Re: source.list

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Attila Kocsis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Cuold anyone write me what the /etc/apt/source.list
> file should contain? 
>
> I have only these:
> deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ testing main
> deb-src http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ testing
> main
>
> Aren't there more sources, including non-free,
> security and so on?
>
> Thanks a lot
> Atis

http://amd64.debian.net/README.mirrors.html is the authorative list of
mirrors.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MD5 mismatches on downloads from ftp.de.debian.org

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Adam Lackorzynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Fri May 13, 2005 at 15:53:27 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> My local mirror has been complaining about md5 mismatches on
>> 
>> pool/main/liba/libarchive-zip-perl/libarchive-zip-perl_1.14-1_all.deb
>> pool/main/libc/libconvert-asn1-perl/libconvert-asn1-perl_0.18-1_all.deb
>> pool/main/libp/libpng/libpng2_1.0.18-1_all.deb
>> 
>> when I was syncing from ftp.de.d.o. Changing to
>> syncproxy2.eu.debian.org has fixed it for me, suggesting that the
>> problem is confined to the German mirror. It'd probably be a good plan
>> to check all the files...
>
> The mismatches come from an incorrect resync after the archive move. The
> contents of the files itself were actually ok.
> To fix the archive I've placed a little script in the root directory
> that wgets the corresponding files as rsync won't do it due to same time
> stamps and sizes. You could also just remove them and resync.

touch ; rsync

or more drastic but fixing undetected files too:

find -type f -exec touch "{}"; rsync


Rsync will then rechecksum all files but not download them
again. Heavy on the disk I/O for both server and client so don't do it
carelessly.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Using Alioth Opteron net install to config MD raid1

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Rupert Heesom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'm using an Alioth net install CD to put Debian onto a new dual opteron
> PC using 2 SATA drives.
>
> I'm getting confused during the drive setup process.
>
> What I'm wanting to do is use the raid 1 setup with each disk having 3
> partitions (as in a workstation install):  root, swap, home.
>
> How do I setup md to work with these partitions?
>
> I seem to be able to use EITHER the 3-partition structure OR the RAID 1
> structure (the install puts 1 ext3 partition into the RAID1 device).
>
> Can I do what I want to with this install?
>
> If I am not able to change these options, can I at least change the ext3
> file system to an XFS system?  (I think XFS is cool!)
>
> -- 
> Rupert Heesom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

You can't use a preset scenario for that but have to go the manual
way. There you have to first create 3 partition on each disk and then
setup raid on those partitions.

Do you realy want swap as raid1? It is unlikely that the system will
live through a disk failure with ide disks anyway. Most of the time a
reboot is required if not even unplugging the broken disk.

Also consider using lvm on raid. My suggestion is:


disk 1
  part 1 - 200 MB raid 1 /
  part 2 - swap
  part 3 - rest raid 1 LVM

disk2
  part 1 - 200 MB raid 1 /
  part 2 - swap
  part 3 - rest raid 1 LVM

LVM
  /var - 1 GB (more if you want squid or similar services there)
  /usr - 2-4GB
  /home - rest - 2 GB
  2GB  to enlarge /var or /usr or for snapshots

/tmp - tmpfs

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cdrdao

[Goswin von Brederlow]

jmt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> This package does not seem to be available, while needed for cd/dvd burning 
> under kernel 2.6.
> Does someone know reasons for that ?
>
> jmt

Check bugs.debian.org for cdrdao.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: fresh install?

[Goswin von Brederlow]

"Paul A. Massey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hello,
>
> I've just received a new box (Shuttle XPC) and would like to
> put the 64 bit version of Debian on it. I downloaded the ISO
> image from:
>
> http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-installer/daily/netboot/
>
> I've also tried the sarge iso found in:
>
> http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/
>
> I keep getting stuck on the download components part (with a
> message indicating I should choose another mirror, retry or
> cancel)? 
>
> The choose a mirror page, does not provide a way to specify
> the site to use (at least nothing that I could see)?

That is actualy a bug in choose-mirror that was fixed yesterday. I
messed up the archive upload though so fixed D-I builds need at least
another day (there is another issue breaking D-I).

