Release critical bugs for amd64/sarge
On 05-May-05 13:35, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:05:49PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > However, even with the patch from #305122, 'ia32-libs' cannot be built
> > and installed in sarge. This is the case because the patch does not
> > remove the 'Depends' and 'Build-Depends' on 'lsb-release' which FTBFS
> > in sarge for amd64. The working ia32-libs version 0.7 did not
> > (Build-)Depend on 'lsb-release'.
>
> However, lsb-release has been fixed in unstable, and this fixed version has
> been marked for approval into sarge.
Great, thanks!
My personal list of release critical bugs for amd64/sarge has now only
three bugs left (not counting lsb-release and libmysqlclient-lgpl which
will hopefully enter sarge soon):
sarge/main/amd64 BTS Bug Problem description
--- ---
debian-installer #306976+ libdevmapper1.00 does not exist (should be 1.01)
debian-installer #307306+ Uses kernel 2.6.10 which is not in sarge
syslinux #306123+ amd64 missing from architecture list and FTBFS
Of course there are still a few other packages which did not apply the
necessary patches for amd64. However, I think that those packages and
all their dependencies can simply be removed from the amd64/sarge release:
sarge/main/amd64 BTS Bug Problem description
--- ---
addresses-for-gn #307290* VCFViewer must not be built
advi - + missing Build-Depends on groff-base
amsynth #274703+ missing '#include ' in main.cc
armagetron - dh_installchangelogs: command returned error code 11
atari-fdisk #248794+ amd64 not in architecture list
binutils-avr - problem with genchanges
binutils-h8300-h #251648+ machine `x86_64-pc' not recognized
cal3d- + libcal3d-doc/html/functions_rela.html missing
cbmlink #207003+ uses i386 specific code
cdrdao #249634+ x86_64-linux-{cc,gcc}.rul links missing
cfdisk-utf8 #249926+ missing 'defined(__x86_64__)' / not in Arch list
commons-daemon # + x86_64 support missing in Makedefs and configure
elk - + needs workaround for ICE with gcc-3.3
etherboot- + needs 'gcc -m32','as --32' and 'ld -melf_i386'
freewnn #142253+ segfaults during build (same as on ia64 #229390)
ftape-tools - "ltconfig: you must specify a host type..."
gcc-avr - problem with genchanges
ghdl #276399 ghdl internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
guile-core #255894+ amd64 missing in UNSUPPORTED_QTHREAD_ARCHS
guile-gnome-plat #304936+ "comparison always false due to limited range..."
heaplayers - "*** [allocators] Error 1"
hfsutils #280310* missing '#include '
ircd-ircu#254165+ configure check for res_mkquery fails
k3d #278966 compilation of expression.cpp does not finish
kmatplot #286533+ missing -fPIC
krb4 #175491+ configure does not define HAVE_H_ERRNO
libglademm2.0#279985* "$LD" vs. $LD in configure
libgtk-java - + java.lang.NullPointerException/build without-javadoc
libhdf4 #251275* missing amd64 support in hdf/src/hdfi.h
libnss-pgsql #273800+ should use pthread_mutex_t instead of libc_lock_t
libooc-vo#164726 "*** [EMAIL PROTECTED]@] Error 1"
libpolyxmass #303856+ passing arg 5 of `bsearch' from incompatible pointer
licq - + undefined reference to pthread_kill_other_threads_np
linux86 #260647+ elksemu's file format not recognized
lvm2 #298762* "device/dev-io.c:342:3: #error miss O_NOATIME"
lxdoom #279190+ missing '#include '
masqmail #254720+ configure check for res_search in -lresolv fails
mindi- + missing amd64 in architecture list
mn-fit #301509 segmentation fault on 64bit architectures
mondo- + missing amd64 in architecture list
mtr #254089+ configure check for res_mkquery broken
muddleftpd #253618 missing -fPIC
mypasswordsafe #307316+ FTBFS if USER environment variable is not set
neon0.23 #278038+ missing amd64 in architecture list/for openoffice.org
nntp #280278+ missing '#include '
octave-gpc #307188* no match for 'operator[]' in '*m["vertices"]'
octaviz #302688+ cast from 'vtkObjectBase*' to 'int' loses precision
ogre - "no matching function for call to ..."
