Re: IPTables allow ping.
Bharath Ramesh píše v Pá 13. 06. 2008 v 21:29 +0200: $IPT --append INPUT --in-interface $EXTIF --protocol icmp --icmp-type 0 \ --destination $EXTIP --match state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED \ --jump ACCEPT A side note: I wonder how much use is --match state in ICMP context. (Well, I can't see any icmp entries in /proc/net/ip_conntrack anyway). You might want to consult debian-firewall list. Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [no subject]
KGB KGB píše v Út 27. 05. 2008 v 06:55 +0200: I have a problem, i recently installed Debian testing on my Compaq presario f756nr, and i replaced my HD by 100GB of hp pavilion fv6110us and i can't install debian on these HD but if install de original HD i can install Debian... The error message is something like this ...Please complain to your hardware vendor. Switching to a random MAC... what's mean this message? Dear KGB KGB (whatever does it mean), 0) Next time please try to fill Subject: field in your message, as empty subject usually means both useless message and/or spam; 1) I wonder how is your question related to AMD64, please note you are posting to debian-amd64 list (but probably you are running AMD64 testing on your notebook anyway); 2) The error message Please complain to your hardware vendor. Switching to a random MAC... is from network card driver, most probably forcedeth, as Compaq Presario F756NR seems to feature nVidia network card embedded. I'm not sure how can swapping hard drivers influence network interface, so please feel free to provide more details on your setup. I'd suggest trying latest Debian kernel. Please post output of 'lspci' and 'uname -a' commands. Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Opinion question (Core2 Duo)
Douglas A. Tutty píše v St 19. 09. 2007 v 00:31 +0200: Why is it that debian doesn't do pre-emption in the kernel? I can imagine workloads (typically on servers) where preemptive kernel is not necessary (or even can be bad for performance). Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: LUKS encrypted removable drives and Gnome [SOLVED]
Vitezslav Kotrla píše v Čt 02. 11. 2006 v 20:48 +0100: Is anyone using LUKS encrypted removable drives in Gnome desktop? What is your experience? When I plug-in my encrypted USB drive, Nautilus shows it properly in Computer place. When I click on the device's icon, I expect some dialog asking for passphrase; but window saying Opening ... appears instead and waits indefinitely. (Replying to myself, just for a record) Problem is gone. Some update has apparently solved it some time ago. :-) Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unable to install etch on amd
Constantine Kousoulos píše v Út 01. 05. 2007 v 14:53 +0200: Ya, I have a hp nx6125 noteboot that simply refuses to accept etch. I have downloaded the first installation cd of etch. After the prompt, either i press enter or type expert, the kernel starts booting and then hangs after showing a few lines. Try booting with kernel option 'noapic', then even with 'noapic nolapic'; sometimes ACPI is a showstopper, too, then try also 'noacpi acpi=off' (I'm not sure whether 'acpi=off' or 'noacpi' is correct, but it won't hurt to use both, one of them should catch it). As I'm lazy, I'm often using 'noapic nolapic noacpi acpi=off' for initial install on problematic notebook hardware (till I tweak my own kernel). Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Performance issues in 64-bit platforms
Same here fwiw. Dual channel on socket 939 is giving 900Mb/sec on the hdparm cache test. I've got socket 939 AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+, nForce4 board, 2 GB RAM in dual channel, hdparm -tT on 74 GB Raptor (WD740GD-00FL Rev: 31.0) says: # hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 1942 MB in 2.00 seconds = 971.33 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 202 MB in 3.02 seconds = 66.97 MB/sec Looks like the rest of you. Just my 0.02 USD. Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: KernelOops
