Re: Realplayer skipping
Hi Joeren, > I've installed realplayer into an ia32 chroot, and I can run it -- but > it skips like mad, independent of the source, whether it's a local file > or streaming: it plays a fraction of a second, then skips forward by a > few seconds, plays a fraction of a second again, etc. > > It seems to have trouble synchronising. Now if I run it with aoss -- > chroot into the ia32 chroot, and run 'aoss realplay ', > then the timing is ok (I can see the timer counting 0:01 .. 0:02 .. 0:03.., > as opposed to 0:01 .. 0:05 .. 0:06 ..), > but I don't get any sound! > > The motherboard is an ATI RS-480 motherboard, and the kernel > is linux-image-2.6-amd64-k8 2.6.15-7, booted with the > disable_timer_pin_1 option, if that matters. > > Any idea how I can get realplay to work without skipping, and with sound ? since some days I wait for an answer to your thread for I have similar problems. I solved the sound problem with adding my user to audio within the chroot and then starting the realplayer with aoss. But my picture is still skipping. I trie to add 3D support to my chroot, but with no success. Maybe that would solve it. Greetings, Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amd64-archive update
>Le Dienstag 14 Februar 2006 17:04, Matthieu Helleboid a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> I've made an update to amd64-archive made by Goswin von Brederlow. >> >> It will make a local repository for amd64 without a chroot for : >> * firefox, mozilla, opera, flash >> * mplayer, w32codecs >> * skype >> * openoffice >> >> Have a look at http://mhelleboid.free.fr/ I'm sorry -- I'm a bit confused about what this script does, and the web page didn't really explain it. Does it remove the need for a 32-bit chroot to run the above apps on a 64-bit system? If so, how? By putting the 32-bit libraries in a special location, and then surrounding all the above apps in a script wrapper that sets library paths to the new locations? That kind of thing? -c -- Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove "snip-me." to email) "As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: HOWTO Installing a Debian IA32 chroot system
> The HOWTO has one do "chroot /var/chroot/sid-ia32", and then starts > talking about "/whatever", without saying whether that's the base "/" > or the chroot's "/". > > Reading between the lines, I'm guessing it means the base > /etc/ld.so.conf, so I changed that. Yes, I think that's right. > But now I don't understand this at all: > > You also need a link to your 32bit linker in the /lib path. Change > in to directory /lib and create a link to the 32bit linker library > of your chroot: (The name of the 64bit linker is > ld-linux-x86-64.so.2) > > I'm again guessing it wants the link in the base "/lib", but what > should the link be named? I surely don't want to replace the 64-bit > linker with a link to the 32-bit linker, do I? I need more steps in > my cookbook or a better explanation of what's going on. OK. What you want is ln -s $CHROOT/lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 > It seems that the goal here is to be able to run a 32-bit app (I'm > trying to run the Real Video player) without having to do a chroot. > Correct? Right, although it's not at all clear to me from reading the HOWTO that that will really work. You're right that that part is confusingly written. As well as I can tell, it seems that that section, as well as "The Quick Way", is about running 32-bit apps without a chroot, while the other sections inbetween them are about setting up a chroot. Personally I've had complete success with the chroot, and no success at all with the other. A. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detecting SATA drive after install
... Okay, I got it! I downloaded the kernel source from www.kernel.org, built it using dpkg, installed it, rebooted, and my drive showed up as /dev/sda. Next I partitioned it with fdisk and finally mounted it successfully. Thanks for all the ideas. I am on a steep learning curve. Each problem takes one full day to resolve. Next on the agenda is my sound card. Joe Sr __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detecting SATA drive after install