oleo #287854+ missing '#include '
oo2c #251577+ missing 64bit-arch handling in debian/rules
perlipq #278944 links against non-fPIC libipq.a from iptables
pike7.4 - "*** [build/autodoc.xml] Segmentation fault"
plex86 - + amd64 missing from architecture list
pocketpc-gcc #301645 "/tmp/ccEpnAHc.s:1046: Error: bignum invalid"
pol
Re: Grub not installing properly
Jannick Ingo wrote: > Hi ! > > I just installed via a chroot install. Installed fine, no bumps…. But > when i installled grub, checked grub bootimages, i couldnt find them. > They are not in the /boot/grub dir.. Neither a config is there… > > I know what has to be there, actually the stage files from the host > system could be used… > > ingo > The short answer is that you have to run grub-install, which: - puts the necessary files in /boot/grub on whatever device you specify - installs grub to the boot block of the device you specify Then, you have to run update-grub to make a menu.lst. ...but there's more, and I don't want to type it all. Here's a little howto I found for you: http://myrddin.org/howto/debian-grub.php -Corey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AMD64 archive move
Joerg Jaspert wrote: Hi As announced earlier the Debian AMD64 archive moved away from alioth the weekend from 30. April til today, 2. May. But what happened with http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/openoffice.org/ ? It seemed to be moved away from alioth also but I cannot find it at amd64.debian.net. So where is it now? Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VMware
Dne čt 5. května 2005 19:32 Jose Luis Iguain napsal(a): > I have some questions about VMware. > > I installed it via apt-get in the ia32-chroot part but when I try to > turn on the application, > it complains about /dev/vmmon... > Could you tell me how to install the vmmon and vmnet modules? > > Is it not possible to install a 64-bit version of VMware? About 15 minutes ago I installed vmware 5.0 by just running vmware-install.pl. ;o) AFAIK only thing you need is ia32-libs version 1.2 (sarge) or 1.4 (sid). Mixi
Re: Bug#305122: ia32-libs: Patch to make 'ia32-libs' work again on amd64/sarge
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:05:49PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > On 05-May-05 13:53, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > retitle 307521 ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Compilation with 'gcc-3.4 > > > -m32' does not work > > > tags 307521 +patch > > > thanks > > > I made some tests and finally found a small patch which makes ia32-libs > > > work again on amd64/sarge without any change to other packages, i.e. > > > without changing the 'gcc-3.4' package from sarge. > > Or just use the patch from the BTS that is already there. > Oops, sorry. I overlooked #305122, maybe because it was tagged > 'fixed' which was not true. Thanks for correcting the tag. > However, even with the patch from #305122, 'ia32-libs' cannot be built > and installed in sarge. This is the case because the patch does not > remove the 'Depends' and 'Build-Depends' on 'lsb-release' which FTBFS > in sarge for amd64. The working ia32-libs version 0.7 did not > (Build-)Depend on 'lsb-release'. However, lsb-release has been fixed in unstable, and this fixed version has been marked for approval into sarge. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: VMware
Jose Luis Iguain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have some questions about VMware. > > I installed it via apt-get in the ia32-chroot part but when I try to > turn on the application, > it complains about /dev/vmmon... > Could you tell me how to install the vmmon and vmnet modules? > > Is it not possible to install a 64-bit version of VMware? > > > Thank you in advance, > > JL Use ia32-libs-dev (version 1.4 from tonight/tomorrow) and install it _outside_ the chroot. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ia32-libs 1.3 brakes vmware
* Andrei Mikhailovsky | Just updated my ia32-libs package and found out that it brakes vmware. | After the upgrade, vmware segfaults. downgrading to 1.2 fixes vmware. | | Did anyone else experienced similar issues, or is it just me? Mea culpa; I uploaded 1.4 today. Can you verify that it fixes the problem for you? -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: install problem: libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21 *** FIXED ***
Thank you Kurt, you instructions worked! [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > The problem is that you didn't upgrade in a while and that this version > doesn't > have the Conflicts + Replaces anymore that should do the upgrade without > problems for you. > To fix this do: dpkg --force-overwrite -i /var/cache/apt/archives/ > libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb > This will move the /usr/lib64 from base-files to libc6. > Then upgrade your base-files to the lastest version: apt-get upgrade > base-files > That should install base-files 3.1.2. (Or a 3.1.2-0.0.1) > If that didn't work try with apt-get install base-files=3.1.2 > It should be fixed at that stage, but I suggest you follow it by: dpkg -i > /var/ > cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb > This makes sure the symlink is now owned by libc6. > Kurt On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:01:38PM -0400, Karl Hoppel wrote: > > I get the following error trying to upgrade libc6 using sid. > Any suggestions or help is appreciated? > > Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using > .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement libc6 ... > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb > (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package base-files > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: install problem: libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21
