Re: flash 9
Hadn't thought of this! Now it works... Thanks!! El Domingo, 22 de Octubre de 2006 03:32, escribió: Flash Player 9 uses ALSA where the old versions used OSS. Try installing alsa-base in your chroot. On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:38:54 +0100 Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, with the new flash plugin 9 beta, I don't have sound in my 32-bit chroot. However I'm able to play sounds with old flash 7 plugin... Anyone has experimented the same situation? BTW, I'm using the debs @ deb http://3v1n0.tuxfamily.org dapper 3v1n0 TIA, -- Rafael Rodríguez http://unrincon.blogspot.com http://cornerofcode.blogspot.com -- Rafael Rodríguez http://unrincon.blogspot.com http://cornerofcode.blogspot.com
flash 9
Hi, with the new flash plugin 9 beta, I don't have sound in my 32-bit chroot. However I'm able to play sounds with old flash 7 plugin... Anyone has experimented the same situation? BTW, I'm using the debs @ deb http://3v1n0.tuxfamily.org dapper 3v1n0 TIA, -- Rafael Rodríguez http://unrincon.blogspot.com http://cornerofcode.blogspot.com
One more time, openoffice :)
Hi,there are experimental ubuntu amd64-native packages for OpenOffice according to [1]. Apart from that, a couple of days ago non-official packages (re-built from the debian unstable sources) were posted in this list, but I haven't had the time to test them quite a lot. In fact, I have a bug: the first time I start OpenOffice, it crashes, but the second time it works... ?¿ Anyway, anyone knows the state of the former and the latter, or the plans? Rene, are you alive? ;)Greets,Rafael Rodríguez[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/199390/
Re: One more time, openoffice :)
On 9/21/06, Emmanuel Fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rafael Rodríguez wrote: 1) Get the source from the experimental Debian repository (getting the sources from the experimental makes it sure to track bugs on the very last version): apt-get source -t experimental openoffice.org 2) Move to the build directory: cd openoffice-* 3) Build the package (this might take quite a while): dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc Just a note to say that I think it's the same 'apt-get -b source -t experimental openoffice.org' and it makes it easier (1 step instead of those 3) ;) Rafael Rodríguez
Re: Some very experimental packages
Downloading OO right now.. I guess it's rebuilt from the sources in Experimental, right? Thnk you! El Domingo, 17 de Septiembre de 2006 10:59, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson escribió: Hi I have been making some packages because of need and curiousity and I am keeping them on my private server: deb http://mve035.mc2.chalmers.se/~gudjon/debian/amd64/ ./ The following packages can be found kdenlive (The mlt library needs to be compiled with the --disable-motion_est option so some functionality is lost but everything else seems to work). I will suggest to Marillat that he adds the amd64 to the list of supported platform. (Unless you prove me wrong:) gnuplot 4.1 (There is much to much new useful function to wait for that program) wxmaxima (This package is recompiled and it can even factorise 10!. Refer to older mails on the list) You need to install maxima and wxmaxima to try it out. openoffice.org 2.0.4 (More for fun but please use it and report bugs where they shall go to) ngspice and easyspice (These have been quite useful to me) If you find it interesting, please remember that you are using it at your own risk. I will spend more time on it during Christmas. (Now I need to do some real work). Regards Gudjon -- Rafael Rodríguez http://unrincon.blogspot.com http://cornerofcode.blogspot.com
Re: KDE being removed?
If you intend to use KDE, yes. El Lunes, 28 de Agosto de 2006 16:58, edwardsa escribió: I was doing an dist-upgrade and kde was being removed. Should I be concerned? -- Rafael Rodríguez http://unrincon.blogspot.com http://cornerofcode.blogspot.com
[OT] about naming schemes
Hi, just for the sake of curiosity, in experimental there are many packages with version numbers containing j: gcj-4.1 (4.1.1-10 = 4.1.1-11j1) gcj-4.1-base (4.1.1-10 = 4.1.1-11j1) gij-4.1 (4.1.1-10 = 4.1.1-11j1) What does j stand for? I can't find anything in the changelogs. Is it something related to the recent etch toolchain freeze? Regards, -- Rafael Rodríguez http://unrincon.blogspot.com http://cornerofcode.blogspot.com
Re: Flash in firefox on amd64 -- revisted?
El Lunes, 21 de Agosto de 2006 21:45, Robert Isaac escribió: HA! They also said they'd release an 8.5 player for GNU/Linux. I'll believe it when I see it. But now they have devels working on it and blogging about it http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/ Regards, -- Rafael Rodríguez http://unrincon.blogspot.com http://cornerofcode.blogspot.com
ndiswrapper screwed up again?
Hi,i've upgraded yesterday to ndiswrapper 1.22 in sid, and upon loading it oopses my kernel. Anyone with the same problem?I'm using a Broadcom chip in my HP laptop and can provide backtraces if someone's is interested... Rafael Rodríguez
ndiswrapper screwed up again?
I'm using 2.6.17-ck1, and the driver still doesn't work for me :)I haven't really thought about it that much due to its alpha state, but it loads and detects my wlan BUT won't associate with any AP. So waiting for 2.6.18... That probably won't be out until the end of the month (or even September) because Linus is on holidays for three weeks ;)Rafael Rodríguez On 8/9/06, Hans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Mittwoch, 9. August 2006 12:41 schrieb Rafael Rodríguez: Hi, i've upgraded yesterday to ndiswrapper 1.22 in sid, and upon loading it oopses my kernel. Anyone with the same problem? I'm using a Broadcom chip in my HP laptop and can provide backtraces if someone's is interested... Rafael RodríguezDid you try kernel 2.6.17 ? It has native WLAN Broadcomdriver shipped with, and it is running fine. No more ndiswrapper needed.The native driver has some advantages, as I found out. You can use somesoftware eith it, which could not b eused, if you use wlan with ndiswrapper.Just check the kernel, good luck ! Best regardsHans--To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firefox ugly fonts
same here :( El Domingo, 30 de Julio de 2006 12:40, antongiulio05 escribió: includeconf.d/no-bitmaps.conf/include It doesn't work for me. .fonts.conf file was already existing in my $HOME: ?xml version=1.0? !DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM fonts.dtd fontconfig dir~/.fonts/dir match target=font edit mode=assign name=hinting booltrue/bool /edit /match match target=font edit mode=assign name=hintstyle consthintfull/const /edit /match match target=font edit mode=assign name=rgba const/const /edit /match /fontconfig and I have modified it to: ?xml version=1.0? !DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM fonts.dtd fontconfig includeconf.d/no-bitmaps.conf/include /fontconfig However not only firefox fonts are ugly, but every KDE/GNOME app... Giulio -- Rafael Rodríguez http://unrincon.blogspot.com
firefox ugly fonts
Hi, since yesterday's update to sid (both chroot and main installation), firefox fonts look just awful (i'm using kde). Any hints on this? -- Rafael Rodríguez http://unrincon.blogspot.com
Re: native 32 bit binaries on amd64
El Jueves, 15 de Junio de 2006 20:10, jmt escribió: alias googleearth='dchroot -c ia32 -d /home/jmt/local/bin/googleearth' In fact, i installed Google Earth in my 64bit environment and works flawlessly... -- Rafael Rodríguez http://unrincon.blogspot.com
Re: sources.list ???
