Re: BADSIGN debian AMD64 Archive Key!
Nuutti Kotivuori wrote: W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG E415B2B4B5F5BBED Debian AMD64 Archive Key debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Shows up for me too. Fixed now. -- Naked -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fdisk_and_dbootstrap_problem
Dear Debian Users, How to do something like: 'debootstrap --arch amd64 sarge /pure64/ http://amd64.debian.net/debian- amd64/' without internet connection, i.e from DVD? I have an 80GB HD with 8 partitions (swap included). When I boot from DVD, fdisk wants to erase/partition the whole disk --- it doesn't see the partitions that are present. So I installed Ubuntu for AMD64 on part. No8 and I want to install Debian Sarge AMD64 on part. No2 without loosing the data on the others (and I have no connection to the Internet yet). With the best regards, Jacek Achremowicz, Kraków, POLAND PS I am completly new to the list. I had an i386 16MB RAM some time ago with Debian Woody. It worked perfectly! But the hardware died... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fdisk_and_dbootstrap_problem
Jacek Achremowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dear Debian Users, How to do something like: 'debootstrap --arch amd64 sarge /pure64/ http://amd64.debian.net/debian- amd64/' without internet connection, i.e from DVD? mount /cdrom debootstrap --arch amd64 sarge /pure64/ file:///cdrom/ I have an 80GB HD with 8 partitions (swap included). When I boot from DVD, fdisk wants to erase/partition the whole disk --- it doesn't see the partitions that are present. You are reading that wrong. It should give you a choice between wipeing the disk and manualy partitioning it. The later lets you reuse the existing partitions. So I installed Ubuntu for AMD64 on part. No8 and I want to install Debian Sarge AMD64 on part. No2 without loosing the data on the others (and I have no connection to the Internet yet). With the best regards, Jacek Achremowicz, Kraków, POLAND PS I am completly new to the list. I had an i386 16MB RAM some time ago with Debian Woody. It worked perfectly! But the hardware died... MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: haskelldb fails to build on debian-amd64
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:35:01PM +0100, Roberto Pariset wrote: Hi, haskelldb is failing on amd64 and ghc could possibly have a part in this. I think you should be informed as well, sorry I didn't think to CC the other emails. I hope that in case there's something wrong with ghc6, maybe you can easily guess :) In particular, reading haskelldb changelod I noticed Update dependencies for ghc6 6.4.1. Could it be something related to the last ghc6 uploads? However, could you please take a look below? Thanks, Aha, ghc6 6.4.1-2 is registerised on amd64, but 6.4.1-1 isn't, and it turns out the two are incompatible. You'll have to BinNMU any libraries built with 6.4.1-1 (in this case haskell-hsql). Sorry about that. Thanks Ian Messaggio Originale Bjorn Bringert ha scritto: Roberto Pariset wrote: Hello, haskelldb fails to build from source on debian-amd64, with a lot of errors like: undefined reference to `stg_ap_p_ret' , as shown at [1]. I have to say I have never heard of haskell before, so I was wondering if you could give me any hint to fix it. A good starting point would be pointing me where stg_ap_p_ret is defined, as I haven't been able to find out (am I unable to use google?). All the best, Roberto PS. please include me in your replies, don't just mail the list! [1] http://amd64.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=ghc6ver=6.4.1-2arch=amd64stamp=1141531193file=logas=raw Hi Roberto, the log that you link to seems to be for the GHC build, not HaskellDB, and it doesn't seem to contain the error messages that you mention. I did find the HaskellDB log with the errors at: http://amd64.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=haskelldbver=0.9.cvs.601-9arch=amd64stamp=1142372938file=logas=raw I think that the stg_ap_p_ret function belongs to the GHC run-time system, but I don't know what would cause the linker to not find it. /Björn (HaskellDB maintainer) Thanks a lot, Björn. I confirm I got the url wrong, sorry. Now, let's hope to hear some feedback from the GHC guys =) Rob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fdisk_and_dbootstrap_problem
is the HDD Sata ?On 3/16/06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jacek Achremowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dear Debian Users, How to do something like: 'debootstrap --arch amd64 sarge /pure64/ http://amd64.debian.net/debian- amd64/' without internet connection, i.e from DVD?mount /cdromdebootstrap --arch amd64 sarge /pure64/ file:///cdrom/ I have an 80GB HD with 8 partitions (swap included). When I boot from DVD, fdisk wants to erase/partition the whole disk --- it doesn't see the partitions that are present.You are reading that wrong. It should give you a choice between wipeing the disk and manualy partitioning it. The later lets you reusethe existing partitions. So I installed Ubuntu for AMD64 on part. No8 and I want to install Debian Sarge AMD64 on part. No2 without loosing the data on the others (and I have no connection to the Internet yet). With the best regards, Jacek Achremowicz, Kraków, POLAND PS I am completly new to the list. I had an i386 16MB RAM some time ago with Debian Woody. It worked perfectly! But the hardware died...MfGGoswin--To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)Home page: http://lavluda.tripod.comBlog: http://lavluda.wordpress.comYahoo!! ID: lavluda MSN ID: lavluda Skype : lavluda Cell no: +880189219056 (tt) or +880186340531
Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Goswin, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But if I run 'ldconfig -v' as suggested the /emul library directories are ignored. See below. The man page for ldconfig doesn't mention /lib/ldconfig either. Is your version in experimental? No, the normal sid version. What version of libc6 do you have? Could it be that the libc6 and libc6-i386 have different versions? The libc6-i386 shoul depend on a new enough libc6 package for ldconfig to work. But I never checked that and don't have access to my sid system currently. Of course there are no pending upgrades. Esp. for libc6\*: % dpkg -l libc6\* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii libc6 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone un libc6-bin none (no description available) un libc6-dbg none (no description available) ii libc6-dev 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea un libc6-dev-i386 none (no description available) un libc6-doc none (no description available) ii libc6-i386 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: 32bit shared libraries for AM un libc6-pic none (no description available) un libc6-prof none (no description available) un libc6.1none (no description available) un libc6.1-devnone (no description available) un libc6.1-picnone (no description available) As mentioned before, the /lib/ldconfig feature is not documented at all. Whch version of libc6* has been used for testing? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l libc6\* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii libc6 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libc6-dev 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea ii libc6-dev-i386 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: 32bit development libraries f un libc6-doc none (no description available) ii libc6-i386 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: 32bit shared libraries for AM pn libc6-pic none (no description available) un libc6-prof none (no description available) un libc6.1none (no description available) un libc6.1-devnone (no description available) That version works fine here. bc5c67ee8d8c763449b70936ab80a8ab /sbin/ldconfig There is yet another concern: ld.so.conf also contained a search sequence for library directories (AFAIK). How is this supposed to work with the new directory containg symbolic links? Hmm. I don't think there is a concept for the search order of those links yet. The directory is ment only for system library dirs so there should be no need for ordering them I think. User dirs should still be in ld.so.conf There could be a conflict even for system libraries, e.g. between a stripped-down small library in /lib used at boot time, and the full multi-lingual version in /usr/lib, for example. That would never work since /lib is before /usr/lib hardcoded in ldconfig. Regards Harri MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Etch amd64 dvds
On Thursday 16 March 2006 14:36, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:42:43PM +0100, linuxdvds.de wrote: Hello, I think something must be wrong with the etch amd64 dvds under http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/ Have not tried to install with these dvds, but a) The dvds have a size of 8.3G whereas all other architectures have 9G - 10.5G b) Can't find e.g. kdebase or kdebase-bin in the jigdo-files Hmmm. Looking in the build logs for the amd64 DVDs, I see: + Trying to add kdebase-bin... libcupsys2 doesn't exist... Can't add kdebase-bin ... dependency problem. Which seems to be a generic problem in amd64 at the moment... :-( Yes. It is probably a result from the accidental migration some time ago that was reversed. That reversal resulted in the AMD64 archive being partially broken. As AMD64 is currently being integrated into the main archive, it is probably not worth trying to fix this. I'll add an erratum for this issue on [1]. Feel free to refer to that page if the question is asked again. [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata pgp7jLwH7VrzM.pgp Description: PGP signature
amd64 glibc update for sarge
Hello, On glibc maintainers request, I have added glibc to the candidate for the next stable release on the wiki. [1] According to the diff between the packages, this update only concerns timezone data. There is no change in the glibc code. When (and iff) will be glibc updated due to timezone, would be also possible to include fix specific to amd64 only (bug #314408) ? Glibc with this fix is currently in sarge-unsupported archive for amd64. Thanks for considering it. Petr --- libc/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_rwlock_unlock.S.jj +++ libc/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_rwlock_unlock.S @@ -49,12 +49,12 @@ __pthread_rwlock_unlock: #endif jnz 1f -2: cmpq$0, WRITER(%rdi) +2: cmpl$0, WRITER(%rdi) jne 5f declNR_READERS(%rdi) jnz 6f -5: movq$0, WRITER(%rdi) +5: movl$0, WRITER(%rdi) movq$1, %rsi leaqWRITERS_WAKEUP(%rdi), %r10 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intel Xeon Server
