Re: Geforce FX 5900XT
Sorry, didn't send this to the list last time. Brian R. Whitecotton wrote: Has onyone successfully installed the nvidia provided drivers for the GeForce FX 5900XT or similar chipset? Yes, I have one and it works fine. I have installed all pertinent kernel-sources, kernel-headers, etc. The nvidia installer compiles the driver with no problem but then it complains about installing the nvidia module. There are symbols that are unrecognized. Nvidia warns that this is usually due to incorrect libs or kernel headers but I have all matching versions installed as prerequisite. So I am at a loss. I am hoping someone has figured out why nvidia's installer fails. I build my own Linux kernels (with make-kpkg so they end up being debian packages). Right now I'm running 2.6.11 and the nvidia installer worked fine after I patched it with the cumulative patch listed here: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=46676 There are also debs for the nvidia drivers in non-free, if you want to go that route. I've never used them but I'd expect them to work fine. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show nvidia-kernel-source Package: nvidia-kernel-source Version: 1.0.6629+1-1 Priority: optional Section: non-free/x11 Maintainer: Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), make, sed ( 3.0), dpatch (= 2.0.0) Recommends: nvidia-glx (= 1.0.6629), kernel-package (= 8.082), devscripts Conflicts: nvidia-kernel-src Replaces: nvidia-kernel-src Architecture: amd64 [--rest of output cut--] More info on this page: http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/index.php So, try things out, don't hesitate to use google, and if you're still having problems then send another mail with more details, especially the output of anything that fails. -Corey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anyone uses the Gigabyte GA K8-NS Pro ?
Hannes Mayer wrote: Noone ? :-( I'd very much appreciate comments on this board, since this is my first system built while I'm using linux only and I want to get it 100% right. Thanks in advance! Best regards, Hannes. It might be that nobody here is using that motherboard. When researching a motherboard to determine linux compatability, I always find a list of compoents and use make menuconfig or google to see if each component's chipset is supported (when I don't know already). Searching google for k8-ns pro reveals this page: http://www.mainboard.cz/mb/gigabyte/GA-K8NSPro.htm I'll answer the ones I know for you; I'm sure you can dig up the rest if someone else doesn't have firsthand experience. GA-K8NS Pro nForce3 250 chipset I've been using an nforce3 250 board since December without a hitch. Processor Socket 754 for AMD Athlon64 This goes without saying... Super I/O: ITE IT8712F chip lm_sensors supports this. Works fine for me. Silicon Image sil3512 controller I'm pretty sure this is supported in recent kernels. GigaRAID ATA 133 RAID controller I don't know. T.I. IEEE1394 controller If this uses the PCILynx chip then it's supported. Marvell 8001 Gigabit Ethernet controller The sk98lin driver supports this. Realtek ALC850 Audio AC'97 Codec Recent versions of alsa should support this too. -Corey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instead of chroot for i386
Tong wrote: Well, I was thinking to abolish the chroot entirely. Say my i386 Debian Sarge is mounted on /os/deb32. Then, having configured the ldconfig, just launch ooffice (or any other tools not available in amd64 yet) as /os/deb32/usr/bin/ooffice -- no bind mount, no dchroot, no various sym-links. theoretically, should it work? Running ooffice outside the chroot should work fine. It's the same principle as the ia32-libs package. I have ia32-libs (which isn't even a full chroot) installed and /emul/ia32-linux/lib and /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib in my ldconfig, and running openoffice works fine without having to chroot or anything. -- Alexander Rapp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't find kernel-source package?!
