Re: acroread on amd64
Alan Ianson píše v Út 02. 01. 2007 v 18:51 +0100: > True. I would file a bug against evince. The developers may like to know it > doesn't work properly with your pdf files. And you can start right here: http://live.gnome.org/Evince/PopplerBugs#poppler (You have to register @ bugs.freedesktop.org to be able to report the bugs, but hey, you have chance to make all poppler based projects - evince, KPDF to name some - more reliable!) Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NVIDIA driver ... fails to compile (again)
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 00:00 +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > > I use "make-kpkg" (from "kernel-package" deb) to compile the Nvidia driver > (I've just downloaded version 1.0.8776-3 of "nvidia-kernel-source"). > > Then I get (after building kernel 2.6.19.1): > 1.0.8776 won't compile against 2.6.19 without a patch. This is something I still need to include in the packages. > Thanks and best regards (and Happy New Year), > Gilles > > -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NVIDIA driver ... fails to compile (again)
Hello. I use "make-kpkg" (from "kernel-package" deb) to compile the Nvidia driver (I've just downloaded version 1.0.8776-3 of "nvidia-kernel-source"). Then I get (after building kernel 2.6.19.1): ---CUT--- NVIDIA: calling KBUILD... make CC=gcc-4.0 -C /home/eran/system/kernel/source/linux-2.6.19.1 SUBDIRS=/home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv modules make[4]: Entering directory /home/eran/system/kernel/source/linux-2.6.19.1' CC [M] /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.o In file included from /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.c:14: /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv-linux.h:17:26: error: linux/config.h: No such file or directory In file included from include/linux/sched.h:57, from include/linux/utsname.h:35, from /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv-linux.h:19, from /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.c:14: include/linux/nodemask.h: In function '__first_node': include/linux/nodemask.h:229: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression include/linux/nodemask.h: In function '__next_node': include/linux/nodemask.h:235: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression include/linux/nodemask.h: In function '__first_unset_node': include/linux/nodemask.h:253: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression In file included from include/linux/list.h:8, from include/linux/wait.h:22, from include/asm/semaphore.h:42, from include/linux/sched.h:61, from include/linux/utsname.h:35, from /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv-linux.h:19, from /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.c:14: include/linux/prefetch.h: In function 'prefetch_range': include/linux/prefetch.h:62: warning: pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic In file included from include/asm/elf.h:48, from include/linux/elf.h:7, from include/linux/module.h:16, from /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv-linux.h:51, from /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.c:14: include/asm/compat.h: In function 'compat_alloc_user_space': include/asm/compat.h:202: warning: pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic In file included from include/asm/pci.h:92, from include/linux/pci.h:716, from /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv-linux.h:76, from /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.c:14: include/asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h: In function 'pci_map_page': include/asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h:49: warning: pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.c: In function 'nv_kern_open': /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.c:1806: warning: passing argument 2 of 'request_irq' from incompatible pointer type make[5]: *** [/home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** [_module_/home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory /home/eran/system/kernel/source/linux-2.6.19.1' NVIDIA: left KBUILD. nvidia.ko failed to build! make[3]: *** [mdl] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv' make[2]: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel' make[1]: *** [kdist_image] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel' Module /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel failed. Perhaps /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel does not understand --rootcmd? If you see messages that indicate that it is not in fact being built as root, please file a bug against /home/eran/system/kernel/source/modules/nvidia-kernel. Hit return to Continue ---CUT--- Last time I followed the same procedure (with version 1.0.8762 and kernel 2.6.17.7) it went fine. What am I missing now? Thanks and best regards (and Happy New Year), Gilles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acroread on amd64
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:50:01PM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hello Folks, > > thanks for your replies. > > Unfortunately Evince, which is nice, does not show properly some > of my slides (produced with [pdf]LaTeX and its friends) > on my older i686 laptop while with acroread everything is fine. Please try Xpdf. The current version 3.01 has very few reports of incompatibilities. evince (actually libpoppler) forked an older version of the Xpdf code which must still have bugs given your experience. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i386 or amd64?