Hi I have an Intel Server with an Xeon Nocona 3.0 GHz EMT64 processor. I would like to run it as a stable webserver. Which distribution shall I install? Is it possible to install x386 Sarge? Are there any known issues? Which is the savest way to go especially when considerating future updates? cheeres Beat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel Xeon Server
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 02:23:15PM +0100, debian wrote: I have an Intel Server with an Xeon Nocona 3.0 GHz EMT64 processor. I would like to run it as a stable webserver. Which distribution shall I install? Is it possible to install x386 Sarge? Are there any known issues? Which is the savest way to go especially when considerating future updates? As long as your hardware is supported, there is no problem running the i386 version of sarge on it. It is still an x86 machine. Some people want to run the 64bit version due to the amount of ram, or type of software they have, while others prefer to stick with a much more mature architecture for now. Both will continue to be supported by debian, so upgrades won't be a future. If multiarch is ever implemented, you should be able to later upgrade from i386 to running a mix of amd64 and i386, but for now it is one or the other (unless you place on in a chroot within the other). Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: strange clock behaviour on a laptop
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:48:01AM +, Ian Cairns wrote: I had clock problems on my HP Pavilion zv6004EA until I upgraded the firmware (used Windows to do it, g!) but since then it has been well behaved. Could I suggest a quick look at the HP web site. So a new bios had fixed the problem? That's good. Many companies don't care about bios bugs that don't affect windows. :( Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel Xeon Server
i am also using this system with amd64 sid :)My kernel is:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -aLinux tanha 2.6.15-1-em64t-p4-smp #2 SMP Tue Mar 7 08:19:39 UTC 2006 x86_64 GNU/LinuxI will prefer this, as you will get support of a very big amount of RAM. btw, please use sarge , as sid is always unstable.For update isue and as web server gentoo is the best choice.On 3/16/06, debian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:HiI have an Intel Server with an Xeon Nocona 3.0 GHz EMT64 processor. I wouldlike to run it as a stable webserver. Which distribution shall I install? Isit possible to install x386 Sarge? Are there any known issues? Which is thesavest way to go especially when considerating future updates? cheeresBeat--To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]-- S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)Home page: http://lavluda.tripod.com Blog: http://lavluda.wordpress.comYahoo!! ID: lavluda MSN ID: lavluda Skype : lavludaCell no: +880189219056 (tt) or +880186340531
Re: Intel Xeon Server
On Thursday 16 March 2006 13:23, debian wrote: Hi I have an Intel Server with an Xeon Nocona 3.0 GHz EMT64 processor. I would like to run it as a stable webserver. Which distribution shall I install? Is it possible to install x386 Sarge? Are there any known issues? Which is the savest way to go especially when considerating future updates? We use a duel Xeon server for fone-me.com, running Debian Sarge - its very stable and fully supported by the debian security team. -- Matthew Robinson www.fone-me.com free phone sex for all new members -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple hardware and RAID failures
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:38:23AM -0400, Stephen Cormier wrote: A quick google search comes up with this page(1) which if it is the Fortron you were using says it only has 15a on the +12v. This is really not enough amperage to allow a heavy draw of power for an AMD64 system. No, I have the FSP400-60THN (1) and this one has just 14a on tihe +12v, even worse :P I have an Enermax 350 (EG365P-VE) in my Socket 754 machine it has 26a on the +12v which is more than the recommended minimum I see most places of 24a, it works well but I only have a video card, one hard drive in the machine. You may want to give the power supply calculator linked on this page(2) a try and see what it says. Thanks for the tip. According to the calculator I need 230W. Because I use it as a server, the videocard is a simple ATI one. I have replaced the crap Fortron with my trusty old Enermax FMA 350W (2) wich also has 26a on the 12v. Mine is you were lucky so far and the draw on the power supply has finally made it unstable/started to kill it off. Guess you're right. A bad power supply is one of the most common reasons for hardware failures hopefully it has not damaged the pieces and you may be able to reuse all that hardware you have laying around now in another machine. BTW you may want to get something along the lines of a 450+w with at least 24a on the +12v line just to be certain you do not draw too much from the 350w you have put in. Well, the server is running stable at the moment and de RAID set is still in sync so I'm hopeful this solved the problem. Thank you and the rest for your help. Frank (1) http://www.home2000.net/client/fspgroupusacom/proddetail.asp?linenumber=179 (2) http://www.enermax.com/english/product_Display1.asp?PrID=29 -- gpg: FBB8E53A jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mysql-server-5.0: double free or corruption - ABRT
