Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
On Saturday 2 April 2005 08:46, Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote: > > They are available here: deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64/ ./ > > I guess they are for pure64. > > Does the -0pre1 in the name of many packages there, indicate the kde > version used was not 3.4 final ? No, the -0pre1 is the Debian part, indicating this: - the 0 means unofficial packages, as KDE 3.4 will not go into sarge/sid - the package that will go into sid after the sarge release will start with -1 so upgrades will go fine - I'm not sure about the pre1/pre2. It probably means that these are packages in progress or that the just allow increasing the deb version while keeping it start with -0 Egon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] PhD student on Molecular Representation in Chemometrics Radboud University Nijmegen http://www.cac.science.ru.nl/people/egonw/ GPG: 1024D/D6336BA6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
> They are available here: deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64/ ./ > I guess they are for pure64. Does the -0pre1 in the name of many packages there, indicate the kde version used was not 3.4 final ? Ernest. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sata_sil -- one of three seagate drives detected on SI 3512
On a Gigabyte K8NS mobo, I have three Seagate 200GB SATA drives on a Silicon Image 3512 SATA Controller. One of them works great. From dmesg it looks like the other two don't get detected. This is on kernel.org's 2.6.12-rc1 amd64 -- I get the same results on Debian's 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8. libata version 1.10 loaded. sata_sil version 0.8 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APC2] enabled at IRQ 17 ACPI: PCI interrupt :02:0d.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 ata1: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xC2004080 ctl 0xC200408A bmdma 0xC2004000 i rq 17 ata2: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xC20040C0 ctl 0xC20040CA bmdma 0xC2004008 i rq 17 ata1: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:346b 83:7d01 84:4003 85:3469 86:3c01 87:4003 88:207f ata1: dev 0 ATA, max UDMA/133, 390721968 sectors: lba48 ata1(0): applying Seagate errata fix ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100 scsi0 : sata_sil ata2: no device found (phy stat ) scsi1 : sata_sil Vendor: ATA Model: ST3200822AS Rev: 3.01 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sda: 390721968 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 390721968 512-byte hdwr sectors (200050 MB) SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 p2 < p5 p6 p7 p8 p9 p10 > Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 Attached scsi generic sg0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0, type 0 There's a patch from Aron Rubin at http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0401.1/1175.html for the 3512 SATA Controller -- is this still needed? Does sata_sil also need patching? Jeff posted a patch http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/1/message/42211/flat a week ago, but it concerns data-corruption, not detection. Am I missing something simple like a boot option? I can't see if all three drives are ST3200822AS, but it's likely. Dave lspci :02:0d.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. (formerly CMD Technology Inc) SiI 3512 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller (rev 01) hwinfo Model: "ATA ST3200822AS" Vendor: "ATA" Device: "ST3200822AS" Revision: "3.01" Serial ID: "5LJ15SMG" Driver: "sata_sil", "sd" 36: PCI 20d.0: 0104 RAID bus controller [Created at pci.244] Unique ID: BVjG.2q+P4XEmX32 Parent ID: vuMS.fnpiWG08KJ2 SysFS ID: /devices/pci:00/:00:0e.0/:02:0d.0 SysFS BusID: :02:0d.0 Hardware Class: storage Model: "CMD RAID bus controller" Vendor: pci 0x1095 "CMD Technology Inc" Device: pci 0x3512 SubVendor: pci 0x1095 "CMD Technology Inc" SubDevice: pci 0x6512 Revision: 0x01 Driver: "sata_sil" I/O Ports: 0x9400-0x9407 (rw) I/O Ports: 0x9800-0x9803 (rw) I/O Ports: 0x9c00-0x9c07 (rw) I/O Ports: 0xa000-0xa003 (rw) I/O Ports: 0xa400-0xa40f (rw) Memory Range: 0xf0009000-0xf00091ff (rw,non-prefetchable) Memory Range: 0x-0x0007 (ro,prefetchable,disabled) IRQ: 17 (37441 events) Driver Info #0: Driver Status: sata_sil is not active Driver Activation Cmd: "modprobe sata_sil" Config Status: cfg=new, avail=yes, need=no, active=unknown Attached to: #23 (PCI bridge) hdparm # hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 3768 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1883.34 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.02 seconds = 21.21 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e1 (rev a1) :00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e0 (rev a2) :00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e4 (rev a1) :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e7 (rev a1) :00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e7 (rev a1) :00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e8 (rev a2) :00:05.