gclcvs

2007-07-18 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings!  It appears that the asm/system.h header has been removed:

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gclcvs;ver=2.7.0-78;arch=alpha;stamp=1184774486

GCL needs this for the imb() assembler routine:

#define SGC
#include 
#define CLEAR_CACHE imb()


1) Is the header coming back?

2) If not, what is the approved replacement?

Thanks!

-- 
Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: gclcvs

2006-11-06 Thread Falk Hueffner
Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Greetings!  The package builds fine, it appears.
>
> 1) could you please install fakeroot

done

> 2) I can make and upload by-hand builds if someone tells me they will
>be installed.  acl2/hppa and maxima/ppc uploads have thus far been
>ignored.

I don't think that's a good idea, it could lead to trouble with
security updates.

> 3) Is my success a sign that this machine is trailing sid in some
>critical installed packages?

It was up-to-date as of about 3 days ago... I've now updated it to the
latest ftp.de.debian.org state.

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: gclcvs

2006-11-07 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings!
1) could you please install gdb?

Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Greetings!  The package builds fine, it appears.
> >
> > 1) could you please install fakeroot
> 
> done
> 
> > 2) I can make and upload by-hand builds if someone tells me they will
> >be installed.  acl2/hppa and maxima/ppc uploads have thus far been
> >ignored.
> 
> I don't think that's a good idea, it could lead to trouble with
> security updates.
> 

OK, though I don't see why.  When I get a successful .deb, on your
machine, I'll request a requeue on the buildd.  I wish there were some
way I could upload something to take care of per-arch temporary
brokenness without forcing all the others into a rebuild.

> > 3) Is my success a sign that this machine is trailing sid in some
> >critical installed packages?
> 
> It was up-to-date as of about 3 days ago... I've now updated it to the
> latest ftp.de.debian.org state.

Thank you!

> 
> -- 
>   Falk
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: gclcvs

2007-07-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 14:04:09 -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:

> Greetings!  It appears that the asm/system.h header has been removed:
> 
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gclcvs;ver=2.7.0-78;arch=alpha;stamp=1184774486
> 
> GCL needs this for the imb() assembler routine:
> 
> #define SGC
> #include 
> #define CLEAR_CACHE imb()
> 
> 
> 1) Is the header coming back?
> 
> 2) If not, what is the approved replacement?
> 
I don't know what the Right Thing™ is, but xorg-server has this:
/* to flush the I-cache before jumping to code which just got loaded */
#define PAL_imb 134
#define istream_mem_barrier() \
__asm__ __volatile__("call_pal %0 #imb" : : "i" (PAL_imb) : "memory")

(hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h)
IOW it duplicates the kernel's definition of imb(), and uses it in
doLoadModule() and UnloadModuleOrDriver().

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: gclcvs

2007-07-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:04:09PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings!  It appears that the asm/system.h header has been removed:

> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gclcvs;ver=2.7.0-78;arch=alpha;stamp=1184774486

> GCL needs this for the imb() assembler routine:

> #define SGC
> #include 
> #define CLEAR_CACHE imb()

> 1) Is the header coming back?

No, the policy for linux-libc-dev is to only expose and support interfaces
that are needed for userspace interaction with the kernel, which this is
not.

> 2) If not, what is the approved replacement?

Copy the code; the X example cited should be a good starting point.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gclcvs, Re: gw.wurtel.net

2007-05-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! And thank you again so much for keeping this machine available.

I have no problem building gclcvs here, but the autobuilders show

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gclcvs;ver=2.7.0-68;arch=alpha;stamp=1178601357

and we still have no official debian alpha machine available for
testing :-(.

Any chance you might install a dchroot?

Take care,

Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Tue 03 Oct 2006, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > 
> > I seem to be running into gcc compiler failures when trying to build
> > gcl-2.6.7.  Is the system running low on resources?  No error message,
> > just -1 gcc return.
> 
> Might that have been around 14:00-14:30 UTC yesterday?
> I see a spike in the munin graph for "committed memory" around then.
> 
> You'd expect gcc to give an "out of memory" error...
> 
> I've added another 128MB swapfile, don't expect things to go fast :)
> 
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gclcvs (was Re: Alpha)

2006-11-06 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings!  The package builds fine, it appears.