El Miércoles, 31 de Mayo de 2006 07:23, Dean Hamstead escribió: ahh ok, so unstable amd64 is now in the main arcvices For next year SoC, why not a script to analyze messages to mailing lists and if the topic has been so repeated during last weeks and months, filter it? :PP -- Rafael Rodríguez http://unrincon.blogspot.com
xlibs?
Hi,
there has been no xlibs package for x.org 7.0 in the recent transition. For
the description it seems it's obsolete, however:
# LANG=C aptitude purge xlibs
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
Building tag database... Done
The following packages are BROKEN:
lsb-graphics
The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED:
xcursor-themes xlibs-data
The following packages have been kept back:
nvidia-glx-ia32
The following packages will be REMOVED:
xlibs{p}
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 3 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 7320kB will be freed.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
lsb-graphics: Depends: xlibs but it is not installable
Resolving dependencies...
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
Remove the following packages:
lsb
lsb-desktop
lsb-graphics
lsb-qt4
Any hints?
Rafael Rodríguez
Re: Xorg 7.0
Hi, here it has upgraded correctly: $ apt-cache policy xserver-xorg xserver-xorg: Instalados: 1:7.0.10 Candidato: 1:7.0.10 Tabla de versión: *** 1:7.0.10 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status *BUT* it's getting me into troubles...right now, my alt-gr doesn't seem to work... anyone has experienced the same problem? BTW, i have a laptop... Rafael Rodríguez El Jueves, 13 de Abril de 2006 07:40, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson escribió: Hi Excuse me for my stupidity but I made the mistake of installing xorg 7.0 despite warnings just to find out there is no xserver-xorg. Does anyone know for how long I might have to wait or should I start the non-trivial task of downgrate Xorg? Regards Gudjon
Re: Xorg 7.0
Doesn't seem to work here... :( El Jueves, 13 de Abril de 2006 11:40, Harald Wenninger escribió: * Am Donnerstag, den 13. Apr 2006 um 10:34, schrieb Rafael Rodríguez: I've seen Bug#362112, but in my case i've installed xkb-data and reconfigured and alt-gr still fails... ln -sf /etc/X11/xkb /usr/share/X11/xkb helps. Greetings, Harald
Re: Xorg 7.0
# setxkbmap -rules xorg -model pc85 -layout es bash: setxkbmap: command not found # apt-cache policy xbase-clients xbase-clients: Instalados: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 Candidato: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 Tabla de versión: *** 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status So maybe when xbase-clients 7.0 enters the repository, all my problems will be gone? :P Rafael Rodríguez El Jueves, 13 de Abril de 2006 12:47, Cyril Chaboisseau escribió: Le 13 April vers 11:48, Rafael Rodríguez écrivait: Doesn't seem to work here... :( El Jueves, 13 de Abril de 2006 11:40, Harald Wenninger escribió: * Am Donnerstag, den 13. Apr 2006 um 10:34, schrieb Rafael Rodríguez: I've seen Bug#362112, but in my case i've installed xkb-data and reconfigured and alt-gr still fails... ln -sf /etc/X11/xkb /usr/share/X11/xkb maybe try this after you've done the link : setxkbmap -rules xorg -model pc105 -layout fr (if you're in french mapping) -- Cyril Chaboisseau
Re: Xorg 7.0
I would calm down for a couple of days if i were you, seeing the problems that I'm having (and others as well) Rafael Rodríguez El Jueves, 13 de Abril de 2006 12:57, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) escribió: Le 13.04.2006 10:59:07, Rafael Rodríguez a écrit : Hi, here it has upgraded correctly: $ apt-cache policy xserver-xorg xserver-xorg: Instalados: 1:7.0.10 Candidato: 1:7.0.10 Tabla de versión: *** 1:7.0.10 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main Packages It is strange, with the same repository, xserver-xorg doesnt upgrade due to dependancies problems. [EMAIL PROTECTED] % sudo apt-get install xserver-xorg Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: xserver-xorg: Depends: xserver-xorg-core but it is not going to be installed Depends: xserver-xorg-video-all but it is not going to be installed or xserver-xorg-video but it is not installable Depends: xserver-xorg-input-all but it is not going to be installed or xserver-xorg-input but it is not installable E: Broken packages Jean-Luc
openoffice good news
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kendy/blog/archives/monthly/2006-04.html#2006-04-10T20_53_15.htm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: nvidia building from source (2.6.15)
mmm... btw... for the ones that don't use DRI at all.. is there any single advantage of nvidia propietary driver over nv? Rafael Rodríguez El Jueves, 6 de Abril de 2006 14:55, Lennart Sorensen escribió: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 02:37:36PM -0700, David Liontooth wrote: I ran nvidia 7676 for 2.6.14, but had to upgrade to 8178-3 for 2.6.16. Not sure about 2.6.15. To build the package, I install nvidia-kernel-source, cd /usr/src/linux (where I have the kernel) and make-kpkg -rev 1 modules_image Works beautifully. m-a -t a-i -k /usr/src/linux nvidia Should also have done the job (including install the package). The -k might even be optional if already running the kernel. Len Sorensen
stupid recent problem (chroot related)
Hi, i've been using skype through a chroot for months, with an icon in the desktop with the associated command: /usr/bin/dchroot -d /home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype but now it has stopped working: /usr/bin/dchroot -d /home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype (ia32) /home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype /home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype: /home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype: cannot execute binary file dchroot: Child exited non-zero. dchroot: Operation failed. However: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18$ dchroot Executing shell in 'ia32' chroot. (ia32)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18$ ./skype works flawlessly. any hints? Rafael Rodríguez
Re: stupid recent problem (chroot related)
Working now thanks!!! :) El Lunes, 3 de Abril de 2006 23:41, Sylvain Archenault escribió: Well maybe, it comes from a problem in the dchroot package. I have problem with open office and the same with skype. Downgrading to login_4.0.15-1 fix it. A fix should be available in a few days. My post : http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2006/04/msg00020.html Rafael Rodríguez wrote: Hi, i've been using skype through a chroot for months, with an icon in the desktop with the associated command: /usr/bin/dchroot -d /home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype but now it has stopped working: /usr/bin/dchroot -d /home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype (ia32) /home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype /home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype: /home/user/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18/skype: cannot execute binary file dchroot: Child exited non-zero. dchroot: Operation failed. However: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18$ dchroot Executing shell in 'ia32' chroot. (ia32)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/downloads/skype-1.2.0.18$ ./skype works flawlessly. any hints? Rafael Rodríguez -- Sylvain Archenault
Re: eclipse
2006/3/29, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So, basicly, until someone actually uploads a version with a build depedency on bzip2. OIC... so writing 5 chars is taking to mantainers months... *sigh*...