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00df (rev a2) :00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00ea (rev a1) :00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e5 (rev a2) :00:0a.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e3 (rev a2) :00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00e2 (rev a2) :00:0e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 00ed (rev a2) :00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge :00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge :00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge :00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge :02:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Yukon Gigabit Ethernet 10/100/1000Base-T Adapter (rev 13) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kernel Asynchronous IO (libaio) support in debian
I wanted to know if anyone knows of any existing package for libaio for debian amd64. Wanted to know if anyone has a debian package for this. Thanks, Bharath --- Bharath Ramesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://csgrad.cs.vt.edu/~bramesh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
On April 1, 2005 02:54 am, Egon Willighagen wrote: > Anyway, how did others get KDE3.4 installed with apt-get? I installed 3.4 with apt-get. I commented out bytekeeper & cyberspace recently <...after the 3.4 install...> as they seem to be unavailable to my machine for some reason. After the update I did an upgrade, but that wasn't enough, I had to do a dist-upgrade and that did the trick. Cheers, Chris W. --- This is my sources.list: deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64/ unstable main deb-src http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64/ unstable main deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/openoffice.org/ ./ deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main non-free contrib #deb http://cyberspace.ucla.edu/marillat/ unstable main deb http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/debian-amd64/pure64 sid main contrib non-free deb-src http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/debian-amd64/pure64 sid main contrib non-free #deb http://bytekeeper.as28747.net/amd64/alioth/debian-pure64 sid main contrib non-free #deb-src http://bytekeeper.as28747.net/amd64/alioth/debian-pure64 sid main contrib non-free deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64 ./ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
That's me, and I'm happy. 3.4 is really nice. Thanks again, Kalle. Chris W. > At least one person in addition to me has installed the debs and has > been happy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Idea for structure of Apt-Get
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 09:55:01PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > The ISps with caching proxies are usualy the ones that always have > problems with apt-get and basicaly any other http/ftp app, esspecialy > ftp. They start to cache stuff they aren't supposed to cache or don't > notice file changes. > > Just think what happens if you get todays Release file and yesterdays > Packages file. Apt currnetly just fails to find packages but with 0.6 > it will detect network intrusion and loudly scream as checksums don't > match. Transparent proxies that don't do a good job rechecking documents are broken. If apt knows it is using a proxy it can request a check for updates on importante files (and does so). It works great. Nothing wrong with apt or proxies, only with transparent proxies that aren't that transparent. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting on nforce3 with SATA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zafod Biblbrox wrote: | Hi all, | | I'm trying to do a net boot on a nforce3 chipset (uses sata_nv module) with | Seagate 160GB SATA drive, but the drive is not recognized: | | > ata1 is slow to respond, please be patient | > ata1 failed to respond (30 secs) | | I have googled for help and have found out, that the same problem has been | noticed with FC3. They seem to have found a fix in the bug | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=140367, but the | proposed fixes are probably not applied to the install kernel. | | Do you have any suggestions how to overcome this problem? I had the exact same problem some time ago. It was a bug in kernel 2.6.8 and 2.6.9. As I see it, there are 2 solutions. Either use a custom kernel with the libata SATA drivers disabled and use the old depreciated ide-sata driver. Or you can use kernel 2.6.10 or above. /Jacob -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCTavtiAWIAI3xXVYRAggnAJ0U0sY2uoEcoq4qT+XB7gwwNOZPNgCaAmDO yMvWZ9rRfEGdfh2x0XqPxpM= =kC4l -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ndiswrapper
Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A couple days ago ndiswrapper 1.1 hit Sid on i386 only. This release > works fine on AMD64 with 64-bit drivers. Will the package just show up > on Debian AMD64, or does it require manual intervention? > > Thanks, > -- > Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802 > Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If the architecture field of the source package is all, any or includes amd64 then it will show up on its own. But that is not the case here. Filing bug. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mirroring debian-pure64 using debmirror