After 2 days of googling and trying various APT mirrors, I simply cannot find a kernel-source package that works for me. My current mirror is http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/ sarge main non-free I am using Debian 2.6.10-amd64-k8 (sarge) distro... I can find the kernel-headers-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8, but no-where can i find the right source package... An apt-get install kernel-source will give me the following possible packages... kernel-source-2.6.9 2.6.9-5 kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-13 kernel-source-2.6.10 2.6.10-5 kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8 kernel-source-2.4.26 2.4.26-6 kernel-source-2.4.25 2.4.25-3 kernel-source-2.4.24 2.4.24-3 kernel-source-2.2.25 2.2.25-3 And as far as i can see, the amd64 arch package isn't there Anyone know where to find this rogue package? Thanks, James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Geforce FX 5900XT
Hi Jens, Thanks! It all worked and what a difference! I still feel like a newbie but learning all the time! I really appreciate your help. Brian On Sunday 06 March 2005 12:19 am, Jens Vogel wrote: Hi, Basically there are four steps to follow if you want to get nVidia support working. Non-free must be included in your sources.list. 1. apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source nvidia-kernel-common 2. Follow the steps in /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian 3. apt-get install nvidia-glx nvidia-settings 4. Edit your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 Done. Hope that helps, Jens Brian R. Whitecotton wrote: Has onyone successfully installed the nvidia provided drivers for the GeForce FX 5900XT or similar chipset? I have a base-debian pure64 netinstall + xserver-common. et. al using the basic nv driver. I have kdm as my window manager and am running KDE3.3.x and it all works quite well! Very excited about that! Now, I want to get hardware graphics support up and running. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Other info: I have installed all pertinent kernel-sources, kernel-headers, etc. The nvidia installer compiles the driver with no problem but then it complains about installing the nvidia module. There are symbols that are unrecognized. Nvidia warns that this is usually due to incorrect libs or kernel headers but I have all matching versions installed as prerequisite. So I am at a loss. I am hoping someone has figured out why nvidia's installer fails. Thank You and Advance!!! -- http://desktux.xs4all.nl/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vpnc seg fault
Benjamin Vötterle wrote: Hi everybody, I am using pure64, when I try to connect, via vpnc-connect I am able to enter the password, after that I get a segmentation fault. Thank you voetzi Hmm have the same problem here too. Any hints ? Mfg Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Geforce FX 5900XT
Hi Brian, What kernel version and APT sources are you using? My apt doesn't appear to have nvidia-kernel-common... Thanks in advance, James Brian R. Whitecotton wrote: Hi Jens, Thanks! It all worked and what a difference! I still feel like a newbie but learning all the time! I really appreciate your help. Brian On Sunday 06 March 2005 12:19 am, Jens Vogel wrote: Hi, Basically there are four steps to follow if you want to get nVidia support working. Non-free must be included in your sources.list. 1. apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source nvidia-kernel-common 2. Follow the steps in /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian 3. apt-get install nvidia-glx nvidia-settings 4. Edit your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 Done. Hope that helps, Jens Brian R. Whitecotton wrote: Has onyone successfully installed the nvidia provided drivers for the GeForce FX 5900XT or similar chipset? I have a base-debian pure64 netinstall + xserver-common. et. al using the basic nv driver. I have kdm as my window manager and am running KDE3.3.x and it all works quite well! Very excited about that! Now, I want to get hardware graphics support up and running. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Other info: I have installed all pertinent kernel-sources, kernel-headers, etc. The nvidia installer compiles the driver with no problem but then it complains about installing the nvidia module. There are symbols that are unrecognized. Nvidia warns that this is usually due to incorrect libs or kernel headers but I have all matching versions installed as prerequisite. So I am at a loss. I am hoping someone has figured out why nvidia's installer fails. Thank You and Advance!!! -- http://desktux.xs4all.nl/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Geforce FX 5900XT
Hi James, My APT Sources.list contains: deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sarge main contrib non-free deb-src http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sarge main contrib non-free and I am running kernelversion 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 which is a stock kernel. Brian On Sunday 06 March 2005 02:29 am, you wrote: Hi Brian, What kernel version and APT sources are you using? My apt doesn't appear to have nvidia-kernel-common... Thanks in advance, James Brian R. Whitecotton wrote: Hi Jens, Thanks! It all worked and what a difference! I still feel like a newbie but learning all the time! I really appreciate your help. Brian On Sunday 06 March 2005 12:19 am, Jens Vogel wrote: Hi, Basically there are four steps to follow if you want to get nVidia support working. Non-free must be included in your sources.list. 1. apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source nvidia-kernel-common 2. Follow the steps in /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian 3. apt-get install nvidia-glx nvidia-settings 4. Edit your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 Done. Hope that helps, Jens Brian R. Whitecotton wrote: Has onyone successfully installed the nvidia provided drivers for the GeForce FX 5900XT or similar chipset? I have a base-debian pure64 netinstall + xserver-common. et. al using the basic nv driver. I have kdm as my window manager and am running KDE3.3.x and it all works quite well! Very excited about that! Now, I want to get hardware graphics support up and running. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Other info: I have installed all pertinent kernel-sources, kernel-headers, etc. The nvidia installer compiles the driver with no problem but then it complains about installing the nvidia module. There are symbols that are unrecognized. Nvidia warns that this is usually due to incorrect libs or kernel headers but I have all matching versions installed as prerequisite. So I am at a loss. I am hoping someone has figured out why nvidia's installer fails. Thank You and Advance!!! -- http://desktux.xs4all.nl/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
amd64 (gcc-3.4) updates?
Hi folks, There were pretty few updates for gcc-3.4 in the last weeks. Any problems? Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: AMD64 small form factor
Le 6 mars 05, à 00:39, Morten Bo Johansen a écrit : Dale E. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed my SN95G5 with very few problems. (During the CD part of the It is a little strange that it works for you and not for me. Maybe the difference lies in the brand of harddisk? I have a Seagate Sata 120 GB sata150 7200.7 Rpm / NCQ disk on the first sata contoller. It seems we are several people stuck with Seagate SATA disks on nforce3. I don't know if Manuele and Zsolt made some progress, but as for me I'm stuck as you are. Exactly the same symptoms. I reported on 02/16 to linux-ide@vger.kernel.org with some interesting tests but got no reaction. I'll try compilling the module in to see if it behaves better. There might be an issue with hotplug (if I manage to use the sata disk very quick after booting from pata it works, if I stop using it after some time it spins down and then is unusable) Thanks for the tip, GoM I tried gentoo and compiled my own kernel. I compiled the sata_nv drier statically into the kernel and then there is no problem. Morten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP.sig Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=
No recent debs in the gcc-3.4 archive?