1) could you please install fakeroot
2) I can make and upload by-hand builds if someone tells me they will
   be installed.  acl2/hppa and maxima/ppc uploads have thus far been
   ignored. 
3) Is my success a sign that this machine is trailing sid in some
   critical installed packages?

-- 
Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: gclcvs, Re: gw.wurtel.net

2007-05-22 Thread Paul Slootman
On Tue 22 May 2007, Camm Maguire wrote:

> Greetings! And thank you again so much for keeping this machine available.
> 
> I have no problem building gclcvs here, but the autobuilders show
> 
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gclcvs;ver=2.7.0-68;arch=alpha;stamp=1178601357
> 
> and we still have no official debian alpha machine available for
> testing :-(.
> 
> Any chance you might install a dchroot?

I'm waiting for some extra memory (to upgrade from 128MB to a whopping
384MB :-), and once I have that I also want to add a second disk. At the
moment I don't want to fill up the disk more than it is already (it's
also my mail gateway).

I'll let you know.


Paul


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: gclcvs, Re: gw.wurtel.net

2007-05-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:48:00AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings! And thank you again so much for keeping this machine available.

> I have no problem building gclcvs here, but the autobuilders show

> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gclcvs;ver=2.7.0-68;arch=alpha;stamp=1178601357

> and we still have no official debian alpha machine available for
> testing :-(.

FWIW, with linux-libc-dev installed I get a failure because asm/system.h is
no longer being shipped.

After fixing that bug (by directly including the definitions in gclcvs,
since asm/system.h doesn't look to me like anything the kernel has an
obligation to export), I seem to get the same build failure on alpha that's
affecting amd64, hppa, mips, mipsel, powerpc, and sparc in unstable (ld
segfault with -Wl,-Map).

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: gclcvs, Re: gw.wurtel.net

2007-05-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks!  But I cannot reproduce on pergolesi
sid_amd64_pure dchroot either.

If there is an issue here, I suspect that gcc doesn't want an empty
map file on input anymore.  Used to be the map option would not work
unless the file already existed.

Take care,

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:48:00AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Greetings! And thank you again so much for keeping this machine available.
> 
> > I have no problem building gclcvs here, but the autobuilders show
> 
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gclcvs;ver=2.7.0-68;arch=alpha;stamp=1178601357
> 
> > and we still have no official debian alpha machine available for
> > testing :-(.
> 
> FWIW, with linux-libc-dev installed I get a failure because asm/system.h is
> no longer being shipped.
> 
> After fixing that bug (by directly including the definitions in gclcvs,
> since asm/system.h doesn't look to me like anything the kernel has an
> obligation to export), I seem to get the same build failure on alpha that's
> affecting amd64, hppa, mips, mipsel, powerpc, and sparc in unstable (ld
> segfault with -Wl,-Map).
> 
> -- 
> Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
> Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: gclcvs, Re: gw.wurtel.net

2007-05-24 Thread Tim Cutts


On 22 May 2007, at 4:48 pm, Camm Maguire wrote:

Greetings! And thank you again so much for keeping this machine  
available.


I have no problem building gclcvs here, but the autobuilders show

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi? 
pkg=gclcvs;ver=2.7.0-68;arch=alpha;stamp=1178601357


and we still have no official debian alpha machine available for
testing :-(.


albeniz.debian.org is still awaiting proper setup by the DSAs.  I  
have been creating local accounts (I created one for Steve) to use,  
and it does have etch and sid dchroots.


Given that there is no immediate prospect of the DSA's dealing with  
the machine, feel free to contact me off-list if you want a local  
account on it for testing while we're waiting for the DSA team.


Tim



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: gclcvs, Re: gw.wurtel.net

2007-05-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:46:02PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings, and thanks!  But I cannot reproduce on pergolesi
> sid_amd64_pure dchroot either.

That chroot doesn't appear to have the current unstable version of binutils.
Have you tested that gclcvs even builds on i386 with this binutils?

