlando ha scritto: > Hi > > I have a Digital Personal Workstation Alpha 500a (miata) with QLogic > ISP 1020 scsi host adapter (4.3GB scsi-3 HD, 256MB ram). > > I have tried to install many times the Debian 3.0 (floppy, CDs, MILO, > aboot, ARC, SRM, ecc), but I have failed systematically. > > My hardware (miata 500a/au) is present in the Debian Hardware support > list, but the Qlogic scsi controller isn't mentioned anywhere. > > Is it supported ? > > I don't understand where I do the mistake :-( > > Andrea. ok. the problem is : - - dont't install ? - - dont't boot ? - -- - --- S.O. di Giovanni Scudeller fax 0331597174 e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] INFORMAZIONI STRETTAMENTE CONFIDENZIALI L'invio di questa e-mail è destinato solo ad uso personale o a enti sopra nominati e potrebbe contenere informazioni riservate, coperte da segreto professionale, e non soggette a divulgazione ai sensi di legge. Se non ne siete i corretti destinatari, con la presente siete informati che non vi è assolutamente permessa alcuna divulgazione, copia, distribuzione, uso ai fini marketing , anche se implicitamente accetto da desitinario o altro uso delle informazioni in essa contenute. Se per errore avete ricevuto questo messaggio, Vi chiedo cortesemente di informarmi immediatamente al mio indirizzodi posta elettronica. Grazie - --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/zu8gWLVqQNzFdZYRAlDrAJ9rzWu0cBX8KA0eKUHYGjp9dluo7wCeLyb7 msa8zzctGsVQmIcr91qWGus= =MdQQ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Installation problem on Miata PWS 500a
Alle 01:16, giovedì 4 dicembre 2003, Richard Fillion ha scritto: > I've installed debian on my Miata 500au without any problems. The > qlogic scsi controller is supported, don't worry. > > As for the problems you're experiencing, it's difficult to help without > knowing exactly where it's failing etc... Could you provide us with > more information? This list has solved basically all of my problems > ever with my alphas, so I'm sure we/they can help you too. > > Richard Fillion > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 15:41, Andrea Orlando wrote: > > Hi > > > > I have a Digital Personal Workstation Alpha 500a (miata) with QLogic > > ISP 1020 scsi host adapter (4.3GB scsi-3 HD, 256MB ram). > > > > I have tried to install many times the Debian 3.0 (floppy, CDs, MILO, > > aboot, ARC, SRM, ecc), but I have failed systematically. > > > > My hardware (miata 500a/au) is present in the Debian Hardware support > > list, but the Qlogic scsi controller isn't mentioned anywhere. > > > > Is it supported ? > > > > I don't understand where I do the mistake :-( > > > > Andrea. I installed Debian 3.0 on a PWS 500au too. You should provide some indication on the errors you encountered. -- --- Roberto Bernetti e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] V. S.da Vecchia del Pinocchio 1/A 60131 ANCONA tel/fax 071 2867103