Hello! Is anyone else seeing mysql-server 5.0.18-9 crashing with messages like: | Mar 14 00:32:59 zwart mysqld[29820]: *** glibc detected *** double | free or corruption (!prev): 0x012b1ab0 *** | Mar 15 02:24:17 zwart mysqld[13255]: *** glibc detected *** free(): | invalid next size (normal): 0x012d3d30 *** | Mar 16 00:32:51 zwart mysqld[17749]: *** glibc detected *** double | free or corruption (!prev): 0x01333540 *** | Mar 16 14:44:07 zwart mysqld[471]: *** glibc detected *** double | free or corruption (!prev): 0x013e4160 *** All followed by: | Mar 16 14:44:07 zwart mysqld[471]: mysqld got signal 6; It causes mysqld to keep running, but it just stops doing anything. You can connect, but anything that accesses the datafiles will just hang indefinitely. Causing mysqld to eventually get 'Too many connections' after which you'd have to kill -9 the daemon to get it working again. This happens on a dual Opteron 250 system with 4GB memory running 2.6.15.6 and mysql-server-5.0 version 5.0.18-9. Another dual Opteron 250 with 2GB running 2.6.15.1 and mysql-server-5.0 version 5.0.18-8 doesn't show this behaviour. I'll try installing the same kernel (2.6.15.1) on the non-working box and see what that brings me. If any of you have any idea what might cause this, please let me know! Thanks, Sander. -- | If TCP/IP handshaking was less formal, | perhaps SYN / ACK would be Yo! / 'sup? instead... | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel Xeon Server
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Matthew Robinson wrote: On Thursday 16 March 2006 13:23, debian wrote: Hi I have an Intel Server with an Xeon Nocona 3.0 GHz EMT64 processor. I would like to run it as a stable webserver. Which distribution shall I install? Is it possible to install x386 Sarge? Are there any known issues? Which is the savest way to go especially when considerating future updates? We use a duel Xeon server for fone-me.com, running Debian Sarge - its very stable and fully supported by the debian security team. I run amd64 unofficial sarge (with a very small number of backported packages in order to use recent kernels) on a number of AMD64/Opteron workstations. They are rock stable, run for months at a time (because from time to time I update their kernels and thus reboot them) and are fully supported by the debian security team. Amd64 is going to be an official port of debian starting from next release, so I see no problem in future updates. And yes, for the kind of workload I use there is a marked performance gain with respect to running i386 sarge on the same machines. By the way, I do have a parallel i386 sarge installed in a chroot in these machines, to ensure complete 32bit compatibility, so it's not like I'm sacrificing anything, apart from a little disk space... Bye Giacomo -- _ Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA) Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222 Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916 _ When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are (Freddy Mercury) _ -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what's better for AMD64 [ASUS A6B00K]
hi everyone, i just decided to install Debian into my laptop with AMD64 (AMD Turion/tm 64 Mobile) with NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 and I would like to ask which option is better: testing distribution (regenerated weekly) from: cdimage.debian.org or the unofficial Debian-AMD64 Sarge from: cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/sarge-amd64 (last version is from jenuary 2005) by the way if some one has ASUS A6B004 - i'll be glade for all information which can help during installation thanks in advance, Bartek -- Bartosz Boguszewski email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: +33 663481868 (fr) * +48 694603537 (pl)
Re: Dropping to a shell
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 15:15, William Humphrey wrote: I am using the latest official testing version of debian (kernel 2.6.15) on a DL580 G3 with Quad Procs. I used the netinst image. Once I installed the program, I have the problem to where is keep dropping to a shell and will not boot. It say that it cannot find my hard drive partition which is /dev/cciss/c0d01. And on top of that, it does not create an /etc/fstab for me to mount it. I have tried creating a fstab myself, but once I reboot, it goes away. Has anyone had this problem? If so please help! Waiting 20 seconds and ctl-d'ing out of the shell works here. When mine does that drop into a shell trick, I just let it sit for 10 or 15 seconds. The boot process prints on the screen that it's created the relevant drive in /dev. And a couple seconds after that, 'ls /dev/sd*' shows