> If there is an issue here, I suspect that gcc doesn't want an empty
> map file on input anymore.  Used to be the map option would not work
> unless the file already existed.

The map file used in my alpha test build wasn't empty.


> > On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:48:00AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > > Greetings! And thank you again so much for keeping this machine available.
> > 
> > > I have no problem building gclcvs here, but the autobuilders show
> > 
> > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gclcvs;ver=2.7.0-68;arch=alpha;stamp=1178601357
> > 
> > > and we still have no official debian alpha machine available for
> > > testing :-(.
> > 
> > FWIW, with linux-libc-dev installed I get a failure because asm/system.h is
> > no longer being shipped.
> > 
> > After fixing that bug (by directly including the definitions in gclcvs,
> > since asm/system.h doesn't look to me like anything the kernel has an
> > obligation to export), I seem to get the same build failure on alpha that's
> > affecting amd64, hppa, mips, mipsel, powerpc, and sparc in unstable (ld
> > segfault with -Wl,-Map).

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: gclcvs (was Re: Alpha)

2006-11-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:00:08PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings!  The package builds fine, it appears.

Um, I seem to be missing part of this conversation.  Are we still talking
about the gclcvs package that was giving me syscall problems when I tried to
build it, or an updated version of some kind?

> 1) could you please install fakeroot
> 2) I can make and upload by-hand builds if someone tells me they will
>be installed.  acl2/hppa and maxima/ppc uploads have thus far been
>ignored. 

If we're still talking about gclcvs on alpha, I would at least like to see
what the autobuilder does with this same package; maybe the problem is
specific to my system, in which case it's ok, or maybe the problem affects
the autobuilder as well in which case we have a supportability problem.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: gclcvs (was Re: Alpha)

2006-11-07 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings!

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:00:08PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Greetings!  The package builds fine, it appears.
> 
> Um, I seem to be missing part of this conversation.  Are we still talking
> about the gclcvs package that was giving me syscall problems when I tried to
> build it, or an updated version of some kind?
> 

Yes, the same version.  profiling seems exceedingly slow, but it
appears to be working.  I'll let you know definitively in a bit.

> > 1) could you please install fakeroot
> > 2) I can make and upload by-hand builds if someone tells me they will
> >be installed.  acl2/hppa and maxima/ppc uploads have thus far been
> >ignored. 
> 
> If we're still talking about gclcvs on alpha, I would at least like to see
> what the autobuilder does with this same package; maybe the problem is
> specific to my system, in which case it's ok, or maybe the problem affects
> the autobuilder as well in which case we have a supportability problem.
> 

OK.  Will post an update hopefully later today.

Take care,



> -- 
> Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
> Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gclcvs build failure on alpha

2007-06-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings!  As we are short of alpha machines, could someone please
help me understand this alpha specific problem?  Does the library have
a different name on alpha?

;; Loading boot.lisp
;; Compiling ../lsp/gcl_listlib.lsp.
Warning: NTH-VALUE is being redefined.
;; End of Pass 1.  

Error: ERROR "dlopen faiure on \"libc.so.6\""
Signalled by DLOPEN.
ERROR "dlopen faiure on \"libc.so.6\""

Broken at DLOPEN.  Type :H for Help.
SYSTEM>>make[1]: *** [unixport/saved_pre_gcl] Error 255


Take care,
-- 
Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: gclcvs build failure on alpha

2007-06-22 Thread Falk Hueffner
Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Greetings!  As we are short of alpha machines, could someone please
> help me understand this alpha specific problem?  Does the library have
> a different name on alpha?
>
> ;; Loading boot.lisp
> ;; Compiling ../lsp/gcl_listlib.lsp.
> Warning: NTH-VALUE is being redefined.
> ;; End of Pass 1.  
>
> Error: ERROR "dlopen faiure on \"libc.so.6\""
> Signalled by DLOPEN.
> ERROR "dlopen faiure on \"libc.so.6\""

Yes, it's called libc.so.6.1 on Alpha, and also on ia64 AFAIK.

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]