Goswin, thanks for the advice. However, I am not smart enough to understand what it means. The apt-get program will not let me do anything without resolving the dependency problem that arose because libc6 was not corretly installed. Here is what I tried: % apt-get --reinstall install base-files=3.1.2 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) but 2.3.2.ds1-18 is to be installed locales: Depends: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-21 E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). Goswin von [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Update base-files to the current version. You might have to force it with > --reinstall base-files=3.1.2. Original message: > I get the following error trying to upgrade libc6 using sid. > Any suggestions or help is appreciated? > > Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using > .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement libc6 ... > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb > (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package base-files > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: install problem: libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:01:38PM -0400, Karl Hoppel wrote: > > I get the following error trying to upgrade libc6 using sid. > Any suggestions or help is appreciated? > > Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using > .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement libc6 ... > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb > (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package base-files > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) The problem is that you didn't upgrade in a while and that this version doesn't have the Conflicts + Replaces anymore that should do the upgrade without problems for you. To fix this do: dpkg --force-overwrite -i /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb This will move the /usr/lib64 from base-files to libc6. Then upgrade your base-files to the lastest version: apt-get upgrade base-files That should install base-files 3.1.2. (Or a 3.1.2-0.0.1) If that didn't work try with apt-get install base-files=3.1.2 It should be fixed at that stage, but I suggest you follow it by: dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb This makes sure the symlink is now owned by libc6. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: install problem: libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21
"Karl Hoppel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I get the following error trying to upgrade libc6 using sid. > Any suggestions or help is appreciated? > > Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using > .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement libc6 ... > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb > (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package base-files > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > > > > Karl Update base-files to the current version. You might have to force it with --reinstall base-files=3.1.2. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMware
I have some questions about VMware. I installed it via apt-get in the ia32-chroot part but when I try to turn on the application, it complains about /dev/vmmon... Could you tell me how to install the vmmon and vmnet modules? Is it not possible to install a 64-bit version of VMware? Thank you in advance, JL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: install problem: libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21
Sorry Castillo, that did not solve the problem. I had already removed the ia32 libs from the ld.so.config problem. The problem still remains, and I still need help: Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package base-files > Hi, > I had the same problem with the chroot (ia32) libraries > I have solved it, by commenting the "chroot i386 system libs" entries in the / > etc/ld.so.conf file. And running "apt-get upgrade -f". > You must do that before uncommenting "chroot i386 system libs entries" and > running ldconfig. > Sorry for my English. l] > Enviado el: jueves, 05 de mayo de 2005 19:02 Para: > debian-amd64@lists.debian.org > Asunto: install problem: libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21 > I get the following error trying to upgrade libc6 using sid. Any suggestions > or > help is appreciated? > Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using > .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) > ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/ > archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package base-files Errors > were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/ > dpkg returned an error code (1) > Karl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: install problem: libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21
Sorry Castillo, that did not solve the problem. I had already removed the ia32 libs from the ld.so.config problem. The problem still remains, and I still need help: Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package base-files > Hi, > I had the same problem with the chroot (ia32) libraries > I have solved it, by commenting the "chroot i386 system libs" entries in the / > etc/ld.so.conf file. And running "apt-get upgrade -f". > You must do that before uncommenting "chroot i386 system libs entries" and > running ldconfig. > Sorry for my English. > -Mensaje original- De: Karl Hoppel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: jueves, 05 de mayo de 2005 19:02 Para: > debian-amd64@lists.debian.org > Asunto: install problem: libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21 > I get the following error trying to upgrade libc6 using sid. Any suggestions > or > help is appreciated? > Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using > .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) > ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/ > archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package base-files Errors > were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/ > dpkg returned an error code (1) > Karl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: install problem: libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21