the partitions. And ctl-d climbs out of the shell, and the boot process finishes. What you describe is happening here on 2 machines: a dual Opteron Sun running smp etch in 32 bit mode and a single P4 homebrew running sid. Both of them have a SCSI boot drive and a SATA to store big stuff on. (The servers running sarge are fine.) The 2.6.15 kernel and/or the current udev and/or something else I don't know about are/is bent pretty badly. SATA drives are not SCSI drives. If the developers want to run them through the SCSI driver, that's fine. But they could at least call them sdA... so things wouldn't get confused. And whoever's doing that reordering should be put up against the wall. Or at least the installer should be told about the reordering algorithm. -- Glenn English [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG ID: D0D7FF20 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: turion/mobile athlon benchmark
Hello again I've managed to find a bit of time to reboot my computers. If you look at the average reluts from all of the tests, AMD is just slightly ahead in the MFLOPs, however, it took P4 5 seconds less on average to perform all tests. This seems a bit odd... AMD64 Average: time: 0.87 MFLOPS: 2447.44 P4 Average: time: 0.82 MFLOPS: 2417.86 Here are the details. I've the test 5 times from the clean reboot in runlevel 1. Here are the average results: AMD64 3200+ 64bit kernel 100 0.011328.55 200 0.031956.21 300 0.1 2263.63 400 0.212459.69 500 0.392576.92 600 0.652643.71 700 1.012709.99 800 1.492753.98 900 2.022882.1 10002.762899.66 Average from above: time: 0.87 MFLOPS: 2447.44 cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 31 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ stepping: 0 cpu MHz : 1004.900 cache size : 512 KB fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow lahf_lm bogomips: 2011.09 TLB size: 1024 4K pages clflush size: 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: ts fid vid ttp - Intel P4 3.2Ghz HT (on toshiba P20 laptop) 100 0.011031.2 200 0.041543.81 300 0.1 2083.01 400 0.232273.86 500 0.412418.78 600 0.612824.15 700 0.962856.21 800 1.372980.17 900 1.913045.33 10002.563122.11 Average from the tests: time: 0.82 MFLOPS: 2417.86 cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 2 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz stepping: 9 cpu MHz : 3193.020 cache size : 512 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid xtpr bogomips: 6388.08 processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 2 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz stepping: 9 cpu MHz : 3193.020 cache size : 512 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid xtpr bogomips: 6383.23 -- Andrei signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: amd64 glibc update for sarge
Hi, Martin Zobel-Helas asked me on irc to comment on the update so here we go. The debian-amd64 team would welcome it very much if it got included. As you can see from the bugreport [1] the fix is included upstream and in debian since 2.3.5-3. The bug prevents NPTL threads from functioning correctly which is a big issue on amd64. Most notably mysql hangs due to this. MfG Goswin [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314408 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: strange clock behaviour on a laptop
Thanks a lot for your reponses and sorry for my delay, I just had been busy trying to understand all your information. Indeed, the version of the BIOS firmware, according to the data provided in HP website, is completely updated (Nov, 22th, 2005). The discussion in bugzilla is a little tricky for me so I'm not an expert in computer science. I also tried to enter the kernel option acpi_os_name=Microsoft Windows XP and It doesn't run. I'll be very glad for further comments ? Do you need more data ? Thanks again, David Gasa i Castell From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (A. P. Kennedy) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED],David Gasa Castell [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: strange clock behaviour on a laptop Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:20:53 -0600 Take a look at this. This bug has been around awhile but a fix is out. I'm asuming that this is an ATI chipset. Would definetly try a bios update if one is out for your laptop. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3927 Ian == Ian Cairns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ian On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 17:30 -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:15:45PM +, David Gasa Castell wrote: Recently, I adquired a laptop (mod. HP Compaq nx 6125) and I tried to install a 32 bits Etch on it. After all, I detected an acceleration of the laptop clock, so it counts two seconds per one. What can I do to fix this ? Thanks in advance. If it has an ati chipset (I suspect it does since I think the nx 6150 does), then try adding this to the kernel command line: acpi_os_name=Microsoft Windows XP According to what I have read the BIOS on almost all ATI based boards has incomplete ACPI implementation and does a crap job on anything that isn't claiming to be windows. If that doesn't do it, then maybe you need to pass an option to set which timer pin to use and/or ignore, but I don't remember which ones off hand. Len Sorensen Ian I had clock problems on my HP Pavilion zv6004EA until I upgraded Ian the firmware (used Windows to do it, g!) but since then it Ian has been well behaved. Ian Could I suggest a quick look at the HP web site. Ian Ian. Ian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of Ian unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what's better for AMD64 [ASUS A6B00K]