Hello, I'm using the gcc-3.4 archive but I didn't see any new debs in the recent days. Looking in http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/buildd-logs/ I can see build-logs from the last few days but I can't find the build packages in http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/pool. Is there something broken or is my sources.list not uptodate? Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amd64 (gcc-3.4) updates?
On 05-Mar-06 12:07, Harald Dunkel wrote: Hi folks, There were pretty few updates for gcc-3.4 in the last weeks. Any problems? Thank you for the hint. There was indeed something wrong. It seems that since a few days the packages I built were not properly uploaded into the gcc-3.4 archive (A 'mv' command in a script that I use did not work. It had an 'argument list too long' error because there were too many files to be moved). I am currently reuploading the missing packages. This will take a few hours. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: snmpd network intefaces not displayed]
Hi everybody. Sorry for bringin this up again, I am a new user to pure64. I saw in some messages from January that some people had problems reading out network statistics from 2.6.8 with snmpd, but that the upgrade to 2.6.10 resolved their problems. Well, for me it doesn't resolv the problems. When snmpwalk:ing system it looks ok, and when trying other stuff, nothing is there. The cfgmaker for mrtg doesn't find anything either. I tried the kernel you get now when net-installing (2.6.8-10) and this one: ii kernel-image-2.6.10-9-amd64-k82.6.10-4 The snmpd installed is: ii snmpd 5.1.2-6 trillian:~# snmpwalk -v 2c -c public localhost SNMPv2-MIB::sysDescr.0 = STRING: Linux trillian 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 #1 Wed Feb 9 22:29:16 CET 2005 x86_64 SNMPv2-MIB::sysObjectID.0 = OID: NET-SNMP-MIB::netSnmpAgentOIDs.10 SNMPv2-MIB::sysUpTime.0 = Timeticks: (290771) 0:48:27.71 SNMPv2-MIB::sysContact.0 = STRING: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SNMPv2-MIB::sysName.0 = STRING: trillian SNMPv2-MIB::sysLocation.0 = STRING: Solna, Sweden SNMPv2-MIB::sysORLastChange.0 = Timeticks: (1) 0:00:00.01 SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.1 = OID: IF-MIB::ifMIB SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.2 = OID: SNMPv2-MIB::snmpMIB SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.3 = OID: TCP-MIB::tcpMIB SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.4 = OID: IP-MIB::ip SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.5 = OID: UDP-MIB::udpMIB SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.6 = OID: SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB::vacmBasicGroup SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.7 = OID: SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB::snmpFrameworkMIBCompliance SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.8 = OID: SNMP-MPD-MIB::snmpMPDCompliance SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.9 = OID: SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB::usmMIBCompliance SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.1 = STRING: The MIB module to describe generic objects for network interface sub-layers SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.2 = STRING: The MIB module for SNMPv2 entities SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.3 = STRING: The MIB module for managing TCP implementations SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.4 = STRING: The MIB module for managing IP and ICMP implementations SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.5 = STRING: The MIB module for managing UDP implementations SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.6 = STRING: View-based Access Control Model for SNMP. SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.7 = STRING: The SNMP Management Architecture MIB. SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.8 = STRING: The MIB for Message Processing and Dispatching. SNMPv2-MIB::sysORDescr.9 = STRING: The management information definitions for the SNMP User-based Security Model. SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.1 = Timeticks: (1) 0:00:00.01 SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.2 = Timeticks: (1) 0:00:00.01 SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.3 = Timeticks: (1) 0:00:00.01 SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.4 = Timeticks: (1) 0:00:00.01 SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.5 = Timeticks: (1) 0:00:00.01 SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.6 = Timeticks: (1) 0:00:00.01 SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.7 = Timeticks: (1) 0:00:00.01 SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.8 = Timeticks: (1) 0:00:00.01 SNMPv2-MIB::sysORUpTime.9 = Timeticks: (1) 0:00:00.01 UDP-MIB::udpOutDatagrams.0 = No more variables left in this MIB View (It is past the end of the MIB tree) trillian:~# Can somebody hint me where to look for the problem? /n -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: powernowd / stock kernels
Hi all, Thank you very much. This was the hint that forced me to look elsewere ;-) I replaced my Q-TEC 350W PSU (which is very silent) with some no-name PSU a friend had lying around. And guess what - no more lockups. regards, Mike Hi, I have the K8T Neo-FIS2R Mainboard, also latest BIOS (v2.0). In the beginning (the board came with v1.4) nothing which is related to power and ACPI did work. Since BIOS v1.9 ACPI and Cool'n'Quiet using powernowd finally works perfectly. No problems throttling up or down whatsoever; while writing this my CPU (AMD64 3000+) is constantly around 26°C. Are you sure you have no thermal problems or other hardware related issues? Greets, Jens Michael Wagener wrote: Hi, would you mind posting your type of mainboard? I have CnQ running but sometimes the machine locks up hard when the CPU tries to throttle up. Throttling down and running full-speed w/o powernowd works fine though :-| I'm trying to hunt this down and assuming a Board/BIOS/CMOS problem. I am using a AMD64 3500+ on a MSI K8T Neo2 board (last BIOS). Thank you, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't find kernel-source package?!