A Dilluns 13 Març 2006 19:34, Joseph Legner va escriure: > > > system, which is running on an IDE hard drive, to > > > recognize and mount a separate SATA drive? > > > > which version of debian have you tried to install? > > you need a recent kernel, > > problably at least 2.6.12 or if it's a recent hw a > > 2.6.15. > > > > Regards, > > > > Leo > > I think my version is 2.6.8. > > legner1:/# uname -a > Linux legner1 2.6.8-11-amd64-generic #1 Sun Oct 2 > 22:11:39 CEST 2005 > x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Do you think I need to re-install? Or can I continue > to run off the > IDE drive and merely access the SATA drive for storage space? I don't know, but you could test any cd inst with newer kernel to see if it recognise your disks. Otherwise if you have your system full installed, and this is only a new drive (/home or /srv) you could try to upgrade. Regards, Leo > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com -- Linux User 152692 Catalonia pgpwE4VHCdZYb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs
Hi G. Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Yes. You can remove ia32-libs or have to wait for an update (ETA > friday night, via NMU if the maintainer doesn't move). > Is it possible that the new ia32-libs doesn't setup ld.so.conf? After changing it to /usr/X11R6/lib /emul/ia32-linux/lib /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib and running ldconfig I could run several 32bit applications (e.g. vmware). Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
HOWTO Installing a Debian IA32 chroot system
I'd like some help deciphering the debian-amd64-howto.html HOWTO. Specifically, the "Installing a Debian IA32 chroot system" section. (I'm trying to get "realplayer" running in a month-old 64-bit "etch". I don't recall why I chose "etch" instead of "sid" or "sarge"; maybe someone can remind me. :) The HOWTO has one do "chroot /var/chroot/sid-ia32", and then starts talking about "/whatever", without saying whether that's the base "/" or the chroot's "/". Reading between the lines, I'm guessing it means the base /etc/ld.so.conf, so I changed that. But now I don't understand this at all: You also need a link to your 32bit linker in the /lib path. Change in to directory /lib and create a link to the 32bit linker library of your chroot: (The name of the 64bit linker is ld-linux-x86-64.so.2) I'm again guessing it wants the link in the base "/lib", but what should the link be named? I surely don't want to replace the 64-bit linker with a link to the 32-bit linker, do I? I need more steps in my cookbook or a better explanation of what's going on. It seems that the goal here is to be able to run a 32-bit app (I'm trying to run the Real Video player) without having to do a chroot. Correct? I tried to install RealPlayer10GOLD.rpm in the chroot, and it seemed to install OK, but when I run it (RealPlayer10GOLD.bin, within the chroot) I get this msg: home/jojo/bin/RealPlayer10GOLD.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Within the chroot, "ls -d /usr/lib/libstd*" gives: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Feb 12 03:31 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 -> libstdc++.so.6.0.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 882324 Jan 29 03:50 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.7 So, it seems I have two question, one about configuring "ldconfig" and the other about how to install/configure a libstd++.so.5 for "realplayer". (BTW, I'm returning to Linux after 6 years of FreeBSD (don't ask), for which I don't recall a single library version problem, and almost the first thing I do after the OS install is be reminded of many old memories of Linux library problems. I never did learn what they did differently. I sure hope the problematic Linux way has some side benefit I'm not aware of.) Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fam uses 100% of CPU problem
I had LOTS of problems with fam and libfam. Since i moved to gamin and libgamin0 (they cover the same dependencies), it works like a charm. Rafael Rodríguez El Lunes, 13 de Marzo de 2006 21:41, Graham Smith escribió: > On Monday 13 March 2006 10:16, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: > > Hi Tobias, > > > > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 09:47 +0100, Tobias Krais wrote: > > > Hi Joost, > > > > > > > I am experiencing problems with fam, using 100% of CPU (actually 50% > > > > as I have 2 processors ;-)). There is already a bug report for this > > > > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252896) . > > > > > > > > Can anyone tell me which programs depend on fam or why it is > > > > installed? Can I safely uninstall the program? > > > > > > I just