Re: Debian vs Ubuntu for Enterprise Production Servers

2006-11-17 Thread Richard Salts
I've mainly stuck with Debian as I've figured my way around it, having been 
using it since slink, and experimenting more since potato going to sid at 
some stage during this period. However I did try out Ubuntu once or twice 
when KDE 3.5 was yet to hit sid and was a bit disappointed that a few issues 
crept into the stable release, kmail having no pgp support compiled in, the 
problem was fixed pretty quickly though. A friend of mine also had the 
apt.sources for breezy on a clean install of Dapper which caused a bit of 
confusion till I helped him figure out what was happening. These issues would 
make me personally lean toward Debian for a server install, but I'm already 
pretty biased.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



SATA/usb mass storage conflict

2004-09-27 Thread Richard Salts
I have tried installing the amd64 port and I was able to install and
configure the base system once but after this it times out when checking the 
partitions on the drive ( i.e. /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/etc. p1 p2 p5 etc.) on
reboot. I've also tried rerunning the installer and it times out at
loading sd_mod.

After much frustration I gave up on the installer and tried the
installer from fedora core 2 for amd64 thinking I might be able to try
with a different kernel and it was freezing when loading the usb mass
storage drivers ( I have a usb flash reader installed instead of a
floppy). Disabling usb allows me to boot the fedora core installer but
still not the debian installer ( hanging at sd_mod) and of course the
initrd image on the hd is loading the usb mass storage drivers and failing 
with the same time out as before.

Is there a simple way to remove the drivers for usbms from the initrd
image while using the fc rescue disk? Has anyone had similar
experiences? I'm assuming the sata drives and the usb drives are
fighting over /dev/sda, if I were to create a kernel image with the sata
drivers compiled in statically and the usbms loaded as a module later
do people think it will still conflict?