source.list and some 404 errors :/
Hi, I have this on my source.list : deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ testing main And since some day ... I can't retreive wget ou other (eGroup), I have a 404 Errors :/ I have do an apt-get update, of course. What is wrong ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: qemu 0.7.0 for amd64
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Sylvain Archenault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>Hello, >> >>I install the deb package for amd64 provided by Cyril Chaboisseau, the >>install was ok. >> >>Then i would like to start "again" my machine, so i did : >>qemu-system-x86_64 -snapshot /dev/sda >> >>But I've got the following errors >>qemu: could not load PC bios '/usr/share/qemu/bios.bin' >> >>Where could i get this file. >> >>Thanks > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -S /usr/share/qemu/bios.bin > qemu: /usr/share/qemu/bios.bin > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% apt-cache policy qemu > qemu: > Installed: 0.6.1+20050407-1-0.0.0.local.1 > Candidate: 0.6.1+20050407-1-0.0.0.local.1 > Version table: > *** 0.6.1+20050407-1-0.0.0.local.1 0 > 500 file: sarge/main Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > The qemu package converted with my amd64-archive package contains the > file. I guess Cyril Chaboisseau messed something up. > > Mfg > Goswin > > Hello, I don't know what's wrong yesterday, but when i reinstall qemu64 again, and some additional packages (vgabios,proll, openhackware, boshsbios), it runs correctly. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: qemu 0.7.0 for amd64
Sylvain Archenault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I install the deb package for amd64 provided by Cyril Chaboisseau, the > install was ok. > > Then i would like to start "again" my machine, so i did : > qemu-system-x86_64 -snapshot /dev/sda > > But I've got the following errors > qemu: could not load PC bios '/usr/share/qemu/bios.bin' > > Where could i get this file. > > Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -S /usr/share/qemu/bios.bin qemu: /usr/share/qemu/bios.bin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% apt-cache policy qemu qemu: Installed: 0.6.1+20050407-1-0.0.0.local.1 Candidate: 0.6.1+20050407-1-0.0.0.local.1 Version table: *** 0.6.1+20050407-1-0.0.0.local.1 0 500 file: sarge/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status The qemu package converted with my amd64-archive package contains the file. I guess Cyril Chaboisseau messed something up. Mfg Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: aptitude?
Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > That's because it didn't compile because of an old gettext macro. > A fixed version has been uploaded and should be available > tomorrow. > > See bugs.debian.org/320859 > I tried to check the bug reports, but if I search for "aptitude", then it gets stuck. Thanx very much Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: aptitude?
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:36:06PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > Whats wrong with aptitude? There is a new source package for > some days now, but the binary for amd64 is still stuck to the > old C++ abi. That's because it didn't compile because of an old gettext macro. A fixed version has been uploaded and should be available tomorrow. See bugs.debian.org/320859 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: qemu 0.7.0 for amd64
Hello, I install the deb package for amd64 provided by Cyril Chaboisseau, the install was ok. Then i would like to start "again" my machine, so i did : qemu-system-x86_64 -snapshot /dev/sda But I've got the following errors qemu: could not load PC bios '/usr/share/qemu/bios.bin' Where could i get this file. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: latest net install ISO?
Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:21:24PM +0100, Rupert Heesom wrote: Well installing sarge seems to work fine. Upgrading afterwards with some things held back may or may not work. Once the transitions stabalize in sid it should be easier to finish upgrading. I haven't tried an upgrade in sid for a week myself. I will just wait for things to calm down a bit.. I was always unsure of the differences between sid & sarge, but I certainly set up sources.list in my last install for sid. I'll try an install again using the same CD with a sarge apt source. BTW, I d/l 2 other iso images: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/amd64/current/ netinstall & the mini.iso (I forget where from). I've found the full netinstall didn't boot, and the mini iso could see my HDs! The HDs are currently configured into md's and an lvm volume. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Downgrading from gcc3.4
Good! ... The only thing is in my first statement ;-) Latchezar > -Original Message- > From: Goswin von Brederlow > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 1:11 PM > To: Latchezar Dimitrov > Cc: Goswin von Brederlow; Alois Zoitl; debian-amd64@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Downgrading from gcc3.4 > > "Latchezar Dimitrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I'd rather wait for gcc-4.0 sid to make a clean install however I'd > > like to have an idea of the time frame and how to tell it's > done. Any idea? > > > > Thanks, > > Latchezar Dimitrov > > Install sarge, try 'apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade'. if > the list of package getting removed doesn't contain anything > you recognise then it is ready. > > MfG > Goswin > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
aptitude?
