Re: Ubuntu with AMD64 Support
* David Wood | Is their amd64 support just based on the pseudo-mainline pure64 sid? I think that «just» is unjustified. But it's based on the pure64 port, yes. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ubuntu with AMD64 Support
* Daniel James | I don't think the development model is as democratic or open as | mainstream Debian either. I mean, if you wanted a particular feature | in Ubuntu but a certain well-known millionaire and space tourist was | dead against it, do you think it would be implemented in his | distribution? : ) We're usually open to ideas, and you should have _really_ crazy ideas for them to be rejected outright. (And if so, we are working on tools which should make it really easy for you to make ubuntu + your crazy modifications and support that sanely.) http://www.ubuntu.com/wiki/MOTU has some information on maintainers and such; we _are_ an open community who wants people to join and help out. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: switch back from gcc-3.4 to pure64
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:23:30 +, Andrei Mikhailovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've followed the steps to move from gcc4 to pure64 and found out that > after the migration, some of the packages haven't been updated. Quite a > lot actually, about 100 or so packages still had .gcc4 in their version > numbers. Here is the list of them: > Does anyone know of the quick way of reinstalling them? I've tried doing > apt-get --reinstall install , but apt failed with: > > Reinstallation of is not possible, it cannot be > downloaded. Apt does consider it a downgrade, so you must pin the priority for the package above 1000 using the /etc/apt/preferences file. See the apt_preferences manpage. I did this last night and ended up having to use --force-yes on apt-get. I made a backup and crossed my fingers, but it seemed to work. -- Will Dyson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual NIC - device assign problem
HiHoo, thanks to all for your awesome help ! You might check out section 10.9 of this manual to see if it helps: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-gateway.en.html cheers, -Ted The docs have helped most ;) ! I first tried the "nameif" programm but finalized it now (due to more flexibility) with the "ifrename" package. Thanks again to all ... and a lot further happy AMD64 testing/using :) Cya Jörg
Re: VLC depends problem !
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 10:52:40PM +, Ludovic watteaux wrote: > vlc: Depends: libflac4 but it is not installable > E: Broken packages > > Maby vlc must use libflac6 in place of libflac4. There was a transistion from libflac4 to libflac6 a few weeks ago. Unfortuantly, the package failed to build for amd64 so you still get an old version. This is actually an RC bug for debian, see bugs.debian.org/289923 There is a patch for it in the BTS, it just hasn't been applied yet. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLC depends problem !
* Ludovic watteaux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto: > vlc: Depends: libflac4 but it is not installable > E: Broken packages > > Maby vlc must use libflac6 in place of libflac4. Compile it by hand. cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VLC depends problem !
vlc: Depends: libflac4 but it is not installable E: Broken packages Maby vlc must use libflac6 in place of libflac4. Ludovic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ubuntu with AMD64 Support
Is their amd64 support just based on the pseudo-mainline pure64 sid? On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Daniel James wrote: Hi Johannes, "Hoary Hedgehog" is available as a native AMD64 version. Has anyone tested this thing so far? I tried the last version on my Opteron, and it was a very smooth install. The packages were well chosen, albeit biased towards GNOME. If you're looking for user-friendly Debian, it's a better bet that some other derivative versions, and the native amd64 support is a bonus. On the other hand, if you're the kind of person who likes to make their own setup choices then it may not be for you. (Mainstream Debian packages are available in 'universe' but they aren't supported). I don't think the development model is as democratic or open as mainstream Debian either. I mean, if you wanted a particular feature in Ubuntu but a certain well-known millionaire and space tourist was dead against it, do you think it would be implemented in his distribution? : ) Cheers Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ubuntu with AMD64 Support
