Lotus notes oamd64?
Hi, I have to install lotus notes here. Our IT guys have provided me with the file ibm_lotus_notes-8.5.i586.deb (linux support here is minimal). Following instructions from http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/534, I installed the .deb (using --force-architecture). There were several libraries needed which were not in the ia32libs packages, so I downloaded the necessary 32 bit packages and placed the library files into /lib32. When I run the notes program (/opt/ibm/lotus/notes/lnotes), I get the following output: /opt/ibm/lotus/notes/lnotes: /usr/lib32/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /lib32/libgnomeprint-2-2.so.0) /opt/ibm/lotus/notes/lnotes: /usr/lib32/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /lib32/libgnomevfs-2.so.0) /opt/ibm/lotus/notes/lnotes: /usr/lib32/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /lib32/libgnomevfs-2.so.0) /opt/ibm/lotus/notes/lnotes: /usr/lib32/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /lib32/libgnomevfs-2.so.0) /opt/ibm/lotus/notes/lnotes: /usr/lib32/libxml2.so.2: no version information available (required by /lib32/libbonoboui-2.so.0) Gtk-Message: Failed to load module canberra-gtk-module: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 I assume that the first 5 lines are warnings, although I don't know why they occur. I installed libcanberra-gtk-module.so in /lib32/modules, and set the environment variable, export GTK_PATH=/lib32/modules, but I still get the final error message, and the program exits. Does anyone have any idea how to fix this? I'd prefer not to have to set up a chroot environment just to occasionally run this program (we don't have to use it for email). -Chris | Christopher Judd, Ph. D. | | Research Scientist III | | NYS Dept. of Health j...@wadsworth.org | | Wadsworth Center - ESP | | P. O. Box 509518 486-7829 | | Albany, NY 12201-0509 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201009160954.01654.j...@wadsworth.org
Re: Lotus notes oamd64?
On Thursday 16 September 2010 11:30:15 A J Stiles wrote: On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Christopher Judd wrote: Hi, I have to install lotus notes here. Our IT guys have provided me with the file ibm_lotus_notes-8.5.i586.deb (linux support here is minimal). [stuff deleted] Did you run ldconfig after you installed the libraries? I hadn't, but I ran it and it makes no difference. In general, it is best not to try to run anything that was not compiled by either yourself or your own distro's package maintainers. Try grabbing the other distro (i.e., Source Code) package and building it yourself. If you do this, you'll also need the -dev versions of all packages it says it needs. As far as I know, the source code is not available. You have to download binaries from the IBM site. An IBM ID is required, which is why I had to go through our IT folks. -Chris | Christopher Judd, Ph. D. | | Research Scientist III | | NYS Dept. of Health j...@wadsworth.org | | Wadsworth Center - ESP | | P. O. Box 509518 486-7829 | | Albany, NY 12201-0509 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201009161327.55960.j...@wadsworth.org
Re: Lotus notes on amd64?
On Thursday 16 September 2010 13:02:11 Fabricio Cannini wrote: On Thursday 16 September 2010 12:30:15 A J Stiles wrote: On Thursday 16 Sep 2010, Christopher Judd wrote: Hi, I have to install lotus notes here. Our IT guys have provided me with the file ibm_lotus_notes-8.5.i586.deb (linux support here is minimal). [stuff deleted] But now i got curious, Christopher. Why do you want to use it ? Does none of the FLOSS collaboration suites like 'egroupware' and such fulfill your needs ? We have to periodically update/verify emergency contact information, which is in a notes database, and are encouraged to maintain a calendar on the notes server, to facilitate meetings and other activities. There are other uses available, but they are not required of us at this time. If I can do theses 2 tasks on our lotus server with other software, I won't need to install notes. Any suggestions? -Chris | Christopher Judd, Ph. D. | | Research Scientist III | | NYS Dept. of Health j...@wadsworth.org | | Wadsworth Center - ESP | | P. O. Box 509518 486-7829 | | Albany, NY 12201-0509 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201009161348.40919.j...@wadsworth.org
Disk errors?
