Re: I want all my 4GB!!!
Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:08:58AM +0400, James Brown wrote: I have a laptop Acer TravelMate 3043WTMi under Lenny AMD64 with 4GD RAM. But the system see only 3GB: dmesg |grep Memory [0.004000] Memory: 3081184k/3136000k available (2225k kernel code, 54428k reserved, 1080k data, 392k init) $ cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 3088108 kB How can I get all my 4GB memory? Could you get the output of dmesg? It would tell us exactly what the BIOS reports for memory. Many older chipsets did not support remapping of memory, so whatever area of the memory space PCI requried was simply lost. Something like this is the key part: BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009ac00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009ac00 - 000a (reserved) BIOS-e820: 000e - 0010 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0010 - bffc7440 (usable) BIOS-e820: bffc7440 - bffceac0 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: bffceac0 - c000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: e000 - f000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: fec0 - 0001 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0001 - 00024000 (usable) ~$ dmesg | grep BIOS [0.00] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: [0.00] BIOS-e820: - 0009f800 (usable) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 0009f800 - 000a (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 000dc000 - 0010 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 0010 - bf68 (usable) [0.00] BIOS-e820: bf68 - bf70 (ACPI NVS) [0.00] BIOS-e820: bf70 - c000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: e000 - f000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fec0 - fec1 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fed0 - fed00400 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fed14000 - fed1a000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fed1c000 - fed9 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fee0 - fee01000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: ff00 - 0001 (reserved) [0.00] ACPI: BIOS bug: multiple APIC/MADT found, using 0 [0.00] early res: 0 [0-fff] BIOS data page [0.00] early res: 4 [9f800-f] BIOS reserved [0.004000] Calgary: detecting Calgary via BIOS EBDA area [0.264998] ACPI: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored via DMI -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: What is the matter with the http://people.debian.org/~rafael/skype-amd64/?
Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:59:34AM +0400, James Brown wrote: I know about ekiga and such but they do not serve for all my aims. I (and many people in my country - Russia, when existing terrible and bloody dictatorship of tyrants Putin and Medvedev ) need to have an encrypted telephony either for calling to VoiP-phones or to ordinary phones. But in the last case ekiga and SIP are not useful and the sources of the Putins secret political police such SORM can control all my outgoing calles through ekiga and SIP. Why would you trust skype to be secure? Have they told you what algorithm they use for encryption? Do you have the source code to verify it? You would have to be crazy to rely on skype for that. Becouse it I think it needs to build new system of internet telephony like skype but running under open sourse programs and protocols. I think it need that new open-source built VoIP network system will operate on a peer-to-peer model, that user directory will be entirely decentralized and distributed among the nodes in the network, and use encrypted connection insluding connetion with the exit node when making calls to ordinary telephones. I think that building such system will protect anonymity and privacy of people and independence each of us from goverments, corporations etc. control, becouse we will be able to call each other without any state or corporate control over our telephone calls. But now it is not exist any such VoIP system based on open sourses. I really don't trust skype but I know that today any secret services of Russia cannot establish real control skype-connections. I know it from the officers of the Russian FSB which really interested (on corruption base) to find one user of skype and didn't be able to do it. But I am not sure that tomorrow the skype team or the US' security services (which perhaps execute control over the skype team) will not give information about skype users and their contacts to the Russia authorities. Furtherinafter, I (and each of us, I think) want to be able having connections with other people absolutely free from any control neither only Russian authorities nor any state secret services and any corporations and groups of people existing in the world. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: What is the matter with the http://people.debian.org/~rafael/skype-amd64/?
