Re: flashplugin-nonfree on debian-amd64 BUG ???
> latest version of package flashplugin-nonfree is (IMO) downloading the wrong > version of flashplayer. It seems, it is downloading the 32-bit-version. This > version is not running on my 64-bit system. >From debian-multimedia.org: New flash-player package for amd64 in experimental (can be installed in testing and unstable). This package contain a real 64 bits plugin. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: access rights in /sbin and /bin [Update]
Am Montag, 8. Dezember 2008 schrieb Lennart Sorensen: > On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 04:11:04PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > thanks for the list. I checked and found out, that a lot of binaries in > > /sbin got permissions to rwxr-xr-- (root:root), but they should have > > rwxrwxr-x. I wondered, as I never changed the rights manually in the past > > and I am sure, I have not been hacked. So there is only one explanation: > > an applicatiopn must have changed it. Does someone know, which > > application is changing rights of binaries below /sbin ? I suppose, it is > > either bastille (which I installed and deinstalled a long time ago) or > > selinux (which i still installed). > > > > Please, which manual did i miss to read ??? > > So far the only thing I have ever seen that causes that is silly people > who mess with the umask of the root user (which causes dpkg to make lots > of mistakes). > > So if you ever set a umask for your root user, well don't and reinstall > every affected package to fix the permissions. > > -- > Len Sorensen Hmm, checked, but umask of root is set to 022. Indeed I played with umask, but only for the normal user. Otherwise, I set umask in /etc/login.defs to 077, but IMO this would result in 700 to files and not in 750 (as I saw). Thanks for the hint anyway, I check my system for any related configurations. Cheers Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: access rights in /sbin and /bin [Update]
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 04:11:04PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > thanks for the list. I checked and found out, that a lot of binaries in /sbin > got permissions to rwxr-xr-- (root:root), but they should have rwxrwxr-x. I > wondered, as I never changed the rights manually in the past and I am sure, I > have not been hacked. So there is only one explanation: an applicatiopn must > have changed it. Does someone know, which application is changing rights of > binaries below /sbin ? I suppose, it is either bastille (which I installed > and deinstalled a long time ago) or selinux (which i still installed). > > Please, which manual did i miss to read ??? So far the only thing I have ever seen that causes that is silly people who mess with the umask of the root user (which causes dpkg to make lots of mistakes). So if you ever set a umask for your root user, well don't and reinstall every affected package to fix the permissions. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: flashplugin-nonfree on debian-amd64 BUG ???
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Dear maintainers, > > latest version of package flashplugin-nonfree is (IMO) downloading the wrong > version of flashplayer. It seems, it is downloading the 32-bit-version. This > version is not running on my 64-bit system. > > I tried to use the 64-bit beta version of Adobes flashplayer and it is > running > well (using opera, as iceweasel got a bug with ELF, and yes, I already > reported this) > > So, as it is not quite a bug in the package "flashplugin-nonfree", I do not > really know, if it should be reported. > Are you using stable, right? Acording to the Flash page on the Wiki [0], the Adobe's Flash is deprecated and must be removed. Also on the testing or sid repositories it isn't available anymore. So i guess that won't be necessary to report a bug against 'flashplugin-nonfree' [0] http://wiki.debian.org/Flash Regards, Mauro -- JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://lusers.com.ar/ work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://gcoop.com.ar/ 2B82 A38D 1BA5 847A A74D 6C34 6AB7 9ED6 C8FD F9C1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
flashplugin-nonfree on debian-amd64 BUG ???
Dear maintainers, latest version of package flashplugin-nonfree is (IMO) downloading the wrong version of flashplayer. It seems, it is downloading the 32-bit-version. This version is not running on my 64-bit system. I tried to use the 64-bit beta version of Adobes flashplayer and it is running well (using opera, as iceweasel got a bug with ELF, and yes, I already reported this) So, as it is not quite a bug in the package "flashplugin-nonfree", I do not really know, if it should be reported. My suggestion: Change the package in that way, that it is downloading the beta version of Adobes 64-bit-flashplayer or make a new package "flashplugin-nonfree-amd64-beta" or similar, which downloads the 64-bit beta version of flashplayer10. If you are on another opinion, I will be pleased to write a bugreport. Please drop me a line. Regards Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