The new choose-mirror now also has the list of amd64 mirrors instead
of the normal ones.

> So the questions are:
>
>1./ Which CD image should I use?

The sid-netinst from Feb. 19 is known to work. You might have to force
installation of the current base-files version on upgrades
though. Can't remember.

>2./ How do I set the mirror if that is the problem
>(previously there was a marker at the top of the list
>to set it explicitly, but that seems to have
>disappeared)?
>
>3./ Which mirrors are currently okay?

Read http://amd64.debian.net/README.mirrors.html in your favourite
browser. Hopefully starting tomorrow you won't need that though.

> Thanks,
>
> Paul.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: problems encountered while performing "apt-get upgrade"

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Monty Lilburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks, switching from ftp.de.debian.org to bytekeeper worked.  I
> thought mirrors were supposed to be identical!!!
>
> Regards,
>Monty
>
>
> On Wed, 11 May 2005, James Curbo wrote:
>
>> I was getting similar errors from ftp.de.debian.org as well.  I switched
>> to the bytekeeper repository in Belgium and have encountered no errors
>> ever since.

Please try to switch back to ftp.de.debian.org. The inconsistencies
are likely temporary effects of the archive move and should be gone
now that ftp.de.debian.org gets mirror pulses from the new archive.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Architecture lines added to Mirrors.masterlist

[Joey Hess]

I've extended the format of the the Mirrors.masterlist file, which is
used to record available Debian mirrors, to include machine-readable
information about what architectures are included in a mirror. This
information will be used by the Debian installer and other programs to
select an appropriate mirror for a user's architecture.

I'm ccing this to the debian-mirrors list because I suspect that a lot
of our information about which mirrors are mirroring which architectures
is out of date. The information about which architectures is available
is now included in the list of mirrors at
, so please check that the
information for your mirror is accurate, and if not, please let us know.

If you change the architectures included in your mirror in the future,
we'd appreciate a mail mentioning this so we can keep the information
up-to-date.

Also, note that I have added the amd64 Mirrors.list file onto
Mirrors.masterlist, but at least for now the amd64 information is
filtered out of the mirror list page on the official Debian website. If
it's decided that should be included there already, it's very easy to
remove the filter. The amd64 people may want to switch over to using
Mirrors.masterlist directly, or should at least keep us current as they
continue adding mirrors.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: why is /lib64 world writable?

[Javier Kohen]

El jue, 19-05-2005 a las 00:14 +0200, Alexandru Cabuz escribiÃ:
> Is it supposed to be world writable? I tried chmod to make it read
> only but that does not seem to work. That's pretty strange...

Huh, it's a symbolic link, that's why.

-- 
Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Where/how to get help/file a bug? azureus won't start with jdk-1_5_0_03-linux-amd64.bin packaged by java-package 0.24 was: Bug#309072

[Javier Kohen]

Gerhard,

El miÃ, 18-05-2005 a las 22:29 +0200, Gerhard GauÃling escribiÃ:
> Gerhard GauÃling wrote
> # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (1.5.0_03-b07 mixed mode)
> # Problematic frame:
> # C  [libc.so.6+0x72f9b]

What libc are you using? I'm afraid I haven't followed the thread
closely, but this is pure64, right?

> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ `which java`
> -Djava.library.path=/usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/lib -Xrs -Xdebug
> -jar /usr/share/java/Azureus2.jar
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no
> swt-pi-gtk-3116 in java.library.path

Funny, I only have libswt-pi-gtk-3106.so in my Azureus directory, no
3116 file (nor is it anywhere else in the file system). Note that I
installed AZ 2.2.0.2/AMD64 from the web page and then uploaded to 2.3
using the internal updater. I guess that shouldn't make a difference,
but looking at file ChangeLog.txt I don't see any reference to version
2.3, so the internal updater might not update all files after all.