A J Stiles wrote: On Tuesday 21 Jul 2009, James Brown wrote: I know about ekiga and such but they do not serve for all my aims. I (and many people in my country - Russia, when existing terrible and bloody dictatorship of tyrants Putin and Medvedev ) need to have an encrypted telephony either for calling to VoiP-phones or to ordinary phones. But in the last case ekiga and SIP are not useful and the sources of the Putins secret political police such SORM can control all my outgoing calles through ekiga and SIP. Are you really so naïve as to think that Governments haven't paid the developers of Skype to insert a backdoor? That could explain part of the reason why they are so dead set against anybody else getting their hands on the Source Code. If it's encrypted telephony you want, you can always tunnell an IAX connection through OpenSSH. The only secrets then are the session keys; and when you sever the connection, you can even publish the used keys, thus allowing you plausibly to claim that any remaining encrypted data found on your system was placed there afterward and re-datestamped. 1. How can I maintain my anonimity when establishing this connection? How can I be sure that an owner of far host don't write logs and don't give or sell or etc. them to the Government? I don't want let them know not only about I talked but my ip-adress and my phisical location too. 2. How can I use this scheme when calling to ordinary telephones, mobile etc.? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: What is the matter with the http://people.debian.org/~rafael/skype-amd64/?
On Wednesday 22 Jul 2009, James Brown wrote: 1. How can I maintain my anonimity when establishing this [IAX tunnelled through SSH] connection? Using the mechanisms already built into SSH. If you are concerned about MITM attacks, then you will need a secure backchannel to exchange key fingerprints beforehand. You aren't anonymous to the far end of the connection; that's kind of the point. You always know who is leaning over and whispering in your ear. How can I be sure that an owner of far host don't write logs and don't give or sell or etc. them to the Government? Because the person on the far end is someone you trust. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking to them. Beside which, this problem exists with all communication channels. If your data passes through some intermediate host over which you have no control, well, it's encrypted so useless to them. And once your used keys are in the public domain, then they could have made it all up :) I don't want let them know not only about I talked but my ip-adress and my phisical location too. Unless you are on a business-grade service, your IP address changes regularly. You might be able to use some TOR variant, though I have no practical experience of this. Beside which, you do not know for a fact that Skype does not pass on information you would rather it did not to someone you would rather it did not. 2. How can I use this scheme when calling to ordinary telephones, mobile etc.? Through a secure VOIP-to-POTS gateway. (You then are at the mercy not only of the gateway's operator, but also the existing phone network. As is exactly the case with a Skype-to-POTS gateway.) -- AJS delta echo bravo six four at earthshod dot co dot uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: I want all my 4GB!!!
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:23:13PM +0400, James Brown wrote: ~$ dmesg | grep BIOS [0.00] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: [0.00] BIOS-e820: - 0009f800 (usable) That is 653312 bytes = 638 KB [0.00] BIOS-e820: 0009f800 - 000a (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 000dc000 - 0010 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 0010 - bf68 (usable) That is 3211231232 bytes = 3062 MB = 2.99 GB [0.00] BIOS-e820: bf68 - bf70 (ACPI NVS) [0.00] BIOS-e820: bf70 - c000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: e000 - f000 (reserved) That's 268435456 bytes = 256 MB, which is not usable. [0.00] BIOS-e820: fec0 - fec1 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fed0 - fed00400 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fed14000 - fed1a000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fed1c000 - fed9 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fee0 - fee01000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: ff00 - 0001 (reserved) [0.00] ACPI: BIOS bug: multiple APIC/MADT found, using 0 [0.00] early res: 0 [0-fff] BIOS data page [0.00] early res: 4 [9f800-f] BIOS reserved [0.004000] Calgary: detecting Calgary via BIOS EBDA area [0.264998] ACPI: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored via DMI So the BIOS atleast tells you you have 3 GB of usable memory. There might be some option that changes it so that more is available, and that it's now using some compatibility option for things that do not support more than 32 bit. I suggest you look for options in your bios that might be related to that. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: What is the matter with the http://people.debian.org/~rafael/skype-amd64/?