eclipse
Hi, eclipse has been uninstallable in debian-amd64 for weeks. Anyone knows why or how long it will last approximately? :( Rafael Rodríguez
Re: fam uses 100% of CPU problem
I had LOTS of problems with fam and libfam. Since i moved to gamin and libgamin0 (they cover the same dependencies), it works like a charm. Rafael Rodríguez El Lunes, 13 de Marzo de 2006 21:41, Graham Smith escribió: On Monday 13 March 2006 10:16, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: Hi Tobias, On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 09:47 +0100, Tobias Krais wrote: Hi Joost, I am experiencing problems with fam, using 100% of CPU (actually 50% as I have 2 processors ;-)). There is already a bug report for this (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252896) . Can anyone tell me which programs depend on fam or why it is installed? Can I safely uninstall the program? I just uninstalled it. My system still works :-) That does not really surprise me, as the account under which fam runs is an ordinary user account. So I don't expect it to be system critical. But assuming that there is reason why it is installed, do you have any idea what program is not functioning as it should be because fam is not running? Fam did this on one of my boxes. I eventually tried writing a script to kill and restart it when it started consuming 100% of the CPU time but I never got it to work correctly. Anyway after much research I concluded that no one really knew what was wrong and no one was looking at fixing it - I removed fam. Nothing stopped working but konqueror no longer detects changes to the file system as quickly as it did before. As I understand it this is because it now has to poll rather than simply listen t fam. Graham -- Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 fax: 024-3608416 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.askesis.nl
Re: Splashy on AMD64
Last time i checked it out, it was apt-geteable from the amd64 debian experimental repos Rafael Rodríguez 2006/2/20, Tony Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, Splashy gives you a nice graphical display and progress bar as your system boots. https://alioth.debian.org/projects/splashy/ I was able to get it to compile, install and run on my dual AMD64 machine - and the fix was posted to svn. svn co svn://svn.debian.org/splashy cd splashy/ cp -a trunk splashy-0.1.8.svn2 cp -a trunk splashy-0.1.8.svn2.orig cd splashy-0.1.8.svn2 ./autogen.sh --prefix=/ debuild -uc -us sudo dpkg -i ../splashy_0.1.8.svn2_amd64.deb sudo dpkg -i ../splashy-themes_0.1.8.svn2_all.deb I like the debian3 theme, so I sym linked it as the default theme: cd /etc/splasy/themes/ sudo rm -rf default sudo ln -s debian3 default There is a command line to see what the theme will look like without having to reboot. Press F2 to exit: sudo splashy test There is one small problem which maybe someone here can help with: the background image shows OK for a few seconds then blanks out while the system is booting; however, the progress bar continues to operate as it should until GDM takes over. Things would be perfect if the background image would not blank out. Maybe it's just me? Could someone else please install and as see if you get the same behavior? Thanks. -- Tony -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Openoffice 2.0.1
mmm... mikmak, one question... Now, everytime i do an upgrade, apt keeps upgrading openoffice.org-common openoffice.org-java-common openoffice.org-l10n-en-us all the time, to the same versions... How can i avoid that? why is this? Rafael Rodríguez
Debianized 2.6.15 + ndiswrapper = kernel panic
Hi, i've upgraded my kernel to linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8 It booted with no problems and then i compiled ndiswrapper with module-assistant. But when i modprobe'd it, kernel panic :) Any hints? Rafael Rodríguez
Re: Debianized 2.6.15 + ndiswrapper = kernel panic
El Martes, 10 de Enero de 2006 14:53, thierry escribió: Which ndiswrapper version did yopu use? It worked perfect on amd64-k8 sarge and etch on my systems. I used ndiswrapper from sources version 1.7. Thierry externillo-debian:/home/apt-drink# apt-cache policy ndiswrapper-source ndiswrapper-source: Instalados: 1.5-1 Candidato: 1.5-1 Tabla de versión: *** 1.5-1 0 500 http://amd64.debian.net sid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Re: Debianized 2.6.15 + ndiswrapper = kernel panic
El Martes, 10 de Enero de 2006 15:43, thierry escribió: Oh, watch out too, starting with ndiswrapper-1.5 you have to desinstall, reinstall your drivers if you had any previously installed with a lower version. I suppose too that you know for sure your card is supported by ndiswrapper? Thierry I don't know if this one went for me :P I have a broadcom which works with debianized 2.6.14, but not with 2.6.15 (kernel panic when loading the module). Rafael Rodríguez
Re: Debianized 2.6.15 + ndiswrapper = kernel panic
El Martes, 10 de Enero de 2006 16:36, Koen Vermeer escribió: Same here. ndiswrapper=1.5 gives me that reset error, and kernel 2.6.15 results in a crash. I haven't tested the combination of ndiswrapper=1.5 and kernel 2.6.15; I guess it'll either work, or the universe will explode :-) Koen So we just have to wait for 1.7 to be in debian, and stick with 2.6.14 until that happens :) Rafa
Re: Openoffice 2.0.1
So finally our particular amd64 Santa has come to town :D is it apt-geteable?? Rafael Rodríguez El Martes, 10 de Enero de 2006 18:08, Mickael Marchand escribió: wow, what a surprise ! I've built the packages using your patch, and openoffice compile and _works_ just fine (I initially just wanted to see what was broken ;) I am currently uploading the packages I've built to a faster server (ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/) so other people can test and confirm I am not going crazy or doing some mistake :) you will need to install gcj-4.1 from experimental to be able to get these packages (or maybe it was gcc-4.1, I have both ...) thanks Emmanuel for the tip ;) btw, I did not got your error Emmanuel, it just built fine, maybe you had an incomplete build laying around before ? Cheers, Mik Emmanuel Fleury a écrit : Hi all, I have some problem to build the debian package of OpenOffice 2.0.1. Here is what I do: 1) Add the experimental repository in my /etc/apt/sources.list: # Debian Experimental repository (sources) deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian experimental main 2) Get the sources: apt-get source -t experimental openoffice.org 3) Get the build dependancies: su -c 'apt-get build-dep openoffice.org' 4) Move to the directory: cd openoffice-2.0.1/ 5) Apply the patch attached to this mail: patch -p1 ../compile_openoffice_x86_64.diff 6) Build the sources: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc 7) Wait :) At the end, I got all the sources compiled but I get the following errors: # generate maintainer scripts from *.in # or generate default script which calls hook in openoffice.org-debian-files package for PKG in `dh_listpackages`; do \ for FILE in postinst postrm preinst prerm; do \ MAINTSCRIPT=debian/$PKG.$FILE ; \ if [ -e $MAINTSCRIPT.in ]; then \ sed -n '1,/^#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#$/p' $MAINTSCRIPT.in | sed -e '/^#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#$/d' $MAINTSCRIPT; \ grep LIBSUFFIX debian/scripts/vars.amd64 $MAINTSCRIPT; \ cat debian/shell-lib.sh $MAINTSCRIPT; \ sed -n '/^#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#$/,$p' $MAINTSCRIPT.in | sed -e '/^#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#$/d' $MAINTSCRIPT; \ else \ echo '#!