After 2 days of googling and trying various APT mirrors, I simply cannot find a kernel-source package that works for me. My current mirror is http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/ sarge main non-free I am using Debian 2.6.10-amd64-k8 (sarge) distro... I can find the kernel-headers-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8, but no-where can i find the right source package... An apt-get install kernel-source will give me the following possible packages... kernel-source-2.6.9 2.6.9-5 kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-13 kernel-source-2.6.10 2.6.10-5 kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8 kernel-source-2.4.26 2.4.26-6 kernel-source-2.4.25 2.4.25-3 kernel-source-2.4.24 2.4.24-3 kernel-source-2.2.25 2.2.25-3 And as far as i can see, the amd64 arch package isn't there sources don't have arch, can be compiled for any arch. (Maybe i misunderstood what your problem was, my english is not that good yet).You need kernel-source 2.6.10 Kernel headers do have an arch tag because they are binary kernel specific (for each binary kernel you should have a kernel-headers package, and you should look for kernel-headers-2.6.10-XX not 2.6.8-10, beacuse those are for kernel 2.6.8 only (package version 10). Aritz Beraza [Rei] -- Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] ___ [ WWW ] http://evangelion.homelinux.net [jabber] rei[en]bulmalug.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't find kernel-source package?!
Hello, That makes a bit more sense to me now! Thank-you for your help! James Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] wrote: After 2 days of googling and trying various APT mirrors, I simply cannot find a kernel-source package that works for me. My current mirror is http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/ sarge main non-free I am using Debian 2.6.10-amd64-k8 (sarge) distro... I can find the kernel-headers-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8, but no-where can i find the right source package... An apt-get install kernel-source will give me the following possible packages... kernel-source-2.6.9 2.6.9-5 kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-13 kernel-source-2.6.10 2.6.10-5 kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8 kernel-source-2.4.26 2.4.26-6 kernel-source-2.4.25 2.4.25-3 kernel-source-2.4.24 2.4.24-3 kernel-source-2.2.25 2.2.25-3 And as far as i can see, the amd64 arch package isn't there sources don't have arch, can be compiled for any arch. (Maybe i misunderstood what your problem was, my english is not that good yet).You need kernel-source 2.6.10 Kernel headers do have an arch tag because they are binary kernel specific (for each binary kernel you should have a kernel-headers package, and you should look for kernel-headers-2.6.10-XX not 2.6.8-10, beacuse those are for kernel 2.6.8 only (package version 10). Aritz Beraza [Rei] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fbpanel from pool segfaults, rebuild helps
On 05/03/2005 Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: for some reason, fbpanel from the pure64 pool segfaults on my pure64 system. if i fetch the package sources and rebuild it on my own, it works like a charm. it doesn't matter whether i build it with gcc-3.4 or gcc-3.3, both work well. any suggestions, why the package in the pool segfaults? btw. can you reproduce this anyway? Did you use the gcc-3.4 archive at some point? no, i use only the pure64 archives, my sources.list contains: deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/pure64/ sid main deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/pure64/ sid main do you have any suggestions? bye jonas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Geforce FX 5900XT
Hi Jens, You seem to know a bit about the nVidia support. I have followed instructions as you said, and all seemed to go well, but XFree86.0.log says it can't load the module. Please see the logfile attatched. I hope you can help... I'm using the same arch as Brian (2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 (sarge)), and I simply cannot seem to get it working.. Many thanks in advance, James Jens Vogel wrote: Hi, Basically there are four steps to follow if you want to get nVidia support working. Non-free must be included in your sources.list. 1. apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source nvidia-kernel-common 2. Follow the steps in /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian 3. apt-get install nvidia-glx nvidia-settings 4. Edit your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 Done. Hope that helps, Jens Brian R. Whitecotton wrote: Has onyone successfully installed the nvidia provided drivers for the GeForce FX 5900XT or similar chipset? I have a base-debian pure64 netinstall + xserver-common. et. al using the basic nv driver. I have kdm as my window manager and am running KDE3.3.x and it all works quite well! Very excited about that! Now, I want to get hardware graphics support up and running. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Other info: I have installed all pertinent kernel-sources, kernel-headers, etc. The nvidia installer compiles the driver with no problem but then it complains about installing the nvidia module. There are symbols that are unrecognized. Nvidia warns that this is usually due to incorrect libs or kernel headers but I have all matching versions installed as prerequisite. So I am at a loss. I am hoping someone has figured out why nvidia's installer fails. Thank You and Advance!!! XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 (Debian 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 2005022119 [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Release Date: 15 August 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 x86_64 [ELF] Build Date: 20 February 2005 This version of XFree86 has been extensively modified by the Debian Project, and is not supported by the XFree86 Project, Inc., in any way. Bugs should be reported to the Debian Bug Tracking System; see URL: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting . We strongly encourage the use of the reportbug package and command to ensure that bug reports contain as much useful information as possible. Before filing a bug report, you may want to consult the Debian X FAQ: XHTML version: file:///usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.xhtml plain text version: file:///usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz Module Loader present OS Kernel: Linux version 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.4.4 20041218 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-7)) #1 Wed Feb 9 22:29:16 CET 2005 Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: /var/log/XFree86.0.log, Time: Sun Mar 6 16:15:38 2005 (==) Using config file: /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 (==) ServerLayout Default Layout (**) |--Screen Default Screen (0) (**) | |--Monitor gnr (**) | |--Device nVidia FX5700 (**) |--Input Device Generic Keyboard (**) Option XkbRules xfree86 (**) XKB: rules: xfree86 (**) Option XkbModel pc104 (**) XKB: model: pc104 (**) Option XkbLayout us (**) XKB: layout: us (**) Option XkbVariant gb (**) XKB: variant: gb (==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled (**) |--Input Device Mouse1 (WW) The directory /usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (**) FontPath set to unix/:7100,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi (==) RgbPath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb (==) ModulePath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules (++) using VT number 7 (WW) Open APM failed (/dev/apm_bios) (No such file or directory) (II) Module ABI versions: XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.2 XFree86 Video Driver: 0.6 XFree86 XInput driver : 0.4 XFree86 Server Extension : 0.2 XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.4 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: bitmap (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a (II) Module bitmap: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.3.0.1, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.4 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: pcidata (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a (II) Module pcidata: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.3.0.1, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.6 (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 (II) PCI: Config type is 1 (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x, mode1Res1 = 0x8000 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1039,0755 card 1019,1891 rev 01 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1039,0002
Re: Geforce FX 5900XT
James Titcumb schreef: Hi Jens, You seem to know a bit about the nVidia support. I have followed instructions as you said, and all seemed to go well, but XFree86.0.log says it can't load the module. Please see the logfile attatched. (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA kernel module! (EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting *** (II) UnloadModule: nvidia (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. Fatal server error: no screens found When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send the full server output, not just the last messages. This can be found in the log file /var/log/XFree86.0.log. Please report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make sure you have loaded the nvidia kernel module by hand (i.e. # modprobe nvidia, or put it in /etc/modules), it won't load automatically. Greetings, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Geforce FX 5900XT
Hi James, Can you please also post the file /etc/X11/XF86Config-4? As far as I can see from here either the compilation went wrong or the XF86Config-4 contains a mistake. With the XF86Config-4 I made the best experiences with removing or commenting the following lines from 'Section Module': - Load GLcore (at least this one is active according to your log) - Load dri Also the complete 'Section DRI' (if exists) needs to be commented. As for the compilation... if you can find a relevant log, please post it as well. This is quite some time ago for me, if I recall correctly `export CC=gcc-3.4' had to be set before you could start compiling. But I am absolutely not sure about this. I followed the Method #1 from the README, of course the correct kernel-headers have to be installed: # apt-get install kernel-headers-`uname -r` I am running Sid/Pure64 w/ 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 and the