Hi, I had the same problem with the chroot (ia32) libraries I have solved it, by commenting the "chroot i386 system libs" entries in the /etc/ld.so.conf file. And running "apt-get upgrade -f". You must do that before uncommenting "chroot i386 system libs entries" and running ldconfig. Sorry for my English. -Mensaje original- De: Karl Hoppel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 05 de mayo de 2005 19:02 Para: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Asunto: install problem: libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21 I get the following error trying to upgrade libc6 using sid. Any suggestions or help is appreciated? Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package base-files Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Karl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
install problem: libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21
I get the following error trying to upgrade libc6 using sid. Any suggestions or help is appreciated? Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package base-files Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-21_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Karl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Asus A8V Deluxe, Xfree display problems with BIOS 1011
Le 05.05.2005 17:01:37, nor a écrit : I got the same problem some months ago with a radeon 9600, so I installed the ubuntu x.org version. This didn't solve my problem, so I remove all packages relative to XFree and then I purge it. And then reinstall them. After that the problem disappeared, I don't know what was the reason but maybe it can help you. I tried to remove and reinstall X and this didnt help. But reverting to 1009 firmawre fixed the problem. Jean-Luc pgp6JLF1Xs7dg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Asus A8V Deluxe, Xfree display problems with BIOS 1011
I got the same problem some months ago with a radeon 9600, so I installed the ubuntu x.org version. This didn't solve my problem, so I remove all packages relative to XFree and then I purge it. And then reinstall them. After that the problem disappeared, I don't know what was the reason but maybe it can help you. Nor. Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 04.05.2005, 15:41 + schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon I've an ASUS A8V Deluxe with an ASUS A9250T/D video card. I've just updated my BIOS from 1009 to 1011. After this update, the machine boot fine and the display works in cosole mode but while swtiching to X when gdm starts, I get a black screen with only the cursor image in white. The machine is still alive and I can access it via ssh. But I cannot even swith to a console and try a "blind reboot" with and then log in. I cannot kill the X server with . Me2. Same board, but I use sid-32bit. It seems to be a mess, but works: I use the "nvidia" module (lsmod), but for X11 I use "nv" (XF86Config-4). When I configure X11 to use "nvidia" instead of "nv", the machine crashes like you described. "nv" is working. Some weeks ago I tried Ubuntu unstable, but didn't use it anymore since then. When this problem occured, I booted into Ubuntu just to see it crashing like you described, even it was working before Bios-Update and I didn't reconfigure anything. That means: X.org is hit by the problem also, exactly like XFree. Maybe using nv instead of nvidia made you believe Ubuntu would run? And up/downgrading the kernel may have broken the nvidia module, so nv is used instead, so that made you believe the kernel-up/downgrade fixed it? I've to agree: Asus broke our machines. Bye, Ratti
Re: Differents versions?
A Dijous 05 Maig 2005 16:09, Goswin von Brederlow va escriure: > Leopold Palomo Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi, > > > > if I do: > > indiana:/home/leo# apt-get upgrade > > Reading Package Lists... Done > > Building Dependency Tree... Done > > The following packages have been kept back: > > libgcj-common > > The following packages will be upgraded: > > bind9-host > > 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > Need to get 0B/108kB of archives. > > After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. > > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y > > (Reading database ... 115722 files and directories currently installed.) > > Preparing to replace bind9-host 1:9.3.1-2 > > (using .../bind9-host_1%3a9.3.1-2_amd64.deb) ... > > Unpacking replacement bind9-host ... > > Setting up bind9-host (9.3.1-2) ... > > > > ok, nice, no, but if I do the same: > > > > indiana:/home/leo# apt-get upgrade > > Reading Package Lists... Done > > Building Dependency Tree... Done > > The following packages have been kept back: > > libgcj-common > > The following packages will be upgraded: > > bind9-host > > 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > > Need to get 0B/108kB of archives. > > After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. > > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] > > > > It install again this package, and I can do it again, again, again > > > > Leo > > apt-get clean; apt-get update; apt-get upgrade; apt-get upgrade > > still there? > Ok, perfect. Thank's Leo -- Linux User 152692 Catalonia pgpMCN3FHOA45.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: spamassassin badness
On (05/05/05 13:23), Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: > Hello all > > I keep getting segfaults from spamd. Is anyone experiencing similar > issues? > > I am using pure64 sid. > > Segfaults looks like this: > > spamd[8059]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp > 7390 error 4 > spamd[8060]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp > 7660 error 4 > spamd[8061]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp > 7660 error 4 > spamd[8062]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp > 7660 error 4 > spamd[8063]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp > 7660 error 4 > spamd[8064]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp > 7660 error 4 > spamassassin[16838]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b > rsp 7420 error 4 All seems OK here with spamassassin 3.0.2-1 on pure64 (sid). Regards Clive -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Differents versions?