Hi,
This morning I did an aptitude full-upgrade this morning (squeeze
amd64). I am now seeing this type of message (from dmesg):
Jun 14 13:11:40 gibbs kernel: [ 1074.152989] ata1: exception Emask 0x10 SAct
0x0 SErr 0x199 action 0xe frozen
Jun 14 13:11:40 gibbs kernel: [ 1074.152995] ata1: SError: { PHYRdyChg 10B8B
Dispar LinkSeq TrStaTrns }
Jun 14 13:11:40 gibbs kernel: [ 1074.153004] ata1: hard resetting link
Jun 14 13:11:40 gibbs kernel: [ 1074.153007] ata1: nv: skipping hardreset on
occupied port
Jun 14 13:11:44 gibbs kernel: [ 1078.520051] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps
(SStatus 123 SControl 300)
Jun 14 13:11:44 gibbs kernel: [ 1078.540414] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Jun 14 13:11:44 gibbs kernel: [ 1078.540419] ata1: EH complete
How can I tell if this a software issue, or some disk/hardware issue (I am
running kernel 2.6.32-3-amd64; 2.6.32-5 was installed with the upgrade, but
failed to boot)?
-Chris
| Christopher Judd, Ph. D. |
| Research Scientist III |
| NYS Dept. of Health j...@wadsworth.org |
| Wadsworth Center - ESP |
| P. O. Box 509518 486-7829 |
| Albany, NY 12201-0509 |
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally
privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It
is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or
from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not
distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the
sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your
system. Thank you for your cooperation.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201006141323.07745.j...@wadsworth.org
Re: Disk errors?
On Monday 14 June 2010 15:18:50 Christopher Judd wrote: On Monday 14 June 2010 14:48:13 Ron Johnson wrote: On 06/14/2010 01:00 PM, brian m. carlson wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:23:07PM -0400, Christopher Judd wrote: [snip] You probably don't want to put that on a public mailing list. It looks silly. Silly or not, he probably has to do it. My company used to mandate such a disclaimer, but then we were bought out by a Big Co that must realize who stupid the disclaimer is. Exactly. It is added to all outgoing mail by the server here; I have no control over it. It turned out that my root partition, /dev/sda1, was marked unclean (other partitions were OK. After booting from a rescue disk and running e2fsck, it booted normally with no errors yet (up about 40 min). Shouldn't that be detected during the boot process and fsck run before mounting it? ^^ I guess that this can't be done, since fsck.ext2 resides in /sbin, and wouldn't be available prior to mounting /. -Chris | Christopher Judd, Ph. D. | | Research Scientist III | | NYS Dept. of Health j...@wadsworth.org | | Wadsworth Center - ESP | | P. O. Box 509518 486-7829 | | Albany, NY 12201-0509 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201006141552.28843.j...@wadsworth.org
Re: What is the state of testing?
On Monday 12 April 2010 00:30:18 Dean Hamstead wrote: To get recent nvidia cards to work, i have found that unstable is required. Fortunately it's quite stable with aptitude safe-upgrades occasionally performed with a little caution. I wouldn't recommend it for anyone who can't fix occasional wacky problems. Dean I've been running testing for years; almost everything works fine here currently. I gave up on the Debian nvidia (legacy 173) packages and installed them from the nvidia site. Opera is so slow that it's unusable here, but it works fine on my home box (i386); I haven't been able to figure out what the cause is. I have had to put off upgrading, or pull in some packages from unstable, a few times in the last few years in order to maintain the box with the software that I have installed. -Chris | Christopher Judd, Ph. D. | | Research Scientist III | | NYS Dept. of Health j...@wadsworth.org | | Wadsworth Center - ESP | | P. O. Box 509518 486-7829 | | Albany, NY 12201-0509 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201004120908.03555.j...@wadsworth.org
Opera 10