/bin/sh' $MAINTSCRIPT ; \ echo THIS_PACKAGE=$PKG $MAINTSCRIPT ;\ echo THIS_SCRIPT=$FILE $MAINTSCRIPT ;\ cat debian/shell-lib.sh $MAINTSCRIPT; \ fi; \ done; \ done grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory touch debian/stampdir/maintscripts /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules DH_OPTIONS=-Npython-uno -Nopenoffice.org-gcj -Nopenoffice.org-hunspell -Nopenoffice.org-filter-so52 -s binary-common make[1]: Entering directory `/home/fleury/devel/projects/openoffice/openoffice.org-2.0.1-2' dh_testdir dh_testdir: I have no package to build make[1]: *** [binary-common] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/fleury/devel/projects/openoffice/openoffice.org-2.0.1-2' make: *** [debian/stampdir/binary-arch] Error 2 I think I did set BUILD_AMD64 to 'y' in debian/rules, but I'm not sure. :-/ Can somebody help me to complete this patch ? Regards -- Emmanuel Fleury First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi diff -ruN openoffice.org-2.0.1/debian/rules openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/debian/rules --- openoffice.org-2.0.1/debian/rules 2006-01-01 15:27:14.0 +0100 +++ openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/debian/rules 2006-01-10 08:18:48.0 +0100 @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ endif ifeq $(ARCH) amd64 +BUILD_AMD64=y BUILD_PYUNO=n else BUILD_PYUNO=y diff -ruN openoffice.org-2.0.1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply --- openoffice.org-2.0.1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply 2006-01-01 15:27:13.0 +0100 +++ openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply 2006-01-03 21:46:10.0 +0100 @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ DebianBase : LinuxCommon, SystemDB, DebianBaseOnly Debian : DebianBase, DebianOnly, DebianSidOnly DebianSarge : DebianBase, DebianOnly, DebianSargeOnly -Debian64 : DebianBase, 64bit, DebianOnly +Debian64 : Debian, 64bit # # DroplineGNOME # @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ [ BuildBits ] # work around http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22392 -powerpc
Re: Openoffice 2.0.1
I'll never learn to try before asking... #oo 2.0 deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./ El Martes, 10 de Enero de 2006 18:42, Rafael Rodríguez escribió: So finally our particular amd64 Santa has come to town :D is it apt-geteable?? Rafael Rodríguez El Martes, 10 de Enero de 2006 18:08, Mickael Marchand escribió: wow, what a surprise ! I've built the packages using your patch, and openoffice compile and _works_ just fine (I initially just wanted to see what was broken ;) I am currently uploading the packages I've built to a faster server (ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/) so other people can test and confirm I am not going crazy or doing some mistake :) you will need to install gcj-4.1 from experimental to be able to get these packages (or maybe it was gcc-4.1, I have both ...) thanks Emmanuel for the tip ;) btw, I did not got your error Emmanuel, it just built fine, maybe you had an incomplete build laying around before ? Cheers, Mik Emmanuel Fleury a écrit : Hi all, I have some problem to build the debian package of OpenOffice 2.0.1. Here is what I do: 1) Add the experimental repository in my /etc/apt/sources.list: # Debian Experimental repository (sources) deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian experimental main 2) Get the sources: apt-get source -t experimental openoffice.org 3) Get the build dependancies: su -c 'apt-get build-dep openoffice.org' 4) Move to the directory: cd openoffice-2.0.1/ 5) Apply the patch attached to this mail: patch -p1 ../compile_openoffice_x86_64.diff 6) Build the sources: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc 7) Wait :) At the end, I got all the sources compiled but I get the following errors: # generate maintainer scripts from *.in # or generate default script which calls hook in openoffice.org-debian-files package for PKG in `dh_listpackages`; do \ for FILE in postinst postrm preinst prerm; do \ MAINTSCRIPT=debian/$PKG.$FILE ; \ if [ -e $MAINTSCRIPT.in ]; then \ sed -n '1,/^#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#$/p' $MAINTSCRIPT.in | sed -e '/^#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#$/d' $MAINTSCRIPT; \ grep LIBSUFFIX debian/scripts/vars.amd64 $MAINTSCRIPT; \ cat debian/shell-lib.sh $MAINTSCRIPT; \ sed -n '/^#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#$/,$p' $MAINTSCRIPT.in | sed -e '/^#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#$/d' $MAINTSCRIPT; \ else \ echo '#!/bin/sh' $MAINTSCRIPT ; \ echo THIS_PACKAGE=$PKG $MAINTSCRIPT ;\ echo THIS_SCRIPT=$FILE $MAINTSCRIPT ;\ cat debian/shell-lib.sh $MAINTSCRIPT; \ fi; \ done; \ done grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory touch debian/stampdir/maintscripts /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules DH_OPTIONS=-Npython-uno -Nopenoffice.org-gcj -Nopenoffice.org-hunspell -Nopenoffice.org-filter-so52 -s binary-common make[1]: Entering directory `/home/fleury/devel/projects/openoffice/openoffice.org-2.0.1-2' dh_testdir dh_testdir: I have no package to build make[1]: *** [binary-common] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/fleury/devel/projects/openoffice/openoffice.org-2.0.1-2' make: *** [debian/stampdir/binary-arch] Error 2 I think I did set BUILD_AMD64 to 'y' in debian/rules, but I'm not sure. :-/ Can somebody help me to complete this patch ? Regards -- Emmanuel Fleury First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi --- - diff -ruN openoffice.org-2.0.1/debian/rules openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/debian/rules --- openoffice.org-2.0.1/debian/rules 2006-01-01 15:27:14.0 +0100 +++ openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/debian/rules 2006-01-10 08:18:48.0 +0100 @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ endif ifeq $(ARCH) amd64 +BUILD_AMD64=y BUILD_PYUNO=n else BUILD_PYUNO=y diff -ruN openoffice.org-2.0.1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply --- openoffice.org-2.0.1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply 2006-01-01 15:27:13.0 +0100 +++ openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply 2006-01-03 21:46:10.0 +0100 @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ DebianBase : LinuxCommon, SystemDB, DebianBaseOnly Debian : DebianBase
Re: such a good news about flash...!!!
Yeah, but i can't stop dreaming with having 64-bit OO 2.0 and Flash in the near future and removing the chroot... x) El Viernes, 30 de Diciembre de 2005 21:19, Stephen Olander Waters escribió: Setting up the dchroot thing in the Debian AMD64 How-to was immensely easy and helpful. https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html Using flash with 32-bit Firefox works like a charm. -s
such a good news about flash...!!!
flash 8.5 for linux (with 64 bit support) really soon! http://www.kaourantin.net/2005/12/flash-player-8-for-linux-update.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: such a good news about flash...!!!
Well, but we _do have_ a plan, haven't we? :P El Jueves, 29 de Diciembre de 2005 13:07, Sven Krahn escribió: But still no time plan for 64bit support... On 12/29/05, Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: flash 8.5 for linux (with 64 bit support) really soon! http://www.kaourantin.net/2005/12/flash-player-8-for-linux-update.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards / Mit den besten Grüssen Sven Krahn
Re: such a good news about flash...!!!
Yeah, well... we... the community... the devels for the users... :P El Jueves, 29 de Diciembre de 2005 13:44, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) escribió: Le 29.12.2005 14:24:39, Rafael Rodríguez a écrit : Well, but we _do have_ a plan, haven't we? :P Do _you_ ? El Jueves, 29 de Diciembre de 2005 13:07, Sven Krahn escribió: But still no time plan for 64bit support... On 12/29/05, Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: flash 8.5 for linux (with 64 bit support) really soon! http://www.kaourantin.net/2005/12/flash-player-8-for-linux-update.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards / Mit den besten Grüssen Sven Krahn
why new packages take so long to enter?