"Pedro Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I'm testing debmirror as a tool to have an internal mirror of > debian-pure64. This is the command I am using: > > # debmirror --host=debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org --root=:debian-pure64 > --dist=sarge,sid --arch=amd64 --nosource --method=rsync > --ignore-missing-release --ignore-release-gpg --timeout=3600 > -v /mirrors/debian-pure64 > > This gives me the following errors. So far I am ignoring the gpg > signature issue, but it consistently fails to download some files due to > md5sum check errors. > > Any comments? Thank you, You can download the public key ring and extract the key or go back 2 month and grab it from the ML archive. As for the two files those are reuploads and I guess I still haven't found out how to do them in such a way that this doesn't happen. I will fix that if I get some spare minutes. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Idea for structure of Apt-Get
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > the protocols usually used by apt over the net. Caching proxies have > two big advantages over changing apt: > > * Nothing have to be done to apt at all! > * Proxies also cache other things than debian packages. > > Helge Hafting The ISps with caching proxies are usualy the ones that always have problems with apt-get and basicaly any other http/ftp app, esspecialy ftp. They start to cache stuff they aren't supposed to cache or don't notice file changes. Just think what happens if you get todays Release file and yesterdays Packages file. Apt currnetly just fails to find packages but with 0.6 it will detect network intrusion and loudly scream as checksums don't match. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with chroot paths
El vie, 01-04-2005 a las 20:18 +0100, Clive Menzies escribiÃ: > # smbclient configuration > //server/share /smb/sharecifs > credentials=/home/user/.smb_pass,file_mode=0660,dir_mode=0770 0 0 > ditto for other shares. > > df -h shows the shares within the chroot environment as well as on /smb > I followed everything in the HOWTO and all is working fine except that > in spite of having identical entries in fstab for the smb shares, they > don't mount in the chroot. ie. I can't read/write from OOo and df -h > doesn't show the chroot mounts. In almost every respect the installs are > identical. I don't know what the problem could be (maybe you can't mount twice the same share?), but you could have a bind or rbind mount to export the /smb tree to the chroot. Greetings, -- Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
Problem with chroot paths
OK I give in. I've been going round in circles with this one and I'm sure the answer is simple, so perhaps someone can put me out of my misery ;) I've been using openoffice on a chroot install I did 2 months ago and it will read/write to smb shares which have been mounted in the fstab: # smbclient configuration //server/share /smb/sharecifs credentials=/home/user/.smb_pass,file_mode=0660,dir_mode=0770 0 0 ditto for other shares. df -h shows the shares within the chroot environment as well as on /smb I just created a new install on different partitions to use xfce rather than kde but have kept the original install just in case, I need it. I followed everything in the HOWTO and all is working fine except that in spite of having identical entries in fstab for the smb shares, they don't mount in the chroot. ie. I can't read/write from OOo and df -h doesn't show the chroot mounts. In almost every respect the installs are identical. In the HOWTO it refers to: "You can also pass filenames on the command line to openoffice since the paths are the same inside the chroot." Can someone point me to where this is set? Many thanks Clive -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thunderbird dies about 'mozilla-thunderbird -remote "mailto(harri)"'
Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > If I run > > mozilla-thunderbird -remote "mailto(harri)" > > then thunderbird dies with a core dump. (This command is > run if I click on a mailto: URL in firefox.) > > There is no such problem on i386, AFAICT. > > > Regards > > Harri For what it's worth, I can't reproduce this with mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.2-1 from pure64 sid. Are you using pure64 or gcc-3.4? A few days ago thunderbird from gcc-3.4 kept segfaulting and I switched to pure64. -Corey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Booting on nforce3 with SATA