uninstalled it. My system still works :-) > > > > That does not really surprise me, as the account under which fam runs is > > an ordinary user account. So I don't expect it to be system critical. > > But assuming that there is reason why it is installed, do you have any > > idea what program is not functioning as it should be because fam is not > > running? > > Fam did this on one of my boxes. I eventually tried writing a script to > kill and restart it when it started consuming 100% of the CPU time but I > never got it to work correctly. Anyway after much research I concluded that > no one really knew what was wrong and no one was looking at fixing it - I > removed fam. > > Nothing stopped working but konqueror no longer detects changes to the file > system as quickly as it did before. As I understand it this is because it > now has to poll rather than simply listen t fam. > > Graham > > > -- > > Groeten, > > > > Joost Kraaijeveld > > Askesis B.V. > > Molukkenstraat 14 > > 6524NB Nijmegen > > tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 > > fax: 024-3608416 > > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > web: www.askesis.nl
Re: fam uses 100% of CPU problem
On Monday 13 March 2006 10:16, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 09:47 +0100, Tobias Krais wrote: > > Hi Joost, > > > > > I am experiencing problems with fam, using 100% of CPU (actually 50% as > > > I have 2 processors ;-)). There is already a bug report for this > > > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252896) . > > > > > > Can anyone tell me which programs depend on fam or why it is installed? > > > Can I safely uninstall the program? > > > > I just uninstalled it. My system still works :-) > > That does not really surprise me, as the account under which fam runs is > an ordinary user account. So I don't expect it to be system critical. > But assuming that there is reason why it is installed, do you have any > idea what program is not functioning as it should be because fam is not > running? Fam did this on one of my boxes. I eventually tried writing a script to kill and restart it when it started consuming 100% of the CPU time but I never got it to work correctly. Anyway after much research I concluded that no one really knew what was wrong and no one was looking at fixing it - I removed fam. Nothing stopped working but konqueror no longer detects changes to the file system as quickly as it did before. As I understand it this is because it now has to poll rather than simply listen t fam. Graham > > -- > Groeten, > > Joost Kraaijeveld > Askesis B.V. > Molukkenstraat 14 > 6524NB Nijmegen > tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 > fax: 024-3608416 > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > web: www.askesis.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fam uses 100% of CPU problem
On Monday 13 March 2006 10:16, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 09:47 +0100, Tobias Krais wrote: > > Hi Joost, > > > > > I am experiencing problems with fam, using 100% of CPU (actually 50% as > > > I have 2 processors ;-)). There is already a bug report for this > > > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252896) . > > > > > > Can anyone tell me which programs depend on fam or why it is installed? > > > Can I safely uninstall the program? > > > > I just uninstalled it. My system still works :-) > > That does not really surprise me, as the account under which fam runs is > an ordinary user account. So I don't expect it to be system critical. > But assuming that there is reason why it is installed, do you have any > idea what program is not functioning as it should be because fam is not > running? > Fam did this on one of my boxes. I eventually tried writing a script to kill and restart it when it started consuming 100% of the CPU time but I never got it to work correctly. Anyway after much research I concluded that no one really knew what was wrong and no one was looking at fixing it - I removed fam. Nothing stopped working but konqueror no longer detects changes to the file system as quickly as it did before. As I understand it this is because it now has to poll rather than simply listen t fam. Graham > -- > Groeten, > > Joost Kraaijeveld > Askesis B.V. > Molukkenstraat 14 > 6524NB Nijmegen > tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 > fax: 024-3608416 > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > web: www.askesis.nl -- .¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`· Shallow Sea Aquatics .¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`· .¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯ http://www.shallowsea.com ¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`