Hi. Many days ago two packages in sid caught my eye: firefox (a replacement for the new mozilla-firefox package) and update-notifier. However, a couple of weeks later, they still haven't hit amd64's sid. Why is this? TIA, Rafael Rodríguez
OO 2.0 released
Anyone knows amd64 status? Regards, Rafael Rodríguez
Re: amd64 bootsplash howto
apt-get install -t experimental splashy El Jueves, 15 de Septiembre de 2005 15:00, Andrei Mikhailovsky escribió: Hello debian users, I am wondering if anyone managed to get graphical bootsplash to work with amd64. I've followed the howto, but the compilation of bootsplash package gives me the following error: gcc -Os -Wall -I/usr/include/freetype2 -c -o mng.o mng.c mng.c: In function 'copyline': mng.c:231: error: invalid lvalue in increment mng.c:282: error: invalid lvalue in increment make[1]: *** [mng.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bootsplash/bootsplash-3.1/Utilities' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 debuild: fatal error at line 765: The rest of the packages seems to compile and install fine, including kernel patches and sysv scripts. I've also read that there is splashy package for debian that takes care of the graphical boot process. There is an experimental version for debian i386 and some other platforms. However, i couldn't find splashy for amd64. Has anyone played with it on amd64. Many thanks for all the help Andrei
Re: new 2.6.13 kernel
Sorry, but i use vanilla kernels (plus ck patchsets). U are not going to see a debianized kernel that fast after the official release, r u? Rafael Rodríguez El Jueves, 1 de Septiembre de 2005 19:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Did you download it from www.kernel.org? Is there a debian source package? Could you tell me the url in that circumstance? tnx! Rafael Rodríguez ha scritto: Hi. In the new kernel, when make oldconfig'ing, i've seen a new option: Preemption Model 1. No Forced Preemption (Server) (PREEMPT_NONE) (NEW) 2. Voluntary Kernel Preemption (Desktop) (PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY) (NEW) 3. Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop) (PREEMPT) Does anyone know if it's already safe to select a preemptive kernel in amd64¿ Regards, Rafael Rodríguez
new 2.6.13 kernel
Hi. In the new kernel, when make oldconfig'ing, i've seen a new option: Preemption Model 1. No Forced Preemption (Server) (PREEMPT_NONE) (NEW) 2. Voluntary Kernel Preemption (Desktop) (PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY) (NEW) 3. Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop) (PREEMPT) Does anyone know if it's already safe to select a preemptive kernel in amd64¿ Regards, Rafael Rodríguez
Re: new 2.6.13 kernel
The same help of the option in kernels = 2.6.12 gave you a hint that it wasn't very safe in x86_64... however, i don't see any help at all in 2.6.13... Rafael Rodríguez El Lunes, 29 de Agosto de 2005 17:34, Ernest jw ter Kuile escribió: On Monday 29 August 2005 09:25, Rafael Rodríguez wrote: Does anyone know if it's already safe to select a preemptive kernel in amd64¿ If it wasn't save them I've had an unsafe kernel since I got myself an Amd64. Anyway, It never crashed on me, (that I know of). I and my pc is switched on nearly permanently. Ernest.
Re: mozilla-firefox 1.06 working for you?
El Jueves, 21 de Julio de 2005 20:12, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) escribió: Wait for the next release ;-) Or try Deer Park from experimental, but it's likely to crash even more lol however, some features it brings are nice ;)
Re: Filesystem stability?
Reiserfs in my amd64 laptop with no probs at all. El Martes, 12 de Julio de 2005 07:25, Cameron Patrick escribió: Mark Ferlatte wrote: What filesystems are you guys using, and anyone had any bad experiences? I'm a big fan of reiserfs but have heard problems with people using it on amd64 (and also alpha, which suggests it might be a general 64-bit cleanliness issue). Cameron.
[OT] Packages.gz shrinked?
Hi. Since apt has been upgraded, and gpg keys are being used, I've noticed quite smaller Packages.gz: Des:7 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main Packages [2622kB] I was used to 34xxkB... Why is this? Regards, Rafael Rodríguez
Re: OpenOffice.org
OO 2.0 was supposed to have 64 bits support. I've tried to build the OO beta in debian experimental with no success. Anyone has tried? Regards, Rafael Rodríguez El Sábado, 25 de Junio de 2005 22:34, Marcin Dębicki escribió: Pete kiedys napisal: Hi all, a quick and probably stupid question... I notice that OpenOffice.org is now listed in the packages in Sid for AMD64. Does this mean I can get rid of my chroot OpenOffice and use the real AMD64 one instead? Pete You should have installed ia32 libs. For more info read HOWTO for AMD64 Debian port -- Registered Linux User 369908 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: synaptics Touchpad and x.org
Er... I still have the xfree86-driver-synaptics debian package and works great.. :? Regards, Rafael Rodríguez El Viernes, 24 de Junio de 2005 07:59, Tobias Krais escribió: Hi together, I switched from xfree86 to x.org and I am searching for a synaptics touchpad driver for x.org. I googled, but I did not find any driver. How do you solve it? do you know a deb? Thanks for your help! Greetings, Tobias
Re: synaptics Touchpad and x.org
Erm.. when I upgraded to X.org with the packages posted to this list (Michael Marchand's ones) i already had xfree86-driver-synaptics installed. With the upgrade, xserver-xfree86 wasn't removed (in fact, i think it's the only thing that remains from xfree86 in my pc). The fact is that X.org works, synaptics works... everyone happy! :P I dunno why can't you simply install it... What's the output for apt-get install xserver-xfree86?? Regards, Rafael Rodríguez El Viernes, 24 de Junio de 2005 11:45, Tobias Krais escribió: Hi Rafael, Er... I still have the xfree86-driver-synaptics debian package and works great.. :? tuxbox:~# apt-get install xfree86-driver-synaptics Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: xfree86-driver-synaptics: Depends: xserver-xfree86 ( 4.1.0) E: Broken packages How did you get it to work? Greetings, Tobias
Re: CPU speed/freq
Been using ondemand for months now (since 2.6.10 IIRC). No oopses related to it. And haven't had to keep an eye on any daemon anymore :) Rafael Rodríguez El Martes, 14 de Junio de 2005 19:54, David Wood escribió: Does this work now? For many months, ondemand was a guaranteed OOPS within a matter of hours (if not minutes); I've been using cpufreq-userspace and the associated daemon. On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Rafael Rodríguez wrote: With recent kernels, that's better done with 'ondemand' governor, which controls, in kernelspace, cpu speed according to system load. BTW, kernel 2.6.12 is going to bring an even better governor for amd64 and laptops (and mine is both), named conservative. Regards, Rafael Rodríguez El Martes, 14 de Junio de 2005 18:08, antonio giulio escribió: Hi, is there a program for amd64 processor, to control its frequecny/speed (and change it) and temperature? I have tried any packages on repository but they seem not working (cpudyn, emifreq, cpufreqd). Thanks Giulio
Re: x.org binaries for amd64
