chroot problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 hi guys, suddenly i have problems with my amd64 system when trying to run applications from my i386 chroot using dchroot. they just fail to run. strace gives me clone(dchroot: chroot: Operation not permitted child_stack=0, flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD, child_tidptr=0x2ae02760) = 32220 - --- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @0 (0) --- when i try to chroot inside the chroot (as root) and run the application (oocalc, nedit, ...), then it is fine. however the dchroot way doesn't work. i recently changed hosts.allow/hosts.deny files so i firstly thought these might be problems, but after 'removing' them, nothing changed. i also tried to manually dchroot into the chroot as an ordinary user. problem is that 'can't open display' - but how do i set display inside the chroot? /tmp and /home are bind-mounted. everything worked fine but yesterday i realized is no longer so... i'd be grateful for any hints. thanks, - -- Lubos [EMAIL PROTECTED]" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFETxPZ5EqL/d2IfcARAzB9AJ9o9sZmjS1LDoM3V7TaOe3h0Di0PwCeJgBc 9XDM+WEJWq5m+RhB5f5i4DE= =1QgJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amd64 updates?
Jonathan Kaye wrote: > For the past 6 or 7 days, updating amd64 sid has produced no new upgrades > which seems a bit unusual. I'm using > deb http://ftp.es.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contrib > in my sources.list but I've also tried > deb http://ftp.belnet.be/debian-amd64/debian/ sarge main contrib > with the same results. > I've read about the problems with xorg-xserver upgrades and I'm wondering if > there is a general freeze while this problem is sorted out. > > I've also read that the debian amd64 repositories have moved but those > listed above are from the most recent Mirrors page I could find. I guess that means the old debian-amd64 archive is no longer being updated. That's ok, though -- amd64 sid is now on the main Debian mirrors, as in: http://www.debian.org/mirror/list -Corey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
amd64 updates?
For the past 6 or 7 days, updating amd64 sid has produced no new upgrades which seems a bit unusual. I'm using deb http://ftp.es.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ sid main contrib in my sources.list but I've also tried deb http://ftp.belnet.be/debian-amd64/debian/ sarge main contrib with the same results. I've read about the problems with xorg-xserver upgrades and I'm wondering if there is a general freeze while this problem is sorted out. I've also read that the debian amd64 repositories have moved but those listed above are from the most recent Mirrors page I could find. All this could just be due to chance but I thought it best to check with you all. Cheers, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: broken ia32-libc6 / libc6-i386
Hi folks, AFAICS ia32-libs shrunk for about 725KByte between 1.8 and 1.9. But using aptitude I can review the changelog. It is not available. What has been dropped? Would it be possible to provide the changelog by default, esp. for such a radical change? Many thanx Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 64bit kernel for i386, apt-get-multiarch - poor mans multiarch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:01:57AM +0100, Jo Shields wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:02:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> > >> > >> >>Hi, >> >> >> >>I've been working on wrappers for apt and dpkg-deb to get some >> >>resemblance of multiarch that can still make it for etch. The first >> >>thing I made to work is installing amd64 kernels on i386 and anyone >> >> >> >> >> > >> >Either you've made a mistake or I'm hopelessly confused. I can see >> >installing an i386 kernel on AMD64, but what's the point of booting an >> >1386 with an AMD64 kernel. It won't have the instruction set. >> > >> >-- hendrik >> > >> >> You may want to run an i386 distribution on an AMD64 processor, for >> assorted reasons - but choose to have the ability to run 64-bit code by >> running a 64-bit kernel. i386 Sarge includes a selection of AMD64 kernels. > > Ah. So when you say installing amd64 kernel on i386, you don't mean > running it on an i386 box, but running it on an AMD64 box that happens > to have the i386 version of Debian running on it. That makes sense. > > -- hendrik Yes. Anything else would be useless. The problem is that etch/sid no longer has a 64bit kernel for debian-i386 and it is stupid to build the same kernel twice, once for amd64 and once for i386 anyway. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 64bit kernel for i386, apt-get-multiarch - poor mans multiarch
