Re: gnutls28 transition
Le dimanche, 4 mai 2014, 02.14:17 peter green a écrit : Personally I'd add a (build-)depends on the relicensed gmp in the next gnutls28 upload. That way packages can (build-)depend on the new gnutls and be assured of getting a GPLv2 compatible version. For cups, as it doesn't build-depend on libgmp directly, I added the inverse relationship: # libgmp-dev is not GPL-2 compatible before it's 6 release, which makes # it also GPL-2+ Build-Conflicts: libgmp-dev ( 2:6) Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: Should we start transition to gnutls28 by default, for all packages that are compatible? Yes, please. Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2156746.eBzsy0u8Yc@gyllingar
gnutls28 transition
Hello all, gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe x32 both of which recently have negative slope on their build status graphs. Thus GPLv2 and LGPLv3 compatible software packages can link against gnutls28. Should we start transition to gnutls28 by default, for all packages that are compatible? Can powerpcspe x32 porters try to get latest gmp built? -- Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANBHLUgp=ahti1vk2rkqqa__aszjvxg7budltey+ezjfeaz...@mail.gmail.com
Re: gnutls28 transition
Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: Hello all, gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe x32 both of which recently have negative slope on their build status graphs. Thus GPLv2 and LGPLv3 compatible software packages can link against gnutls28. Should we start transition to gnutls28 by default, for all packages that are compatible? Can powerpcspe x32 porters try to get latest gmp built? Personally I'd add a (build-)depends on the relicensed gmp in the next gnutls28 upload. That way packages can (build-)depend on the new gnutls and be assured of getting a GPLv2 compatible version. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53659469.8060...@p10link.net
