Re: Problems upgrading libc6
On 10-Apr-2007 01:17.00 (BST), Luis Hidalgo wrote: I think I have a serious problem. I tried to upgrade my packages using apt-get upgrade but instead of being successful the following message appeared: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package nspluginwrapper Uff. Can you tell me what the output of: dpkg -S /usr/lib64 Is? /usr/lib64 *should* be a symbolic link to /usr/lib on amd64 installations. Can you also show me the output of: ls -ld /usr/lib64 Thanks, rob. -- rob andrews :: pgp 0x01e00563 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems upgrading libc6
On 10-Apr-2007 01:17.00 (BST), Luis Hidalgo wrote: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package nspluginwrapper It has also occurred to me that you are installing the sarge package for libc6. Is the nspluginwrapper package you are using a self-built package or a backport from unstable? -- rob andrews :: pgp 0x01e00563 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems upgrading libc6
Am Dienstag, 10. April 2007 02:23 schrieb Andrew J. Barr: Luis Hidalgo wrote: Hi, I think I have a serious problem. I tried to upgrade my packages using apt-get upgrade but instead of being successful the following message appeared: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package nspluginwrapper Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I would temporarily remove nspluginwrapper and upgrade your libc6. Then check if there is a new version of nspluginwrapper available, and if not, or you still have this problem after upgrading that package, file a bug. HTH, Andrew This problem happened in the past already. My solution was (but please check, what you are doing), to get into /var/cache/apt/archives and install the libc manually with the --force-all option. i.e. dpkg --force-all -i libcxx.deb But you should know, what you are doing ! Best regards Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems upgrading libc6
[sorry for the third reply to this message] On 10-Apr-2007 09:48.10 (BST), Rob Andrews wrote: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib64', which is also in package nspluginwrapper It has also occurred to me that you are installing the sarge package for libc6. Is the nspluginwrapper package you are using a self-built package or a backport from unstable? A dump of the nspluginwrapper package lists the contents as: usr usr/lib usr/lib/nspluginwrapper usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/x86_64 usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/x86_64/linux usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/x86_64/linux/npwrapper.so usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/x86_64/linux/npconfig usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386 usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/libxpcom.so usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/noarch usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/noarch/mkruntime usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/noarch/npviewer usr/bin usr/bin/nspluginwrapper usr/share usr/share/doc usr/share/doc/nspluginwrapper usr/share/doc/nspluginwrapper/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/nspluginwrapper/copyright usr/share/doc/nspluginwrapper/README usr/share/doc/nspluginwrapper/changelog.Debian.gz usr/share/doc/nspluginwrapper/changelog.gz usr/share/doc/nspluginwrapper/TODO usr/share/doc/nspluginwrapper/README.Debian usr/share/man usr/share/man/man1 usr/share/man/man1/nspluginwrapper.1.gz There's no /usr/lib64 in there. I suggest you remove the nspluginwrapper package that you have! -- rob andrews :: pgp 0x01e00563 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Youtube on non X86 platforms.
Hello all, I know cross-posting is frowned upon but I just discovered a useful item that you may like to try. http://blog.mikeasoft.com/2006/11/24/playing-youtube-videos-without-flash/ The above link is a Greasemonkey script that plays Youtube movies through MPlayer. You'll need MPlayer and the MPlayer Mozilla plugin as well as Greasemonkey installed to use the script. I'm using the unofficial Marilliat MPlayer on Etch AMD64 and it works fine for me! regards, Ananda Samaddar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who is using Debian? [was: MSI forum runs Debian amd64]
Hello Stephen, This should be forwarded to debian-www@lists.debian.org which I have CCed under the Section Who is using Debian? Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant Am 2007-04-01 11:50:53, schrieb Stephen Olander Waters: Apparently, the MSI forum server runs Debian amd64. Cool, eh? -s Forwarded Message From: MSI HQ User to User Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New announcement: MSI will replace all servers. Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:38:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 13:38:06 + X-Mailer: SMF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi guys, Finally MSI and the forum team reached an agreement. As you know the current forum server is incredibly fast. MSI has done some testing the last few days with new fileservers for LiveUpdate and downloading various stuff but they where unable to match the speed of the forum server. Because they noticed we do such a good job of running the forum, they wanted us to takeover all other servers and put everything on the forum server. This includes their marketting/support websites, fileservers and all other forums. We think our server can handle all this traffic with ease. Our current traffic is between 100~200GB each month, but we think our connection can handle all the traffic and should give better results. MSI thinks that the current server can do all their other traffic as well. It might slowdown the forum a little bit, but we expect no major problems. This move will happen beginning of the second quarter this year. Our forum server is build with this stuff: 2x Xeon 2.8GHz 2x 15000 RPM SCSI drive's in RAID1 (but we are going to add 2 more for RAID5 to gain about 275MB/s speed) 2x 1GB memory reg ecc Debian AMD64 with all the latest updates. Tests so far has shown that we can handle MSI's traffic of 27TB/month isn't a problem. So please test the speed of everything the first day of next quarter, we are moving bits and pieces that day and hope to recieve reports on the speed. There might be a nice supprice for the best reporter on how the move is going, but I'm not allowed what that will be. I will post shortly the email address that can be used to send in reports. [Edit]The move has been done. You can use this link to test the new servers: http://www.msi.eu Also, you can sent in speed reports here: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from these announcements, login to the forum and uncheck Receive forum announcements and important notifications by email. in your profile. You can view the full announcement by following this link: http://forum.msi.com.tw/index.php?topic=106503.0 Regards, The MSI HQ User to User Forum Team. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] - END OF REPLIED MESSAGE - -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