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:01:57AM +0100, Jo Shields wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:02:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>I've been working on wrappers for apt and dpkg-deb to get some > >>resemblance of multiarch that can still make it for etch. The first > >>thing I made to work is installing amd64 kernels on i386 and anyone > >> > >> > > > >Either you've made a mistake or I'm hopelessly confused. I can see > >installing an i386 kernel on AMD64, but what's the point of booting an > >1386 with an AMD64 kernel. It won't have the instruction set. > > > >-- hendrik > > > > You may want to run an i386 distribution on an AMD64 processor, for > assorted reasons - but choose to have the ability to run 64-bit code by > running a 64-bit kernel. i386 Sarge includes a selection of AMD64 kernels. Ah. So when you say installing amd64 kernel on i386, you don't mean running it on an i386 box, but running it on an AMD64 box that happens to have the i386 version of Debian running on it. That makes sense. -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dist-upgrade sarge to etch
Hi, > > And now I made it, to install a 2.6.16-kernel on sarge and nothing bad > > happened this time... graphics and sound are runnning now. > > Can you post your sources.list? Did you have to rebuild your nvidia > driver again or does Xorg use the nv driver? I actually use the nvidia-driver. I had build it for the sarge-kernel 2.6.8. and was surprised, that after my new installation of the 2.6.16-kernel there automatically the module nvidiafb was used... So, I think, that this module now is natively supported by newer kernels..? My sources.list actually looks like this: 8< deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ stable main contrib non-free deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free #marillat #deb http://spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sarge main #deb http://spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sid main #deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ etch main #deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ etch main #deb-src ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ unstable main #deb http://spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sid main #deb http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free #nvidia #deb http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/nvidia unstable/amd64/ #Goswins OO.o #wget http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://amd64.debian.net/~goswin/amd64-archive/amd64-archive_0.2_amd64.deb #http://amd64.debian.net/~goswin/amd64-archive/ # Converted 32bit debs deb file:///var/lib/amd64-archive sarge main contrib non-free # Only needed for sarge users (I think) deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/ -->8 Actually I did not use dselect or aptitude this time, but only apt-get with the -t stable, -t testing or -t unstable option. With this method now all works fine. Aptitude did a mess last time with it's update! And to answer your last question: Up to now I use the stable xserver-xfree86. I didn't try to upgrade to Xorg, yet. Last time I said aptitude to install Xorg, it wanted to uninstall almost all my gnome and kde packages and broke it all up. > This is what I used: > deb http://spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sarge main I tried this one this afternoon, but it didn't work. sigi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 64bit kernel for i386, apt-get-multiarch - poor mans multiarch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:02:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Hi, I've been working on wrappers for apt and dpkg-deb to get some resemblance of multiarch that can still make it for etch. The first thing I made to work is installing amd64 kernels on i386 and anyone Either you've made a mistake or I'm hopelessly confused. I can see installing an i386 kernel on AMD64, but what's the point of booting an 1386 with an AMD64 kernel. It won't have the instruction set. -- hendrik You may want to run an i386 distribution on an AMD64 processor, for assorted reasons - but choose to have the ability to run 64-bit code by running a 64-bit kernel. i386 Sarge includes a selection of AMD64 kernels. --Jo Shields -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 64bit kernel for i386, apt-get-multiarch - poor mans multiarch
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:02:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Hi, > > I've been working on wrappers for apt and dpkg-deb to get some > resemblance of multiarch that can still make it for etch. The first > thing I made to work is installing amd64 kernels on i386 and anyone Either you've made a mistake or I'm hopelessly confused. I can see installing an i386 kernel on AMD64, but what's the point of booting an 1386 with an AMD64 kernel. It won't have the instruction set. -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dist-upgrade sarge to etch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:40:03AM +0200 sigi said: > > And now I made it, to install a 2.6.16-kernel on sarge and nothing bad > happened this time... graphics and sound are runnning now. Can you post your sources.list? Did