Re: ATI-drivers flickers was: ATI-driver will not start with 3D-acceleration (Update)
Am Montag, 13. März 2006 00:37 schrieb sigi: > > Using the vesa-driver, the problem is less problematic. > Did somebody get another solution than using the vesa-driver? seems a common problem follow the thread at http://ati.cchtml.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248 -- mit freundlichem Gruss -- regards Thomas Drillich Heugasse 4 / D-55116 Mainz / Germany fon +49 (0)6131 570 26 21 fax +49 (0)180 506 033 437 443 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amd64-archive update
Le Montag 13 März 2006 12:41, Matthieu Helleboid a écrit : > Le Dimanche 12 Mars 2006 20:33, Klaus Becker a écrit : > > Hello Matthieu, > > > When I finished installing your packages, can I safely > > delete /var/lib/amd64-archive? In which way? > > yes, you can purge amd64-archive, it should remove /var/lib/amd64-archive. > installed packages will remain installed. And what about /emul? I suppose it came with amd64-archive. Can I safely do "rm -rf /emul"? bye Klaus
Re: amd64-archive update
Le Montag 13 März 2006 20:31, Klaus Becker a écrit : > Le Montag 13 März 2006 12:41, Matthieu Helleboid a écrit : > > Le Dimanche 12 Mars 2006 20:33, Klaus Becker a écrit : > > > Hello Matthieu, > > > > > > When I finished installing your packages, can I safely > > > delete /var/lib/amd64-archive? In which way? > > > > yes, you can purge amd64-archive, it should remove > > /var/lib/amd64-archive. installed packages will remain installed. > > And what about /emul? I suppose it came with amd64-archive. Can I safely do > "rm -rf /emul"? I renamed it and firefox won't work any more. So it's necessary for a wile. bye Klaus
Re: amd64-archive update
Le Montag 13 März 2006 12:41, Matthieu Helleboid a écrit : > Le Dimanche 12 Mars 2006 20:33, Klaus Becker a écrit : > > Hello Matthieu, > > Hello, > > > using your script, I installed firefox, opera, mplayer and w32codecs. But > > I cannot install flash : > > > > apt-get install mozilla-flash-player7=7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1 > > ... > > E: Version '7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1' for 'mozilla-flash-player7' was > > not found. > > > > It's not in /var/lib/amd64-archive. > > strange, I have > > sudo find /var/lib/amd64-archive/ -name "*flash*" > /var/lib/amd64-archive/pool/non-free/f/flash-player7-binary-i386 > /var/lib/amd64-archive/pool/non-free/f/flash-player7-binary-i386/mozilla-fl >ash-player7_7.0.61-1duo1_i386.deb > /var/lib/amd64-archive/pool/non-free/f/flash-player7-binary-i386/mozilla-fl >ash-player7_7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1_amd64.deb > > sudo apt-cache policy mozilla-flash-player7 > mozilla-flash-player7: > Installé : 7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1 > Candidat : 7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1 > Table de version : > *** 7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1 0 > 991 file: debian-unofficial/non-free Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > and you ? I dont' have all that, but flashplayer7 works with firefox, so it's not a problem. > > > When I finished installing your packages, can I safely > > delete /var/lib/amd64-archive? In which way? > > yes, you can purge amd64-archive, it should remove /var/lib/amd64-archive. > installed packages will remain installed. Ok, but shouldn't I keep it for updates of the programs you provide? Or will updates work without amd64-archive? bye Klaus
Re: Detecting SATA drive after install
On Monday 13 Mar 2006 16:50, Joseph Legner wrote:
> I had a generic AMD64 computer built for me, and they
> put a SATA hard drive in it. It also has a
> motherboard with on-board NIC, video, and sound.
> .
> My question is: what do I need to do to get my Debian
> system, which is running on an IDE hard drive, to
> recognize and mount a separate SATA drive?
You need to check your motherboard, and download some kernel sources with a
suitable driver. `lspci` might give you some clues. Compile yourself a new
kernel, including the drivers for the SATA card; note they must be compiled
right into the kernel {not as modules}. Install new kernel and regenerate
your bootloader.