I hope I'm not confusing you further :)

-- 
Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Where/how to get help/file a bug? azureus won't start with jdk-1_5_0_03-linux-amd64.bin packaged by java-package 0.24 was: Bug#309072

[Gerhard Gaußling]

Gerhard Gaußling wrote:

> 2. I'll try to install java sdk with the bin file into /usr/local,
> to see, if that will do the trick, and if java-package is
> the one who fools me.

Unfortunately No Success :((

.bashrc:
# JAVA SDK
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/i2p:~/bin
$PATH:/usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/bin:/usr/share/java
JDK_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/
JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/
export PATH
export JDK_HOME
export JAVA_HOME
# Trolltec qt 3.3 20040907
if [ -d /usr/share/qt3 ]; then
QTDIR=/usr/share/qt3
export QTDIR
fi
PATH=$QTDIR/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH
MANPATH=$QTDIR/doc/man:/usr/share/java:$MANPATH
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$QTDIR/lib:/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/lib:/usr/share/java
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
export PATH MANPATH LD_LIBRARY_PATH

$ echo $JAVA_HOME
/usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/

$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/usr/share/qt3/lib:/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/lib:/usr/share/java:


$ which java /usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/bin/java
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ `which java`
-Djava.library.path=/usr/lib:/usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/lib -Xrs -Xdebug
-jar /usr/share/java/Azureus2.jar
#
# An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual Machine:
#
#  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x2ae4cf9b, pid=17189, tid=46912501787360
#
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (1.5.0_03-b07 mixed mode)
# Problematic frame:
# C  [libc.so.6+0x72f9b]
#
# An error report file with more information is saved as hs_err_pid17189.log
#
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
#   http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp
#
Abgebrochen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ `which java`
-Djava.library.path=/usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/lib -Xrs -Xdebug
-jar /usr/share/java/Azureus2.jar
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no
swt-pi-gtk-3116 in java.library.path
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1682)
at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:822)
at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:992)
at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Library.loadLibrary(Library.java:100)
at org.eclipse.swt.internal.gtk.OS.(OS.java:19)
at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Converter.wcsToMbcs(Converter.java:63)
at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Converter.wcsToMbcs(Converter.java:54)
at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.(Display.java:121)
at
org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.SWTThread.(SWTThread.java:75)
at
org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.SWTThread.createInstance(SWTThread.java:58)
at
org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.Initializer.(Initializer.java:107)
at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main.(Main.java:71)
at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main.main(Main.java:98)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ jdb `which java`
-Djava.library.path=/usr/lib:/usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/lib -Xrs -Xdebug
-jar /usr/share/java/Azureus2.jar
Initializing jdb ...
> run
run /usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/bin/java
-Djava.library.path=/usr/lib:/usr/local/jdk1.5.0_03/lib -Xrs -Xdebug
-jar /usr/share/java/Azureus2.jar
Set uncaught java.lang.Throwable
Set deferred uncaught java.lang.Throwable
>
VM Started:
Exception occurred: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException
(uncaught)"thread=main", java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(), line=200 bci=72

main[1]




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

why is /lib64 world writable?

[Alexandru Cabuz]

Is it supposed to be world writable? I tried chmod to make it read
only but that does not seem to work. That's pretty strange...
Wha

Alex.

Re: Where/how to get help/file a bug? azureus won't start with jdk-1_5_0_03-linux-amd64.bin packaged by java-package 0.24 was: Bug#309072

[Gerhard Gaußling]

Gerhard Gaußling wrote:

> 1. I'm just downloading the azureus.jar file from sf.net.
> I'll test if this will run.

This gives exactly the same errors:
jdb:
[...]
VM Started:
Exception occurred: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException
(uncaught)"thread=main", java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(), line=200 bci=72

Now I'll try point 2.

regards

Gerhard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: apt-file and AMD64 port.

[Matt Ittigson]

> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:49:52AM -0500, Matt Ittigson wrote:
> > Did you ever find a solution to this problem?  I'm also looking for a
> > solution to this problem and found only your original question when
> > searching for the answer on Google.
> > 
> > Perhaps if someone could answer it on-list, in this thread, it would
> > become a great reference.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance.  Doubly sorry if the answer is RTFM and I just missed it.
> 
> I'm not sure what you're asking here.  Looking in the archive, it
> looks like a question about why we don't have Contents files?
> 
> We do have Contents since the move, so I have no idea what the
> problem is.  Just run: apt-file update, and then apt-file search
> or list.