Zafod Biblbrox wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to do a net boot on a nforce3 chipset (uses sata_nv module) with > Seagate 160GB SATA drive, but the drive is not recognized: > > > ata1 is slow to respond, please be patient > > ata1 failed to respond (30 secs) > > I have googled for help and have found out, that the same problem has been > noticed with FC3. They seem to have found a fix in the bug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=140367, but the > proposed fixes are probably not applied to the install kernel. > > Do you have any suggestions how to overcome this problem? > > juraj > > I've been booting from SATA using the nforce3 controller since 2.6.10 - no problems at all. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci | grep Serial :00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK8S Serial ATA Controller (v2.5) (rev a2) :00:0a.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK8S Serial ATA Controller (v2.5) (rev a2) >From looking at the bugzilla, it seems to be an old kernel bug. What kernel are you running? Have you tried upgrading? -Corey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[4]:
Popular software at low low prices. Photoshop, Windows, Office. http://msn.com.lmabbeyha.com/?tc_x_E.f1xAcYtZJ696h -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thunderbird dies about 'mozilla-thunderbird -remote "mailto(harri)"'
Hi folks, If I run mozilla-thunderbird -remote "mailto(harri)" then thunderbird dies with a core dump. (This command is run if I click on a mailto: URL in firefox.) There is no such problem on i386, AFAICT. Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: mozilla-thunderbird and enigmail problem
Doubletwist wrote: Corey Hickey wrote: | | | Were you using pure64 or gcc-3.4? I was using gcc-3.4 and I had pretty | much the same problem. Here's how it went. Most of this happened yesterday. | No, I'm using pure64. But I just ran an update and was able to install enigmail, so I guess the change was made. Everything works fine now. :) This is not an uncommon occurrence in Debian Sid. In general, if installation of one package requires the removal of another, as yesterday's Mozilla-Thunderbird required the removal of Enigmail, the most common problem is just that one package was released a day or two before the other (but it could be weeks). In most cases, the simplest strategy is to hold the upgrade until all dependent packages are ready. BTW I recommend wajig for managing packages. wajig newupgrade wajig install mozilla-thunderbird -s (simulates to check for dependencies) wajig mozilla-thunderbird hold (keep current version -- later unhold) Lots of good features and very well maintained on Debian by the developer. Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Acer Aspire 1510 and Debian Gnu/Linux amd64
Jean Alexandre PEYROUX a écrit : > I wrote this page in French. I hope to translate it in a few times. > > http://www.phear.org/~alnix > > Did you manage to have a proper ACPI support? I use the dsdt patch provided by http://casteyde.christian.free.fr/laptop/LinuxOnAspire1511LMi.html for my 1511LMi, I guess it should work on your 1513... The battery status is now correctly reported, and the suspend-to-disk works with a kernel >2.6.9 (without X) and with the 2.6.11 with X running (unfortunately, only if I use the free nv driver, not the NVIDIA). For information, the "5 in 1" card reader works out-oh-the-box. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [AGAIN] kde 3.4 packages anybody?
So far, so good :) Just installed them and work as smooth as expected... many many thanks!! Rafael Rodríguez El Lunes, 28 de Marzo de 2005 12:38, Kalle Kivimaa escribió: > Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm currently compiling the stuff from source and will probably set up > > a binary repository (probably unsigned packages, so use at your own > > discretion). I'll let you know later where. > > OK, the packages are being uploaded to the following apt repository. > Please wait a while for all the packages to get there, my upload speed > from home isn't that hot. > > deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64 ./ > > I think I've included everything but in case I've missed something, > just let me know and I'll add it. > > -- > * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * > * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer *
Re: Sis 190
Bhushan Kulkarni wrote: I have Asus K8S-MX Mobo which is having Sis 190 Ethernet Card , debian Installer unable to detect , how do i configure it Note my message on March 5th, I was unable to get this to work in the end. My suggestion is to keep watching http://www.sis.com/download/ in case they announce a Linux driver later on. /v\ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mirroring debian-pure64 using debmirror
Hi, I'm testing debmirror as a tool to have an internal mirror of debian-pure64. This is the command I am using: # debmirror --host=debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org --root=:debian-pure64 --dist=sarge,sid --arch=amd64 --nosource --method=rsync --ignore-missing-release --ignore-release-gpg --timeout=3600 -v /mirrors/debian-pure64 This gives me the following errors. So far I am ignoring the gpg signature issue, but it consistently fails to download some files due to md5sum check errors. Any comments? Thank you, -- Pedro Mirroring to /mirrors/debian-pure64 from rsync://anonymous:debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/:debian-pure64/ Arches: amd64 Dists: sarge,sid Sections: main,contrib,non-free,main/debian-installer Download at most 200 files per rsync call. Attempting to get lock, this might take 2 