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 17:55 +, Daniel James wrote: [snip] > I don't think the development model is as democratic or open as > mainstream Debian either. I mean, if you wanted a particular feature > in Ubuntu but a certain well-known millionaire and space tourist was > dead against it, do you think it would be implemented in his > distribution? : ) It's "his" distro. Paul Volkerding gets to make Slackware like he wants, Mark Shuttleworth makes it like he wants, Klaus Knopper makes it like he wants... BTW, how many DDs is Ubutnu employing? -- - Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "This is the optimal setup for a geek. Your wife thinks you are with your girlfriend, your girlfriend thinks, you have to look for your wife, and you have time to do something with your computer." http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=98180&cid=8396791 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Dual NIC - device assign problem
Jörg Ebeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I've a Tyan S4882 with a Broadcom Dual NIC controller on Board. > > The NIC module "tg3" loads so far but assigns the ethernet devices > (eth0/eth1) randomly to the NICs. FWIW, I have 9 systems, each with a Tyan S2882 and these same dual NICs and have never experienced this problem. But, besides being only dual CPU, these systems differ in that they are running 32bit Debian and kernel and the tg3 module is compiled into a monolithic kernel. Every boot and every machine has the socket furthest right if facing the back of the box comming up as eth1. Its MAC is one less than the neighboring eth2. Eth0 is the 100 Mbps NIC. I vaguely remember that with Linux 2.4 eth1 and eth2 came up switched. Luck, -Brett. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unable to boot Kernel 2.6.10
Thanks for sharing this; it will probably help others. It's interesting that these steps solved your problem; I wonder what caused it? On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Leoncini Xavier wrote: I got to boot. I erased my modprobe.conf and modprobe.d as well as my modules.conf and modutils, then removed modconf and modutils and reinstalled them as well as installed udev. I have now no problem Thanks for the different tips Xavier Le Mardi 25 Janvier 2005 19:37, Leoncini Xavier a écrit : I guess it's my fault I was toolazy to copy the error message and retype it. I was hoping it was a more common problem. My computer is a laptop with an athlon 3000+ I use a precompiled debian kernel, and installed debian pure 64 on it last june and been upgrading regularly ever since. The error message is: Pid: 2065, comm setserial Tainted: G M 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 RIP 0010 with garbage RSP: 0018:... RAX: etc.. Process setserial (pid: 2065, threadinfo ..) Stack: f Call trace [n_tty_flush_buffer+9} etc.. last message Code: Bad RIP value RIP [ Well I hope it helps PS: I have been using Debian since late 96, and its the first time I get such a silly answer Best Xavier Leoncini Le Mardi 25 Janvier 2005 19:17, Alvaro Hernandez a écrit : Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 07:10:07PM +0100, Egon Willighagen escribió: On Tuesday 25 January 2005 17:22, Alvaro Hernandez wrote: Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:01:53PM +0100, Leoncini Xavier wrote: I have a problem while booting 2.6.10 ;)) Take it with a grain of salt! Yes, sure. Ok, I've encountered boot problems too in the past, but don't really care about them. It might be more helpful if people would not make fun of Leonici, but tell him where to find information on how to debug the problems he has ? Nobody is making fun of anyone, just joking. Anyway, it is very difficult to tell someone how to debug a problem he hasn't provided no information about it. There is need, first, to know what is going on, what the error messages are, software versions, etc. Do you go to doctor and say "it hurts, doctor, help me"? Or do you provide information to help doctor start asking questions? Regards, Alvaro
Re: Dual NIC - device assign problem
You might check out section 10.9 of this manual to see if it helps: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-gateway.en.html cheers, -Ted On Friday 28 January 2005 10:03, Jörg Ebeling wrote: > HiHo, > > I've a Tyan S4882 with a Broadcom Dual NIC controller on Board. > > The NIC module "tg3" loads so far but assigns the ethernet devices > (eth0/eth1) randomly to the NICs. > > First I thought it would be a noob problem but after parsing (nearly the > whole) google I still found no real solution. > > My hope in a i.e. "MAC address selection module option" is gone and I > saw/read that Dual NIC's seem to have that problem in general (ifup/down > says such stuff in the man page). > > The mapping solution which is proposed by ifupdown, doesn't makes me > happy too, because I need the ethernet device names later on in my > shorewall. Well it could be made via scripts and shorewall variables, > but it sounds like the wrong way for me. > > Any help/suggestions ?