you have to rebuild your nvidia driver again or does Xorg use the nv driver? > But now, I have another question: where can I get packages like > libdvdcss to access my DVDs? All the marillat-mirrors I know seem to > be down actually: nerim..., spello..., ucla... > Is there any mirror running out there? This is what I used: deb http://spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sarge main Sam - -- Sam Varghese http://www.gnubies.com Double your drive space - delete Windows! My PGP key: http://www.gnubies.com/encryption/sign.txt -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFETrB3ZyXhknb+33gRAu8QAJ0c6c/fTZmR/Q/tvMXBTxFZhq3rQwCggZZG oD8Fs645I69ZgIbPHr2UuMM= =Q7Wj -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hard disk fails? / mounted read-only
I had this happen
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
turned out to be bad connections
Igor TAmara wrote:
Hi, I don't know if my hd is failing or it has something to see with the
drivers of my mainboard, a summary is the following
Debian Etch K 2.6.12-1 : Mounts read only / shows some errors (/dev/hda7)
Debian Etch K 2.6.15-1 : Does not mount / , due to errors (/dev/hda7)
Ubuntu BreezK 2.6.12-9 : boots fine on (/dev/hda6)
Are there any applications to check the hard disk different from fsck?
I've run it, but it didn'tn fix the prob.
On Deb 2.6.12 I seen on dmesg lines like :
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
When Deb 2.6.12-1 boots, shows the following errors, my / is on /dev/hda7 :
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #1979049 contains a hole
at offset 4096
Remounting filesystem read-only
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #1979049 contains a hole
at offset 8192
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #1979049 contains a hole
at offset 12288
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #1979049 contains a hole
at offset 16384
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #1979049 contains a hole
at offset 20480
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #35945 contains a hole at
offset 4096
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #35945 contains a hole at
offset 8192
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #35945 contains a hole at
offset 12288
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #35945 contains a hole at
offset 16384
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #35945 contains a hole at
offset 20480
When I use the Kernel kernel 2.6.12-9-amd64-generic from the /dev/hda6
it doesn't show any errors at all :(
And finally, when I try to use kernel 2.6.15-1-amd64-generic I get the
following :
Begin : Mounting root file system ... ...
Begin : Running /scripts/local-top ...
Done.
Begin : Waiting for root file system ... ...
Done.
ALERT! /dev/hda7 does not exist. Dropping to a shell!
BusyBox V1.01 (Debian1:1.01-4) Built-in shell(ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.
/bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
#
And I can use ctr-alt-del to try to use another kernel.
Is my hd broken? any sugestions? thanks in advance.
--
J. Paul Bissonnette
http://canadian-dream.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hard disk fails? / mounted read-only
Hi, I don't know if my hd is failing or it has something to see with the
drivers of my mainboard, a summary is the following
Debian Etch K 2.6.12-1 : Mounts read only / shows some errors (/dev/hda7)
Debian Etch K 2.6.15-1 : Does not mount / , due to errors (/dev/hda7)
Ubuntu BreezK 2.6.12-9 : boots fine on (/dev/hda6)
Are there any applications to check the hard disk different from fsck?
I've run it, but it didn'tn fix the prob.
On Deb 2.6.12 I seen on dmesg lines like :
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
When Deb 2.6.12-1 boots, shows the following errors, my / is on /dev/hda7 :
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #1979049 contains a hole
at offset 4096
Remounting filesystem read-only
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #1979049 contains a hole
at offset 8192
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #1979049 contains a hole
at offset 12288
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #1979049 contains a hole
at offset 16384
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #1979049 contains a hole
at offset 20480
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #35945 contains a hole at
offset 4096
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #35945 contains a hole at
offset 8192
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #35945 contains a hole at
offset 12288
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #35945 contains a hole at
offset 16384
EXT3-fs error (device hda7): ext3_readdir: directory #35945 contains a hole at
offset 20480
When I use the Kernel kernel 2.6.12-9-amd64-generic from the /dev/hda6
it doesn't show any errors at all :(
And finally, when I try to use kernel 2.6.15-1-amd64-generic I get the
following :
Begin : Mounting root file system ... ...