Hi folks, Whats wrong with aptitude? There is a new source package for some days now, but the binary for amd64 is still stuck to the old C++ abi. ??? Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: latest net install ISO?
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:21:24PM +0100, Rupert Heesom wrote: > I'm trying to reinstall my Debian amd64. > > When I got to the desktop & packages install, none of the install > options worked. > > I then tried to use aptitude to install Gnome, but there was 72 broken > packages!! > > I was using sid inside my apt sources file. I think there's been > changes since I first installed amd64. I suspect sid is still busy trasitioning c++ ABI so many packages are currently broken. That may be the cause of your current problems. > I've seen a thread talking about the ISO images now being at > cdimage.debian.org rather than amd64.debian.net.. I've checked the > cdimage site, but amd64 is not listed as as arch. > > Where do I get the latest iso for amd64 which works & is able to install > a workstation with Gnome? Well installing sarge seems to work fine. Upgrading afterwards with some things held back may or may not work. Once the transitions stabalize in sid it should be easier to finish upgrading. I haven't tried an upgrade in sid for a week myself. I will just wait for things to calm down a bit. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
latest net install ISO?
I'm trying to reinstall my Debian amd64. When I got to the desktop & packages install, none of the install options worked. I then tried to use aptitude to install Gnome, but there was 72 broken packages!! I was using sid inside my apt sources file. I think there's been changes since I first installed amd64. I've seen a thread talking about the ISO images now being at cdimage.debian.org rather than amd64.debian.net.. I've checked the cdimage site, but amd64 is not listed as as arch. Where do I get the latest iso for amd64 which works & is able to install a workstation with Gnome? Tnx, Rupert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Downgrading from gcc3.4
"Latchezar Dimitrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I'd rather wait for gcc-4.0 sid to make a clean install however I'd like > to have an idea of the time frame and how to tell it's done. Any idea? > > Thanks, > Latchezar Dimitrov Install sarge, try 'apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade'. if the list of package getting removed doesn't contain anything you recognise then it is ready. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is there a working boot.img.gz for installing with an USBstick?
"Joost Kraaijeveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Goswin, > > Joost Kraaijeveld schreef: >> On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 19:09 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >>> From cdimage.debian.org? >> Not that I could find. > I (re)found the location: not cdimage.debian.org but amd64.debian.net. > > Groeten, > > Joost There still is a copy there? I though those were deleted shortly after cdimage.d.o got the daily builds. Hunt for the sarge announcements for the cdimage.d.o urls. They aren#t linked on the main page. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is there a working boot.img.gz for installing with an USBstick?
Hi Goswin, Joost Kraaijeveld schreef: > On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 19:09 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> From cdimage.debian.org? > Not that I could find. I (re)found the location: not cdimage.debian.org but amd64.debian.net. Groeten, Joost
Re: ASUS A8V Deluxe OK, but for audio
Hello, it has. I stumbled on this, too :-) On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 04:43:39PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote: > Has this module been rendered redundant in 2.6.12+? I no longer have a > snd-ioctl32.ko (or indeed, any ioctl32 directory in > /lib/modules/2.6.12-1-amd64-k8/kernel/sound/core/), but 32bit apps still > use audio fine. Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: ASUS A8V Deluxe OK, but for audio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 02.08.2005 16:31:14, A Mennucc a écrit :
hi there
I just installed an Athlon64 on a M/B "ASUS A8V Deluxe" and I want to
report that (using kernel 2.6.11-1-k7 ) audio and networking are
working fine (and they where configured automatically by hotplug/udev)
whereas I did not find a way to load the cpufreq monitor ; but I
enabled Cool-n-quiet in the BIOS and it is managing the CPU since I
see that the fan is slowing down when I do not overuse the system
You have probably enabled Q-fan wich is a pure BIOS feature. Cool'n
quiet only allow you via a suitable module and utilities to use a
frequency / voltage table according to the CPU load.