A J Stiles wrote: On Wednesday 22 Jul 2009, James Brown wrote: 1. How can I maintain my anonimity when establishing this [IAX tunnelled through SSH] connection? Using the mechanisms already built into SSH. If you are concerned about MITM attacks, then you will need a secure backchannel to exchange key fingerprints beforehand. You aren't anonymous to the far end of the connection; that's kind of the point. You always know who is leaning over and whispering in your ear. How can I be sure that an owner of far host don't write logs and don't give or sell or etc. them to the Government? Because the person on the far end is someone you trust. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking to them. Beside which, this problem exists with all communication channels. If your data passes through some intermediate host over which you have no control, well, it's encrypted so useless to them. And once your used keys are in the public domain, then they could have made it all up :) To have somebody you trust is very difficult. Even you can trust anybody he can be tort by somebody else :-) , for example. It needs to have a technical system which be able to give you needed guaranies for your security and anonimity. It will be very good if it is be created a VoIP network running like Tor. But I don't know anyone working like Tor. But the Tor itself doesn't work with UDP using in VoIP, only with TCP. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: What is the matter with the http://people.debian.org/~rafael/skype-amd64/?
A J Stiles wrote: On Wednesday 22 Jul 2009, James Brown wrote: 1. How can I maintain my anonimity when establishing this [IAX tunnelled through SSH] connection? Using the mechanisms already built into SSH. If you are concerned about MITM attacks, then you will need a secure backchannel to exchange key fingerprints beforehand. You aren't anonymous to the far end of the connection; that's kind of the point. You always know who is leaning over and whispering in your ear. How can I be sure that an owner of far host don't write logs and don't give or sell or etc. them to the Government? Because the person on the far end is someone you trust. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking to them. Beside which, this problem exists with all communication channels. If your data passes through some intermediate host over which you have no control, well, it's encrypted so useless to them. And once your used keys are in the public domain, then they could have made it all up :) I don't want let them know not only about I talked but my ip-adress and my phisical location too. Unless you are on a business-grade service, your IP address changes regularly. You might be able to use some TOR variant, though I have no practical experience of this. Beside which, you do not know for a fact that Skype does not pass on information you would rather it did not to someone you would rather it did not. To have somebody you trust is very difficult. Even you can trust anybody he can be tort by somebody else :-) , for example. It needs to have a technical system which be able to give you needed guaranies for your security and anonimity. It will be very good if it is be created a VoIP network running like Tor. But I don't know anyone working like Tor. But the Tor itself doesn't work with UDP using in VoIP, only with TCP. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: What is the matter with the http://people.debian.org/~rafael/skype-amd64/?
A J Stiles wrote: On Wednesday 22 Jul 2009, James Brown wrote: 1. How can I maintain my anonimity when establishing this [IAX tunnelled through SSH] connection? Using the mechanisms already built into SSH. If you are concerned about MITM attacks, then you will need a secure backchannel to exchange key fingerprints beforehand. You aren't anonymous to the far end of the connection; that's kind of the point. You always know who is leaning over and whispering in your ear. How can I be sure that an owner of far host don't write logs and don't give or sell or etc. them to the Government? Because the person on the far end is someone you trust. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking to them. Beside which, this problem exists with all communication channels. If your data passes through some intermediate host over which you have no control, well, it's encrypted so useless to them. And once your used keys are in the public domain, then they could have made it all up :) To have somebody you trust is very difficult. Even you can trust anybody he can be tort by somebody else :-) , for example. It needs to have a technical system which be able to give you needed guaranies for your security and anonimity. It will be very good if it is be created a VoIP network running like Tor. But I don't know anyone working like Tor. But the Tor itself doesn't work with UDP using in VoIP, only with TCP. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: What is the matter with the http://people.debian.org/~rafael/skype-amd64/?
On Qua, 22 Jul 2009, James Brown wrote: To have somebody you trust is very difficult. Could be, but this problem is something you cannot avoid. It is theoretically possible to encrypt a message in a way that it simply cannot be decrypted without the right key, not even given infinite time and infinite resources (google One Time Pad). It can even be used in practice, but it quite unpractical and brings other problems such as distribution of the keys. However, even if you could use a One Time Pad efficiently, nothing will ever prevent the other party in the communication to make public the message he received and that was so carefully protected. So if you do not trust the person on the other side of the line, then don't communicate with them, even if you can get the best encryption available. -- Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: I want all my 4GB!!!
