Re: a lot of broken packages in apt
Andrei Mikhailovsky a écrit : Hello debian users, I am using pure64/sid. For the past week or so I am experiencing upgrading problems. A lot of packages are not being updated due to dependency issues. Is there a known problem that hasn't been fixed? - apt-get dist-upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Calculating Upgrade... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: base-files bash cupsomatic-ppd deborphan foomatic-db foomatic-db-engine foomatic-db-hpijs foomatic-filters foomatic-filters-ppds gnome gnome-desktop-environment gnome-volume-manager hal hal-device-manager hotplug libplanner1-0 mailx mkrboot mysql-server udev The following packages have been kept back: openoffice.org-debian-files The following packages will be upgraded: apache2 apache2-common apache2-mpm-prefork apache2-utils cupsys cupsys-bsd cupsys-client exim4-base exim4-daemon-light gpm libapr0 libc6 libc6-dev libcupsimage2 libcupsys2-dev libcupsys2-gnutls10 libgpmg1 libnspr-dev libnspr4 libnss-dev libnss3 libscrollkeeper0 locales mozilla-browser mozilla-dev mozilla-firefox mozilla-firefox-gnome-support mozilla-psm nscd pkg-config planner scrollkeeper WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing! base-files bash 32 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 20 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/52.6MB of archives. After unpacking 46.8MB disk space will be freed. You are about to do something potentially harmful To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!' ?] n Abort. --- Does anyone know how to fix this? I don't know any way to fix this, but I have the same issue here. If you don't need exim, just uninstalled it and everything will be fined. If you need exim... Then I don't know. I have uninstalled it, and am currently running libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 If I want to install exim4, it will upgrade libc6, and base-file depends to libc6 < 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 which causes the trouble. Hope it may help Julien Tailleur -- Julien Tailleur Phd Student PMMH - UMR 7636 ESPCI 10 rue Vauquelin 75231 Paris Cedex 5 - FRANCE Phone : (+33) 1 40 79 47 16 Fax : (+33) 1 40 79 45 23 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wesnoth in unstable
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, NaiosKAE{FR} wrote:
I can't make it work too
--
Erwann PENCREACH
Thanks for your answer. Well the package is broken, and one has to compile
it from the sources to get it work - which I eventually did.
Bye
Julien Tailleur
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amd64 into mainstream
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Christopher Browne wrote: As far as I can see, the main merit of Ubuntu isn't anything to do with "desktop" support, but rather to do with the fact that it is several years more up to date than Debian/stable. and with the fact that installing Ubuntu is possible for my mother, while I had to visit her to install Debian Sarge :-) By the way I never understood why the debian community never released a "nice" installation menu... It may well be that there is room for two systems: 1. Debian, as the "grand collector of package updates," and 2. Ubuntu, as the folks that actually create release candidates on some reasonably regular schedule. That's true, but it could also be the case of Stable/sarge vs sid. Anyway this would implie a compatibility between ubuntu packages and debian packages, and it already seems that some ubuntu packages can't be install on Sarge, even if I have not checked personaly the later, and may be spreading rumors founded by debian fundamentalist :-) Best Julien Tailleur -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wesnoth in unstable
Can anyone use last wesnoth version? I can use it under debian sid (not amd64) withtout issue, but it fails to start under amd64 with the really usefull message: Battle for Wesnoth v0.9.0 Started on Mon Apr 18 19:36:16 2005 started game: 1449246887 Abandon It used to work before my last update, and the 32 bit version is still working. If it fails to work on someone computer which has a working chroot, can you try the 32 bit version? Thanks -- Julien Tailleur Phd Student PMMH - UMR 7636 ESPCI 10 rue Vauquelin 75231 Paris Cedex 5 - FRANCE Phone : (+33) 1 40 79 47 16 Fax : (+33) 1 40 79 45 23 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: java plugin for firefox
Julien Tailleur a écrit : Hi, under my old 32 bit AMD, I was running debian and had no trouble to use the java runtime environment plugin for firefox. I had downloaded and installed the .bin from blackdown and made the sym link /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugin/libjavaplugin_oji.so -> /usr/local/.../libjavaplugin_oji.so I tryed to follow the same protocol with my new amd64 system (both for sun java and blackdown java), but without success: ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugins/ total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 2005-03-16 08:26 libjavaplugin_oji.so -> /usr/local/jre1.5.0/lib/amd64/libjava.so The link was of course not directed to the "right" file. There is no "plugin" directory in sun java 1.5.0, so I installed blackdown java, wondering wether I had just made the same mistake. It seems I had since the plugin is working perfectly... Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
java plugin for firefox
Hi, under my old 32 bit AMD, I was running debian and had no trouble to use the java runtime environment plugin for firefox. I had downloaded and installed the .bin from blackdown and made the sym link /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugin/libjavaplugin_oji.so -> /usr/local/.../libjavaplugin_oji.so I tryed to follow the same protocol with my new amd64 system (both for sun java and blackdown java), but without success: ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugins/ total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 2005-03-16 08:26 libjavaplugin_oji.so -> /usr/local/jre1.5.0/lib/amd64/libjava.so the about:plugins page of firefox stays empty of any sign of any java plugin. Any guess? Julien Tailleur -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