Re: Ubuntu with AMD64 Support
* Johannes Klug ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto: > Hello! > The Ubuntu Team has recently released [1] a new version of their live-cd > distro. > > "Hoary Hedgehog" is available as a native AMD64 version. > Has anyone tested this thing so far? > How does it fare? I tried it. The live cd has been able to detect everything, and I ended up using gnome 2.9.4 at 1280x1024 which is the resolution I use normally. In the overall I think it is nice, but from my point of view some tools. Compared to, let's say, Knoppix it has far less applications. It is OK for home and office use. cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual NIC - device assign problem
I've a Tyan S4882 with a Broadcom Dual NIC controller on Board. The NIC module "tg3" loads so far but assigns the ethernet devices (eth0/eth1) randomly to the NICs. [...] Any help/suggestions ? If it really does it randomly, you could simply repeatedly start and stop the driver until it gets them the right way around. On average, it'll take you only two attempts (the worst case is pretty bad 8-) Yes it really does it randomly and I already thought about such script... but it may take 2, 3 or in the case of bad luck a lot more tries. Howeven, the same as with the ifupdown suggestion, I feel that this would NOT be the right way. It sounds like Win~1 solution "If it's not working, simply boot (reload) again, you may have luck then" ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual NIC - device assign problem
Le 28.01.2005 19:08:44, Alex Perry a écrit : Jörg Ebeling wrote: I've a Tyan S4882 with a Broadcom Dual NIC controller on Board. The NIC module "tg3" loads so far but assigns the ethernet devices (eth0/eth1) randomly to the NICs. [...] Any help/suggestions ? If it really does it randomly, you could simply repeatedly start and stop the driver until it gets them the right way around. On average, it'll take you only two attempts (the worst case is pretty bad 8-) There is a way to assign a name to the MAC. Use the nameif command in your /etc/network/interfaces as follow: As an example, I've an interface I've given the name "lan" and it is associated to the "00:00:B4:BB:46:E9" MAC address iface lan inet static pre-up nameif lan 00:00:B4:BB:46:E9 address 192.168.0.253 netmask 255.255.255.0 then "ifconfig lan works nameif is part of the package net-tools Regards Jean-Luc pgpiFXudKvpq9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Dual NIC - device assign problem
Jörg Ebeling wrote: I've a Tyan S4882 with a Broadcom Dual NIC controller on Board. The NIC module "tg3" loads so far but assigns the ethernet devices (eth0/eth1) randomly to the NICs. [...] Any help/suggestions ? If it really does it randomly, you could simply repeatedly start and stop the driver until it gets them the right way around. On average, it'll take you only two attempts (the worst case is pretty bad 8-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dual NIC - device assign problem
HiHo, I've a Tyan S4882 with a Broadcom Dual NIC controller on Board. The NIC module "tg3" loads so far but assigns the ethernet devices (eth0/eth1) randomly to the NICs. First I thought it would be a noob problem but after parsing (nearly the whole) google I still found no real solution. My hope in a i.e. "MAC address selection module option" is gone and I saw/read that Dual NIC's seem to have that problem in general (ifup/down says such stuff in the man page). The mapping solution which is proposed by ifupdown, doesn't makes me happy too, because I need the ethernet device names later on in my shorewall. Well it could be made via scripts and shorewall variables, but it sounds like the wrong way for me. Any help/suggestions ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ubuntu with AMD64 Support
Hi Johannes, > "Hoary Hedgehog" is available as a native AMD64 version. > Has anyone tested this thing so far? I tried the last version on my Opteron, and it was a very smooth install. The packages were well chosen, albeit biased towards GNOME. If you're looking for user-friendly Debian, it's a better bet that some other derivative versions, and the native amd64 support is a bonus. On the other hand, if you're the kind of person who likes to make their own setup choices then it may not be for you. (Mainstream Debian packages are available in 'universe' but they aren't supported). I don't think the development model is as democratic or open as mainstream Debian either. I mean, if you wanted a particular feature in Ubuntu but a certain well-known millionaire and space tourist was dead against it, do you think it would be implemented in his distribution? : ) Cheers Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ubuntu with AMD64 Support
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 06:34:37PM +0100, Johannes Klug wrote: > The Ubuntu Team has recently released [1] a new version of their live-cd > distro. > > "Hoary Hedgehog" is available as a native AMD64 version. > Has anyone tested this thing so far? > How does it fare? Works great on a Sun V20z box. It'll be a very useful rescue/diagnostic CD at least. It appears to use the debian installer's hardware detection and rather than going into an installer, boots into a GNOME desktop. Ryan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ubuntu with AMD64 Support