Not long after I wrote this message, I spent a little more time
looking around the various mirrors and the problem was simply the
mirror that I was using had no Contents_amd64.gz file.  I'm now using:

deb http://ftp.belnet.be/pub/mirror/debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/
sid main contrib non-free

and that solved my problem.

Thanks for the response.  If anyone else has the problem, just search
around the mirrors and check a couple until you find one with the
Contents file.

-matt

Re: Where/how to get help/file a bug? azureus won't start with jdk-1_5_0_03-linux-amd64.bin packaged by java-package 0.24 was: Bug#309072

[Gerhard Gaußling]

Javier Kohen wrote:
> as I mentioned earlier on this thread, I can run upstream Azureus
> 2.3.0.0 (not Debian's) with JDK 1.5.0_03/AMD64 as packaged by
> java-package.
> I suggest you first give upstream Azureus a try on your computer.

Hi Javier,

sorry, I didn't subscribe to the list, and I read your post today in gmane,
which I now use to answer. Somewhere in alioth, or at debian.de I read,
that it will be necessary to use
X_DEBBUGS_CC: when it will be a amd64
related bug. But I didn't subscribed to this list, so I didn't get your
message. 

The few things I will try to do before I'll file a bug to sun.com:

 1. I'm just downloading the azureus.jar file from sf.net.
I'll test if this will run.
 2. I'll try to install java sdk with the bin file into /usr/local,
to see, if that will do the trick, and if java-package is 
the one who fools me.
 3. Wait for an answer of the debian java package team.

After step 3. without success I will report a bug to sun.com, I think
without much success :(.

Thank you for your suggestion.

Kind regards

Gerhard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CoreCell and linux

[Leopold Palomo Avellaneda]

Hi,

this maybe is an offtopic, but I would like to try :-)

I have a MSI-k8t Neo-Fis2R (6702) and I would like to know if is possible to 
configure for use the CoreCell technology from MSI, in the way that I could 
control the fan speed of the cpu and the board.

I have updated the bios and I'm using the powernow-k8 module but I don't have 
any idea how to do the same with the corecell. ACPI? 

Best regards,

Leo
-- 
Linux User 152692 
Catalonia


pgphZptThi7e5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: p2p command line client in amd64

[Javier Kohen]

Ciao Daniele,

El miÃ, 18-05-2005 a las 21:09 +0200, daniele escribiÃ:

> but i have a question
> mldonkey is a 32bit
> in a pure 64bit a 32 bit don't run without lib32
> or not?
> i am confused now

MLDonkey is available natively in pure64.

If you don't mind I'd like to use your thread to ask if anybody knows
whether MLDonkey works fine on UTF-8 locales. Last time I tried it, it
failed to display most text on such locales.

-- 
Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: p2p command line client in amd64

[Lennart Sorensen]

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:09:46PM +0200, daniele wrote:
> thanks :-)
> but i have a question
> mldonkey is a 32bit
> in a pure 64bit a 32 bit don't run without lib32
> or not?
> i am confused now

apt-cache search mldonkey on debian-pure64 has these:

mldonkey-server
mldonkey-gui

The gui is optinal, the server has a telnet and http interface (port
4000 and 4080 I think).

I am pretty sure the packages in debian-pure64 are 64bit and don't need
32bit libs.  They certainly don't depend on the 32bit lib package.

Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: p2p command line client in amd64

[daniele]

Lennart Sorensen ha scritto:

  On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:49:58PM +0200, daniele wrote:
  
  
hello, sorry for my orrible english :-)
now i use debian sarge in all my computers
i use amule for p2p, on my amd64 3000+
but i used overnet and edonkey 2000 from command line and i think (from 
my experience) that is better than amule (no flame please)
the problem is that i have a pure 64 system, i dont' want install lib32
any solutions?

  
  
Using mldonkey might work.  Best overnet/e2dk client I ever used.