dist-upgrade is supposed to work to change to x.org? Or does it coexist with xfree? Another question, how is that supposed to affect when debian switches to its own x.org packages? There could be transition problems, right? (anyway i'm eager to try...) Rafael Rodríguez El Lunes, 13 de Junio de 2005 20:15, Mickael Marchand escribió: deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/debian-amd64/ ./ works like a charm here for weeks now. it's 6.8.2 + patch from Suse I took from xorg bugzilla to cache some X generated stuff iirc (mkdir ~/.compose-cache/ to use the patch at runtime). The patch is supposed to speed up loading of apps ;) Cheers, Mik
Re: Debian AMD64 Sarge released
Any approximate time for that event? :) Rafael Rodríguez El Jueves, 9 de Junio de 2005 13:29, Joerg Jaspert escribió: We will continue to track these two releases until AMD64 is in Debian
Re: KDE 3.4.1 packages for amd64
My kmail 3.4.1 (alioth) segfaults all the time when deleting many mails in a row (that's pressing del a couple of seconds...). Didn't use to happen with 3.4.0 :( Regards, Rafael Rodríguez El Viernes, 3 de Junio de 2005 18:50, Theodore Kisner escribió: On Friday 03 June 2005 09:54, Andreas Richter wrote: I have installed packages from pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org and it looks great. It seems that the kde 3.4.1 packages working correct. ah yes- my mistake. There were no 3.4.0 packages for amd64, but I see that there *are* amd64 packages for 3.4.1. My apologies for the list traffic. -Ted
packages with kopete fix
Hi. I've just recompiled kdenetwork in order to make kopete usable again with MSN (rebuilding the latest ones from alioth) and they seem to work. If anyone wants to give them a try or space to upload them, just drop me a note ;) Regards, Rafael Rodríguez
Re: Debian AMD64 Archive Move
I don't know why some of you are making all that noise... if I have understood correctly, non-free will be made available after sarge release (which is supposed to happen within 3 or 4 weeks)... so... why bother the developers instead of thaking them for all the work they've already made? Regards, Rafael Rodríguez Goswin von Brederlow dijo: Ed Cogburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sunday 08 May 2005 9:27am, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 10283 March 1977, Ed Tomlinson wrote: Whats going on == someone needs to check it. Thats it. That was the point made by Ed Cogburn. Its already been checked in the other arch! If this is not the case please explain why. Without that explanation I am forced to agree with Ed - the problem are political... Which is the bane of debian. We are *NOT* Debian We ARE Debian for Heaven's sake! This move to another server is just TEMPORARY! We WILL be Debian as soon as sarge gets out and development on You said it yourself. etch picks up. Who in the world is going to get upset when they know we will soon be part of official Debian, and they've already given permission for Debian to distribute their stuff! Get real people! How many non-free packages have been cleared? Why haven't you at least set up non-free and moved the packages known to be ok into it? I know for sure that the rogue-like games in non-free are perfectly fine and can brought on-line now, since they and a lot of other stuff is in non-free just because they are old pre-GPL software with don't sell for money restrictions which make them fail the DFSG test on distribution, but are otherwise fully open-source (and who's earlier authors can no longer be found to ask them if they'd agree to a change to the GPL or some other Free license). In fact, looking through the non-free docs section, most of that can go in right now because they don't require anyone's permission to distribute since they're in non-free because of the dispute between Debian and FSF over documentation. Will you pay us for the work and cover legal fees if any should arise? Seriously, get some patience and don't inflame the situation please. Things like most of that is of zero help in deciding what can go in and what not. We know most of it can, the question is what packages are those in particular. We can't just add all of non-free and say it is mostly OK. thats all you need to get! Hogwash. This sounds like an extremely defensive response. How many packages have been cleared for non-free? Why haven't you just put up a non-free section with the stuff thats been cleared? Why has it been more than a week, with no non-free section at all, no indication of how the vetting process is going, and with you telling us above that we don't need to know anything more? Now do you understand why I'm just a little bit skeptical? We had (an empty) non-free right after the dns switch so apt-get wouldn't fail. And we told you exactly what the status is: Someone has to do the work. Just establish the non-free section and move everything over. If anyone complains then just drop the package they're complaining about. Of course, NO ONE is going to complain since they know we will become Debian soon anyway (and for all intents we ARE Debian - just not on their server), and they've already given Debian permission to distribute. For the rest of non-free, permission to distribute is not an issue, and not the reason they're in non-free to begin with. The pine author would for one thing. Re-evaluating non-free is just silly when we're going to officially become Debian again in a few months, certainly less than a year, anyway (assuming Debian gets Sarge out soon). Heck, Debian doesn't even advertise us, we're the bastard child they don't want to talk about, because when they do it reignites the argument about which architectures to officially support, and why... and why not. NO ONE IS GOING TO CARE ABOUT OUR NON-FREE! It will be at least 18 month going by the release plans till etch will be stable and sarge amd64 can be dropped. Considering the track record of past timelines 2-3 years is probably more accurate. That is a long time for someone to start suing. In one point you are right though: NO ONE IS GOING TO CARE ABOUT OUR NON-FREE! None of us anyway. With the exception of nvidia* package it seems. That is the only package that users missed so far. Please excuse us for not giving it higher priority than fixing RC bugs or otherwise vital archive maintainance. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kdm taking ages to start
Hi. Since i upgraded to amd64.debian.net (sid), kdm is taking ages to start. While loading, top shows kdm_greet going mad... Anyone has experienced the same problem? Any hints? TIA, Rafael Rodríguez
Re: kdm taking ages to start
El Viernes, 6 de Mayo de 2005 14:48, Modestas escribió: try running `fc-cache -fv` as root Thnks, that worked! Now i've only have to find out why xfree is pretending to take more than 100 Mb of mem at times :P Rafael Rodríguez
Re: kdm taking ages to start
Hopefully not... didn't happen. After opening a 1800-page pdf, RES of xfree stays in 26 mb. BTW, would be a rare test case for me (u haven't seen kpdf, have u? :D) Regards and thanks again, Rafael Rodrguez El Viernes, 6 de Mayo de 2005 15:44, Modestas escribi: 2005 m. Gegus 6 d., Penktadienis 17:18, Rafael Rodrguez ra: Thnks, that worked! Now i've only have to find out why xfree is pretending to take more than 100 Mb of mem at times :P Open a big pdf file ( 1000 pages) with gpdf and watch XFree86 memory usage (eg with top). If the value of the RES field increases like mad, I'll explain how to solve (actually, avoid) this problem.
Re: ISO not found?