Q-FAN is a feature that lower (slightly) the fans speed according to
the temperature.
instead when I tried to run any of the two kernels
2.6.8-11-amd64-k8 or 2.6.8-11-amd64-generic
I could not use the audio;
any program trying to use the audio would trigger a lot of lines such
as:
ioctl32(amixer:4199): Unknown cmd fd(3) cmd(80045500){00}
arg(d92c) on /dev/snd/controlC0
in the kernel log
Is you system a 32 bit system or 64 bit? Arent you using only the 64bit
kernel or something like that?
With the same motherboard, audio is (was) working with a 32bit system
and now I'm running a 64bit and it works fine also. I've installed it
from a Sarge 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 and upgraded (?) to sid and built a
custom 2.6.11 then 2.6.12 system.
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC75Z/Xit3lz9m7V4RAv0CAJ9VTHTv3lC9izL0RF5/fBzUb5wmaACfbY8W
f7odKXpd54laHn5pQ4Menvw=
=MVfW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: Downgrading from gcc3.4
Hi, I'd rather wait for gcc-4.0 sid to make a clean install however I'd like to have an idea of the time frame and how to tell it's done. Any idea? Thanks, Latchezar Dimitrov > -Original Message- > From: Goswin von Brederlow > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:25 AM > To: Alois Zoitl > Cc: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Downgrading from gcc3.4 > > Alois Zoitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hallo, > > > > whats the easiest way to downgrade from gcc3.4 to standard amd64? > > Wait a bit longer and upgrade to sid being gcc-4.0. Thats the > only way that won't have big pitfals. > > > or what is the best archieve to use when trying the gcc3.4 branch. > > If you have to ask that then you aren't ready for it I must say. > > > best regards, > > Alois > > MfG > Goswin > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: ASUS A8V Deluxe OK, but for audio
Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
you need the 32bit I/O-control layer module:
modprobe snd-ioctl32
this should fix it.
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 04:31:14PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
any program trying to use the audio would trigger a lot of lines such as:
ioctl32(amixer:4199): Unknown cmd fd(3) cmd(80045500){00} arg(d92c) on
/dev/snd/controlC0
in the kernel log
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
Has this module been rendered redundant in 2.6.12+? I no longer have a
snd-ioctl32.ko (or indeed, any ioctl32 directory in
/lib/modules/2.6.12-1-amd64-k8/kernel/sound/core/), but 32bit apps still
use audio fine.
--Jo Shields
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ASUS A8V Deluxe OK, but for audio
Hello,
you need the 32bit I/O-control layer module:
modprobe snd-ioctl32
this should fix it.
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 04:31:14PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> any program trying to use the audio would trigger a lot of lines such as:
> ioctl32(amixer:4199): Unknown cmd fd(3) cmd(80045500){00} arg(d92c) on
> /dev/snd/controlC0
> in the kernel log
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ASUS A8V Deluxe OK, but for audio
hi there
I just installed an Athlon64 on a M/B "ASUS A8V Deluxe" and I want to
report that (using kernel 2.6.11-1-k7 ) audio and networking are
working fine (and they where configured automatically by hotplug/udev)
whereas I did not find a way to load the cpufreq monitor ; but I
enabled Cool-n-quiet in the BIOS and it is managing the CPU since I
see that the fan is slowing down when I do not overuse the system
instead when I tried to run any of the two kernels
2.6.8-11-amd64-k8 or 2.6.8-11-amd64-generic
I could not use the audio;
any program trying to use the audio would trigger a lot of lines such as:
ioctl32(amixer:4199): Unknown cmd fd(3) cmd(80045500){00} arg(d92c) on
/dev/snd/controlC0
in the kernel log
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
"Ukn ow,Ifina llyfixe dmysp acebar.ohwh atthef"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: media:/ in kde 3.4.1 does not see my devices
2005 m. Rugpjūčio 2 d., Antradienis 14:46, Cédric Boutillier rašė: > hal, udev, dbus-1, pmount, work perfectly, but there seems to be a > lack of communication between these tools and kde. > > Has anyone experienced this already ? And do you know a solution to fix > that ? Thank you. kde 3.4.1 amd64 version on alioth is compiled (accidently) without dbus/hal support. You have a few options: 1) Wait for kde 3.4.2 to enter unstable 2) Recompile kdebase 3.4.1-1 from alioth. No changes required. 3) Try installing the following package. You may need to put it on hold because apt may keep insisting on "upgrading" back to the old version from alioth: http://uosis.mif.vu.lt/~mova3971/debian/kdebase/kdebase-kio-plugins_3.4.1-1_amd64.deb pgpY5zZFPdlac.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Mplayer/Totem slow motion