Re: Who is using Debian? [was: MSI forum runs Debian amd64]
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:48:03 +0200 Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This should be forwarded to debian-www@lists.debian.org which I have CCed under the Section Who is using Debian? Someone will have to reword the text to be more like the other entries on the page (http://www.debian.org/users/). It's usually me who add submissions to the Who's is using Debian? page, but I don't write them. :-) Regards, Kaare Am 2007-04-01 11:50:53, schrieb Stephen Olander Waters: Apparently, the MSI forum server runs Debian amd64. Cool, eh? -s Forwarded Message From: MSI HQ User to User Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New announcement: MSI will replace all servers. Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:38:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 13:38:06 + X-Mailer: SMF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi guys, Finally MSI and the forum team reached an agreement. As you know the current forum server is incredibly fast. MSI has done some testing the last few days with new fileservers for LiveUpdate and downloading various stuff but they where unable to match the speed of the forum server. Because they noticed we do such a good job of running the forum, they wanted us to takeover all other servers and put everything on the forum server. This includes their marketting/support websites, fileservers and all other forums. We think our server can handle all this traffic with ease. Our current traffic is between 100~200GB each month, but we think our connection can handle all the traffic and should give better results. MSI thinks that the current server can do all their other traffic as well. It might slowdown the forum a little bit, but we expect no major problems. This move will happen beginning of the second quarter this year. Our forum server is build with this stuff: 2x Xeon 2.8GHz 2x 15000 RPM SCSI drive's in RAID1 (but we are going to add 2 more for RAID5 to gain about 275MB/s speed) 2x 1GB memory reg ecc Debian AMD64 with all the latest updates. Tests so far has shown that we can handle MSI's traffic of 27TB/month isn't a problem. So please test the speed of everything the first day of next quarter, we are moving bits and pieces that day and hope to recieve reports on the speed. There might be a nice supprice for the best reporter on how the move is going, but I'm not allowed what that will be. I will post shortly the email address that can be used to send in reports. [Edit]The move has been done. You can use this link to test the new servers: http://www.msi.eu Also, you can sent in speed reports here: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from these announcements, login to the forum and uncheck Receive forum announcements and important notifications by email. in your profile. You can view the full announcement by following this link: http://forum.msi.com.tw/index.php?topic=106503.0 Regards, The MSI HQ User to User Forum Team. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] - END OF REPLIED MESSAGE - -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian-amd64 mirror plans
I'm mirrorring debian-amd64, including the unofficial sarge, on debian.csail.mit.edu. For how much longer should that mirror stick around? Does it need to exist after sarge has been moved off the main mirror network or after the security team stops supporting it (1 year from now)? Is the mirror still needed for stuff other than sarge? noah -- Noah Meyerhans System Administrator MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Youtube on non X86 platforms.
Ananda Samaddar wrote: Hello all, I know cross-posting is frowned upon but I just discovered a useful item that you may like to try. http://blog.mikeasoft.com/2006/11/24/playing-youtube-videos-without-flash/ The above link is a Greasemonkey script that plays Youtube movies through MPlayer. You'll need MPlayer and the MPlayer Mozilla plugin as well as Greasemonkey installed to use the script. I'm using the unofficial Marilliat MPlayer on Etch AMD64 and it works fine for me! regards, Ananda Samaddar Thank you!!! -- Regards, Jimmy Registered Penguin #380263 Registered Linux Computer #279395 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian-amd64 mirror plans
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:18:18PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: I'm mirrorring debian-amd64, including the unofficial sarge, on debian.csail.mit.edu. For how much longer should that mirror stick around? Does it need to exist after sarge has been moved off the main mirror network or after the security team stops supporting it (1 year from now)? Is the mirror still needed for stuff other than sarge? See: http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2007/04/msg00061.html Basicly, we follow what Debian does. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian-amd64 mirror plans
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:06:32PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: I'm mirrorring debian-amd64, including the unofficial sarge, on debian.csail.mit.edu. For how much longer should that mirror stick around? Does it need to exist after sarge has been moved off the main mirror network or after the security team stops supporting it (1 year from now)? Is the mirror still needed for stuff other than sarge? See: http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2007/04/msg00061.html Basicly, we follow what Debian does. Thanks, that's exactly how I'd have expected it to go. noah signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Update of AMD64 port page for Etch
On Thursday 22 March 2007 00:36, Kurt Roeckx wrote: So we have an linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 and amd64-libs packages on i386. The default gcc version supports building 64 bit binaries, I suggest you change gcc-3.4 by toolchain. Anyway, the limits are outdated by now. I think the current limit is 47 bit (128 TiB) of memory per process. 1 TiB physical is still what the the processor only support, but the kernel supports 46 bit (64 TiB). page has now been updated with this info. If any more changes are needed, please mail d-www or file a BR against 'www.debian.org'. Cheers, FJP pgpaUoIFCfINV.pgp Description: PGP signature
intel 920 D running debian etch amd64
I have a ASUS P5LD2-V motherboard with Intel 920 D running debian etch amd64 all works fine with installation and installation of programs. But when i shutdown or reboot I get kernel panic or it just hangs and in 1 of 40 reboots it actually manage to reboot. 0Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler! kernel is 2.6.18-4-amd64 I have tried all diffrent settings in BIOS with ACPI on/off and removed all controllercards, disks and cd-rom. The system is on a single 80GB sata disk attached to the motherboard direct. //Elias
