Re: Mute key not working anymore on T61

2008-01-15 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 05:43:28PM +0100, Cyril Jaquier wrote:
 Since a few days (weeks?), my mute key does not work anymore. Volume up 
 and down work as expected. xev just says nothing while pressing this 
 key. I reported this here:
 
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460564
 
 However, I can't remember if the mute key used to generate an ACPI event 
 or was monitored by thinkpad-keys!?
 
 Dear Lenovo T61 users, do you have a working mute key under unstable?

I think I saw some lenovo thinkpad acpi discussions on LKML a few days
ago involving the mute key.  Might be worth looking that up.  I know it
was sometime in the last 4 days.

http://groups.google.ca/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/9336308b2f32816e/fbf3c13bad7f8231?lnk=stq=lenovo+mute+acpi+linux#fbf3c13bad7f8231

I searched for 'lenovo mute acpi linux' on google groups which found it.
It appears to be a change in 2.6.23 that causes the problem.

--
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: apt-get problem

2008-01-15 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 05:39:04PM -0600, Don Montgomery wrote:
 that sounds like a good idea; perhaps I could google up 
 proxy package and find out what might be there?

Well given you had files named anon-proxy, then it is probably this
package:

anon-proxy - Proxy to surf the web anonymously

So 'apt-get remove --purge anon-proxy'

That should clean it out thoroughly.

--
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[SOLVED] Re: apt-get problem

2008-01-15 Thread Don Montgomery


On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Lennart Sorensen wrote:

On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 05:39:04PM -0600, Don Montgomery wrote:

that sounds like a good idea; perhaps I could google up
proxy package and find out what might be there?


Well given you had files named anon-proxy, then it is probably this
package:

anon-proxy - Proxy to surf the web anonymously

So 'apt-get remove --purge anon-proxy'

That should clean it out thoroughly.

--
Len Sorensen


Len,

Based on output from

'apt-cache search --names-only proxy'

I ran

'apt-get remove --purge anon-proxy privoxy'

and then the output from

'grep 4001 -r /etc/'

revealed no further http proxy entries.

apt-get update works fine now, and my system is updating 
even as I write this.  Thank you, everyone, for all of 
your help and patience.


Don


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: nvidia-glx not updating

2008-01-15 Thread sigi
Hi, 

On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:12:23AM +0100, Thomas Rösch wrote:

 For the last several days, nvidia-glx fails to upgrade with apt-get
 install nvidia-glx (or apt-get update):

 You must build the new nvidia-kernel-169.07 version of this package. Due a 
 bug, already reported, you must have a link to fix a renaming problem:

 ln -s /usr/src/nvidia-kernel.tar.bz2 /usr/src/nvidia-kernel-source.tar.bz2

 Now you can build the package. :-)

here I couldn't even make 
apt-get source nvidia-kernel-source 
like I did always before. This now downloads the nvidia-graphics-drivers  
source package - is this the right way nowadays? I tried mirrors in NL 
and D - they both offered the graphics-drivers. 

Now I downloaded nvidia-kernel-source 169.07-2 directly from 
ftp.de.debian.org/debian and installed it via dpkg - and it worked. 
Created the above mentioned symlink and m-a a-i nvidia worked. 

Now I have some blurred areas under X11 - is this because new bugs in 
this sources, or was my method a bad idea?

Regards,
sigi.



-- 
 --- 
 | .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **|  |
 |: :' :  The  universal|My GPG/PGP-Key-ID:|
 |`. `'  Operating System   |0xB4C7DE55|
 |  `-http://www.debian.org/|  |
 |-| 
 | Please note that according to the German law on data retention, |
 | information on every electronic information exchange with me is |
 | retained for a period of six months.| 
 ---


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Corrupted Gnome terminal

2008-01-15 Thread Jack Schneider
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 15:11 -0800, Alex Malinovich wrote:
snip 
  Also
  
  when I started gnome-terminal from that point it gave me a completely
  working terminal... I tried to capture the profile as the default and
  restarted my normal login...  No Improvemnt 
 
 Well, this tells us that, most likely, the problem doesn't lie with
 gnome-terminal itself, but rather with some other application that's
 running in your session. The next step would be to try to log into a
 failsafe gnome session and see if it works there. That'll just start up
 gnome with none of your personal settings applied.
 