Leopold Palomo Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > if I do: > indiana:/home/leo# apt-get upgrade > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > The following packages have been kept back: > libgcj-common > The following packages will be upgraded: > bind9-host > 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > Need to get 0B/108kB of archives. > After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y > (Reading database ... 115722 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to replace bind9-host 1:9.3.1-2 > (using .../bind9-host_1%3a9.3.1-2_amd64.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement bind9-host ... > Setting up bind9-host (9.3.1-2) ... > > ok, nice, no, but if I do the same: > > indiana:/home/leo# apt-get upgrade > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > The following packages have been kept back: > libgcj-common > The following packages will be upgraded: > bind9-host > 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. > Need to get 0B/108kB of archives. > After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] > > It install again this package, and I can do it again, again, again > > Leo apt-get clean; apt-get update; apt-get upgrade; apt-get upgrade still there? MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Asus A8V Deluxe, Xfree display problems with BIOS 1011
Am Mittwoch, den 04.05.2005, 15:41 + schrieb Jean-Luc Coulon > I've an ASUS A8V Deluxe with an ASUS A9250T/D video card. > I've just updated my BIOS from 1009 to 1011. > > After this update, the machine boot fine and the display works in > cosole mode but while swtiching to X when gdm starts, I get a black > screen with only the cursor image in white. > > The machine is still alive and I can access it via ssh. But I cannot > even swith to a console and try a "blind reboot" with > and then log in. I cannot kill the X server with . Me2. Same board, but I use sid-32bit. It seems to be a mess, but works: I use the "nvidia" module (lsmod), but for X11 I use "nv" (XF86Config-4). When I configure X11 to use "nvidia" instead of "nv", the machine crashes like you described. "nv" is working. Some weeks ago I tried Ubuntu unstable, but didn't use it anymore since then. When this problem occured, I booted into Ubuntu just to see it crashing like you described, even it was working before Bios-Update and I didn't reconfigure anything. That means: X.org is hit by the problem also, exactly like XFree. Maybe using nv instead of nvidia made you believe Ubuntu would run? And up/downgrading the kernel may have broken the nvidia module, so nv is used instead, so that made you believe the kernel-up/downgrade fixed it? I've to agree: Asus broke our machines. Bye, Ratti -- -o) fontlinge | Fontmanagement for Linux | Schriftenverwaltung in Linux /\\ http://freshmeat.net/projects/fontlinge/ _\_V http://www.gesindel.de https://sourceforge.net/projects/fontlinge/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: ia32-libs: Patch to make 'ia32-libs' work again on amd64/sarge
On 05-May-05 13:53, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > retitle 307521 ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Compilation with 'gcc-3.4 -m32' > > does not work > > tags 307521 +patch > > thanks > > > > I made some tests and finally found a small patch which makes ia32-libs > > work again on amd64/sarge without any change to other packages, i.e. > > without changing the 'gcc-3.4' package from sarge. > > Or just use the patch from the BTS that is already there. Oops, sorry. I overlooked #305122, maybe because it was tagged 'fixed' which was not true. Thanks for correcting the tag. However, even with the patch from #305122, 'ia32-libs' cannot be built and installed in sarge. This is the case because the patch does not remove the 'Depends' and 'Build-Depends' on 'lsb-release' which FTBFS in sarge for amd64. The working ia32-libs version 0.7 did not (Build-)Depend on 'lsb-release'. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Differents versions?
Hi, if I do: indiana:/home/leo# apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages have been kept back: libgcj-common The following packages will be upgraded: bind9-host 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/108kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y (Reading database ... 115722 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace bind9-host 1:9.3.1-2 (using .../bind9-host_1%3a9.3.1-2_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement bind9-host ... Setting up bind9-host (9.3.1-2) ... ok, nice, no, but if I do the same: indiana:/home/leo# apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages have been kept back: libgcj-common The following packages will be upgraded: bind9-host 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/108kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] It install again this package, and I can do it again, again, again Leo -- Linux User 152692 Catalonia pgpuksstULyV1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ISO not found?