Downloading as we speak, but at the rate it's coming, it'll be tomorrow before I get to test it. cmr On Friday 28 January 2005 11:34 am, Johannes Klug wrote: > Hello! > The Ubuntu Team has recently released [1] a new version of their live-cd > distro. > > "Hoary Hedgehog" is available as a native AMD64 version. > Has anyone tested this thing so far? > How does it fare? > > Best regards, > Johannes Klug > > [1] > http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2005-January/11.html -- Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964 "More laws, less justice." -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ubuntu with AMD64 Support
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 06:34:37PM +0100, Johannes Klug wrote: > "Hoary Hedgehog" is available as a native AMD64 version. > Has anyone tested this thing so far? > How does it fare? I'm running it here (as an installed version, not the live CD), and have been for a couple of weeks. It's very nice. Fewer of the sharp edges I found with Warty (not that there were many to start with). Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: [EMAIL PROTECTED] carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 1C335860 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- You've read the project plan. Forget that. We're going to Do --- Stuff and Have Fun doing it. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: How to interprete machine check exception
Just in case someone else searches the mailing lists... Ralf Schmitt wrote: Hi, One of out our Opteron based machines here at work keeps crashing (with kernel 2.6.8/2.6.10). Last thing it prints on the console is (hand transcript): CPU0: Machine Check Exception 4 Bank 0: b60ea833 TSC 6e5cd030ae71 ADDR 258f8640 I've downloaded parsemce.c 0.0.9 from http://codemonkey.org.uk/cruft/. But I'm not sure about the correct way to call it (or if it even works for amd64). still don't know. but one can use the recently released mcelog 0.3: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat mce.txt CPU 0: Machine Check Exception:4 Bank 0: b60ea833 TSC 3151881f80cc Kernel panic - not syncing: Machine check [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/sbin/mcelog --k8 --ascii - Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ubuntu with AMD64 Support
Hello! The Ubuntu Team has recently released [1] a new version of their live-cd distro. "Hoary Hedgehog" is available as a native AMD64 version. Has anyone tested this thing so far? How does it fare? Best regards, Johannes Klug [1] http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2005-January/11.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: switch back from gcc-3.4 to pure64
Hmmm, this happened to me as well, but only with a couple packages (like cpp). I just installed them by hand. I'm not an expert, but does the installation of the equivalent pure64 packages constitute a "downgrade" for these packages, or are the versions identical? Perhaps what is happening is that the identical version is not available in pure64, and apt refuses to downgrade. Again, I am not an expert... -Ted -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unable to boot Kernel 2.6.10
I got to boot.
I erased my modprobe.conf and modprobe.d as well as my modules.conf and
modutils, then removed modconf and modutils and reinstalled them as well as
installed udev.
I have now no problem
Thanks for the different tips
Xavier
Le Mardi 25 Janvier 2005 19:37, Leoncini Xavier a écrit :
> I guess it's my fault I was toolazy to copy the error message
> and retype it. I was hoping it was a more common problem.
> My computer is a laptop with an athlon 3000+
> I use a precompiled debian kernel, and installed debian pure 64
> on it last june and been upgrading regularly ever since.
>
> The error message is:
> Pid: 2065, comm setserial Tainted: G M 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8
> RIP 0010 with garbage
> RSP: 0018:...
> RAX: etc..
> Process setserial (pid: 2065, threadinfo ..)
> Stack: f
> Call trace
> [n_tty_flush_buffer+9}
> etc..
> last message
> Code: Bad RIP value
> RIP [ CR2: ...
> /etc/rcS.d/S46setserial: line 152: 2065 killed ¤{SETSERIAL} -z $device
> $args Then if I type ctrl C I lose allability to do anything
> with another Bad RIP value and some kthread thread return worker_thread
> message in the CallTrace message
> I use also the cpudyn daemon when I can boot.
>
> Well I hope it helps
>
> PS: I have been using Debian since late 96, and its the first time I get
> such a silly answer
> Best
> Xavier Leoncini
>
> Le Mardi 25 Janvier 2005 19:17, Alvaro Hernandez a écrit :
> > Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 07:10:07PM +0100, Egon Willighagen escribió:
> > >On Tuesday 25 January 2005 17:22, Alvaro Hernandez wrote:
> > >> Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:01:53PM +0100, Leoncini Xavier wrote:
> > >> >I have a problem while booting 2.6.10
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> ;)) Take it with a grain of salt!