Hi, Is anyone using Opera 10.0 with amd64. I have installed it, but it is slow as to be unuseable. This is apparently only an issue on amd64, since it works fine on x386 on my home box. Does anyone have a clue as to what the problem is? I ran strace -c opera with the following output: % time seconds usecs/call callserrors syscall -- --- --- - - 18.000.012159 52923 5 wait4 14.110.009532 0 27068 4 poll 12.340.008338 1 16010 select 8.860.005988 1 11091 11089 connect 7.960.005375 0 11696 1 close 7.360.004975 0 77723 mprotect 6.540.004420 0 11103 sendto 6.300.004253 17724 clone 4.370.002950 0 28249 recvfrom 3.670.002479 0 53200 34239 read 3.580.002421 0 44911 fcntl 2.080.001406 0 11092 1 socket 2.010.001360 0 14006 writev 0.650.000436 0 11086 setsockopt 0.570.000383 0 11085 getsockopt 0.490.000332 0 23646 7555 stat 0.400.000267 0 984 424 open 0.180.000120 0 785 1 ioctl 0.170.000117 0 1837 454 lstat 0.140.92 173 getdents 0.090.62 0 38070 access 0.070.44 0 1735 write 0.040.25 0 1657 fstat 0.030.17 0 327 brk 0.000.00 0 5210 lseek 0.000.00 0 564 mmap 0.000.00 0 416 munmap 0.000.00 020 rt_sigaction 0.000.00 0 1 rt_sigprocmask 0.000.00 0 9 4 rt_sigreturn 0.000.00 023 pipe 0.000.00 020 madvise 0.000.00 0 1 getpid 0.000.00 0 1 getsockname 0.000.00 0 1 getpeername 0.000.00 0 2 execve 0.000.00 0 4 kill 0.000.00 011 uname 0.000.00 020 fsync 0.000.00 084 ftruncate 0.000.00 020 rename 0.000.00 0 6 unlink 0.000.00 062 2 readlink 0.000.00 040 umask 0.000.00 0 1 getrlimit 0.000.00 0 7 getuid 0.000.00 0 5 getgid 0.000.00 0 5 geteuid 0.000.00 0 3 getegid 0.000.00 0 1 getppid 0.000.00 0 2 getgroups 0.000.00 0 2 arch_prctl 0.000.00 0 268 futex 0.000.00 0 1 set_tid_address 0.000.00 0 1 set_robust_list -- --- --- - - 100.000.067551366602 53849 total -Chris | Christopher Judd, Ph. D. | | Research Scientist III | | NYS Dept. of Health j...@wadsworth.org | | Wadsworth Center - ESP | | P. O. Box 509518 486-7829 | | Albany, NY 12201-0509 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure
Re: Opera 10
On Wednesday 09 September 2009, Liviu Andronic wrote: Hello On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Christopher Juddj...@wadsworth.org wrote: Is anyone using Opera 10.0 with amd64. I have installed it, but it I do. I'm currently using the qt4 build, which is not available via synaptic and needs downloaded and installed manually. For details, please check my comments on this discussion [1] [1] http://list.opera.com/pipermail/opera-linux/2009-September/010025.htm l Hi, Liviu, Thanks for the quick response. I installed the qt4 .deb, but unfortunately it is only slightly better. After viewing a few pages, it becomes extremely slow and top shows it using 97 - 100% of cpu time. I'll play around with it some more when I have time. By the way, are you running squeeze or sid? I have squeeze installed here. -Chris | Christopher Judd, Ph. D. | | Research Scientist III | | NYS Dept. of Health j...@wadsworth.org | | Wadsworth Center - ESP | | P. O. Box 509518 486-7829 | | Albany, NY 12201-0509 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Amarok 2 - solved
On Wednesday 04 March 2009, Christopher Judd wrote: Hi, I recently upgraded to stable and added kde4 and amarok 2.0.60+svn934288-1 from experimental. Kde4 works fine, althogh I had to manually migrate my kmail settings. Unfortunately, amorok (the main reason that I tried this) doesn't work. It crashes upon startup with the following output: Thanks to those who responded. I found the problem; gstreamer0.10-alsa isn't listed as a dependency for the amarok package in experimental. Once I installed it, amarok works fine. -Chris IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Amarok 2
Hi, I recently upgraded to stable and added kde4 and amarok 2.0.60+svn934288-1 from experimental. Kde4 works fine, althogh I had to manually migrate my kmail settings. Unfortunately, amorok (the main reason that I tried this) doesn't work. It crashes upon startup with the following output: amarok(6176) Phonon::KdePlatformPlugin::createBackend: using backend: GStreamer virtual bool Phonon::Gstreamer::AudioOutput::setOutputDevice(const Phonon::AudioOutputDevice) HDA NVidia (AD198x Analog) virtual bool Phonon::Gstreamer::AudioOutput::setOutputDevice(const Phonon::AudioOutputDevice) (x-phonon:CARD=0,DEV=0, plughw:CARD=0,DEV=0) virtual bool Phonon::Gstreamer::AudioOutput::setOutputDevice(const Phonon::AudioOutputDevice) setProperty(device, x-phonon:CARD=0,DEV=0 ) failed virtual bool Phonon::Gstreamer::AudioOutput::setOutputDevice(const Phonon::AudioOutputDevice) setProperty(device, plughw:CARD=0,DEV=0 ) failed virtual bool Phonon::Gstreamer::AudioOutput::setOutputDevice(const Phonon::AudioOutputDevice) HDA NVidia (AD198x Analog) virtual