Re: amd64(gcc4): aptitude dumps core
On 05-Jan-13 09:34, Giacomo Mulas wrote: If I understood things correctly, the pure64 archive is the one which is supposed to become the official debian unstable distribution. The gcc34 version, which is actually compiled with the latest compiler to maximise optimisation, is a little bit more on the experimental side. If you favour maximum stability, use pure64, if you accept a little bit more instability for (supposedly) best performance, go with gcc34. By the way, at least some of this instability is probably due to the fact that not all of the archive has been recompiled with gcc4, and there is some binary library incompatibility bitween the two. This will go away in time. Since the beginning of December 2004 almost every new package version for the gcc-3.4 archive has been compiled with gcc4. Up to now, more than 2000 source packages (i.e. roughly 25% of all source packages) in the gcc-3.4 archive have been built using gcc4. My plan is to rebuild the complete archive with gcc4 and upload the resulting packages to alioth during the next month. When this upload has been completed, the name of the current 'gcc-3.4' archive will be changed to 'gcc4'. I apologize for any inconveniece caused by this transition, but I think it is worth the efforts. Gcc4 has already detected a large number of amd64 related errors in many packages because of its stricter warnings concerning dubious pointer-to-integer conversions. Finding and fixing those errors will likely also help the pure64 archive. Every report of a bug or a problem in the gcc-3.4 archive will be greatly appreciated and I will of course try to provide fixes as soon as possible. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vote to support java browser plugin on amd64
May be subj can help. http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4802695 -- Olleg smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Synaptic gcc3.4
Hello everybody, I updated from pure64 to gcc3.4 with dist-upgrade, due some little errors it was a smooth run, but now I can't start synaptic anymore it crashes with a segmentation fault. Does someone, who is using the same repository, have the same error? and how to solve it. Thank you Andree -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Synaptic gcc3.4
On 05-Jan-13 17:27, Andree Zeulner wrote: Hello everybody, I updated from pure64 to gcc3.4 with dist-upgrade, due some little errors it was a smooth run, but now I can't start synaptic anymore it crashes with a segmentation fault. Does someone, who is using the same repository, have the same error? and how to solve it. I just built a new version of synaptic for the gcc-3.4 archive which should fix this. I will upload it to the gcc-3.4 archive on alioth soon. However, at the moment the upload is not possible because alioth's root partition is full. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vpnc seg fault
Hi everybody, I am using pure64, when I try to connect, via vpnc-connect I am able to enter the password, after that I get a segmentation fault. Thank you voetzi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Inkscape Bug!
Hm where did you get it from? Is it just the unstable package with the patch from Andreas Jochens? I don't know exactly ! I've get it from the unstable amd64 project (gcc-3.4) : http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4 sid main on my source.list file When i do : apt-cache show inkscape Maintainer: Wolfram Quester [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ludovic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bug reporting?
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 08:25:35PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: Bob Proulx wrote: | Giacomo Mulas wrote: | |Now the questions: should I use the standard debian bug tracking system to |report amd64 bugs? I am uncertain, since it is not (yet) an official port. | MHO: Yes. I would say that the package owner is best to decide whether the problem is caused by the new compiler and can be put on hold, or whether there is a more general problem affecting the official platforms, too. I have to disagree if it's build using an experimental compiler. Please do not submit bugs to the debian bts about those. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amd64(gcc4): aptitude dumps core
On 05-Jan-13 20:20, Harald Dunkel wrote: Andreas Jochens wrote: | | Since the beginning of December 2004 almost every new package version | for the gcc-3.4 archive has been compiled with gcc4. Up to now, | more than 2000 source packages (i.e. roughly 25% of all source packages) | in the gcc-3.4 archive have been built using gcc4. | | My plan is to rebuild the complete archive with gcc4 and upload the | resulting packages to alioth during the next month. When this upload | has been completed, the name of the current 'gcc-3.4' archive will be | changed to 'gcc4'. | It would have been nice if you had announced this more early. Democracy in software engineering is a myth, but on the other side, you are not the only one using the gcc-3.4 branch. This had been discussed and announced on the list some time ago. See for example: http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2004/12/msg00174.html Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vote to support java browser plugin on amd64
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:52:21PM +0100, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote: Hi, May be subj can help. http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4802695 The Blackdown 1.4.2 AMD64 JRE already has a working browser plugin. There are debian packages available from some of their mirrors, but do watch out because many carry only the old packages :( The actual link in /etc/alternatives is wrong, but a little manual intervention fixes that. Sun is providing their JDK in the 64bit too. You can download it from java.sun.com. 1.5.0_01 is available last time I checked (it was yesterday). Seb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