> > >
> > >Yes, sure. Ok, I've encountered boot problems too in the past, but don't
> > >really care about them.
> > >
> > >It might be more helpful if people would not make fun of Leonici, but
> > > tell him where to find information on how to debug the problems he has
> > > ?
> >
> > Nobody is making fun of anyone, just joking. Anyway, it is very
> > difficult to tell someone how to debug a problem he hasn't provided no
> > information about it.
> >
> > There is need, first, to know what is going on, what the error
> > messages are, software versions, etc.
> >
> > Do you go to doctor and say "it hurts, doctor, help me"? Or do
> > you provide information to help doctor start asking questions?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Alvaro
Re: switch back from gcc-3.4 to pure64
Nope, did and update beforehand. If the update haven't been done, then
most likely that the other packages haven't been updated as well.
Any other ideas?
Do you know how can I force download and reinstallation of a package?
the mans for dpkg/apt-get show the --reinstall option, but it doesn't
work. For some reason, the available version of some packages still
remain from the gcc4 branch, even after I did apt-get update for a few
days in a row.
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:45 +0100, Andreas Knüpfer wrote:
> my first guess is a missing 'apt-get update' before the reinstall attempt.
> i checked some of the packages you mentioned and they are fine on my system.
>
> sorry if this idea was too simple
>
> best regards, knue
>
>
> On Friday 28 January 2005 16:23, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 23:55 +, L W wrote:
> > > I've find the good way :
> > >
> > > dpkg --get-selections | grep -w install | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -n 10
> > > -- apt-get -y --reinstall install
> >
> > I've followed the steps to move from gcc4 to pure64 and found out that
> > after the migration, some of the packages haven't been updated. Quite a
> > lot actually, about 100 or so packages still had .gcc4 in their version
> > numbers. Here is the list of them:
> >
> > ii xprt-common 0.1.0.alpha1-6.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii xprt-xprintorg 0.1.0.alpha1-6.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii xpdf-utils 3.00-12.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii xpdf-common 3.00-12.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii xmms 1.2.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii util-linux 2.12p-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii sasl2-bin2.1.19-1.5.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii python2.3-gtk2 2.4.1-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii python2.3-glade2 2.4.1-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii python-gtk2 2.4.1-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii php4-mysql 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii php4-cli 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii php4-common 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii php4-gd 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii php4-imap4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii php4-ldap4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii openssl 0.9.7e-3.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii php44.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii ooqstart-gnome 0.8.3-8.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii mutt 1.5.6-20040907+2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii mtr-tiny 0.67-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii mount2.12p-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii modutils 2.4.26-1.2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libxine1 1.0-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libstdc++6-dev 3.4.3-7.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libstdc++6 4.0-0pre1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libssl-dev 0.9.7e-3.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libsigc++-1.2-5c102 1.2.5-4.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libsasl2-modules 2.1.19-1.5.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.5.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libroken16-kerberos4kth 1.2.2-11.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libpt-plugins-v4l1.6.6.4-5.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libpt-plugins-alsa 1.6.6.4-5.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libpt-1.6.3 1.6.6.4-5.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libopenh323-1.13.2 1.13.5.4-4.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libkrb53 1.3.6-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libkrb-1-kerberos4kth1.2.2-11.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libguile-ltdl-1 1.6.7-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgtkmm-2.4-1 2.4.8-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgtkhtml3.2-11 3.2.4-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgtkhtml3.2-dev3.2.4-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgnorba27 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgnorbagtk01.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgnome32 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgnome-pilot2 2.0.12-1.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgnome-pilot2-dev 2.0.12-1.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgmp3 4.1.4-5.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgda2-11.0.4-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgda2-common 1.0.4-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgcrypt7-doc 1.1.90-9.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgcrypt7 1.1.90-9.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgcrypt11-dev 1.2.0-11.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgcrypt1 1.1.12-8.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libgcc1 4.0-0pre1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libfltk1.1c102 1.1.6-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libesd0-dev 0.2.35-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libesd-alsa0 0.2.35-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libdb3-util 3.2.9-20.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libasound2 1.0.8-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libart2 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> > ii libapache2-mod-php4 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc
Re: switch back from gcc-3.4 to pure64
my first guess is a missing 'apt-get update' before the reinstall attempt.
