Re: Why does this happen ?
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 11:01:05AM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: Oh sorry, I did not prezise my question corretly. I know that both conflict. This is clear for me. What I want to know is, WHY such a conflict happens. Why can (in my case) nexuis not access to libcurl4 and the other ones stay access to libcurl3 ? This was my question, as IMO both libs seem independent for me. On the other hand I wondered, why apt does not inhibit the deinstallation of the other programs or the installation of libcurl 4. Is it, because the philosophy says, in linux everything is allowed to be done and controlled by root ? My question aimed less to the technical side, but to the philosophical side. You want to install libcurl4 which conflicts with your installed libcurl3. Lets assume that they both contain identially named files that would overwrite each other on installation. They may not be destined for eventual coexistance so that is not planned for in their namespace. So apt will remove libcurl3. However, your packages A, B, and C depend on libcurl3 (which is now removed). So apt will remove A, B, and C. Sounds like you're running unstable. Things like this should never happen in stable. The maintainers for A, B, and C can't update them to work with libcurl4 until its available. So the timeline looks like this: libcurl4 becomes available. New package D needs libcurl4. A, B, and C already exist and need libcurl3. Maintainers for A, B, and C, start to transition their packages to use the new libcurl4. Here's where you're at now. Eventually, A, B, C, and D will all depend on libcurl4 and libcurl3 will be obsolete. So philosophically, one must be philosophical about problems when running unstable. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [UWAGA SPAM] Re: debian on sun x4200
PMFJI (I haven't read the whole thread) and since it has been 'years' since I have run Debian on SUN please take what I write with caution. Are the proper SUN disk labels still in effect? The SUN version of a BIOS will not bless a Hard Drive unless it has the proper disk labels. We are talking about Debian AMD64 on this [ http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/x4200/specs.xml ] X4200 system? Is it the X4200 or the X4200 M2 -- I'm not sure if the AMD Opteron 2000 series chips are supported? HTH/Bill On 6/24/07, Maciej Jan Broniarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does it load LILO/GRUB? No, it doesn't Does it start loading the kernel? Which kernel No. I am trying to install debian on Sun X4200 server.
Re: opteron 175: only one core recognized
Unless I am mis-reading the AMD spec this chip is a 1-way: http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_8796_9240,00.html The current kernels should work, but will likely show up as only 1 CPU. Bill On 6/25/07, Tom Vier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to search the archives, but i got an internal server error from lists.debian.org. Looks like there's no seperate smp kernel anymore. 2.6.18-4 seems to support smp, but it doesn't recognize my dual core 175. I don't see any newer kernels. processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 35 model name : AMD Hammer Family processor - Model Unknown stepping: 2 cpu MHz : 2210.803 cache size : 1024 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 1 core id : 0 cpu cores : 1 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow up pni bogomips: 4424.24 TLB size: 1024 4K pages clflush size: 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: ts fid vid ttp -- Tom Vier [EMAIL PROTECTED] DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE
Re: opteron 175: only one core recognized
2007/6/27, Bill Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unless I am mis-reading the AMD spec this chip is a 1-way: http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_8796_9240,00.html The current kernels should work, but will likely show up as only 1 CPU. Bill Well, from the AMD spec I think 1-way means you can only put 1 chip on the motherboard, but it is still dual-core. Tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