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:30:09PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote: This is probably irrelevant but it may help someone searching the archives. I bought a Thinkpad X61 with 4GB a while back. At first it would recognise more than 3gb on either windows or squeeze. I checked the BIOS which was registering 4Gb. I had many other things to do and left it for a while. The windows deficiency must have been fixed in the Vista (shudder) SP1 update but the Debian shortfall continued and I've been following this thread. I use aptitude and found the following kernel package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem Installed it, rebooted and hey presto,cat /proc/meminfo gives: MemTotal: 4074284 kB Thanks. You guys are so great. Well if the BIOS does remap memory above 4GB, then on x86 you do need a PAE kernel to get the rest of memory, which would be the 686-bigmem kernel. On x86-64 you always get all the memory in that case. I believe vista SP1 did in fact add PAE support, so that would make sense there too. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: I want all my 4GB!!!
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:23:13PM +0400, James Brown wrote: ~$ dmesg | grep BIOS [0.00] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: [0.00] BIOS-e820: - 0009f800 (usable) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 0009f800 - 000a (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 000dc000 - 0010 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 0010 - bf68 (usable) [0.00] BIOS-e820: bf68 - bf70 (ACPI NVS) [0.00] BIOS-e820: bf70 - c000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: e000 - f000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fec0 - fec1 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fed0 - fed00400 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fed14000 - fed1a000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fed1c000 - fed9 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fee0 - fee01000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: ff00 - 0001 (reserved) So the last address reported by your bios is 4GB (0001) at the end of a reserved area. The last address of usable memory is bf68 which is 3211264000 bytes, so your system does not remap memory and hence anything covered by PCI devices is simply lost and can not be used at all. The hardware is either simply not capable of remapping memory (this is true for many intel chipsets) or the BIOS didn't make the chipset do remapping (sometimes there is a bios option for it). [0.00] ACPI: BIOS bug: multiple APIC/MADT found, using 0 [0.00] early res: 0 [0-fff] BIOS data page [0.00] early res: 4 [9f800-f] BIOS reserved [0.004000] Calgary: detecting Calgary via BIOS EBDA area [0.264998] ACPI: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored via DMI So unless your bios has an option for memory remapping, there is no way to make the rest of memory useable, and you will only get about 3.2GB out of your 4GB. Of course if the video steals some of that 3.2GB, you get whatever is left. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: I want all my 4GB!!!
Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:30:09PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote: This is probably irrelevant but it may help someone searching the archives. I bought a Thinkpad X61 with 4GB a while back. At first it would recognise more than 3gb on either windows or squeeze. I checked the BIOS which was registering 4Gb. I had many other things to do and left it for a while. The windows deficiency must have been fixed in the Vista (shudder) SP1 update but the Debian shortfall continued and I've been following this thread. I use aptitude and found the following kernel package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem Installed it, rebooted and hey presto,cat /proc/meminfo gives: MemTotal: 4074284 kB Thanks. You guys are so great. Well if the BIOS does remap memory above 4GB, then on x86 you do need a PAE kernel to get the rest of memory, which would be the 686-bigmem kernel. On x86-64 you always get all the memory in that case. I believe vista SP1 did in fact add PAE support, so that would make sense there too. Do you think is it possible to get all 4GB even the BIOS doesn't see all installed memory? P.S. I have send request to the technical support of the Acer corporation concirning the matter of my BIOS (becouse I upgraided my BIOS from the latest version on their site) and waiting their answer. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: I want all my 4GB!!!