bool Phonon::Gstreamer::AudioOutput::setOutputDevice(const Phonon::AudioOutputDevice) (x-phonon:CARD=0,DEV=0, plughw:CARD=0,DEV=0) virtual bool Phonon::Gstreamer::AudioOutput::setOutputDevice(const Phonon::AudioOutputDevice) setProperty(device, x-phonon:CARD=0,DEV=0 ) failed virtual bool Phonon::Gstreamer::AudioOutput::setOutputDevice(const Phonon::AudioOutputDevice) setProperty(device, plughw:CARD=0,DEV=0 ) failed virtual bool Phonon::Gstreamer::AudioOutput::setOutputDevice(const Phonon::AudioOutputDevice) default unknown program name(6175)/: Communication problem with amarok , it probably crashed. Error message was: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply : Message did not receive a reply (timeout by message bus) c...@gibbs:~$ KCrash: Application 'amarok' crashing... sock_file=/home/cdj/.kde4/socket-gibbs/kdeinit4__0 I know that this is an experimental package, but does anyone have any idea how I can go about getting it to run? Thanks. -Chris IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Opera 9.51
Hi, everyone, I have Opera 9.51 (amd64 version) installed here, but it is unusable. It starts without error, and I can usually browse a page or two, but then it stalls, or at least becomes hideously slow. If I run top and then start Opera, it's CPU usage climbs to near 100% and the memory percentage seems to increase slowly as long as it is open. This doesn't happen with the 32-bit version that I have installed at home. Does anyone have an idea as to what's going on here? -Chris | Christopher Judd, Ph. D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange mouse behaviour
On Friday 16 May 2008, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: Hi, I have a weird problem with the mouse and I don't know what's happen. Since yesterday that I upgraded testing (before was working) my system worked ok, normal, as it has to work. But, when it upgraded X.org I got a problem that I had haven with the same version in unstable. Now, this version have arrived to testing and I got the same problem. I don't know how to describe it. Simple, the simple click have disappeared, but not completely. For example, if I click over a work in a editor (gedit or kedit) I have not the cursor over the word, I have the whole word selected, as if I have done double click and not simple click. Also, the menu entries are very difficult to chose, because I must keep the click done or the entry disappear. For example, the in qt4config, I _only_ could activate the entry menus with keyboard because I couldn't with the mouse. I posted this error in the debian-kde list when I had it the first time, but none said something. But now, looking a bit more deeply, it's not a problem of qt programs, it's a general problem of all X apps (with all users also) Any ideas? Regards, Leo Hi, Leo, This sounds like a problem that I had a while ago with my home box, which I had temporarily changed from testing to unstable. Apparently the file /etc/X11/xorg.conf had not been properly updated. A dpkg-reconfigure fixed the problem. -Chris | Christopher Judd, Ph. D. | | Research Scientist III | | NYS Dept. of Health [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Wadsworth Center - ESP | | P. O. Box 509518 486-7829 | | Albany, NY 12201-0509 | IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: chroot64 the chroot32
On Thursday 31 January 2008, Rob Andrews wrote: On 31-Jan-2008 10:20.51 (GMT), Hans Vogelsberger wrote: Well, I never tried chroot. But Opera and - because of Sun Java plugins - Iceweasel and Openoffice still run on my old (and much too loud) 32-bit intel 686 computer instead of the newer Amd 64 one. You can install the 32bit opera on amd64 using --force-architecture and some alterations of the startup script. It works (somewhat) with flash and java. There's also a beta amd64 .deb of 9.50b, which I'm planning on trying tomorrow. -Chris The Java plugin is an interesting one. I don't see why the Java NPAPI plugin hasn't been ported to 64-bit systems. Konqueror uses a Java hack as far as I am aware, calling the java executable direcly and embedding it directly into an X region on the display. I wonder how hard it would be to hack a wrapper plugin to do that natively. -- rob andrews :: pgp 0x5c205974 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Christopher Judd, Ph. D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