When adding the new mirror. dist-upgrade wants to upgrade many installed packages... with ones of the same version! Example: ike:/home/apt-drink# apt-cache policy ttf-freefont ttf-freefont: Installed: 20031008-1.1 Candidate: 20031008-1.1 Version table: 20031008-1.1 0 500 http://amd64.debian.net sid/main Packages *** 20031008-1.1 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Any hints on why can this be happening? TIA, Rafael Rodríguez El Jueves, 5 de Mayo de 2005 12:51, Clive Menzies escribió: On (05/05/05 12:52), Emmanuel Doguet wrote: This URL http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/ doesn't work anymore. Any idea? If you check the mailing list archive for Subject: AMD64 Archive Move you'll see that the archive is on the move: As announced earlier the Debian AMD64 archive moved away from alioth the weekend from 30. April til today, 2. May. Yes, that is why there are so many days without updates. This is just a short information, and we are still evaluating the archive, so if you dont like the small chance to kill your system you maybe wait with a change until we sent out the full announce. We expect that to happen somewhere between now and Saturday night. It looks good for us, but we want to make sure it is fully working before we do something big with it. For the impatient here are the important things you need to know: - Modify /etc/apt/sources.list to read like deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ DIST main contrib and replace DIST with either sid or sarge (or testing/unstable), whatever you prefer to have. Thats it basically, now your system will do the right thing fetching the packages. Note: NO non-free is provided yet. We need to decide what we do with it, as some software in it may forbid us to distribute it (we arent Debian). Probably we will do a case-by-case study for things that we consider important and add them if license allows us to. We also intend to offer a push-mirror service for interested mirrors, so if you are an interested mirror admin please contact me and I will come back to you with further instructions, as soon as we are sure our archive is clean. Regards Clive -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business
alioth not updating
Hi. Its been several days since sid was latest updated for me. Is alioth not working, stopped from upgrading due to the new mirrors to come, or me missing something in the list? Regards, Rafael Rodríguez
Question for KDE 3.4 debs users (dbus-1)
Hi.My system is trying to upgrade dbus-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy dbus-1 dbus-1: Installed: 0.23.2-3qt1 Candidate: 0.23.4-1 According to the names (and to the fact that 0.23.2-3qt1 was downloaded from the location of the 3.4 debs, and 0.23.4-1 is available in the usual pure64 mirrors) i doubt it's safe to upgrade. Any hints? Rafael Rodríguez
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
Do u already have any feedback on those debs? I'm still without my amd64 laptop...sigh... :( Rafael Rodríguez Kalle Kivimaa dijo: Modestas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: They are available here: deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64/ ./ I guess they are for pure64. I guess so, the compiler which I used is gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-12) I'm not familiar with the difference of pure64 and gcc 3.4, just happily use the Debian amd64 port :) -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kde 3.4 amd64 debs?
Do u already have any feedback on those debs? I'm still without my amd64 laptop...sigh... :( Rafael Rodríguez Kalle Kivimaa dijo: Modestas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: They are available here: deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64/ ./ I guess they are for pure64. I guess so, the compiler which I used is gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-12) I'm not familiar with the difference of pure64 and gcc 3.4, just happily use the Debian amd64 port :) -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [AGAIN] kde 3.4 packages anybody?
So far, so good :) Just installed them and work as smooth as expected... many many thanks!! Rafael Rodríguez El Lunes, 28 de Marzo de 2005 12:38, Kalle Kivimaa escribió: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm currently compiling the stuff from source and will probably set up a binary repository (probably unsigned packages, so use at your own discretion). I'll let you know later where. OK, the packages are being uploaded to the following apt repository. Please wait a while for all the packages to get there, my upload speed from home isn't that hot. deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64 ./ I think I've included everything but in case I've missed something, just let me know and I'll add it. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer *
Re: [AGAIN] kde 3.4 packages anybody?
I'm afraid I won't be able to test them until next week, since my laptop is out for technical service :( Sorry! Rafael Rodríguez Kalle Kivimaa dijo: Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm currently compiling the stuff from source and will probably set up a binary repository (probably unsigned packages, so use at your own discretion). I'll let you know later where. OK, the packages are being uploaded to the following apt repository. Please wait a while for all the packages to get there, my upload speed from home isn't that hot. deb http://people.debian.org/~killer/amd64 ./ I think I've included everything but in case I've missed something, just let me know and I'll add it. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[AGAIN] kde 3.4 packages anybody?
From wiki.debian.net: KDE 3.4.0 will not enter sid until sarge is released. Now i _DO_ worry for having an alternative repository.. anyone with 64-bit packages? Regards, Rafael Rodríguez
amarok crashing
Hi. After upgrading today (and installing the long-awaited amarok 1.2), i can't use this app anymore. Crashes on startup :( Any hints? Regards, Rafael Rodríguez -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest kicker freezing randomly
Hi. I'm using the latest kde in pure64, and kicker freezes randomly upon pressing the K menu button. Anyone having the same problem? Regards, Rafael Rodríguez -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
k3b exploding
Hi. Whenever i open k3b and select new data CD, it crashes... any hints?¿ using 0.11.18 from sid (pure64) regards, Rafael Rodríguez
Scribus, kinda unusable
Hi. today i've tried to design some leaflets with scribus, and it crashes all the time... I don't know if it's a general issue (the version in sid is 1.2.0.final+cvs20041026-1) or it has to be with amd64... Anyone else has experienced this? Regards, Rafael Rodríguez
Re: nvidia drivers
sources.list attached :) I've been successfully using 2.6.9-ck3 with the drivers that lived in the mirrors... From which kernel version is supposed to be needed those patches? Regards, Rafael Rodríguez El Domingo, 19 de Diciembre de 2004 02:19, Mark Nipper escribió: On 18 Dec 2004, Rafael Rodr?guez wrote: Hi. In the usual apt-geteable nvidia drivers mirror i've found a nice message from its mantainer: AMD64 is now supported by the Debian Packages! However, in the amd64 mirrors i haven't found anything... hints? I'm running the Debian sid, gcc-3.4 branch currently and the drivers are available. What does your /etc/apt/sources.list file look like? Also, if you're running a recent kernel version, you will most likey need the patches at: --- http://www.minion.de/files/1.0-6629/ for the driver to actually work (in case you missed my earlier post). Let me know what your sources.list looks like and we can go from there. :) -- Mark Nippere-contacts: Computing and Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Texas AM Universityhttp://ops.tamu.edu/nipsy/ College Station, TX 77843-3142 AIM/Yahoo: texasnipsy ICQ: 66971617 (979)575-3193 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GG/IT d- s++:+ a- C++$ UBL$ P---+++ L+++$ !E--- W++(--) N+ o K++ w(---) O++ M V(--) PS+++(+) PE(--) Y+ PGP