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:51:22PM +0400, James Brown wrote: Do you think is it possible to get all 4GB even the BIOS doesn't see all installed memory? P.S. I have send request to the technical support of the Acer corporation concirning the matter of my BIOS (becouse I upgraided my BIOS from the latest version on their site) and waiting their answer. No probably not. In that case it is almost certain the chipset is not setup to remap memory (if it is even capable of it). Vista could also just read the DMI info, detect what actual memory is installed and report that, rather than the amount of memory actually available. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: What is the matter with the http://people.debian.org/~rafael/skype-amd64/?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 01:55:57PM +0400, James Brown wrote: Becouse it I think it needs to build new system of internet telephony like skype but running under open sourse programs and protocols. I think it need that new open-source built VoIP network system will operate on a peer-to-peer model, that user directory will be entirely decentralized and distributed among the nodes in the network, and use encrypted connection insluding connetion with the exit node when making calls to ordinary telephones. I think that building such system will protect anonymity and privacy of people and independence each of us from goverments, corporations etc. control, becouse we will be able to call each other without any state or corporate control over our telephone calls. But now it is not exist any such VoIP system based on open sourses. I really don't trust skype but I know that today any secret services of Russia cannot establish real control skype-connections. I know it from the officers of the Russian FSB which really interested (on corruption base) to find one user of skype and didn't be able to do it. But I am not sure that tomorrow the skype team or the US' security services (which perhaps execute control over the skype team) will not give information about skype users and their contacts to the Russia authorities. Furtherinafter, I (and each of us, I think) want to be able having connections with other people absolutely free from any control neither only Russian authorities nor any state secret services and any corporations and groups of people existing in the world. The fact skype is p2p is part of why I hate it. It is a complete nightmare to try and deal with on company networks. Trying to allow skype (because some people insist on it being amazingly useful) while blocking other p2p traffic is very very hard. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: What is the matter with the http://people.debian.org/~rafael/skype-amd64/?
Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 01:55:57PM +0400, James Brown wrote: Becouse it I think it needs to build new system of internet telephony like skype but running under open sourse programs and protocols. I think it need that new open-source built VoIP network system will operate on a peer-to-peer model, that user directory will be entirely decentralized and distributed among the nodes in the network, and use encrypted connection insluding connetion with the exit node when making calls to ordinary telephones. I think that building such system will protect anonymity and privacy of people and independence each of us from goverments, corporations etc. control, becouse we will be able to call each other without any state or corporate control over our telephone calls. But now it is not exist any such VoIP system based on open sourses. I really don't trust skype but I know that today any secret services of Russia cannot establish real control skype-connections. I know it from the officers of the Russian FSB which really interested (on corruption base) to find one user of skype and didn't be able to do it. But I am not sure that tomorrow the skype team or the US' security services (which perhaps execute control over the skype team) will not give information about skype users and their contacts to the Russia authorities. Furtherinafter, I (and each of us, I think) want to be able having connections with other people absolutely free from any control neither only Russian authorities nor any state secret services and any corporations and groups of people existing in the world. The fact skype is p2p is part of why I hate it. It is a complete nightmare to try and deal with on company networks. Trying to allow skype (because some people insist on it being amazingly useful) while blocking other p2p traffic is very very hard. What is needing to block p2p traffic? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: What is the matter with the http://people.debian.org/~rafael/skype-amd64/?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 07:36:04PM +0400, James Brown wrote: What is needing to block p2p traffic? Because users are idiots. When you have 250 people sharing a 3Mbit internet link, you do not need idiots running p2p file sharing. Or even worse, p2p video streaming (like CNN's garbage system, and that tv brodcast thing from india that I don't remember the name of right now, and many others). We will be moving to a 10Mbit link next month, but that still doesn't mean p2p file sharing at work is a good idea. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Installing legacy nvidia drivers on 2.6
Hello,
I would like to use the 3d capabilities of my old TNT2 card, which in
theory is supported by
# export VERSION=-legacy-71xx
# m-a auto-install nvidia-kernel${VERSION}-source
Unfortunately, this command fails as can be seen below. It appears
that the nvidia bridge to the kernel should be updated so that it
works with newer kernels. I didn't try installing 2.6.18, because it
is not available as a Debian package in unstable. I know there are
ways to work around that, but I was not interested in doing that, and
also it would probably have some security issues.