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:30:13 +0100, Bartek Boguszewski wrote: i just decided to install Debian into my laptop with AMD64 (AMD Turion/tm 64 Mobile) with NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 and I would like to ask which option is better: Depends on how well Sarge supports your hardware and on how experienced you are with debian. I generally install testing and switch immediately to unstable, but i like the bleeding edge. If you want a more conservative approach, then go with Sarge and know that you might need newer kernels than the default one to support your hardware. -- Best Regards, Jack Linux User #264449 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Etch amd64 dvds
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: + Trying to add kdebase-bin... libcupsys2 doesn't exist... Can't add kdebase-bin ... dependency problem. Which seems to be a generic problem in amd64 at the moment... :-( Yes. It is probably a result from the accidental migration some time ago that was reversed. That reversal resulted in the AMD64 archive being partially broken. Yes, as a result lots of packages are missing. As AMD64 is currently being integrated into the main archive, it is probably not worth trying to fix this. Which is why I never bothered to try and fix it. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what's better for AMD64 [ASUS A6B00K]
On Thursday 16 March 2006 08:21, Bartek Boguszewski wrote: hi everyone, i just decided to install Debian into my laptop with AMD64 (AMD Turion/tm 64 Mobile) with NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 and I would like to ask which option is better: testing distribution (regenerated weekly) from: cdimage.debian.org or the unofficial Debian-AMD64 Sarge from: cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/sarge-amd64 (last version is from jenuary 2005) by the way if some one has ASUS A6B004 - i'll be glade for all information which can help during installation For a new laptop I would say Sarge probably is not current enough, check the hardware though if you want to be sure. A while back unstable was a better bet for amd64 than testing, not sure if that is still the case. -- Greg Madden -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dropping to a shell
Thanks for the reply Glenn! I just tried your suggestion and it still does the same thing. I also forgot to mention that I am using Quad Xeon's 3.33ghz 64-bit. I did an ls- l on my partition /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 and it finds it, but ctrl-d does get me out of the shell, it just continues to say tty job control turned off. Do you maybe have any other suggestions? -Original Message- From: Glenn English [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 12:32 PM To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Dropping to a shell On Wednesday 15 March 2006 15:15, William Humphrey wrote: I am using the latest official testing version of debian (kernel 2.6.15) on a DL580 G3 with Quad Procs. I used the netinst image. Once I installed the program, I have the problem to where is keep dropping to a shell and will not boot. It say that it cannot find my hard drive partition which is /dev/cciss/c0d01. And on top of that, it does not create an /etc/fstab for me to mount it. I have tried creating a fstab myself, but once I reboot, it goes away. Has anyone had this problem? If so please help! Waiting 20 seconds and ctl-d'ing out of the shell works here. When mine does that drop into a shell trick, I just let it sit for 10 or 15 seconds. The boot process prints on the screen that it's created the relevant drive in /dev. And a couple seconds after that, 'ls /dev/sd*' shows the partitions. And ctl-d climbs out of the shell, and the boot process finishes. What you describe is happening here on 2 machines: a dual Opteron Sun running smp etch in 32 bit mode and a single P4 homebrew running sid. Both of them have a SCSI boot drive and a SATA to store big stuff on. (The servers running sarge are fine.) The 2.6.15 kernel and/or the current udev and/or something else I don't know about are/is bent pretty badly. SATA drives are not SCSI drives. If the developers want to run them through the SCSI driver, that's fine. But they could at least call them sdA... so things wouldn't get confused. And whoever's doing that reordering should be put up against the wall. Or at least the installer should be told about the reordering algorithm. -- Glenn English [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG ID: D0D7FF20 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dropping to a shell