nVidia-driver is working fine. I still have the .deb file, but I am not sure whether it's legal to post it (if it would help you anyway). Greets, Jens James Titcumb wrote: Hi Jens, You seem to know a bit about the nVidia support. I have followed instructions as you said, and all seemed to go well, but XFree86.0.log says it can't load the module. Please see the logfile attatched. I hope you can help... I'm using the same arch as Brian (2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 (sarge)), and I simply cannot seem to get it working.. Many thanks in advance, James Jens Vogel wrote: Hi, Basically there are four steps to follow if you want to get nVidia support working. Non-free must be included in your sources.list. 1. apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source nvidia-kernel-common 2. Follow the steps in /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian 3. apt-get install nvidia-glx nvidia-settings 4. Edit your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 Done. Hope that helps, Jens Brian R. Whitecotton wrote: Has onyone successfully installed the nvidia provided drivers for the GeForce FX 5900XT or similar chipset? I have a base-debian pure64 netinstall + xserver-common. et. al using the basic nv driver. I have kdm as my window manager and am running KDE3.3.x and it all works quite well! Very excited about that! Now, I want to get hardware graphics support up and running. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Other info: I have installed all pertinent kernel-sources, kernel-headers, etc. The nvidia installer compiles the driver with no problem but then it complains about installing the nvidia module. There are symbols that are unrecognized. Nvidia warns that this is usually due to incorrect libs or kernel headers but I have all matching versions installed as prerequisite. So I am at a loss. I am hoping someone has figured out why nvidia's installer fails. Thank You and Advance!!! -- http://desktux.xs4all.nl/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Geforce FX 5900XT
It appears that it is a mistake on my part... after checking Jen's reply carefully, I found out that somewhere between when I first started trying to install the nvidia drivers and now... my kernel version had changed... previously, I had the correct headers (kernel-headers-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8), and I upgraded kernel to 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8. Stupid mistake, I know. I have just logged in, and the nvidia drivers work fine... I can finally use my second monitor :) Thanks very much for both your help James David Hartveld wrote: James Titcumb schreef: Hi Jens, You seem to know a bit about the nVidia support. I have followed instructions as you said, and all seemed to go well, but XFree86.0.log says it can't load the module. Please see the logfile attatched. (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA kernel module! (EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting *** (II) UnloadModule: nvidia (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. Fatal server error: no screens found When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send the full server output, not just the last messages. This can be found in the log file /var/log/XFree86.0.log. Please report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make sure you have loaded the nvidia kernel module by hand (i.e. # modprobe nvidia, or put it in /etc/modules), it won't load automatically. Greetings, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.11 and fglrx 8.10.19 (patch included)
Hi @all,
out of curiosity I prepared a patch for fglrx-8.10.19 to compile against
kernel 2.6.11:
$ uname -a
Linux camelot 2.6.11 #4 Fri Mar 4 19:33:03 CET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
$ grep -i fglrx /var/log/messages
Mar 6 17:32:32 camelot kernel: [fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 8.10.19 [Feb 9
2005] on minor 0
Mar 6 17:45:47 camelot kernel: [fglrx] AGP detected, AgpState = 0x1f000217
(hardware caps of chipset)
Mar 6 17:45:47 camelot kernel: [fglrx] AGP enabled, AgpCommand = 0x1f000314
(selected caps)
Mar 6 17:45:47 camelot kernel: [fglrx] free AGP = 121909248
Mar 6 17:45:47 camelot kernel: [fglrx] max AGP = 121909248
Mar 6 17:45:47 camelot kernel: [fglrx] free LFB = 44960
Mar 6 17:45:47 camelot kernel: [fglrx] max LFB = 44960
Mar 6 17:45:47 camelot kernel: [fglrx] free Inv = 0
Mar 6 17:45:47 camelot kernel: [fglrx] max Inv = 0
Mar 6 17:45:47 camelot kernel: [fglrx] total Inv = 0
Mar 6 17:45:47 camelot kernel: [fglrx] total TIM = 0
Mar 6 17:45:47 camelot kernel: [fglrx] total FB = 0
Mar 6 17:45:47 camelot kernel: [fglrx] total AGP = 32768
I used hints and older patches from this link:
http://web38.austria182.server4free.de/forum2/viewforum.php?f=5
It compiles with some warnings and runs at least on ia32. Cannot test on AMD64
since
my MSI K8T Neo2 does not like my Sapphire Radeon 9600 TX (does not POST).
good luck,
Mike
Does anybody try to install the ati drivers fglrx 8.10.19 with the latest
stable 2.6.11 Kernel.
I'm currently using the a 2.6.10 kernel with the fglrx-installer 8.10.19-1
from flavio's pages. And it work great. Thanks flavio.
But the fglrx modules refuse to compile with a 2.6.11 kernel !
Ludovic
Don't worry , be happy.