t+ 5 X R tv b+++@ DI+(++) D+ G e h r++ y+(**) --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- ---begin random quote of the moment--- I cannot tolerate intolerant people. end random quote of the moment #deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sid main #deb-src http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sid main deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib #deb http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/pure64 sid main deb-src http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/pure64 sid main #deb http://bytekeeper.as28747.net/amd64/alioth/pure64 sid main #deb-src http://bytekeeper.as28747.net/amd64/alioth/pure64 sid main #deb http://debian.inode.at/pure64/ sid main #deb-src http://debian.inode.at/pure64/ sid main #kalyxo #deb-src http://www.kalyxo.org/debian/ unstable main #deb-src http://www.kalyxo.org/debian/ experimental main deb-src http://archive.kalyxo.org/kalyxo/ staging main deb-src http://archive.kalyxo.org/kalyxo/ experimental main #deb http://archive.kalyxo.org/kalyxo/ staging main #deb http://archive.kalyxo.org/kalyxo/ experimental main #drivers nvidia #deb http://www.w3r3wolf.de/debian/nvidia/ ./ #deb-src http://www.w3r3wolf.de/debian/nvidia/ ./ #knemo sources deb-src http://www.mpe.mpg.de/~ach/debian/sid ./ #yzis deb-src ftp://download.yzis.org/yzis ./ #deb ftp://download.yzis.org/yzis ./ #usbmount deb http://www.zero-based.org/debian packages/binary-amd64/ #marillat deb-src ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ unstable main deb http://cyberspace.ucla.edu/marillat/ unstable main deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ unstable main
Re: udev segfaulting, problems with udev
Same here with amd64 _AFTER_ upgrading to 048... Rafael Rodríguez El Lunes, 13 de Diciembre de 2004 22:21, Jean-Luc Coulon escribió: On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 05:09:50PM -0500, Bharath Ramesh wrote: I just re-installed my machine and started to use udev. Every restart I udev seg faults. This what it gives out in the dmesg udev[2413]: segfault at 0138 rip 00402fa4 rsp 007fb1 c0 error 4 udev[2416]: segfault at 0138 rip 00402fa4 rsp 007fb1 c0 error 4 udev[2452]: segfault at 0138 rip 00402fa4 rsp 007fb1 c0 error 4 udev[2482]: segfault at 0138 rip 00402fa4 rsp 007fb1 c0 error 4 udev[2519]: segfault at 0138 rip 00402fa4 rsp 007fb1 c0 error 4 udev[2526]: segfault at 0138 rip 00402fa4 rsp 007fb1 c0 error 4 udev[2562]: segfault at 0138 rip 00402fa4 rsp 007fb1 c0 error 4 udev[2719]: segfault at 0138 rip 00402fa4 rsp 007fb1 c0 error 4 udev[2726]: segfault at 0138 rip 00402fa4 rsp 007fb1 c0 error 4 The other thing I have noticed is that it doesnt create the device nodes for my other hard IDE hard drive. I am using my SATA hard drive but I use my IDE hard drive for backups. I load the module for my IDE controller at bootup. The other error is with usb I get this error continuously driver/usb/input/hid-core.c input irq status -75 received I've got a segfault of udev in the same conditions on a i386 machine (K6-2 500 running 2.6.9). The version of udev was 0.042. This have been fixed with version 0.046 of udev (Debian sid). The bug reference is ##281107 So, maybe it is not specially related to amd64... Any help on this is appreciated. Thanks, Bharath Regards Jean-Luc
[OT] Am i in the chroot?
Hi. Any simple command so in a shell i can know if i'm into my 32-bit chroot or in the main system? Thx, Rafael Rodríguez
Re: Acrobat reader
None at all... just wanted to have it running embedded in firefox ;) El Sábado, 11 de Diciembre de 2004 18:57, Alexandru Cabuz escribió: What's the problem with xpdf though?
Re: Cool N' Quiet
El Domingo, 14 de Noviembre de 2004 17:24, Harald Dunkel escribió: Jared Burke wrote: | Slava Risenberg wrote: | | I just wanted to suggest that the ondemand governor in the kernel | replaces a lot of the userspace daemons like powernowd. It might not be | as configurable, but it works for me. I thought the general trend is to move functionality from kernel to user space, if possible? I think that CPU frequency scaling is a task important enough (and with enough priority) to be done in kernel space... deals completely with hardware and with nothing else! -- Rafael Rodríguez - http://djclue.no-ip.org -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s-: a-- C++ UL++ P++ L++ E--- W+++ N o? K? w--- !O !M V-- PS PE- Y+ PGP+ t--- 5? X R* tv- b- DI- D+ G e++ h! r++ y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
korganizer up and running!
Hey! I'm one of those who couldn't start korganizer without exploding... but hey! after tonight's upgrade to 3.3.1, it's finally working!! yeeeah! :DDD Rafael Rodríguez
Re: stats for pure64 vs. gcc-3.4
Just asking... where can i learn about all this gcc-3.4 vs pure64 stuff? I read the debian-amd64-howto and installed my system, but never heard about this two-branches stuff thx in advance, Rafael Rodríguez El Viernes, 12 de Noviembre de 2004 23:32, Kurt Roeckx escribió: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:09:30PM -0800, kristian kvilekval wrote: Are there any online stats or recommendations when to use pure64 vs. gcc-3.4 repositories? I've noticed that some pure64 missing applications (evolution2) are showing up in the gcc-3.4. evolution 2.0.2-3 is in pure64 since today. The reason this took longer to get in pure64 than gcc-3.4 is that I (pure64) always wait for upstream debian to fix it in sid. It was waiting for evolution-data-server which was fixed in yesterdays upload which made building evolution (and a few other related) package possible today. I'm trying to get the difference between upstream sources and ours as small as possible. The gcc-3.4 archive on the other hand applies many more patches itself, basicly because it has to. There are alot of packages that fail to build using gcc-3.4, and upstream debian isn't always that fast with applying patches. For the stats part. They just started their daily build cycle, so I don't know the result of what is going to be installed when they're done, but here are the currents stats for both archives: There are stats available in the amd64.txt file and in the dists/sid version of each archive. Pure64: Installed : 5531 () Installed+all : 8466 () Needs-Build : 43 Building: 1 () Uploaded: 16 () Failed : 120 Dep-Wait: 69 () Failed-Removed : 0 Dep-Wait-Removed: 0 Not-For-Us : 94 total : 5675 total+all : 8715 gcc-3.4: Installed : 5600 () Installed+all : 8606 () Needs-Build : 64 Building: 0 () Uploaded: 0 () Failed : 99 Dep-Wait: 24 () Failed-Removed : 0 Dep-Wait-Removed: 0 Not-For-Us : 67 total : 5747 total+all : 8794 Now, the most interesting part is why are they different? The first thing you'll notice is that gcc-3.4 seems to have 69 pakcakges more installed. And 71 arch all packages more installed, having a total of 140 packages more installed. The arch all package all seem to be related to java. I don't know if kaffe works on the gcc-3.4 archive, but there are currently problems with it on i386 and pure64. The other are mostly packages that just fail to build and have a patch available in the bug tracking system, but isn't uploaded yet. Then there are some packages that shouldn't be build on amd64 in the first place. For instance there are mono (C#) and ada pacakges in the gcc-3.4 archive for which upstream says amd64 is not supported. Kurt
Re: Cool N' Quiet
IMHO having ondemand in-kernel, there's no need for userspace daemons anymore... I used to have cpudyn running but now i've purged it... Rafael Rodríguez El Sábado, 13 de Noviembre de 2004 18:49, Harald Dunkel escribió: Slava Risenberg wrote: | I've tried to get it working, I mean to lower the CPU frequency | automatically by loading powernow_k8 module, but without any success. | I guess I have to do something else to get it working. Any ideas? | I'm using Gigabyte GA-K8 NS motherboard with NVidia 3 250 chipset. I would suggest to install the powernowd package and read the READMEs in /usr/share/doc/powernowd. To get the current frequency, you can try cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq Good luck Harri