You can lsmod in the shell and find out whether or not the driver for your SATA or SCSI card is loaded. If not, then you have to boot again with your netinst CD and mount the root partition. Modify the /etc/modules to include the driver, and re-make the initramfs. -- Bhaskar S. Manda Financial Engineer Cooperfund, Inc. 611 Enterprise Dr. Oak Brook, IL 60523-8811 (630) 573-8700 (630) 573-0652 (Fax) -Original Message- From: William Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1:05 PM To: Glenn English Cc: debian-x86-64@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: Dropping to a shell Thanks for the reply Glenn! I just tried your suggestion and it still does the same thing. I also forgot to mention that I am using Quad Xeon's 3.33ghz 64-bit. I did an ls- l on my partition /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 and it finds it, but ctrl-d does get me out of the shell, it just continues to say tty job control turned off. Do you maybe have any other suggestions? -Original Message- From: Glenn English [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 12:32 PM To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Dropping to a shell On Wednesday 15 March 2006 15:15, William Humphrey wrote: I am using the latest official testing version of debian (kernel 2.6.15) on a DL580 G3 with Quad Procs. I used the netinst image. Once I installed the program, I have the problem to where is keep dropping to a shell and will not boot. It say that it cannot find my hard drive partition which is /dev/cciss/c0d01. And on top of that, it does not create an /etc/fstab for me to mount it. I have tried creating a fstab myself, but once I reboot, it goes away. Has anyone had this problem? If so please help! Waiting 20 seconds and ctl-d'ing out of the shell works here. When mine does that drop into a shell trick, I just let it sit for 10 or 15 seconds. The boot process prints on the screen that it's created the relevant drive in /dev. And a couple seconds after that, 'ls /dev/sd*' shows the partitions. And ctl-d climbs out of the shell, and the boot process finishes. What you describe is happening here on 2 machines: a dual Opteron Sun running smp etch in 32 bit mode and a single P4 homebrew running sid. Both of them have a SCSI boot drive and a SATA to store big stuff on. (The servers running sarge are fine.) The 2.6.15 kernel and/or the current udev and/or something else I don't know about are/is bent pretty badly. SATA drives are not SCSI drives. If the developers want to run them through the SCSI driver, that's fine. But they could at least call them sdA... so things wouldn't get confused. And whoever's doing that reordering should be put up against the wall. Or at least the installer should be told about the reordering algorithm. -- Glenn English [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG ID: D0D7FF20 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
realplayer in chroot VERY slow
I've got realplay running via firefox, both in a chroot. Firefox seems OK (though it didn't notice the ~/.mozilla I copied to the chroot, like it does running outside the chroot), but realplay GUI buttons take anywhere from a few to maybe 30 seconds to respond to clicks and the video updates very slowly and the player resets to run at slowest bitrate (34kbps). Anyone have a clue for me? Google didn't find one in my first search. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dropping to a shell
On Thursday 16 March 2006 08:32, Glenn English wrote: On Wednesday 15 March 2006 15:15, William Humphrey wrote: I am using the latest official testing version of debian (kernel 2.6.15) on a DL580 G3 with Quad Procs. I used the netinst image. Once I installed the program, I have the problem to where is keep dropping to a shell and will not boot. It say that it cannot find my hard drive partition which is /dev/cciss/c0d01. And on top of that, it does not create an /etc/fstab for me to mount it. I have tried creating a fstab myself, but once I reboot, it goes away. Has anyone had this problem? If so please help! Waiting 20 seconds and ctl-d'ing out of the shell works here. When mine does that drop into a shell trick, I just let it sit for 10 or 15 seconds. The boot process prints on the screen that it's created the relevant drive in /dev. And a couple seconds after that, 'ls /dev/sd*' shows the partitions. And ctl-d climbs out of the shell, and the boot process finishes. What you describe is happening here on 2 machines: a dual Opteron Sun running smp etch in 32 bit mode and a single P4 homebrew running sid. Both of them have a SCSI boot drive and a SATA to store big stuff on. (The servers running sarge are fine.) The 2.6.15 kernel and/or the current udev and/or something else I don't know about are/is bent pretty badly. SATA drives are not SCSI drives. If the developers want to run them through the SCSI driver, that's fine. But they could at least call them sdA... so things wouldn't get confused. And whoever's doing that reordering should be put up against the wall. Or at least the installer should be told about the reordering algorithm. -- Glenn English [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG ID: D0D7FF20 The cciss indicates it is a hardware raid controller, maybe Compaqs 'smart array' -- Greg Madden -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