Begin : Running /scripts/local-top ...
Done.
Begin : Waiting for root file system ... ...
Done.
ALERT! /dev/hda7 does not exist. Dropping to a shell!
BusyBox V1.01 (Debian1:1.01-4) Built-in shell(ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.
/bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
#
And I can use ctr-alt-del to try to use another kernel.
Is my hd broken? any sugestions? thanks in advance.
--
Recomiendo Openoffice.org como herramienta de ofimática
http://www.openoffice.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: dist-upgrade sarge to etch
Hi, > > Is there something wrong here, or should I risk this upgrade? > > Nothing realy wrong here. Just uninstallable and missing packages. The > unofficial etch was never truely functional. It just got worse lately > and with the official archive shaping up we are basicaly past caring. > > If you still want to use it then apt-get install specific > packages. Try what you can update without deinstalling half the > system. Might not be much or anything usefull. My recommendation is to > switch to the official etch and wait it out till it becomes complete. > > Only 4 days left till XOrg enters etch. That should allow a ton of > stuff to enter. > Thanks a lot for your answer! So, I'll wait some days... And now I made it, to install a 2.6.16-kernel on sarge and nothing bad happened this time... graphics and sound are runnning now. But now, I have another question: where can I get packages like libdvdcss to access my DVDs? All the marillat-mirrors I know seem to be down actually: nerim..., spello..., ucla... Is there any mirror running out there? Regards, sigi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xfonts-utils missing?
I switched to the main debian.org archive. Fixed all of my xutils, etc. missing problems. FYI, -s -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mysql-server-5.0: double free or corruption -> ABRT
Quoting Chris Yeoh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08259238 *** > Kernel is Ubuntu Breezy. Any asistance appreciated. In my particular case problems went away after upgrading to 5.0.19-# and (and this is probably the most important) after I rebuilt the indexes on all my tables. For some reason, binary copying .MYI, .MYD and .frm files from a 32bit system to a 64bit system makes MySQL crash on tables with indexes. Even though the MySQL.com website states that it should not be any problem. After i rebuilt all the indexes the server was stable again. Even binary copying 64bit to 32bit works just fine. The other way around doesn't. We have our first 64bit (Debian) /workstation/ at the office now. I'll put on my sysadmin cap and harras the user with some mysql tests, probably crashing his machine. *gnagnagna* HTH, HAND, Sander. -- | If peanut butter cookies are made from peanut butter, | then what are Girl Scout cookies made out of? | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
64bit kernel for i386, apt-get-multiarch - poor mans multiarch
Hi, I've been working on wrappers for apt and dpkg-deb to get some resemblance of multiarch that can still make it for etch. The first thing I made to work is installing amd64 kernels on i386 and anyone interested is welcome to try a very alpha release: ftp://mrvn.homeip.net/apt-get-multiarch/ Beware that only the linux-kernel packages will work at all in this release. Everything else (like iptables) will fail with file conflicts. Don't try non kernel packages with --force-overwrite (default on stable dpkg). Future aim for this is to allow 32bit OpenOffice.org, rar, mplayer + w32codecs, acrobat-reader to be installed on amd64/ia64. And any library some 3rd party software might need. Just run "apt-get install ia32-libfoo" and it is there. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mysql-server-5.0: double free or corruption -> ABRT
Hi! I am seeing this as well. In my case, it occurs after my client successfully connects to MySQL5.0, retrieves data set via ODBC (libiodbc), fails to free the statement handle and dumps with the followjng: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08259238 *** Kernel is Ubuntu Breezy. Any asistance appreciated. Thanks, -Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