minutes before it fails. Get Release files. remote_get rsync dists/sarge/Release remote_get rsync dists/sarge/Release.gpg gpg: Signature made Thu Mar 31 12:44:58 2005 EST using DSA key ID 1B67D3C0 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Release signature does not verify. remote_get rsync dists/sid/Release remote_get rsync dists/sid/Release.gpg gpg: Signature made Thu Mar 31 12:45:11 2005 EST using DSA key ID 1B67D3C0 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Release signature does not verify. Get Packages and Sources files and other miscellany. Parse Packages and Sources files and add to the file list everything therein. Cleanup mirror. Download all files that we need to get (2 MiB). receiving file list ... done ./ pool/contrib/q/quake2/quake2_0.3-1_amd64.deb pool/main/r/rpl/rpl_1.5.1_all.deb sent 5958 bytes received 4050 bytes 2859.43 bytes/sec total size is 853456 speedup is 85.28 pool/contrib/q/quake2/quake2_0.3-1_amd64.deb failed md5sum check pool/main/r/rpl/rpl_1.5.1_all.deb failed md5sum check Downloaded files in 12s Errors: Release signature does not verify. Release signature does not verify. Failed to download files (2 errors)! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
On Friday 01 April 2005 12:35, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Rafael Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do u already have any feedback on those debs? > > At least one person in addition to me has installed the debs and has > been happy. add one more ;-) The Debs work wonderfully, with only minor glitches which are also present in the KDE packages for i386 which I use on my laptop. That's the price to pay for running the very latest stuff, I guess ;-) regards, Volker
Booting on nforce3 with SATA
Hi all, I'm trying to do a net boot on a nforce3 chipset (uses sata_nv module) with Seagate 160GB SATA drive, but the drive is not recognized: > ata1 is slow to respond, please be patient > ata1 failed to respond (30 secs) I have googled for help and have found out, that the same problem has been noticed with FC3. They seem to have found a fix in the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=140367, but the proposed fixes are probably not applied to the install kernel. Do you have any suggestions how to overcome this problem? juraj -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian-installer using 2.6.10
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 00:12:43 +0200, "dr.bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well excuse me, for a moment I thought you were talking about > monolithic installation cd images (but apparently that wasn't the > case). I, for one, would find a monolithic installation cd iso (not > netinstall) very useful (i'm trying to install on a system with no > debian-supported NICs and I need to push a full build environment on > the machine, including kernel source, before i have a chance of > building the NIC vendor-provided driver). AFAICS there are no isos > (nor jigdos) available that would help me get that done? > > /dr.bob > ummm never mind, I finally managed to sort out the situation and it wasn't a NIC driver issue at all, in spite of appearances -- my guess is some rather subtle failure in link negotiation between the NIC and the switch it's hooked to. Not something I can hope to understand easily I'm afraid. Anyway, the problem is solved and debian-amd64 is installed & running just fine on this box. /dr.bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian-installer using 2.6.10
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're working on 2.6.11 kernel. As you might have noticed it was > announced a few days ago that their is a 2.6.11 kernel in the > archive and we would like to get d-i working with that kernel. Any time frame when we can expect install images based on 2.6.11? I am eagerly anticipating this in the hope that the nvidia sata issues that have so far prevented me from getting any further might also be solved with 2.6.11. Thanks, Morten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Acer Aspire 1510 and Debian Gnu/Linux amd64
FRENCH ==> Je vais regarder ça, car j'ai un problème d'installation chez moi: ma carte ethernet n'est pas reconnu... Bref, je vais suivre tes indications, et regarder ça =) Plus de détails de mon problème à >> http://trustonme.net/forum/public/post.php?cat=8&topic=1035 ENGLISH ==> I'm going to look at that because I had a problem with my ethernet card, which wasn't reconnize for an unknowned reason. More details of my problem @ >> http://trustonme.net/forum/public/post.php?cat=8&topic=1035 [in french] On Mar 31, 2005 10:59 PM, Jean Alexandre PEYROUX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wrote this page in French. I hope to translate it in a few times. > > http://www.phear.org/~alnix > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- N-0-X, webmaster de http://www.noxistes.org
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
Egon Willighagen dijo: > Maybe we should setup a DebianAmd64KDE34 page? With the deb urls, and > where we > could post problems when we find them? It think it would be more reasonable to mail the debian-kde developers, so they announce the debs in the DebianKDE wiki, and maybe even upload them to alioth... Rafael Rodríguez -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