Kernel version (from Debian package): Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64
I use a 64 bits user-land too. The errors start from about line 100,
but I included all output.
I am not a member of this list, so please CC me.
Best regards,
Ron
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx'
# select which makefile to use.
rm -f /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv/Makefile || true
if [ 6 = 6 ]; then \
cd /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv ; \
ln -s Makefile.kbuild Makefile ; \
cd .. ; \
if [ 0 = 1 ] ; then \
dpatch apply 04_minion ; \
fi ; \
if [ 0 = 1 ]; then \
dpatch apply 01_sysfs ; \
dpatch status 01_sysfs patch-stamp ; \
dpatch apply 02_pcialias ; \
dpatch status 02_pcialias patch-stamp ; \
fi ; \
fi
if [ 6 = 4 ]; then \
cd /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv ; \
ln -s Makefile.nvidia Makefile ; \
cd .. ; \
fi
if [ -e patch-stamp ]; then \
dpatch deapply-all ; \
rm -rf patch-stamp debian/patched ; \
fi
if [ -f /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/debian/control.template
]; then \
cp
/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/debian/control.template
/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/debian/control; \
fi
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
/usr/bin/make clean SYSSRC=/lib/modules/2.6.30-1-amd64/build -C
/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv -f Makefile
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv'
rm -f /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv/Makefile || true;
rm /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv/gcc-check
rm /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv/cc-sanity-check
dh_clean
rm /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/debian/control
rm /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/debian/dirs
rm /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/debian/override
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx'
echo ROOT_CMD =
ROOT_CMD =
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules binary_modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx'
# select which makefile to use.
rm -f /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv/Makefile || true
if [ 6 = 6 ]; then \
cd /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv ; \
ln -s Makefile.kbuild Makefile ; \
cd .. ; \
if [ 0 = 1 ] ; then \
dpatch apply 04_minion ; \
fi ; \
if [ 0 = 1 ]; then \
dpatch apply 01_sysfs ; \
dpatch status 01_sysfs patch-stamp ; \
dpatch apply 02_pcialias ; \
dpatch status 02_pcialias patch-stamp ; \
fi ; \
fi
if [ 6 = 4 ]; then \
cd /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv ; \
ln -s Makefile.nvidia Makefile ; \
cd .. ; \
fi
#nothing here anymore
touch configure-stamp
if [ -f /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/debian/control.template
]; then \
cp
/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/debian/control.template
/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/debian/control; \
fi
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
PATCHLEVEL = 6
Kernel compiler version : 4.3.3
Detected compiler version : 4.3.3
Using compiler gcc-4.3 version 4.3.3
touch /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv/gcc-check
touch /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv/cc-sanity-check
## Main Make ##
IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH=1 CC=gcc-4.3 /usr/bin/make -C
/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv -f Makefile
SYSSRC=/lib/modules/2.6.30-1-amd64/build KBUILD_PARAMS=-C
/lib/modules/2.6.30-1-amd64/build
SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv module;
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv'
NVIDIA: calling KBUILD...
make CC=gcc-4.3 -C /lib/modules/2.6.30-1-amd64/build
SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv modules
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.30-1-amd64'
CC [M] /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel-legacy-71xx/nv/nv.o
In file included
Re: How to install wine on debian/amd64/sid?