Rafael Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When adding the new mirror. dist-upgrade wants to "upgrade" many installed > packages... with ones of the same version! > > Example: > > ike:/home/apt-drink# apt-cache policy ttf-freefont > ttf-freefont: > Installed: 20031008-1.1 > Candidate: 20031008-1.1 > Version table: > 20031008-1.1 0 > 500 http://amd64.debian.net sid/main Packages > *** 20031008-1.1 0 > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > Any hints on why can this be happening? Because they are different packages. apt will reinstall the same version if the packages differ. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spamassassin badness
Hello all I keep getting segfaults from spamd. Is anyone experiencing similar issues? I am using pure64 sid. Segfaults looks like this: spamd[8059]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp 7390 error 4 spamd[8060]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp 7660 error 4 spamd[8061]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp 7660 error 4 spamd[8062]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp 7660 error 4 spamd[8063]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp 7660 error 4 spamd[8064]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp 7660 error 4 spamassassin[16838]: segfault at 00f0 rip 00373ca16e3b rsp 7420 error 4 Any help highly appreciated. -- Andrei signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: ISO not found?
When adding the new mirror. dist-upgrade wants to "upgrade" many installed packages... with ones of the same version! I saw that my /etc/apt/preference was causing unnecessary upgrades, when pinning to the "wrong" d=NAME .. Maybe only put a=testing or a=unstable there?! The "d" obviously changed... /n -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ide module sis5513
On Monday 02 May 2005 16:43, Javier Kohen wrote: > Hey Uwe, > > I know it's been a long time, but I just came across this thread > http://kerneltrap.org/node/4925 . Somebody found the cause for the > problem and solved it. Look at the last message in the thread, the rest > is uninteresting. It turns out that the SiS5513 model is not specified > in the driver's list of supported controllers. > > Cheers, yes, that seems to be the cause! thank you very much! cu Uwe -- --- ASUS K8S-MX, 2800+ (754), 512MB, gnuLinux v2.6.x -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISO not found?
When adding the new mirror. dist-upgrade wants to "upgrade" many installed packages... with ones of the same version! Example: ike:/home/apt-drink# apt-cache policy ttf-freefont ttf-freefont: Installed: 20031008-1.1 Candidate: 20031008-1.1 Version table: 20031008-1.1 0 500 http://amd64.debian.net sid/main Packages *** 20031008-1.1 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Any hints on why can this be happening? TIA, Rafael Rodríguez El Jueves, 5 de Mayo de 2005 12:51, Clive Menzies escribió: > On (05/05/05 12:52), Emmanuel Doguet wrote: > > This URL http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/ doesn't > > work anymore. Any idea? > > If you check the mailing list archive for Subject: AMD64 Archive Move > you'll see that the archive is on the move: > > As announced earlier the Debian AMD64 archive moved away from alioth > the weekend from 30. April til today, 2. May. > Yes, that is why there are so many days without updates. > > > This is just a short information, and we are still evaluating the > archive, so if you dont like the small chance to kill your system you > maybe wait with a change until we sent out the full announce. We expect > that to happen somewhere between now and Saturday night. > > It looks good for us, but we want to make sure it is fully working > before we do something big with it. > > > For the impatient here are the important things you need to know: > - Modify /etc/apt/sources.list to read like > > deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ DIST main contrib > > and replace DIST with either sid or sarge (or testing/unstable), > whatever you prefer to have. Thats it basically, now your system will > do the right thing fetching the packages. > > Note: NO non-free is provided yet. We need to decide what we do > with it, as some software in it may forbid us to distribute it (we > arent Debian). Probably we will do a case-by-case study for things > that we consider important and add them if license allows us to. > > We also intend to offer a push-mirror service for interested > mirrors, so if you are an interested mirror admin please > contact me and I will come back to you with further > instructions, as soon as we are sure our archive is clean. > > Regards > > Clive > > -- > www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... > ...strategies for business
Re: ISO not found?
Emmanuel Doguet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This URL http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/ doesn't > work anymore. Any idea? > > Bye bye. Wait a few days. CD images will be provided on cdimage.debian.org then. ftp://alioth.debian.org/pub/debian-amd64/install-images/ or http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/alioth/install-images/ for the needy. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ia32-libs: Patch to make 'ia32-libs' work again on amd64/sarge
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > retitle 307521 ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Compilation with 'gcc-3.4 -m32' > does not work > tags 307521 +patch > thanks > > I made some tests and finally found a small patch which makes ia32-libs > work again on amd64/sarge without any change to other packages, i.e. > without changing the 'gcc-3.4' package from sarge. Or just use the patch from the BTS that is already there. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISO not found?