i checked some of the packages you mentioned and they are fine on my system.
sorry if this idea was too simple
best regards, knue
On Friday 28 January 2005 16:23, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 23:55 +, L W wrote:
> > I've find the good way :
> >
> > dpkg --get-selections | grep -w install | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -n 10
> > -- apt-get -y --reinstall install
>
> I've followed the steps to move from gcc4 to pure64 and found out that
> after the migration, some of the packages haven't been updated. Quite a
> lot actually, about 100 or so packages still had .gcc4 in their version
> numbers. Here is the list of them:
>
> ii xprt-common 0.1.0.alpha1-6.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii xprt-xprintorg 0.1.0.alpha1-6.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii xpdf-utils 3.00-12.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii xpdf-common 3.00-12.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii xmms 1.2.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii util-linux 2.12p-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii sasl2-bin2.1.19-1.5.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii python2.3-gtk2 2.4.1-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii python2.3-glade2 2.4.1-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii python-gtk2 2.4.1-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii php4-mysql 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii php4-cli 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii php4-common 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii php4-gd 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii php4-imap4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii php4-ldap4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii openssl 0.9.7e-3.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii php44.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii ooqstart-gnome 0.8.3-8.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii mutt 1.5.6-20040907+2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii mtr-tiny 0.67-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii mount2.12p-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii modutils 2.4.26-1.2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libxine1 1.0-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libstdc++6-dev 3.4.3-7.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libstdc++6 4.0-0pre1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libssl-dev 0.9.7e-3.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libsigc++-1.2-5c102 1.2.5-4.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libsasl2-modules 2.1.19-1.5.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.5.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libroken16-kerberos4kth 1.2.2-11.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libpt-plugins-v4l1.6.6.4-5.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libpt-plugins-alsa 1.6.6.4-5.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libpt-1.6.3 1.6.6.4-5.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libopenh323-1.13.2 1.13.5.4-4.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libkrb53 1.3.6-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libkrb-1-kerberos4kth1.2.2-11.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libguile-ltdl-1 1.6.7-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgtkmm-2.4-1 2.4.8-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgtkhtml3.2-11 3.2.4-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgtkhtml3.2-dev3.2.4-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgnorba27 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgnorbagtk01.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgnome32 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgnome-pilot2 2.0.12-1.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgnome-pilot2-dev 2.0.12-1.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgmp3 4.1.4-5.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgda2-11.0.4-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgda2-common 1.0.4-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgcrypt7-doc 1.1.90-9.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgcrypt7 1.1.90-9.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgcrypt11-dev 1.2.0-11.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgcrypt1 1.1.12-8.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libgcc1 4.0-0pre1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libfltk1.1c102 1.1.6-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libesd0-dev 0.2.35-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libesd-alsa0 0.2.35-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libdb3-util 3.2.9-20.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libasound2 1.0.8-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libart2 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii libapache2-mod-php4 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii kdelibs4 3.3.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii kdelibs-bin 3.3.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii kdelibs-data 3.3.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii inkscape 0.40-2.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii guile-1.6-libs 1.6.7-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii gtkhtml3.2 3.2.4-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii gnome-pilot 2.0.12-1.1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii gnome-libs-data 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii gnome-bin1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii gnome-applets2.8.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii gnome-applets-data 2.8.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii gcc-4.0-base 4.0-0pre1.0.0.1.gcc4
> ii gcc-3.4
Bug#248796: status of this bug?