Wolfgang Mader píše v Út 30. 01. 2007 v 22:21 +0100: I have found these messages in /var/log/messages. I am using the nvidia driver for my GForce6600-GT card. Can someone please explain to me what is going on on my system? Thank you -- W. Mader -/var/log/messages--- Nov 5 21:27:17 FUCKUP kernel: Process Xorg (pid: 3404, threadinfo 8100359ea000, task 810037bd3770) Nov 5 21:27:17 FUCKUP kernel: Stack: 8025e93f 80210aaa 81003f38a868 8100192b9200 I can't explain what's going on, but I've just tried to grep FUCKUP string in vanilla 2.6.18 tree and found nothing. Also grepping nvidia source yields nothing. Could you please provide output of 'uname -a'? Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: KernelOops
[EMAIL PROTECTED] píše v St 31. 01. 2007 v 22:30 +0100: That would be the 'hostname'. (Of course, I must have been too sleepy. At the first glance it looked like some euphemism for 'error') Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#405012: libwmf: Dependencies problem on experimental
Kurt Roeckx píše v So 27. 01. 2007 v 14:22 +0100: I've build it manually, it seems to work, so I've uploaded it. Last upgrade indeed brought libwmf0.2-7 version 0.2.8.4-2.1 and I was finally able to install gimp from experimental. Thanks a lot. Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#405012: libwmf: Dependencies problem on experimental
Loïc, I've noticed new i386 package in experimental, thanks a lot. Is it possible to provide amd64 package, too? I have built my own amd64 package for libwmf0.2-7 (0.2.8.4-2.1), but for some reason it is unusable, please see details below. Longer story: As I'm currently on AMD64 system, I tried to build my own package. I got the source $ sudo apt-get -t experimental source libwmf0.2-7 $ sudo apt-get build-dep libwmf0.2-7 it said dpkg-source: extracting libwmf in libwmf-0.2.8.4 dpkg-source: unpacking libwmf_0.2.8.4.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: applying ./libwmf_0.2.8.4-2.diff.gz so the source looks up-to-date. $ cd libwmf-0.2.8.4/ applied your patch from Debian BTS $ patch -p1 ../libwmf_0.2.8.4-2.1.diff and built the package $ fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage no apparent errors so far. Alas, installing the package fails: $ sudo dpkg -i libwmf0.2-7_0.2.8.4-2.1_amd64.deb (Reading database ... 109931 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libwmf0.2-7 0.2.8.4-2.1 (using libwmf0.2-7_0.2.8.4-2.1_amd64.deb) ... Cleaning up font configuration of libwmf0.2-7... Unpacking replacement libwmf0.2-7 ... dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute old post-removal script: Exec format error dpkg: warning - old post-removal script returned error exit status 2 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute new post-removal script: Exec format error dpkg: error processing libwmf0.2-7_0.2.8.4-2.1_amd64.deb (--install): subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 2 dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute new post-removal script: Exec format error dpkg: error while cleaning up: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: libwmf0.2-7_0.2.8.4-2.1_amd64.deb Obviously I've done something wrong. What is your opinion? (CC to debian-amd64@lists.debian.org) Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#405012: libwmf: Dependencies problem on experimental
Loïc Minier píše v So 27. 01. 2007 v 09:00 +0100: dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute old post-removal script: Exec format error This is weird, did you use a chroot for building? It looks like mixed architectures to me. No chroot, I have built (and tried to install) the package in 64bit environment. Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LUKS encrypted removable drives and Gnome
Is anyone using LUKS encrypted removable drives in Gnome desktop? What is your experience? When I plug-in my encrypted USB drive, Nautilus shows it properly in Computer place. When I click on the device's icon, I expect some dialog asking for passphrase; but window saying Opening ... appears instead and waits indefinitely. At the same time 'ps' command says ... vitko 7806 5495 0 20:40 pts/4 00:00:00 /usr/bin/pmount-hal /dev/sdh vitko 7807 7806 0 20:40 pts/400:00:00 pmount /dev/sdh usbdisk root 7809 7807 0 20:40 pts/400:00:00 /sbin/cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sdh _dev_sdh ... so something is going on, but no prompt for passphrase. Any ideas? I'm runnig AMD64 Sid. Vit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