On (05/05/05 12:52), Emmanuel Doguet wrote: > This URL http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/ doesn't > work anymore. Any idea? If you check the mailing list archive for Subject: AMD64 Archive Move you'll see that the archive is on the move: As announced earlier the Debian AMD64 archive moved away from alioth the weekend from 30. April til today, 2. May. Yes, that is why there are so many days without updates. This is just a short information, and we are still evaluating the archive, so if you dont like the small chance to kill your system you maybe wait with a change until we sent out the full announce. We expect that to happen somewhere between now and Saturday night. It looks good for us, but we want to make sure it is fully working before we do something big with it. For the impatient here are the important things you need to know: - Modify /etc/apt/sources.list to read like deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ DIST main contrib and replace DIST with either sid or sarge (or testing/unstable), whatever you prefer to have. Thats it basically, now your system will do the right thing fetching the packages. Note: NO non-free is provided yet. We need to decide what we do with it, as some software in it may forbid us to distribute it (we arent Debian). Probably we will do a case-by-case study for things that we consider important and add them if license allows us to. We also intend to offer a push-mirror service for interested mirrors, so if you are an interested mirror admin please contact me and I will come back to you with further instructions, as soon as we are sure our archive is clean. Regards Clive -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libtasn1-2
Where do I find build status on a package? I.e. why a package is not in testing, but in unstable .. My googling only found status for other debian arch's .. It should now be available. Thanks! My question of where I can see status of packages still stands.. /n -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libtasn1-2
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Niklas Ögren wrote: > Hi! > > Where do I find build status on a package? I.e. why a package is not in > testing, but in unstable .. My googling only found status for other debian > arch's .. It should now be available. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISO not found?
This URL http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/ doesn't work anymore. Any idea? Bye bye. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libtasn1-2
Hi! Where do I find build status on a package? I.e. why a package is not in testing, but in unstable .. My googling only found status for other debian arch's .. My problem is that libtasn1-2 is not in debian-amd64/testing, but in i386/testing .. and packages like libgnutls11 is dependent on that, which in turn programs like mutt and lynx are dependent on. My sources.list is: deb http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/debian-pure64 testing main contrib non-free deb-src http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/debian-pure64 testing main contrib non-free deb http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/debian-pure64 unstable main contrib deb-src http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/debian-pure64 unstable main contrib ..and I use /etc/apt/preferences to priorities testing over unstable. I checked the archive at amd64.debian.net as well.. same thing there. /n -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ia32-libs: Patch to make 'ia32-libs' work again on amd64/sarge
retitle 307521 ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Compilation with 'gcc-3.4 -m32'
does not work
tags 307521 +patch
thanks
I made some tests and finally found a small patch which makes ia32-libs
work again on amd64/sarge without any change to other packages, i.e.
without changing the 'gcc-3.4' package from sarge.
The attached patch does the following:
* Remove the (Build-)Depends on 'lsb-release' from debian/control.
* Change debian/rules, debian/ia32-libs.postinst and debian/ia32-libs/postrm
to use 'ROOT=' and 'SUFFIX=32' also for Debian amd64.
* Change debian/ia32-libs.postinst and debian/ia32-libs/postrm to create
and remove a symlink from /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 to
/usr/lib32/libgcc_s.so.1.
This symlink is necessary for sarge because the lib32gcc1 package
from gcc-3.4 installs libgcc_s.so.1 in /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib
instead of /usr/lib32. Once the gcc-3.4 package is corrected to
use /usr/lib32, this symlink can simply be dropped.
* Change a sed rule in debian/rules so that it does not remove the leading
'/' in the first commentary lines of libc.so and libpthread.so.
With this patch, it is possible to compile 32 bit binaries with 'gcc-3.4 -m32'
and to run those binaries.