Reboot into new kernel and make sure your SATA drive is recognised. You can
then migrate your system over and remove the IDE drive.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detecting SATA drive after install
--- Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A Dilluns 13 Març 2006 17:50, Joseph Legner va > escriure: > > I had a generic AMD64 computer built for me, and > they > > put a SATA hard drive in it. It also has a > > motherboard with on-board NIC, video, and sound. > > > > The Debian netinst CD would not detect the hard > drive, > > NIC, video card, or sound card. I salvaged an old > PCI > > NIC from a dead computer and also installed an IDE > > drive, and was able to successfully install to the > IDE > > drive. I then fussed for a week and finally got > the > > nVidia driver up and running. Still no sound, > though. > > > > So, right now I have Debian running on the IDE > drive > > while my 200 GB SATA drive is in the case, > useless. I > > know enough to look under /dev, but it only lists > my > > CD drive and the IDE drive with its partitions. > > > > My question is: what do I need to do to get my > Debian > > system, which is running on an IDE hard drive, to > > recognize and mount a separate SATA drive? > > which version of debian have you tried to install? > you need a recent kernel, > problably at least 2.6.12 or if it's a recent hw a > 2.6.15. > > Regards, > > Leo I think my version is 2.6.8. legner1:/# uname -a Linux legner1 2.6.8-11-amd64-generic #1 Sun Oct 2 22:11:39 CEST 2005 x86_64 GNU/Linux Do you think I need to re-install? Or can I continue to run off the IDE drive and merely access the SATA drive for storage space? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detecting SATA drive after install
Joseph Legner wrote: I had a generic AMD64 computer built for me, and they put a SATA hard drive in it. It also has a motherboard with on-board NIC, video, and sound. The Debian netinst CD would not detect the hard drive, NIC, video card, or sound card. I salvaged an old PCI NIC from a dead computer and also installed an IDE drive, and was able to successfully install to the IDE drive. I then fussed for a week and finally got the nVidia driver up and running. Still no sound, though. So, right now I have Debian running on the IDE drive while my 200 GB SATA drive is in the case, useless. I know enough to look under /dev, but it only lists my CD drive and the IDE drive with its partitions. My question is: what do I need to do to get my Debian system, which is running on an IDE hard drive, to recognize and mount a separate SATA drive? Forgive me if this is trivial, because I am rather new at administering Linux. Thanks in advance, Joe Legner I'm running into a (possibly) similar issue in my attempt to move my install from an IDE to a SCSI disk. From what I've been able to gather, I need to add the necessary module(s) for my card to /etc/mkinitrd/modules and run mkinitrd. I believe you can also do a dpkg-reconfigure on your kernel package. Haven't had a chance to try this yet, but I hope to try it tonight. Your issue may be completely unrelated, but I thought I'd share my experience. Just out of curiosity, which SATA controller are you using? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Detecting SATA drive after install
A Dilluns 13 Març 2006 17:50, Joseph Legner va escriure: > I had a generic AMD64 computer built for me, and they > put a SATA hard drive in it. It also has a > motherboard with on-board NIC, video, and sound. > > The Debian netinst CD would not detect the hard drive, > NIC, video card, or sound card. I salvaged an old PCI > NIC from a dead computer and also installed an IDE > drive, and was able to successfully install to the IDE > drive. I then fussed for a week and finally got the > nVidia driver up and running. Still no sound, though. > > So, right now I have Debian running on the IDE drive > while my 200 GB SATA drive is in the case, useless. I > know enough to look under /dev, but it only lists my > CD drive and the IDE drive with its partitions. > > My question is: what do I need to do to get my Debian > system, which is running on an IDE hard drive, to > recognize and mount a separate SATA drive? which version of debian have you tried to install? you need a recent kernel, problably at least 2.6.12 or if it's a recent hw a 2.6.15. Regards, Leo
Detecting SATA drive after install
I had a generic AMD64 computer built for me, and they put a SATA hard drive in it. It also has a motherboard with on-board NIC, video, and sound. The Debian netinst CD would not detect the hard drive, NIC, video card, or sound card. I salvaged an old PCI NIC from a dead computer and also installed an IDE drive, and was able to successfully install to the IDE drive. I then fussed for a week and finally got the nVidia driver up and running. Still no sound, though. So, right now I have Debian running on the IDE drive while my 200 GB SATA drive is in the case, useless. I know enough to look under /dev, but it only lists my CD drive and the IDE drive with its partitions. My question is: what do I need to do to get my Debian system, which is running on an IDE hard drive, to recognize and mount a separate SATA drive? Forgive me if this is trivial, because I am rather new at administering Linux. Thanks in advance, Joe Legner __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wrong timings on amd64 (Turion) Solution