--- firegl_public.c.orig 2005-03-06 17:50:52.0 +0100
+++ firegl_public.c 2005-03-04 23:45:37.0 +0100
@@ -217,7 +217,11 @@
/* global module vars and constants - defined trough macros */
MODULE_AUTHOR(Fire GL - ATI Research GmbH, Germany);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION(ATI Fire GL);
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x020600
MODULE_PARM(firegl, s);
+#else
+module_param(firegl, charp, 0);
+#endif
#ifdef MODULE_LICENSE
MODULE_LICENSE(Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies, Starnberg, GERMANY);
#endif
@@ -2424,7 +2428,7 @@
static vm_nopage_ret_t vm_pcie_nopage(struct vm_area_struct* vma,
unsigned long address,
- int write_access)
+ int *type)
{
return do_vm_pcie_nopage(vma, address);
}
@@ -2703,8 +2707,12 @@
struct page *page = virt_to_page((unsigned long)__va(VM_OFFSET(vma)));
if (!VALID_PAGE(page) || PageReserved(page))
#else
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02060b
+if (vma-vm_pgoff = __pa(high_memory))
+#else
if (__ke_vm_offset(vma) = __pa(high_memory))
#endif
+#endif
{
#ifdef __i386__
if (boot_cpu_data.x86 3)
@@ -2719,13 +2727,23 @@
#endif /* __ia64__ */
vma-vm_flags |= VM_IO; /* not in core dump */
}
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02060b
+if (remap_pfn_range(FGL_VMA_API_PASS
+ vma-vm_start,
+ vma-vm_pgoff,
+#else
if (remap_page_range(FGL_VMA_API_PASS
vma-vm_start,
__ke_vm_offset(vma),
+#endif
vma-vm_end - vma-vm_start,
vma-vm_page_prot))
{
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02060b
+__KE_DEBUG(remap_pfn_range failed\n);
+#else
__KE_DEBUG(remap_page_range failed\n);
+#endif
return -EAGAIN;
}
vma-vm_flags |= VM_SHM | VM_RESERVED; /* Don't swap */
@@ -2786,9 +2804,15 @@
{
if (__ke_vm_offset(vma) = __pa(high_memory))
vma-vm_flags |= VM_IO; /* not in core dump */
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02060b
+if (remap_pfn_range(FGL_VMA_API_PASS
+vma-vm_start,
+vma-vm_pgoff,
+#else
if (remap_page_range(FGL_VMA_API_PASS
vma-vm_start,
__ke_vm_offset(vma),
+#endif
vma-vm_end - vma-vm_start,
vma-vm_page_prot))
{
@@ -2823,9 +2847,15 @@
{
if (__ke_vm_offset(vma) = __pa(high_memory))
vma-vm_flags |= VM_IO; /* not in core dump */
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02060b
+if (remap_pfn_range(FGL_VMA_API_PASS
+ vma-vm_start,
+ vma-vm_pgoff,
+#else
if (remap_page_range(FGL_VMA_API_PASS
vma-vm_start,
__ke_vm_offset(vma),
+#endif
vma-vm_end - vma-vm_start,
vma-vm_page_prot))
{
@@ -2873,6 +2903,37 @@
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x020400
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02060b
+
+typedef struct {
+ void
Re: Can't find kernel-source package?!
James Titcumb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After 2 days of googling and trying various APT mirrors, I simply cannot find a kernel-source package that works for me. My current mirror is http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/ sarge main non-free I am using Debian 2.6.10-amd64-k8 (sarge) distro... I can find the There is no such thing as a 2.6.10-amd64-k8 (sarge) distro. It is sarge, period. 2.6.10-amd64-k8 is just the kernel you are using and has nothing to do with the dist. kernel-headers-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8, but no-where can i find the right source package... apt-get source kernel-headers-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fbpanel from pool segfaults, rebuild helps
Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 05/03/2005 Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: for some reason, fbpanel from the pure64 pool segfaults on my pure64 system. if i fetch the package sources and rebuild it on my own, it works like a charm. it doesn't matter whether i build it with gcc-3.4 or gcc-3.3, both work well. any suggestions, why the package in the pool segfaults? btw. can you reproduce this anyway? Did you use the gcc-3.4 archive at some point? no, i use only the pure64 archives, my sources.list contains: deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/pure64/ sid main deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/pure64/ sid main do you have any suggestions? bye jonas Debug it. Something must be wrong with your config. fbpanel runs fine here. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AudiglyLS sound
Hi All, I have one more hardware issue that I am hoping someone can help me with. arch 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 soundcard soundblaster audigyls alsa is installed but does not recognize the card (no PCI cards found) Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Brian Whitecotton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
via-velocity not detected in D-I
Was this the correct forum for AMD64-related D-I issues? When booting up with this weekends D-I for AMD64, the nic was not detected, and I had to switch to another console and modprobe via-velocity before choosing country, language, and so on.. Only the Firewire ethernet was loaded otherwise. The hardware is a ABIT AV-8 motherboard with integrated via nic: :00:0e.0 0200: 1106:3119 (rev 11) Subsystem: 147b:1415 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Latency: 32 (750ns min, 2000ns max) Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 22 Region 0: I/O ports at b400 [size=256] Region 1: Memory at f882 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME- /n -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AudiglyLS sound
Brian R. Whitecotton wrote: arch 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 soundcard soundblaster audigyls alsa is installed but does not recognize the card (no PCI cards found) http://www.linuxquestions.org/hcl/showproduct.php?product=2034sort=8cat=81page=1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AudiglyLS sound
Brian R. Whitecotton wrote: Hi All, I have one more hardware issue that I am hoping someone can help me with. arch 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 soundcard soundblaster audigyls alsa is installed but does not recognize the card (no PCI cards found) http://alsa.opensrc.org/index.php?page=audigyls -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: via-velocity not detected in D-I
Niklas Ögren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Was this the correct forum for AMD64-related D-I issues? When booting up with this weekends D-I for AMD64, the nic was not detected, and I had to switch to another console and modprobe via-velocity before choosing country, language, and so on.. Only the Firewire ethernet was loaded otherwise. This isn't amd64 related but a general probelm. Please report it against discover. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anyone uses the Gigabyte GA K8-NS Pro ?