Hello, what is the state of the emacs21 amd64 build patch? may I politely ask why it is still not included in the source package? we have at least 10 packages FTBFS because of this currently, among them important packages like auctex and python2.3. The bug is open since 260 days now. Kind regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: switch back from gcc-3.4 to pure64
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 23:55 +, L W wrote:
> I've find the good way :
>
> dpkg --get-selections | grep -w install | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -n 10
> -- apt-get -y --reinstall install
>
I've followed the steps to move from gcc4 to pure64 and found out that
after the migration, some of the packages haven't been updated. Quite a
lot actually, about 100 or so packages still had .gcc4 in their version
numbers. Here is the list of them:
ii xprt-common 0.1.0.alpha1-6.0.0.1.gcc4
ii xprt-xprintorg 0.1.0.alpha1-6.0.0.1.gcc4
ii xpdf-utils 3.00-12.0.0.1.gcc4
ii xpdf-common 3.00-12.0.0.1.gcc4
ii xmms 1.2.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii util-linux 2.12p-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii sasl2-bin2.1.19-1.5.0.0.1.gcc4
ii python2.3-gtk2 2.4.1-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii python2.3-glade2 2.4.1-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii python-gtk2 2.4.1-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii php4-mysql 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii php4-cli 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii php4-common 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii php4-gd 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii php4-imap4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii php4-ldap4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii openssl 0.9.7e-3.0.0.1.gcc4
ii php44.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii ooqstart-gnome 0.8.3-8.0.0.1.gcc4
ii mutt 1.5.6-20040907+2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii mtr-tiny 0.67-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii mount2.12p-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii modutils 2.4.26-1.2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libxine1 1.0-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libstdc++6-dev 3.4.3-7.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libstdc++6 4.0-0pre1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libssl-dev 0.9.7e-3.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libsigc++-1.2-5c102 1.2.5-4.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libsasl2-modules 2.1.19-1.5.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.5.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libroken16-kerberos4kth 1.2.2-11.1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libpt-plugins-v4l1.6.6.4-5.1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libpt-plugins-alsa 1.6.6.4-5.1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libpt-1.6.3 1.6.6.4-5.1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libopenh323-1.13.2 1.13.5.4-4.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libkrb53 1.3.6-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libkrb-1-kerberos4kth1.2.2-11.1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libguile-ltdl-1 1.6.7-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgtkmm-2.4-1 2.4.8-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgtkhtml3.2-11 3.2.4-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgtkhtml3.2-dev3.2.4-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgnorba27 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgnorbagtk01.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgnome32 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgnome-pilot2 2.0.12-1.1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgnome-pilot2-dev 2.0.12-1.1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgmp3 4.1.4-5.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgda2-11.0.4-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgda2-common 1.0.4-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgcrypt7-doc 1.1.90-9.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgcrypt7 1.1.90-9.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgcrypt11-dev 1.2.0-11.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgcrypt1 1.1.12-8.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libgcc1 4.0-0pre1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libfltk1.1c102 1.1.6-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libesd0-dev 0.2.35-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libesd-alsa0 0.2.35-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libdb3-util 3.2.9-20.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libasound2 1.0.8-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libart2 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
ii libapache2-mod-php4 4.3.10-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii kdelibs4 3.3.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii kdelibs-bin 3.3.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii kdelibs-data 3.3.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii inkscape 0.40-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii guile-1.6-libs 1.6.7-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii gtkhtml3.2 3.2.4-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii gnome-pilot 2.0.12-1.1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii gnome-libs-data 1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
ii gnome-bin1.4.2-19.0.0.1.gcc4
ii gnome-applets2.8.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii gnome-applets-data 2.8.2-1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii gcc-4.0-base 4.0-0pre1.0.0.1.gcc4
