Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-03-02 Thread Martin Guy 
On 2 March 2011 02:34, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
  armel (although optimized for a different processor)

Hi
  For which processor (/architecture) is it optimized, and do you mean
optimized-for, or only-runs-on?
I ask in case this would mean dumping all the armv4t systems that are
using Debian armel.

   M


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktiktn0zoa_hzgciwhkzbup7_ji6pbeji+p4c7...@mail.gmail.com

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

2011-03-02 Thread Matthias Klose 
On 02.03.2011 17:54, Martin Guy wrote:
 On 2 March 2011 02:34, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
   armel (although optimized for a different processor)
 
 Hi
   For which processor (/architecture) is it optimized, and do you mean
 optimized-for, or only-runs-on?
 I ask in case this would mean dumping all the armv4t systems that are
 using Debian armel.

I didn't propose changing the minimum required processor for armel.  I said that
4.5 looks ok, although I can only say that for another processor default 
(armv7-a).

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d6e787c.9090...@debian.org