Re: 2.6.23 build fails from Debian sources
Hi. on 10/17/07 14:08, Jack Malmostoso wrote: but I wanted to add the tickless option to my AMD64 kernel so I downloaded the hrt-1 patch from: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tglx/hrtimers/2.6.23/ patch-2.6.23-hrt1.patch.bz2 I couldn't find patch-2.6.23-hrt1.patch.bz2 on that page. but I could see patch-2.6.23-hrt2.patch.bz2 and patch-2.6.23-hrt3.patch.bz2. it seems newer than what you downloaded. if so, let's try it:-) Cheers, -- /* * Masami Ichikawa * mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * : [EMAIL PROTECTED] */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel panics on new machine
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 06:48:59PM -0400, Rob Klingsten wrote: Yes, I have the DIMMs in banks 1 and 2 out of 4 and I've removed and reseated them; I have swapped out the SATA cable, there are no PCI or PCI Express cards (system is headless.) And it looks like it was just that easy; I pulled one DIMM and ran the system on a single 512, problem gone; I wrote out 3 separate 100gb files without incident. It makes no sense to me as the RAM was fine in the other system, I never had problems. What kind of system was the ram in before? Oh well, guess I'm getting new RAM. Get GOOD ram. Athlon64/Opteron systems are picky. Well known name brand ram is not much more money than generic (and usually crap) ram. thanks, sorry to trouble the list with such a trivial thing. Ram is not trivial on AMD systems. :) -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel panics on new machine
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 16:39, Rob Klingsten wrote: Yes, I have the DIMMs in banks 1 and 2 out of 4 and I've removed and reseated them; I have swapped out the SATA cable, there are no PCI or PCI Express cards (system is headless.) And it looks like it was just that easy; I pulled one DIMM and ran the system on a single 512, problem gone; I wrote out 3 separate 100gb files without incident. It makes no sense to me as the RAM was fine in the other system, I never had problems. What kind of system was the ram in before? Oh well, guess I'm getting new RAM. Get GOOD ram. Athlon64/Opteron systems are picky. Well known name brand ram is not much more money than generic (and usually crap) ram. thanks, sorry to trouble the list with such a trivial thing. Ram is not trivial on AMD systems. :) Thanks again for the help ... the RAM was used for about 4 months in a desktop P4 system on an Asus board. It is good RAM, Micron from Crucial. I suppose I must have shocked and killed it moving it, but before this I have never had that happen in 20 years (and I've built many systems.) I've ordered Corsair as a replacement. thanks! Rob Lately, I mounted 2 stick of ram from one MB to a Asus MB with a AMD Athlon 4400, and I got the system either not starting (kernel panic) or, when it started, I soon had bad memory access, and the system would freeze. I put new ram in and everything was OK, except I was frustrated to have lilled the memories. First time it happended to me. Then I tried to put them back in, and I changed the memory voltage in the bios from auto to 2 V. And, guess what, they worked fine, and are still in!!! My 2 ct. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel panics on new machine
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:39:05AM -0400, Rob Klingsten wrote: Ram is not trivial on AMD systems. :) Thanks again for the help ... the RAM was used for about 4 months in a desktop P4 system on an Asus board. It is good RAM, Micron from Crucial. I suppose I must have shocked and killed it moving it, but before this I have never had that happen in 20 years (and I've built many systems.) The memory may be as good as it was when you received it. It still may work perfectly on the P4. However, the P4 is (most likely) more tolerant of memory being off-spec than an AMD which seems to expect that memory will be at least as good as spec and uses it to its max. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.23 build fails from Debian sources
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:40:08 +0200, Masami Ichikawa wrote: it seems newer than what you downloaded. if so, let's try it It sure is newer, but unfortunately the problem is not there... pristine sources do not compile either :) -- Best Regards, Jack Linux User #264449 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux on AMD64 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.23 build fails from Debian sources
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:19:32PM +, Jack Malmostoso wrote: It sure is newer, but unfortunately the problem is not there... pristine sources do not compile either :) Sorry to be jumping in late. I tried compiling 2.6.23.1 and faced no problems. It compiled fine. Regards, -- Sridhar M.A. GPG KeyID : F6A35935 Fingerprint: D172 22C4 7CDC D9CD 62B5 55C1 2A69 D5D8 F6A3 5935 By protracting life, we do not deduct one jot from the duration of death. -- Titus Lucretius Carus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