If going back to the old working ia32-libs version 0.7 is not an option
for some reason, this small patch could be used to make ia32-libs work
again on amd64.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ia32-libs-1.3/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/ia32-libs-1.3/debian/control2005-04-25 03:33:40.0
+0200
+++ ./debian/control2005-05-05 10:16:18.953931574 +0200
@@ -2,12 +2,12 @@
Section: libs
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), dpkg-dev (>= 1.10.23), lsb-release
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), dpkg-dev (>= 1.10.23)
Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0
Package: ia32-libs
Architecture: amd64 ia64
-Depends: lsb-release, lib32gcc1
+Depends: lib32gcc1
Replaces: ia32-libs-openoffice.org
Description: ia32 shared libraries for use on amd64 and ia64 systems
This package contains runtime libraries for the ia32/i386
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ia32-libs-1.3/debian/ia32-libs.postinst
./debian/ia32-libs.postinst
--- ../tmp-orig/ia32-libs-1.3/debian/ia32-libs.postinst 2005-04-11
18:08:38.0 +0200
+++ ./debian/ia32-libs.postinst 2005-05-05 10:15:54.642627454 +0200
@@ -2,13 +2,8 @@
set -e
-if [ $(lsb_release -i -s) = "Debian" ]; then
-ROOT=/emul/ia32-linux
-SUFFIX=
-else
-ROOT=
-SUFFIX=32
-fi
+ROOT=
+SUFFIX=32
addlineifmissing () {
if ! grep -q "^$1$" "$2" ; then
@@ -23,4 +18,8 @@
ldconfig
fi
+if [ "`uname -m`" != "ia64" ] && ! [ -e /usr/lib32/libgcc_s.so.1 ]; then
+ ln -s /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 /usr/lib32
+fi
+
#DEBHELPER#
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ia32-libs-1.3/debian/ia32-libs.postrm
./debian/ia32-libs.postrm
--- ../tmp-orig/ia32-libs-1.3/debian/ia32-libs.postrm 2005-04-11
18:15:06.0 +0200
+++ ./debian/ia32-libs.postrm 2005-05-05 10:15:54.642627454 +0200
@@ -2,13 +2,8 @@
set -e
-if [ $(lsb_release -i -s) = "Debian" ]; then
-ROOT=/emul/ia32-linux
-SUFFIX=
-else
-ROOT=
-SUFFIX=32
-fi
+ROOT=
+SUFFIX=32
removeline () {
if grep -q "^/$1$" "$2"; then
@@ -28,4 +23,8 @@
dpkg-divert --divert /usr/bin/ldd.ia32-libs --quiet --rename --package
ia32-libs --remove /usr/bin/ldd
fi
+if [ "`uname -m`" != "ia64" ] && [ -L /usr/lib32/libgcc_s.so.1 ]; then
+ rm /usr/lib32/libgcc_s.so.1
+fi
+
#DEBHELPER#
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ia32-libs-1.3/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/ia32-libs-1.3/debian/rules 2005-04-25 03:26:00.0
+0200
+++ ./debian/rules 2005-05-05 10:15:54.643627302 +0200
@@ -5,14 +5,8 @@
# Lowest version with fully ABI compatible libraries
SHLIB_VERSION=0.2
-OSVER=$(shell lsb_release -s -i)
-ifeq (Debian,$(OSVER))
- ROOT=emul/ia32-linux
- SUFFIX=
-else
- ROOT=
- SUFFIX=32
-endif
+ROOT=
+SUFFIX=32
build:
# ./fetch-and-build
@@ -53,11 +47,6 @@
mv debian/ia32-libs/usr/lib debian/ia32-libs/$(ROOT)/usr/lib$(SUFFIX)
mv debian/ia32-libs/usr/X11R6/lib
debian/ia32-libs/$(ROOT)/usr/X11R6/lib$(SUFFIX)
-ifeq (Debian,$(OSVER))
- mkdir -p debian/ia32-libs/$(ROOT)/bin
- mv debian/ia32-libs/bin/uname debian/ia32-libs/$(ROOT)/bin
-endif
-
rm -r debian/ia32-libs/usr/include
rm -r debian/ia32-libs/usr/X11R6
@@ -127,7 +116,7 @@
# Fix up GROUP commands in linker scripts
for lib in libc.so libpthread.so; do\
cat debian/ia32-libs/$(ROOT)/usr/lib$(SUFFIX)/$$lib
\
- | sed -e 's,^/,$(ROOT),' -e 's,/lib/,/lib$(SUFFIX)/,g' > $$lib;
\
+ | sed -e 's, /, /$(ROOT),g' -e 's,/lib/,/lib$(SUFFIX)/,g' > $$lib; \
mv -f $$lib debian/ia32-libs/$(ROOT)/usr/lib$(SUFFIX)/$$lib;
\
done
--
To