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 08:54:52PM +0100, Matteo Vescovi wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:36:29AM +0100, Hans wrote: > > I have found a solution: you must add "disable_timer_pin_1" in grub. Other > > solution was, to start without acpi. The first solution will start with > > acpi. > > Beware of ACPI, it's buggy with X200!! > > Pay a visit to: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5534 > > Richard Mace posted a thread about it a couple of months ago, IIRC. > I don't know if you've got a HP nx6125 like Richard, me and some others > but you'd better check your ACPI behaviour. If not monitored constantly, > it could damage your CPU, since the fan won't start when it's supposed > to. Is this one of the systems where telling ACPI that you are running Windows makes things work better? Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amd64-archive update
Hello all, I've just made a change, simply update amd64-archive and it should work. The only problem is for people using reprepro < 0.8 (version in sarge), because of new option "--noskipold", but I don't have much time now. The problem was that mozilla-flash-player7 was replaced by mozilla-flash-player7-binary on debian-unofficial.org. For information, there is also a backport for wine (version 0.9.7) in this version. Matthieu Helleboid http://mhelleboid.free.fr Le Lundi 13 Mars 2006 12:41, vous avez écrit : > Le Dimanche 12 Mars 2006 20:33, Klaus Becker a écrit : > > Hello Matthieu, > > Hello, > > > using your script, I installed firefox, opera, mplayer and w32codecs. But > > I cannot install flash : > > > > apt-get install mozilla-flash-player7=7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1 > > ... > > E: Version '7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1' for 'mozilla-flash-player7' was > > not found. > > > > It's not in /var/lib/amd64-archive. > > strange, I have > > sudo find /var/lib/amd64-archive/ -name "*flash*" > /var/lib/amd64-archive/pool/non-free/f/flash-player7-binary-i386 > /var/lib/amd64-archive/pool/non-free/f/flash-player7-binary-i386/mozilla-fl >ash-player7_7.0.61-1duo1_i386.deb > /var/lib/amd64-archive/pool/non-free/f/flash-player7-binary-i386/mozilla-fl >ash-player7_7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1_amd64.deb > > sudo apt-cache policy mozilla-flash-player7 > mozilla-flash-player7: > Installé : 7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1 > Candidat : 7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1 > Table de version : > *** 7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1 0 > 991 file: debian-unofficial/non-free Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > and you ? > > > When I finished installing your packages, can I safely > > delete /var/lib/amd64-archive? In which way? > > yes, you can purge amd64-archive, it should remove /var/lib/amd64-archive. > installed packages will remain installed. > > > Thanks a lot for your work! > > you're welcome :-) > > > Klaus > > Matthieu
Re: DVD burning stop to work...PLEASE HELP ME!!!
Em Segunda 13 Março 2006 08:39, Gordon Ball escreveu: > On a similar issue I've found that the latest update appears to have broken > k3b (when attempting to burn an image I get the error (cdrecord returned > error code 1) which appears to be permissions related, since it > successfully burnt the image when run as root. I haven't checked all the > permissions manually but k3b identifies when it starts up that "cdrecord > will be run without root priviledges" and "cdrdao will be run without root > priviledges". Starting k3bsetup to fix this currently gets me a blank panel > (from the command "kcmshell 'k3bsetup2'"). Thanks. But..Waht version of the k3b you are using? My is 0.12.12-1, and the problemas seasm to be growisofs specific. A did have to fix the permissions by myself, and k3b does not report wrong permission for none of the porgrams(cdrecord, cdrda, mksisofs, growisofs). But a couloel of days ago I ahve updated the firmware of my DVD-writer to add support for new dvd burnable media and k3b report that there is no 'support for burning DVD-R sequential...'. This did not happens before. SO a try 'force', yeah a really love 'live in the edge', try strong emotions, and things like that. And the growisofs return the same erro again, about runing 'uiltin_dd'. I still have no tried run as root. I will try this soon. Any way I preparing a vfat partion to share data with the windows instalation on my HD and try using NERO to burn DVD's if the CD/DVD-burning on linux still acting in a strangeous way. So...Thank you very muchh for help, all of you. ps: there is a thing that I really want understand: why cdrecodr does not found my write on ATAPI transport? the only way to cdrecord report my dvd-writer is runing 'cdrecord dev=ATA:1,0,0 -scanbus' os dev=/dev/hdc. 'cdrdao scanbus' reports a writer on ATA:1,0,0 but I supose to see a ATAPI:0,0,0 device. On my AthlonXP computer the CD-writer/DVD-rom combo driver is reported to on ATAPI:0,0,0.. I really confused. > > Anyway, for the moment running k3b as root appears to deal with this if you > have this issue. > > On 3/11/06, Tony Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 21:20 -0300, Marlon Régis Schmitz wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: cdrecord -scanbus > > > > I see that you are logged in as a normal user ... try doing your > > growisofs command as root. > > > > I had a similar problem just yesterday morning! I was using the > > nautilus cd/dvd burning gui as a normal user and was frustrated that the > > cd was not being burned. I then realized that my new updates to the > > system must have screwed some permissions somewhere (after all it is a > > testing distribution) so that a normal user could not burn cd/dvds ... I > > logged in as root and sure enough I could use the nautilus cd/dvd > > burning gui just fine. > > > > > > -- Tony > > > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: netinstall CD