Jim, On Tuesday 02 January 2007 13:03, Jim Crilly wrote: > On 01/02/07 12:02:37PM -0600, Mike Reinehr wrote: > > Greg, > > > > On Monday 01 January 2007 18:25, Greg Madden wrote: > > > On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:30:08 +0200 > > > > > > Thomas Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Other than non-free stuff like flash and openoffice, > > > > > is there anything in the main section of i386 that isn't in the > > > > > main section of AMD64? > > > > > > > > A few minor things are missing, such as memtest86, partimage, and of > > > > course wine. Also note that most java-packages come without the > > > > plugin in 64bit. > > > > > > > > > In other words, what are people having to use a chroot i386 for? > > > > > > > > Closed software such as acrobat reader, flash, skype, vmware, picasa, > > > > googleearth etc. Most can be installed without a change root, but > > > > that is a bit of a struggle. > > > > > > > > Since you have only 1 GB of RAM, you can go with i386 without any > > > > obvious penalty. With amd64 you can get a little bit more > > > > performance, but you are also more likely to run into problems, such > > > > as the ones mentioned here. > > > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > FYI, the latest VMware runs on 64 bit linux hosts. > > > > Which VMware? Just this past Saturday I downloaded & tried to install > > Workstation 5.5.5-29772 and the install failed with a list of missing > > libraries (32-bit, I presume, although I haven't had time to > > investigate). > > I don't know about VMWare Workstation, but I know Server works although > the UI is 32-bit so you need at least ia32-libs installed. > > Jim. Thanks! I'm in the process of setting up my first, new 64-bit desktop system. Trying to install Workstation was the last thing that I had time to do Saturday and when it failed I just packed it in for the weekend. I hope to have time to have another go at it soon. cmr -- Debian 'Etch': Registered Linux User #241964 "More laws, less justice." -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i386 or amd64?
On 01/02/07 12:02:37PM -0600, Mike Reinehr wrote: > Greg, > > On Monday 01 January 2007 18:25, Greg Madden wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:30:08 +0200 > > > > Thomas Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Other than non-free stuff like flash and openoffice, > > > > is there anything in the main section of i386 that isn't in the main > > > > section of AMD64? > > > > > > A few minor things are missing, such as memtest86, partimage, and of > > > course wine. Also note that most java-packages come without the plugin > > > in 64bit. > > > > > > > In other words, what are people having to use a chroot i386 for? > > > > > > Closed software such as acrobat reader, flash, skype, vmware, picasa, > > > googleearth etc. Most can be installed without a change root, but that > > > is a bit of a struggle. > > > > > > Since you have only 1 GB of RAM, you can go with i386 without any > > > obvious penalty. With amd64 you can get a little bit more performance, > > > but you are also more likely to run into problems, such as the ones > > > mentioned here. > > > > > > Thomas > > > > FYI, the latest VMware runs on 64 bit linux hosts. > > Which VMware? Just this past Saturday I downloaded & tried to install > Workstation 5.5.5-29772 and the install failed with a list of missing > libraries (32-bit, I presume, although I haven't had time to investigate). I don't know about VMWare Workstation, but I know Server works although the UI is 32-bit so you need at least ia32-libs installed. Jim. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: i386 or amd64?
