Re: Plugins
Am 2007-05-03 23:05:49, schrieb Pepo: Hi friends. Please, How do I can use plugins in Iceweasel if I am using Lenny-AMD64? (java, flash player) Thanks. - END OF REPLIED MESSAGE - Why not use the nsplugingwraper which is in Debian? Whit this wraper you can run 32bit plugins on amd64. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
Re: Plugins
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:51:07PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: Am 2007-05-03 23:05:49, schrieb Pepo: Hi friends. Please, How do I can use plugins in Iceweasel if I am using Lenny-AMD64? (java, flash player) Thanks. - END OF REPLIED MESSAGE - Why not use the nsplugingwraper which is in Debian? Whit this wraper you can run 32bit plugins on amd64. does that include the java plugin as well ? Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Plugins
On 5/4/07, Pepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi friends. Please, How do I can use plugins in Iceweasel if I am using Lenny-AMD64? (java, flash player) Thanks. hi, afaik adobe flash player comes in 32bit version only You might want to consider Installing a Debian IA32bit chroot system: take a look at https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id292010 bye // SS
Re: Plugins
Am Donnerstag, den 03.05.2007, 23:05 -0500 schrieb Pepo: Hi friends. Please, How do I can use plugins in Iceweasel if I am using Lenny-AMD64? (java, flash player) Thanks. On sid-amd64 there is nspluginwrapper. With that little piece of software you can run the Adobe Flash-Player on amd64. If you don´t want to mix up your system with unstable you can get nspluginwrapper from http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/projects/nspluginwrapper/ You don´t have to compile it. Just take the two *.rpm files (both Plugin _and_ Viewer), convert them with alien into deb and install. Normally this should work. More instructions you can find on the Web-Site mentioned above. Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plugins
Hi friends. Please, How do I can use plugins in Iceweasel if I am using Lenny-AMD64? (java, flash player) Thanks. -- Linux User Registered #232544 Jabber : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ekiga : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ : 337889406 GnuPG-key : www.keyserver.net --- dum loquimur, fugerit invida aetas: carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Java 6 plugins
Hello List, I have just installed the gcj one: it fits my need. Thanks for the quick reply, Jerome Alex Samad wrote: On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:27:14PM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Hello List, I have just install the new Java 6 Debian package on my amd64 Etch box: my hope was to have a last a working java plugin for Iceweasel. Unfortunately I have still no working java plugin : what is the issue here ? don't think there has been an offical java plugin (atleast not from sun) there is the blackdown one (1.4.2) but its old and not maintained and breaks a lot. Then there is the gcj one - still alpha sort of. Thanks in advance, Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Java 6 plugins
Hello List, I have just install the new Java 6 Debian package on my amd64 Etch box: my hope was to have a last a working java plugin for Iceweasel. Unfortunately I have still no working java plugin : what is the issue here ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Java 6 plugins
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:27:14PM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Hello List, I have just install the new Java 6 Debian package on my amd64 Etch box: my hope was to have a last a working java plugin for Iceweasel. Unfortunately I have still no working java plugin : what is the issue here ? don't think there has been an offical java plugin (atleast not from sun) there is the blackdown one (1.4.2) but its old and not maintained and breaks a lot. Then there is the gcj one - still alpha sort of. Thanks in advance, Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [SOLVED]chroot: firefox browser plugins
Jaime Ochoa Malagón schrieb: execute dchroot -d all the installation with the links must look good if thats true run the firefox, that should work that way... I'm using schroot rather than dchroot, but I assume the -d option is the same: to specify the working directory? It still didn't work. Neither did turning on debug messages help because I didn't get any output when running 'ln -s ...' . But I decided to just install Iceweasel and use that. It registers all my plugins during the install process, and it's also working well with Flash 9 Beta. I probably should have done that in the first place. Thanks for the help, anyway. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: chroot: firefox browser plugins
Jaime Ochoa Malagón schrieb I had have a similar problem with directories in rbind inside a chroot al the files are in the same partition? when firefox is installed to /usr/local in chroot, yes. when it's installed in /home/user, no. But I have no problem linking to other files in the chroot from this home directory, even though it's on another partition... do your use the tab key to make de link? no, just the terminal and eg. /usr/local/firefox/plugins# ln -s path_to_javaplugin . Doesn't the tab key achieve the same result? as a las resource why do you not copy the files of the plugins to your directory? I tried that. The files copy OK but the getfirefox.com Firefox says it can't find them. It's strange, the Debian firefox obviously makes the necessary plugin links during the install process, but I can't do so manually... Best whishes and to you! :) On 12/21/06, Les Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just built