Runs as a server daemon, which you then telnet to to control, or use the
http interface or the optional gui application (which can even run on a
different machine).

Len Sorensen


  

thanks :-)
but i have a question
mldonkey is a 32bit
in a pure 64bit a 32 bit don't run without lib32
or not?
i am confused now

Re: apt-file and AMD64 port.

[Patryk Cisek]

> We do have Contents since the move, so I have no idea what the
> problem is.  Just run: apt-file update, and then apt-file search
> or list.
That's right Matt, it's been fixed.

--
Regards.


pgpaB9DVIGpBA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: p2p command line client in amd64

[Lennart Sorensen]

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:49:58PM +0200, daniele wrote:
> hello, sorry for my orrible english :-)
> now i use debian sarge in all my computers
> i use amule for p2p, on my amd64 3000+
> but i used overnet and edonkey 2000 from command line and i think (from 
> my experience) that is better than amule (no flame please)
> the problem is that i have a pure 64 system, i dont' want install lib32
> any solutions?

Using mldonkey might work.  Best overnet/e2dk client I ever used.

Runs as a server daemon, which you then telnet to to control, or use the
http interface or the optional gui application (which can even run on a
different machine).

Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

p2p command line client in amd64

[daniele]

hello, sorry for my orrible english :-)
now i use debian sarge in all my computers
i use amule for p2p, on my amd64 3000+
but i used overnet and edonkey 2000 from command line and i think (from 
my experience) that is better than amule (no flame please)
the problem is that i have a pure 64 system, i dont' want install lib32
any solutions?
thanks

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: source.list

[Adam Majer]

Clive Menzies wrote:

>On (18/05/05 01:12), Attila Kocsis wrote:
>  
>
>>I have only these:
>>deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ testing main
>>deb-src http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ testing
>>main
>>
>>Aren't there more sources, including non-free,
>>security and so on?
>>
>>
>There was a bit of a flame war on non-free in the last couple of weeks
>(check the archive) and no non-free isn't available thus far.
>

This is not correct. non-free appears to be added now,

http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/dists/sarge/non-free/source/

Adding contrib and non-free should work. For example,

deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ sarge main contrib non-free
deb-src http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ sarge main contrib non-free

are probably correct. The http part up to the trailing / can be
replaced with other mirrors.

Also, DO NOT use 'testing' as Sarge. Use 'sarge' if you want to run
sarge version. The testing symlink will be moved to Etch right after
Sarge is released.

- Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: source.list

[Mike Reinehr]

On Wednesday 18 May 2005 04:47 am, DR GAVIN SEDDON wrote:
> Hi,
> I use the list in
> http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html
> Gavin.
>
> On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 11:19 +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > On (18/05/05 01:12), Attila Kocsis wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Cuold anyone write me what the /etc/apt/source.list
> > > file should contain?
> > >
> > > I have only these:
> > > deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ testing main
> > > deb-src http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ testing
> > > main
> > >
> > > Aren't there more sources, including non-free,
> > > security and so on?
> >
> > There was a bit of a flame war on non-free in the last couple of weeks
> > (check the archive) and no non-free isn't available thus far.  However,
> > I have:
> >
> > deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contrib
> > deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contrib
> >
> > substitute sarge/testing for sid
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Clive
> >
> > --
> > www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
> > ...strategies for business

Here's another list, which may be more up to date:

http://amd64.debian.net/README.mirrors.html

Cheers!

cmr
-- 
Debian 'Sarge': Registered Linux User #241964

"More laws, less justice." -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [(Partial) SOLUTION] nforce4, Harddisk SATA, DVD-Burner ATAPI: How can I keep ide-scsi from loading?

[Lennart Sorensen]

On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:07:21PM +0200, K. Gysin wrote:
> scsi_mod, yes of course... what about sd_mod? sg? It might be that
> libata also uses these, but I have not seen them loaded on Knoppix...
> might be it is compiled into the kernel, though.

sd_mod is scsi disk, which of course is needed.  sg is scsi generic and
used for low level scsi commands.