Greg, On Monday 01 January 2007 18:25, Greg Madden wrote: > On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:30:08 +0200 > > Thomas Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Other than non-free stuff like flash and openoffice, > > > is there anything in the main section of i386 that isn't in the main > > > section of AMD64? > > > > A few minor things are missing, such as memtest86, partimage, and of > > course wine. Also note that most java-packages come without the plugin > > in 64bit. > > > > > In other words, what are people having to use a chroot i386 for? > > > > Closed software such as acrobat reader, flash, skype, vmware, picasa, > > googleearth etc. Most can be installed without a change root, but that > > is a bit of a struggle. > > > > Since you have only 1 GB of RAM, you can go with i386 without any > > obvious penalty. With amd64 you can get a little bit more performance, > > but you are also more likely to run into problems, such as the ones > > mentioned here. > > > > Thomas > > FYI, the latest VMware runs on 64 bit linux hosts. Which VMware? Just this past Saturday I downloaded & tried to install Workstation 5.5.5-29772 and the install failed with a list of missing libraries (32-bit, I presume, although I haven't had time to investigate). Cheers! cmr -- Debian 'Etch': Registered Linux User #241964 "More laws, less justice." -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acroread on amd64
Hello, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote: Hi I use acroread in chroot does that not work for you? I am migrating from i386 to amd64: `chroot' stuff is certainly the best way, but the idea to have a second system to maintain on my box afraid me. As I really need only a couple of 32bits applications (acroread and maple in fact), I prefer to play with the `/emul' stuff. Jerome Have you set up a chroot. The only problem is that i cannot read files in the /usr directory but I do live with that. There are descriptions on the internet on how to install a chroot and I can try to help you if it does not work. /Gudjon Þann Þriðjudagur 2. janúar 2007 15:50 skrifaði Jerome BENOIT: Hello Folks, thanks for your replies. Unfortunately Evince, which is nice, does not show properly some of my slides (produced with [pdf]LaTeX and its friends) on my older i686 laptop while with acroread everything is fine. Thanks, Jerome Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:32:51AM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote: does anyone succeeded to run properly acroread on Etch amd64 box ? Why do you want to? Use xpdf or evince if you can. Hamish -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net
Re: acroread on amd64
On Tue January 2 2007 09:00, fred wrote: > Alan Ianson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > I don't use pdf files a lot but kpdf always works well for me when I do. > > But you have to install a lot of KDE libs for that :-( True. I would file a bug against evince. The developers may like to know it doesn't work properly with your pdf files.
Re: acroread on amd64
Hello List, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: Jerome BENOIT wrote: do you mean that there is a ready to use Debian _amd64_ package to install acroread ? No, Acroread is not yet ported to 64 bits architectures. You should ask Adobe about it. :) As a matter of fact the 32bit version can run with appropriate packages and fixes. For the record, as for January 3rd 2007 and on a Etch machine: apt-get install ia32-libs ia32-libs-gtk dpkg -i --force-all acroread_7.0.8-0.0_i386.deb where acroread_7.0.8-0.0_i386.deb can be grab here http://www.debian-multimedia.org/pool/main/a/acroread/ Then in the script `/usr/bin/acroread' the line near the end exec "$ACRO_EXEC_CMD" ${1+"$@"} was replaced by export GTK_PATH=/usr/lib32/gtk-2.0/ export GCONV_PATH=/usr/lib32/gconv export PANGO_RC_FILE=/etc/pango32/pangorc export GDK_PIXBUF_MODULE_FILE=/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders.32 export GTK_IM_MODULE_FILE=/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk.immodules.32 exec "$ACRO_EXEC_CMD" ${1+"$@"} 2> ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/acroread-err.log `stderr' is redirected to avoid remaining noise. The configuration file `/etc/pango32/pangorc' had to be added, it contains: [Pango] ModuleFiles=/etc/pango32/pango.modules ModulesPath=/usr/lib32/pango/1.5.0/modules [PangoX] AliasFiles=/etc/pango/pangox.aliases and in the file `/etc/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders.32' /usr/lib32/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/ must be replaced by /usr/lib32/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/ The main information are here (further informations can be find there too): http://wiki.debian.org/DebianAMD64Faq Otherwise, to debug I had to play with `strace' anf Google: `strace' to figure out which files were badly opened, and Google to get the answer (nothing new here). I have certainly forget some other steps: anyhow the basic idea are here. hth, Jerome Regards -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acroread on amd64