On Friday 01 April 2005 12:35 pm, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Rafael Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do u already have any feedback on those debs? > > At least one person in addition to me has installed the debs and has > been happy. Count another one. I've been running KDE 3.4 at home and at another i386 machines for some days now, and earlier today installed it on my dual amd64 system... amarok was running fine, and found no other problems either sofar... I was pleased to see that these debs also includes the kontact plugin for akregator :) Maybe we should setup a DebianAmd64KDE34 page? With the deb urls, and where we could post problems when we find them? The only problem I did have was how to install them... after adding the apt-get source as given earlier in this thread and updating/etc, I was not able to get things automatically updated... I do have both sarge and sid lines in the apt-get sources, and had a lot of trouble getting it going on the two i386 machines too (with other sources, of course...) I now downloaded all debs with wget on the index HTML page, and then did 'dpkg -i *deb', which mostly worked... applying a 'apt-get -f install' solved all problems, and then another 'dpkg -i *deb' completed the install... Anyway, how did others get KDE3.4 installed with apt-get? Egon
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
Rafael Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do u already have any feedback on those debs? At least one person in addition to me has installed the debs and has been happy. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
Do u already have any feedback on those debs? I'm still without my amd64 laptop...sigh... :( Rafael Rodríguez Kalle Kivimaa dijo: > Modestas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> They are available here: deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64/ ./ >> I guess they are for pure64. > > I guess so, the compiler which I used is > gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-12) > > I'm not familiar with the difference of pure64 and gcc 3.4, just > happily use the Debian amd64 port :) > > -- > * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) > * > * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer > * > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
Do u already have any feedback on those debs? I'm still without my amd64 laptop...sigh... :( Rafael Rodríguez Kalle Kivimaa dijo: > Modestas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> They are available here: deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64/ ./ >> I guess they are for pure64. > > I guess so, the compiler which I used is > gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-12) > > I'm not familiar with the difference of pure64 and gcc 3.4, just > happily use the Debian amd64 port :) > > -- > * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) > * > * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer > * > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
broken libnss-ldap
Hello Yesterday i've upgraded my pure64 box. One of the packages was libnss-ldap. After the upgrade and restart my login stopped working. The remote logins are still working fine, but the local logins are not. I am using centralised authentication with ldap. After removing the ldap related entries from the nsswitch.conf the local login accounts have started to work. Has anyone else experienced similar issues, or is it just me? Shall i file in a bug report? Many thanks -- Andrei Mikhailovsky Arhont Ltd - Information Security Web: http://www.arhont.com http://www.wi-foo.com Tel: +44 (0)870 4431337 Fax: +44 (0)117 9690141 PGP: Key ID - 0xFF67A4F4 PGP: Server - keyserver.pgp.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
Modestas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > They are available here: deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64/ ./ > I guess they are for pure64. I guess so, the compiler which I used is gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-12) I'm not familiar with the difference of pure64 and gcc 3.4, just happily use the Debian amd64 port :) -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
2005 m. Balandžio 1 d., Penktadienis 11:10, Egon Willighagen rašė: Hi, > I thought someone posted that he had put amd64 (pure64 or gcc3.4?) debs > online for KDE 3.4, but cannot find it in the archives, only someone > mentioning he was compiling... did I dream this? > > Are such debs online yet? They are available here: deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64/ ./ I guess they are for pure64. pgp9gDqNLPf8S.pgp Description: PGP signature
kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
Hi all, I thought someone posted that he had put amd64 (pure64 or gcc3.4?) debs online for KDE 3.4, but cannot find it in the archives, only someone mentioning he was compiling... did I dream this? Are such debs online yet? Egon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