 If it works fine there, then it's time to start really digging. At that
 point, you can try the strace approach that Jurriaan mentioned and see
 if it helps. If you have a conflict with another program the strace
 should show you where the problem lies (if you can read the output that
 is. It's a bit of an acquired skill...)
 
 p.s. I'm subscribed to the list so you don't have to do a Reply To All
 when responding. As it looks like you're using Evolution you can just do
 Reply to List (Ctrl+L is the default, I believe), and it will take
 care of the rest for you.
 

Hi, Alex

Tried the failsafe Gnome-Terminal, Terminal is fine when I login as
alternate-user, but when I login as myself it continues to fail...8-(

Tried the strace procedure the Jurriaan suggested.  and the diff
returned a null output.  so it seems that starting gnome-terminal does
not give a traceable error..  unless I screwed up again...8-)
I hope I'm not interfering with your day... Thanks for your efforts and
guidance

Jack



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Corrupted Gnome terminal

2008-01-15 Thread Alex Malinovich
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 14:36 -0600, Jack Schneider wrote:
 On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 15:11 -0800, Alex Malinovich wrote:
--snip--
 Tried the failsafe Gnome-Terminal, Terminal is fine when I login as
 alternate-user, but when I login as myself it continues to fail...8-(
 
 Tried the strace procedure the Jurriaan suggested.  and the diff
 returned a null output.  so it seems that starting gnome-terminal does
 not give a traceable error..  unless I screwed up again...8-)
 I hope I'm not interfering with your day... Thanks for your efforts and
 guidance

Ok, let's do a quick refresher so I can make sure we're both on the same
page here:

1) Launching gnome-terminal through a failsafe xterm session works fine
2) Launching it as a different user in a regular gnome session works
fine
3) Launching it as yourself in a regular gnome session or even a
failsafe gnome session causes it to fail?
4) Using xterm or any other terminal emulator works fine

And of the following, which have you/haven't you done already:

1) Removed all the gnome-terminal gconf settings
2) Done a purge of gnome-terminal followed by a reinstall (apt-get
remove --purge gnome-terminal)

Now, come to think of it, can you give some more details on what exactly
is happening with the window? I know you said you can't close it, but
does the terminal work ok otherwise? After you open the terminal, can
you actually type commands, get output, etc?

Do the drop-down menus at the top work if you click on them?

If you click the close button at the top of the window does Gnome give
you the force quit dialog?

If you can provide a screenshot of the terminal in the hung state that
would also be helpful.

-- 
Alex Malinovich
Support Free Software, delete your Windows partition TODAY!
Encrypted mail preferred. You can get my public key from any of the
pgp.net keyservers. Key ID: A6D24837



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: nvidia-glx not updating

2008-01-15 Thread Randall Donald
 here I couldn't even make 
 apt-get source nvidia-kernel-source 
 like I did always before. This now downloads the nvidia-graphics-drivers  
 source package - is this the right way nowadays? I tried mirrors in NL 

That is what apt-get source always has done. It asks for the package
source. I think you wanted apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source 

regards,
randy
 
-- 

Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: nvidia-glx not updating

2008-01-15 Thread Randall Donald

On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 09:04 +1100, Dean Hamstead wrote:
 maybe your mirror is confused?
 
 its worth adding rdonalds archive to your apt.sources
 
 http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/index.php
 

Not really. It hasn't been updated for months.

-- 

Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: kernel module eeprom causing system freeze

2008-01-15 Thread Dean Hamstead

regardless, when i got home from work it booted properly.
with no changes or updates.

seems strange. but oh well, back to normal computing...

Dean

Gabor Gombas wrote:

On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:26:29AM +, Koen Tavernier wrote:

The package lm-sensors uses the eeprom module to get temperature  
readings from motherboard sensors.


No, the eeprom module is not involved in temperature monitoring. You
need the eeprom module when e.g. you want to know the parameters of the
memory modules you have installed.

Gabor




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: nvidia-glx not updating

2008-01-15 Thread Dean Hamstead

happy to be wrong :)

Dean

Randall Donald wrote:

On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 09:04 +1100, Dean Hamstead wrote:

maybe your mirror is confused?

its worth adding rdonalds archive to your apt.sources

http://people.debian.org/~rdonald/index.php



Not really. It hasn't been updated for months.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]