On Tue January 2 2007 06:50, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hello Folks, > > thanks for your replies. > > Unfortunately Evince, which is nice, does not show properly some > of my slides (produced with [pdf]LaTeX and its friends) > on my older i686 laptop while with acroread everything is fine. I don't use pdf files a lot but kpdf always works well for me when I do. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel general protection fault
Just as a piece of information, because it had no irreversible consequences. During a memory-intensive mpqc computation, I found yesterday the system halted with message on the screen: At 2.35 UTC kernel: general protection fault. Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed (message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) (deb64 is the hostname). On rebooting, everything fine, work by mpqc of a type that saves frequently. This the first failure after I changed months ago the Maxtors to WD Raptors. System: two dual-core opterons, mainboard Tyan S2895 K8WE, ram 8GB Kingston ECC, HD two WD Raptor, OS debian amd64 etch, kernel 2.6.18-3-amd64, no X installed, not connected to network, protection: APC 1500VA. Cheers francesco pietra __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acroread on amd64
Jerome BENOIT wrote: > > do you mean that there is a ready to use Debian _amd64_ package to > install acroread ? No, Acroread is not yet ported to 64 bits architectures. You should ask Adobe about it. :) Regards -- Emmanuel Fleury | Office: 261 Associate Professor, | Phone: +33 (0)5 40 00 69 34 LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Fax: +33 (0)5 40 00 66 69 351, Cours de la Libération | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 33405 Talence Cedex, France | URL: http://www.labri.fr/~fleury -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acroread on amd64
Hello Folks, thanks for your replies. Unfortunately Evince, which is nice, does not show properly some of my slides (produced with [pdf]LaTeX and its friends) on my older i686 laptop while with acroread everything is fine. Thanks, Jerome Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:32:51AM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote: does anyone succeeded to run properly acroread on Etch amd64 box ? Why do you want to? Use xpdf or evince if you can. Hamish -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: acroread on amd64
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:32:51AM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > does anyone succeeded to run properly acroread on Etch amd64 box ? Why do you want to? Use xpdf or evince if you can. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: keep specific versions of packages
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Francesco Pietra wrote: dselect recognizes the mpqc 2.3.1-0.2 installation and I could place "H" on that. that's ok. You should actually put on hold all packages which come from the mpqc source package. To see what packages come from a given source package you can use the apt-cache command, as in "apt-cache showsrc mpqc". This will tell you that the mpqc source package generates the binary packages: mpqc, libsc7, libsc-doc, libsc-dev, mpqc-support. You therefore ought to have produced a 2.3.1-0.2 version of all of them as well, when you compiled your personal mpqc. Install them and put them on hold as well. As to libint, is it a library which is included in mpqc? A system library? A library you compiled yourself as well which is not part of available debian packages? In any case, I don't think you should need to do anything special about it. Moreover, simply placing "H" on the mpqc package does prevent upgradind dependencies, or is that immaterial to mpqc functioning? Not necessarily. In any case, the only dependencies you should worry about and put on hold are the ones on libraries coming from mpqc itself. In principle it is possible that an upgrade to another library may cause problems to mpqc, but changes which make a library incompatible with previous versions are a very rare occurrence, avoided whenever possible (even in unstable) due to the havoc such things may easily wreak. Ciao Giacomo -- _ Giacomo Mulas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _ OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA) Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222 Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916 _ "When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are" (Freddy Mercury) _ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Still no AMD 3.1r4 images available
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:23:54AM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote: >Hi, > >http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ still links to the outdated 3.1r3 >images but refers to 3.1r4. I suggest to build new images. Apologies - I've started building them more than once during the Christmas break, but each time there have been problems causing failures and delays. Starting again now... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Google-bait: http://www.debian.org/CD/free-linux-cd Debian does NOT ship free CDs. Please do NOT contact the mailing lists asking us to send them to you. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Still no AMD 3.1r4 images available
Hi, http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ still links to the outdated 3.1r3 images but refers to 3.1r4. I suggest to build new images. Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]