Cavan Mejias 提到: 2009/7/19 John Wong jo...@wonghome.net: I add the below url to /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://www.lamaresh.net/apt/ sid main then apt-get update apt-get install wine but it always said: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: wine: Depends: ia32-libs but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages Is it only me? I saw this message a few weeks ago. uname -a: Linux redcat 2.6.30-1-amd64 #1 SMP Sat Jul 18 12:55:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux cat /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free deb http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free deb http://www.lamaresh.net/apt/ sid main Please help, thank you. Can you manually do apt-get install ia32-libs ? Does that succeed? Or if you are using Gnome can you locate it in Synaptic? (All the KDE package managers seem to be orphaned/nonfunctional). It appears you are using sid, therefore the ia32-libs may indeed be broken or have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming.. I use lenny and I think it works there. Good luck! I hope you get to install wine. Yes, when i manually do apt-get install ia32-libs, then it just show the message like this: --- Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: wine: Depends: ia32-libs but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages --- When i use Synaptic, the result is the same like use apt-get, It ask me, i need to remove ia32-apt-get first: Yes/No, then i choose Yes, then Synaptic tell me, CAN NOT be install, becuase it depend ia32-apt-get. (-- i know do not know why) Yes, my system is sid/amd64, so maybe different to lenny. Anyway, thank your help. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Installing legacy nvidia drivers on 2.6
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 08:08:15PM +0200, Ron wrote: I would like to use the 3d capabilities of my old TNT2 card, which in theory is supported by I sent a patch to Randall a few days ago to make the latest 71.xx driver compile and work with 2.6.30 (and probably 2.6.31 as well). I can build a test version if you want until he gets around to releasing it. You should be able to find my updated build (71.86.11) at: http://www.tinyplanet.ca/~lsorense/debian/nvidia-71xx-lenny/ Built for lenny (although I would be very surprised if it does not also work perfectly on squeeze and sid). Kernel modules prebuilt for lenny kernels as well (both i386 and amd64, except not amd64 kernel on i386 due to some assembly mistake in the old 71.xx drivers that I don't feel like fixing). -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: I want all my 4GB!!!
I don't have time to check your machine's specs, but many chipsets of a few years ago only recognized a maximum of 3GB (even though they correctly work with 4GB installed). My Thinkpad T60 is among them. In this case, there's nothing you can do about it, short of getting another machine. Looks like it, indeed: http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/configurator_new/modelsinfo.asp?SysID=33507mfr=Acermodel=TravelMate+3040+Series+3043%2C+3044search_type=root=usLinkBack=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kingston.comSys=33507-Acer-TravelMate+3040+Series+3043%2C+3044distributor=0submit1=Search Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: I want all my 4GB!!!
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 04:32:12PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: Looks like it, indeed: http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/configurator_new/modelsinfo.asp?SysID=33507mfr=Acermodel=TravelMate+3040+Series+3043%2C+3044search_type=root=usLinkBack=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kingston.comSys=33507-Acer-TravelMate+3040+Series+3043%2C+3044distributor=0submit1=Search Well it confirms it being 945GM, and the 945GM is absolutely not capable of memory remapping, so there is no way to get more of the memory to be available. The benefit of 4GB ram simply is that you get dual channel access to the 3.something GB you see as far as I can tell. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reading the end of file
Hi: Is any command faster than cat filename to reach and print on screen the last page of the file? The question (i hope) is not outside amd64 as such large files as 10GB can only result from computations at 64 bit. The scope is following the progress of the computational procedure; the command cat filename takes hours to print the end of the file. At least so when all memory (24GB) is taken by the diagonalization of matrix, while the hamiltonian is stored out of memory (10GB). thanks francesco pietra -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: reading the end of file
Francesco Pietra wrote: Hi: Is any command faster than cat filename to reach and print on screen the last page of the file? Define 'page'. Anyway, the command you want is 'tail'. By default it prints the last 10 lines, but this can be changed, see the man page. The question (i hope) is not outside amd64 As a matter of fact it is not amd64-specific, debian-user would have been more appropriate. as such large files as 10GB can only result from computations at 64 bit. As long as the filesystem supports, it's trivial to create a 10GB file even on 32-bit systems. But I digress. -- The New England Journal of Medicine reports that 9 out of 10 doctors agree that 1 out of 10 doctors is an idiot. Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
