amd64 port plans for the squeeze cycle
Heya, As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December 2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wouldn't be possible in this time frame. So, to find out when releasing would work for most people, it would be great if you could answer the following questions: Do you have any big changes planned? How much time would they take, and what consequences are there for the rest of the project? How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should those happen? Can we do something to make them easier? Thanks, Marc [RT1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/07/msg1.html pgptqYWrfoDDm.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Re: ia32-apt-get and dependencies errors
> So I guess the question is how to we organise to get it back into the > repro's - the debian way ? I think, if people wish for it, then ftp-master should be asked to put it back again. However, I underrstand, it might cause trouble (as other packages might cause, too!), but this is the kind of "experimental"! or "unstable", just as its name is expressing. I understand well, there are efforts to chose other ways, so ia32-apt-get should not block the other ways. Well, which one will win at last will show the future. IMO ia32-apt-get is a good way at the moment, and I think, even Goswin would not mourne if some day a better way will be found and ia32-apt- get will disappear. The future will show us. As far as i understood the policies of debian, there are rules to get a package into the official repository. If ia32-apt-get does not break those rules, I see no reason, why to put this software into the repository. All software is free, and every software should be handled even. True democracie Well, I suggest, to handle ia32-apt-get just as other software in debian. Another for way testing might be, to use an own repository, besides the debian official ones. IMO this is the worse way, because it might be worse to maintain (dependencies and so on). These are my thoughts about it, feel free to comment it. Cheers Hans P.S. As you may have remarked: I hate everything, which is deminuishing freedom! Sorry for that! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: How can I set going more one Tor daemons?
Am 15.08.2009 um 18:47 schrieb James Brown: I have a laptop with the Debian Lenny AMD64 and I want to start several Tor daemons in one moment, each for every user. How can I do it? Why? To torify web browsing, all you have to do is install an add-on to firefox. If you like to share some bandwidth to the tor community, install one tor daemon on your internet connection. A nice combination is a squid server in your local net and link the squid to a tor daemon on the same machine. I've set up a cascade with tor to privoxy to havp to squid. And if I choose the squid proxy, it's routed through through the cascade and leaves through tor. On every machine and browser that's configured to use the proxy. So why would you like to run one tor deamon for every user on one machine when one daemon for all users of your local net will do? As tor is a daemon, why would someone like to start one for every user? You don't start a nfs server or a sshd server for every user? A little bit puzzled. Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