> Hmmm... are you sure that this still works on the newest kernels? I
> mean, because of ide-scsi being officially unsupported (I do not know if
> you have seen the relevant flamewars...) and at least on my machine
> kernel-oopsing on rmmod...

Works on 2.6.11 at least.  I just upgraded my plextor firmware a couple
of weeks ago.

Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: source.list

[DR GAVIN SEDDON]

Hi,
I use the list in
http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html
Gavin.


On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 11:19 +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (18/05/05 01:12), Attila Kocsis wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Cuold anyone write me what the /etc/apt/source.list
> > file should contain? 
> > 
> > I have only these:
> > deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ testing main
> > deb-src http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ testing
> > main
> > 
> > Aren't there more sources, including non-free,
> > security and so on?
> There was a bit of a flame war on non-free in the last couple of weeks
> (check the archive) and no non-free isn't available thus far.  However,
> I have:
> 
> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contrib
> deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contrib
> 
> substitute sarge/testing for sid
> 
> Regards
> 
> Clive
> 
> -- 
> www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
> ...strategies for business
> 
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: source.list

[Clive Menzies]

On (18/05/05 01:12), Attila Kocsis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Cuold anyone write me what the /etc/apt/source.list
> file should contain? 
> 
> I have only these:
> deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ testing main
> deb-src http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ testing
> main
> 
> Aren't there more sources, including non-free,
> security and so on?
There was a bit of a flame war on non-free in the last couple of weeks
(check the archive) and no non-free isn't available thus far.  However,
I have:

deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contrib
deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contrib

substitute sarge/testing for sid

Regards

Clive

-- 
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with packages, resolved

[Ronny Wikh]

Things got resolved. It turned out I had incompatible versions
of bash and base-files installed, reinstalling them with a properly
named version was all that was required to get it working again. Sorry
to bother you guys!

/Ronny


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

source.list

[Attila Kocsis]

Hi,

Cuold anyone write me what the /etc/apt/source.list
file should contain? 

I have only these:
deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ testing main
deb-src http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/ testing
main

Aren't there more sources, including non-free,
security and so on?

Thanks a lot
Atis



__ 
Yahoo! Mail Mobile 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

dvd::rip doesn't find tools

[antongiulio]

Hi,

I have installed dvd:rip and needed tools, but when I launch it, dvd::rip shows 
a window with list of "failed" dipendencies. In "preferences" windows instead, 
I got all "OKs". Versions of tools seem ok. Is it a bug of package or my error 
on configuration?

Thank you very much
Giulio
 
 
 --
 Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
 
 Sponsor:
 Telefona con Email.it Phone Card, tanti minuti di conversazione con il massimo 
del risparmio, clicca qui
 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=2687&d=18-5


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with packages

[Peter Nelson]

Read the logs, the archive has moved:
http://amd64.debian.net/README.mirrors.html
deb http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contrib
-Peter
Ronny Wikh wrote:
Hi!
After a period of inactivity I needed to update my pure64 installation.
Looking through the (massive) backlog of messages it turns out that
the organisation had changed, so I modified my apt sources.list to
point to
deb http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/debian-pure64 sid main contrib non-free
deb-src http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/debian-pure64 sid main contrib non-free
as per instructions. Now for the upgrade:
-
 