after the restart, i am not getting the pppd or base-config :(On 3/13/06, Goswin von Brederlow < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:"S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> I tried with netinstall CD, It's not giving me any chance to use my modem to> connect to internet . Any body knows the way to get working ppp on > netinstaller CD?> --> S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)> Home page: [[http://lavluda.tripod.com]]> Blog: [[http://lavluda.wordpress.com] ]> Yahoo!! ID: lavluda MSN ID: lavluda Skype : lavluda> Cell no: +880189219056 (t&t) or +880186340531 You can't and you don't need to. Just install it and then configurepppd and run apt-setup and base-config again. MfGGoswin-- S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)Home page: http://lavluda.tripod.comBlog: http://lavluda.wordpress.comYahoo!! ID: lavluda MSN ID: lavluda Skype : lavludaCell no: +880189219056 (t&t) or +880186340531
Re: fam uses 100% of CPU problem
Hi Joost, >>>I am experiencing problems with fam, using 100% of CPU (actually 50% as >>>I have 2 processors ;-)). There is already a bug report for this >>>(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252896) . >>> >>>Can anyone tell me which programs depend on fam or why it is installed? >>>Can I safely uninstall the program? > That does not really surprise me, as the account under which fam runs is > an ordinary user account. So I don't expect it to be system critical. > But assuming that there is reason why it is installed, do you have any > idea what program is not functioning as it should be because fam is not > running? somebody on the list has to correct me if my info is not 100% correct - I am not firm with the topic. fam is the file alteration monitor. It checks changes of files. This is good for e.g. Filebrowsers for getting updates of files immedeatly. What apps depend on fam: -%<- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> apt-cache showpkg fam ~ Package: fam Versions: 2.7.0-9(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.twc.de_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-i386_Packages) Reverse Depends: lincvs,fam stopmotion,fam libgnomevfs2-0,fam libfam0,fam 2.7.0-9 gnome-panel,fam gnome-desktop-environment,fam gamin,fam education-desktop-gnome,fam doodled,fam apachetop,fam Dependencies: 2.7.0-9 - libc6 (2 2.3.5-1) libgcc1 (2 1:4.0.2) libstdc++6 (2 4.0.2-4) portmap (0 (null)) Provides: 2.7.0-9 - Reverse Provides: -%< If you have non of these applications, you can securely remove it. If you have one of the apps, they won't get file change infos in time. Greetings, Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i686 to amd64
"S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, let's see what i have done. > I make a new partation /dev/sda6 with resierfs and mount it with /mnt/pure64 > Then tried: > > debootstrap --arch amd64 sid /mnt/pure64/ [[ > http://amd64.debian.net/debian-amd64/]] > And it's started to download some files. > > After passing some time, i am getting this error :( > I: Extracting zlib1g... > W: Failure trying to run: chroot /mnt/pure64 mount -t proc proc /proc > What should i do now, i am not enough expert, i never use this process . I bet you didn't first install and boot a 64bit kernel. Bootstraping will run some commands in the new system it creates and you can only run amd64 binaries with a 64bit kernel. There is a 2.6.8 amd64 kernel in sarge. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amd64-archive update
Le Dimanche 12 Mars 2006 20:33, Klaus Becker a écrit : > Hello Matthieu, Hello, > > using your script, I installed firefox, opera, mplayer and w32codecs. But I > cannot install flash : > > apt-get install mozilla-flash-player7=7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1 > ... > E: Version '7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1' for 'mozilla-flash-player7' was not > found. > > It's not in /var/lib/amd64-archive. strange, I have sudo find /var/lib/amd64-archive/ -name "*flash*" /var/lib/amd64-archive/pool/non-free/f/flash-player7-binary-i386 /var/lib/amd64-archive/pool/non-free/f/flash-player7-binary-i386/mozilla-flash-player7_7.0.61-1duo1_i386.deb /var/lib/amd64-archive/pool/non-free/f/flash-player7-binary-i386/mozilla-flash-player7_7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1_amd64.deb sudo apt-cache policy mozilla-flash-player7 mozilla-flash-player7: Installé : 7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1 Candidat : 7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1 Table de version : *** 7.0.61-1duo1-0.0.0.local.1 0 991 file: debian-unofficial/non-free Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status and you ? > > When I finished installing your packages, can I safely > delete /var/lib/amd64-archive? In which way? yes, you can purge amd64-archive, it should remove /var/lib/amd64-archive. installed packages will remain installed. > > Thanks a lot for your work! you're welcome :-) > > Klaus Matthieu
Re: DVD burning stop to work...PLEASE HELP ME!!!