ii gcc-3.4 3.4.3-7.0.0.1.gcc4
ii gcc-3.4-base 3.4.3-7.0.0.1.gcc4
ii g++-3.4 3.4.3-7.0.0.1.gcc4
ii esound 0.2.35-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii esound-clients 0.2.35-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii esound-common0.2.35-2.0.0.1.gcc4
ii ed 0.2-20.0.0.1.gcc4
ii dselect 1.10.26.0.0.1.gcc4
ii dpkg-dev 1.10.26.0.0
Re: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs
Thanks, i forgot to put the symlink /usr/X11R6/lib64 to /usr/X11R6/lib. That's verry Nice ! sh-3.00$ glxgears 6745 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1349.000 FPS Stable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:58:17AM +, Ludovic watteaux wrote: > Ok your patch is very nice. > That work for me. > VIAK8 > Radeon Mobility 9600 > Kernel 2.6.10 > Debian AMD64/GCC3.4 > > But performance is not realy there ! > before glxgear = 150 fps > Afterglxgear = 472 fps [snip] Do an "export LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/" before executing startx, this should resolve your issues. Regards, -- Davide Puricelli, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian Developer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.debian.org Time looked like snow dropping silently into a black room -- Ray Bradbury signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs
* Ludovic watteaux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto: > > h-3.00$ fglrxinfo > display: :0.0 screen: 0 > OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect > OpenGL version string: 1.3 Mesa 4.0.4 > > I don't have the performance of Johannes Pleikies : > > After this the estimated fps in glxgears raised from 150 to 1750. > Is it normal ? Maybe fglrx libGL.so.1.2 is not in place. The vendor string should be "ATI ..". cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AMD64 patch for flavio's fglrx debs
Ok your patch is very nice. That work for me. VIAK8 Radeon Mobility 9600 Kernel 2.6.10 Debian AMD64/GCC3.4 But performance is not realy there ! before glxgear = 150 fps Afterglxgear = 472 fps Error with fgl_glxgears ! sh-3.00$ fgl_glxgears X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) Major opcode of failed request: 131 (GLX) Minor opcode of failed request: 5 (X_GLXMakeCurrent) Serial number of failed request: 33 Current serial number in output stream: 33 h-3.00$ fglrxinfo display: :0.0 screen: 0 OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect OpenGL version string: 1.3 Mesa 4.0.4 From dmesg : fglrx: module license 'Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies, Starnberg, GERMANY' taints kernel. [fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 428 MBytes. [fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 8.8.25 [Jan 14 2005] on minor 0 [fglrx] AGP detected, AgpState = 0x1f000a1b (hardware caps of chipset) agpgart: Found an AGP 3.5 compliant device at :00:00.0. agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at :00:00.0 into 8x mode agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at :01:00.0 into 8x mode [fglrx] AGP enabled, AgpCommand = 0x1f000312 (selected caps) [fglrx] free AGP = 256126976 [fglrx] max AGP = 256126976 [fglrx] free LFB = 55570432 [fglrx] max LFB = 55570432 [fglrx] free Inv = 0 [fglrx] max Inv = 0 [fglrx] total Inv = 0 [fglrx] total TIM = 0 [fglrx] total FB = 0 [fglrx] total AGP = 65536 I don't have the performance of Johannes Pleikies : > After this the estimated fps in glxgears raised from 150 to 1750. Is it normal ? Greetings Ludovic
Audio tests on pure64
Hello all, I have attempted to build a DeMuDi style kernel on pure64 using the Debian source package of 2.6.10 as a base. It patched OK, but during 'make' I ran into this xtime_lock bug which only seems to affect x86_64 systems: http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/10/108 However, the latency performance of unpatched 2.6.10 doesn't seem to be that bad, from other reports. I was even able to run jackd on the unpatched Debian 2.6.8 without xrun hell (I had to run as root in order to set the realtime option though). It seems that 2.6.11 has a number of latency improvements to come, too: http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/0618.html On the applications side, I have ardour 0.9beta24 running without problems so far, Hydrogen and qjackctl. Rosegarden4 and Audacity installed OK, but I haven't had a chance to test them yet. Alsa worked fine out of the box after running alsaconf. I can't seem to find the envy24control mixer in the apt archive - I may need to create a package for that. However, Jamin segfaults after a brief flash of the GUI. Norval - could you do an apt-get install jamin on your Pure64 box, start jackd, run jamin and see if the same behaviour happens for you? If so, I'll bring it to the attention of the Jamin developers. I'll probably have to try building it from source with debugging enabled. (By the way, the pure64 team appear to have done a really good job with this distribution. For something so bleeding edge, the infrastructure seems really solid. Thanks!) Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: nforce4 + gt6600 (pce) X redraw problems
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292252 There is a patch at the above link, get it and put in the xfree debian source tree under the directory debian/patches. Recompile and reinstall xserver-common and xserver-xfree86. Thanks a lot! I had seen the patch earlier, but its description didn't sound to me like it would solve my problem. But it did. I'm uploading my binaries to "http://intux.org/debian"; in case anyone wants to save him/herself the hassle of recompiling xfree86. Elmar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