> one last check: if you download a non-wmv file, a slow one, and play it > in a shell (ie, whitout fileforx), is it still slow? plus, if you have a > slow video url, i'd like to test it and report how it goes here. Hi, I have downloaded any video mov, mpeg, asf but all seem right now. Problem it's just for any wvm stream (but I don't remember URL, I found them googling, sorry). However I have found another strange problem for mozilla-mplayer: file .mov (quicktime) here: http://www.inter.it/aas/news/darwinlist?L=en# (soccer snips) Stream seems start, but buffering remain to zero... Giulio
media:/ in kde 3.4.1 does not see my devices
I am running Debian amd64 sid with a 2.6.12 kernel. I installed kde 3.4.1 and I am a bit disappointed because the media:/ service does not work properly for me, (whereas it works perfectly on my sid 32). media:/ does not show for example my USB stick, and the CD icon on the desktop is always present (even if there is no CD in the drive), and does not change depending on the type of disc present (as it must be). In konqueror, the url media:/ shows only devices in /etc/fstab but does not say anything on what is mounted in /media/... hal, udev, dbus-1, pmount, work perfectly, but there seems to be a lack of communication between these tools and kde. Has anyone experienced this already ? And do you know a solution to fix that ? Thank you.
Re: cdrdao not in the testing/unstable
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 01.08.2005 18:42:39, Alexander Jede a écrit : Hi list, I wanted to install gnomebaker on my etch (testing) platform. That for I have to install cdrdao, but I can't find it in the testing nor in the unstable tree. Where can I get cdrdao for debian? thanks alex Get the the source of cdrdao with apt-get source. You will have to use a deb-src line pointing to a 32bit depository for that. Then get the patch attached to the second messages in this thread: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=249642 Apply the patch Build the package Install the package Enjoy Jean-Luc I know we all want to annoy asuffield for his "not in Debian so doesn't exist" attitude, but isn't it worth letting people use the sarge-unsupported (stinkypete) repository? i.e. deb url://yourdebianamd64mirror stinkypete main contrib non-free --Jo Shields -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Linux on FSC Amilo A 1630
Hi together, I have the notebook mentioned above and wrote a little Linux Howto in German, but it might be interesting anyway: http://www.design-to-use.de/index.php?file5=linux/amilo_a1630/amilo_a1630.php Greetings, Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Downgrading from gcc3.4
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: Alois Zoitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Kopie: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org > Betreff: Re: Downgrading from gcc3.4 > Datum: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 09:25:07 +0200 > > Alois Zoitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hallo, > > > > whats the easiest way to downgrade from gcc3.4 to standard > > amd64? > > Wait a bit longer and upgrade to sid being gcc-4.0. Thats the only way > that won't have big pitfals. > > > or what is the best archieve to use when trying the gcc3.4 branch. > > If you have to ask that then you aren't ready for it I must say. No the reason is that the current archive (I think unstable on alioth.ppc) is not realy working. I always get MD5 checksum errors when upgrading. Thats the reason for asking. The machine is running quite fine. Alois > > > best regards, > > Alois > > MfG > Goswin > -- GMX DSL = Maximale Leistung zum minimalen Preis! 2000 MB nur 2,99, Flatrate ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Downgrading from gcc3.4
Alois Zoitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hallo, > > whats the easiest way to downgrade from gcc3.4 to standard > amd64? Wait a bit longer and upgrade to sid being gcc-4.0. Thats the only way that won't have big pitfals. > or what is the best archieve to use when trying the gcc3.4 branch. If you have to ask that then you aren't ready for it I must say. > best regards, > Alois MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