Hi Corey! On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:43:19 -0800, Corey Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] It might be that nobody here is using that motherboard. I already feared that, but I wanted to get sure. When researching a motherboard to determine linux compatability, I always find a list of compoents and use make menuconfig or google to see if each component's chipset is supported (when I don't know already). Searching google for k8-ns pro reveals this page: http://www.mainboard.cz/mb/gigabyte/GA-K8NSPro.htm ahh.. make menuconfig :-) I do compile my own kernels, but I didn't have the idea to compare the kernel config to the chipset! Thank you for the hint! I'll answer the ones I know for you; I'm sure you can dig up the rest if someone else doesn't have firsthand experience. GA-K8NS Pro nForce3 250 chipset I've been using an nforce3 250 board since December without a hitch. Excellent! Processor Socket 754 for AMD Athlon64 This goes without saying... Super I/O: ITE IT8712F chip lm_sensors supports this. Works fine for me. Cool! Silicon Image sil3512 controller I'm pretty sure this is supported in recent kernels. I don't use SATA drives in the near future, so this is not that important currently, but as far as I've read it's supported. GigaRAID ATA 133 RAID controller I don't know. As far as I've read, the nForce3 has an IDE/ATA controller. Is that GigaRAID additional to the nForce3 controller, or does one need the GigaRAID working in order to use a ATA disk ? I grep'ed the kernel source and only found 8212 (GigaRAID uses the ITE8212 chip) in /drivers/pci/pci.ids Since I only found it in the PCI id's I think it's not supported ? (otherwise it would appear somewhere in the source aswell ?) T.I. IEEE1394 controller If this uses the PCILynx chip then it's supported. Don't use Firewire (yet) Marvell 8001 Gigabit Ethernet controller The sk98lin driver supports this. Good, but I have 2 PCI network cards anyway. Realtek ALC850 Audio AC'97 Codec Recent versions of alsa should support this too. Rock'n'roll!! ;-) Thank you very much! Best regards, Hannes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instead of chroot for i386
Well, that's really encouraging, thanks a lot for the post! On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:15:05 +0300, Alexander Rapp wrote: Tong wrote: Well, I was thinking to abolish the chroot entirely. Say my i386 Debian Sarge is mounted on /os/deb32. Then, having configured the ldconfig, just launch ooffice (or any other tools not available in amd64 yet) as /os/deb32/usr/bin/ooffice -- no bind mount, no dchroot, no various sym-links. theoretically, should it work? Running ooffice outside the chroot should work fine. It's the same principle as the ia32-libs package. I have ia32-libs (which isn't even a full chroot) installed and /emul/ia32-linux/lib and /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib in my ldconfig, and running openoffice works fine without having to chroot or anything. -- Alexander Rapp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instead of chroot for i386
Tong wrote: My understand that the solo reason for the i386 chroot to exist is to avoid messing up 64bit and 32bit libraries. Is that so? Nope, it's because debian's packaging system isn't intelligent enough to handle two architectures in the same installation. Linux can handle 32 and 64-bit libraries side by side at the same time just fine. I'm running an i386 Debian Sarge perfectly well, and I have sufficient spare partitions to test AMD64 Sarge. In this case, is it ok just to append my i386 tool paths to the PATH and add i386 library paths to ldconfig? If you want, but I'd mount the whole tree and use it as a chroot. For other reasons, you're going to want to bind mount certain portions of your 64bit install into the 32bit one or vice-versa, depending on which one is master. To me, theoretically it should work, and it is much much simpler than doing a brand new i386 chroot install. I don't think so. The chroot'd install is really a slave install and doesn't need to be a full, bootable debian install (nor do you really want it to be), Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AudiglyLS sound
David, I have tried exactly what alsa.opensrc.org has suggested and still alsaconf finds no pci sound devices. alsa-base and alsa-utils are installed, modules.conf and modutils shows all pertinent entries, modinfo soundcore shows soundcore is present and loadable...this is frustrating. Any further insight that you may have would be very appreciated. Brian On Sunday 06 March 2005 12:12 pm, David Liontooth wrote: Brian R. Whitecotton wrote: Hi All, I have one more hardware issue that I am hoping someone can help me with. arch 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 soundcard soundblaster audigyls alsa is installed but does not recognize the card (no PCI cards found) http://alsa.opensrc.org/index.php?page=audigyls -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