On a similar issue I've found that the latest update appears to have broken k3b (when attempting to burn an image I get the error (cdrecord returned error code 1) which appears to be permissions related, since it successfully burnt the image when run as root. I haven't checked all the permissions manually but k3b identifies when it starts up that "cdrecord will be run without root priviledges" and "cdrdao will be run without root priviledges". Starting k3bsetup to fix this currently gets me a blank panel (from the command "kcmshell 'k3bsetup2'"). Anyway, for the moment running k3b as root appears to deal with this if you have this issue.On 3/11/06, Tony Freeman < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 21:20 -0300, Marlon Régis Schmitz wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: cdrecord -scanbusI see that you are logged in as a normal user ... try doing yourgrowisofs command as root.I had a similar problem just yesterday morning! I was using thenautilus cd/dvd burning gui as a normal user and was frustrated that the cd was not being burned. I then realized that my new updates to thesystem must have screwed some permissions somewhere (after all it is atesting distribution) so that a normal user could not burn cd/dvds ... I logged in as root and sure enough I could use the nautilus cd/dvdburning gui just fine.-- Tony--To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: netinstall CD
"S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I tried with netinstall CD, It's not giving me any chance to use my modem to > connect to internet . Any body knows the way to get working ppp on > netinstaller CD? > -- > S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) > Home page: [[http://lavluda.tripod.com]] > Blog: [[http://lavluda.wordpress.com]] > Yahoo!! ID: lavluda MSN ID: lavluda Skype : lavluda > Cell no: +880189219056 (t&t) or +880186340531 You can't and you don't need to. Just install it and then configure pppd and run apt-setup and base-config again. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fam uses 100% of CPU problem
Hi Tobias, On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 09:47 +0100, Tobias Krais wrote: > Hi Joost, > > > I am experiencing problems with fam, using 100% of CPU (actually 50% as > > I have 2 processors ;-)). There is already a bug report for this > > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252896) . > > > > Can anyone tell me which programs depend on fam or why it is installed? > > Can I safely uninstall the program? > > I just uninstalled it. My system still works :-) That does not really surprise me, as the account under which fam runs is an ordinary user account. So I don't expect it to be system critical. But assuming that there is reason why it is installed, do you have any idea what program is not functioning as it should be because fam is not running? -- Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 fax: 024-3608416 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.askesis.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fam uses 100% of CPU problem
Hi Joost, > I am experiencing problems with fam, using 100% of CPU (actually 50% as > I have 2 processors ;-)). There is already a bug report for this > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252896) . > > Can anyone tell me which programs depend on fam or why it is installed? > Can I safely uninstall the program? I just uninstalled it. My system still works :-) Greetings, Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fam uses 100% of CPU problem
Hi, I am experiencing problems with fam, using 100% of CPU (actually 50% as I have 2 processors ;-)). There is already a bug report for this (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252896) . Can anyone tell me which programs depend on fam or why it is installed? Can I safely uninstall the program? -- Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 fax: 024-3608416 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.askesis.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