apt-get -fu dist-upgrade
   

Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Calculating Upgrade... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
 apache2 apache2-common apache2-mpm-prefork cpp cpp-3.3 g++ g++-3.3 gcc
 gcc-3.3 kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8 kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8
 libapache2-mod-auth-pam libapache2-mod-php4 libapache2-svn
 libstdc++5-3.3-dev resolvconf x-window-system-core xbase-clients xdm
 xfonts-100dpi xfonts-75dpi xfonts-base xfonts-scalable xutils
The following NEW packages will be installed:
 lsb-release
The following packages have been kept back:
 apache2-utils bind9-host bzip2 chkrootkit cpp-3.4 dash devfsd dmsetup
 dnsutils e2fslibs e2fsprogs fontconfig gcc-3.4 gettext gettext-base hdparm
 ifupdown imagemagick lbxproxy lesstif2 libapr0 libbind9-0 libblkid1
 libbz2-1.0 libc-client2002edebian libc6 libc6-dev libcomerr2
 libdevmapper1.01 libdm0 libdns20 libdps1 libexpat1 libfontconfig1
 libfreetype6 libgcc1 libgd2-noxpm libgimpprint1 libgpmg1 libice6 libisc9
 libisccc0 libisccfg1 libkpathsea3 libkrb53 libldap2 liblwres1 libmagick6
 libneon24 libnewt0.51 libsm6 libssl-dev libssl0.9.7 libstdc++5 libsvn0
 libtasn1-2 libtext-charwidth-perl libusb-0.1-4 libuuid1 libx11-6 libxaw7
 libxext6 libxft1 libxi6 libxmu6 libxmuu1 libxp6 libxpm4 libxrandr2
 libxrender1 libxt6 libxtrap6 libxtst6 libxv1 locales login logrotate
lvm2 mc
 mlock modutils net-tools nis nmap openssl passwd portmap postfix ppp
 proxymngr python2.3 python2.3-dev python2.3-subversion python2.4 rcs rsync
 sensible-mda strace subversion subversion-tools sudo tar tcpdump tetex-bin
 twm unzip usbutils uw-imapd wget whiptail xdu xfs xfwp xlibmesa-gl
 xlibmesa-glu xnest xserver-common xserver-xfree86 xterm xvfb
The following packages will be upgraded:
 apache2-doc ca-certificates gcc-3.3-base ia32-libs initrd-tools
 libtext-wrapi18n-perl mime-support php4-common python-pyopenssl
 python-twisted tetex-base tetex-doc xfree86-common xlibmesa-dri xlibs
 xlibs-data
16 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 24 to remove and 120 not upgraded.
Need to get 62.2MB/62.2MB of archives.
After unpacking 116MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
-
Now, this is all rather unwelcome news to me as I'm dependant on
having apache2 running.
In the listing above it seems that libc6 is part of the upgrade,
so I figured that perhaps I'd better go for that and apache2 to
see what happens. This is what I get:
---
 

apt-get install apache2 libc6
   

Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
 apache2-common apache2-mpm-prefork apache2-utils libapache2-mod-php4
libapr0
 libc6-dev locales php4-common
Suggested packages:
 php4-pear
The following packages will be REMOVED:
 aide base-files bash deborphan hotplug mailx
The following packages will be upgraded:
 apache2 apache2-common apache2-mpm-prefork apache2-utils
libapache2-mod-php4
 libapr0 libc6 libc6-dev locales php4-common
WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed
This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
 base-files bash
10 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 6 to remove and 144 not upgraded.
Need to get 15.9MB of archives.
After unpacking 4461kB disk space will be freed.
You are about to do something potentially harmful
To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'
 

NO!
   

--
The question is, what's causing this and how do I fix it? Will I
need to install everything from scratch again, or what's going on?
I'd very much appreciate any kind of advice.
Regards,
Ronny Wikh
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2.6.11 kernel can't see 4GB?

[Koen Tavernier]

Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:35:28PM +0100, Koen Tavernier wrote:
 

I've been running a dual opteron box with 2GB for a few days. Today I 
added 2GB to the box, all recognised by the motherboard, but after 
booting into linux (with the stock 2.6.11 debian kernel) free only 
reports 3344996 Kb. I thought the 64 bit kernel avoided all problems 
with having lots of memory? Or should I pass the kernel a parameter?

I had a quick search through the list but couldn't see anything relevant.
   

Does your bios have an option for mapping memory from 3-4GB up to 4-5GB
so the PCI memory hole at 3-4GB won't overlap with it?
This is sometimes called a memory hole (and you want to make one).
The kernel can then use all the memory since 4GB is not a limit for it.
Len Sorensen
 

This was in deed the culprit! Once you had mentioned the memory hole I 
was able to find a lot more information on this. Setting the memory hole 
mapping to [Software] on the Tyan motherboard gave me 4GB immediately.

Thanks a lot for your help!
Koen.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]