myself a 64-bit AMD X2 desktop system and decided I'd give a 64-bit distro a shot. On my recently ebayed last system I was using 32-bit Sarge for just over a year and loved it. I am now happily running Etch RC1 64-bit. Happily? Well, almost For the relatively few 32-bit programs I need/want to run, I opted for the chroot method (as described in the Debian AMD64 HOWTO). I installed Firefox 2.0.0.1 by unpacking the archive from getfirefox.com into /usr/local in my chroot (I prefer not to use Debian-packaged firefox because I've found it to be more crash prone). The browser starts up without a hitch. But, for the life of me, I am unable to create any symlinks in /usr/local/firefox/plugins to the currently installed plugins in the chroot (acrobat and java, atm). Each time I try, it results in a dangling symlink (and, yes, I am issuing each command from within the chroot). I thought it might be a permissions issue (even though I didn't change any), so I tried unpacking firefox in bind-mounted /home/user. No change. I also tried 3 methods of installing Sun Java - from the Debian repo, from sun.com, and building locally using java-package. Again, no ability to symlink to the java plugin. I don't get it. I can create symlinks to any other files/dirs in the chroot, just not browser plugins?? I have read permissions on all elements of the plugin path, and write permissions to where I want to create the symlink. I've also tried copying the plugins to the firefox plugins directory, but firefox still doesn't register them. Curiously (or not?), I don't have this problem if I use the firefox version from Debian. It's just 'getfirefox'. I don't want to use the Debian version, though, or another browser. I may use Iceweasel from unstable as a last resort, but I really shouldn't be having this problem in the first place. Any clues? It's the first time I've used chroot, so if I am overlooking something simple, my apologies :) Thanks, Les -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: chroot: firefox browser plugins
Jaime Ochoa Malagón schrieb: On 12/21/06, Les Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jaime Ochoa Malagón schrieb I had have a similar problem with directories in rbind inside a chroot al the files are in the same partition? when firefox is installed to /usr/local in chroot, yes. when it's installed in /home/user, no. But I have no problem linking to other files in the chroot from this home directory, even though it's on another partition... do your use the tab key to make de link? no, just the terminal and eg. /usr/local/firefox/plugins# ln -s path_to_javaplugin . if you want to check the path you could use the tab key while you are typing to complete the text... are you using the absolute path? Oh, I forgot about the tab key for this :) But I have all the plugin paths updated and saved in my 'setup notes', and I just use the X keyboard to (carefully) paste them into the terminal. and, yes, they are the absolute paths. Doesn't the tab key achieve the same result? as a las resource why do you not copy the files of the plugins to your directory? I tried that. The files copy OK but the getfirefox.com Firefox says it can't find them. It's strange, the Debian firefox obviously makes the necessary plugin links during the install process, but I can't do so manually... thats really weird or the plugins are of another arch... 32/64? I checked that. They are all from things either installed via apt-get in my etch-ia32 chroot, or that I made sure were 32-bit versions when I downloaded them. I also made sure that my copy of Firefox was 32-bit by checking the browser header (I don't think you can download a specifically 64-bit version of Firefox from getfirefox.com, anyway). Any other ideas? It's certainly got me stumped... thanks Best whishes and to you! :) On 12/21/06, Les Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just built myself a 64-bit AMD X2 desktop system and decided I'd give a 64-bit distro a shot. On my recently ebayed last system I was using 32-bit Sarge for just over a year and loved it. I am now happily running Etch RC1 64-bit. Happily? Well, almost For the relatively few 32-bit programs I need/want to run, I opted for the chroot method (as described in the Debian AMD64 HOWTO). I installed Firefox 2.0.0.1 by unpacking the archive from getfirefox.com into /usr/local in my chroot (I prefer not to use Debian-packaged firefox because I've found it to be more crash prone). The browser starts up without a hitch. But, for the life of me, I am unable to create any symlinks in /usr/local/firefox/plugins to the currently installed plugins in the chroot (acrobat and java, atm). Each time I try, it results in a dangling symlink (and, yes, I am issuing each command from within the chroot). I thought it might be a permissions issue (even though I didn't change any), so I tried unpacking firefox in bind-mounted /home/user. No change. I also tried 3 methods of installing Sun Java - from the Debian repo, from sun.com, and building locally using java-package. Again, no ability to symlink to the java plugin. I don't get it. I can create symlinks to any other files/dirs in the chroot, just not browser plugins?? I have read permissions on all elements of the plugin path, and write permissions to where I want to create the symlink. I've also tried copying the plugins to the firefox plugins directory, but firefox still doesn't register them. Curiously (or not?), I don't have this problem if I use the firefox version from Debian. It's just 'getfirefox'. I don't want to use the Debian version, though, or another browser. I may use Iceweasel from unstable as a last resort, but I really shouldn't be having this problem in the first place. Any clues? It's the first time I've used chroot, so if I am overlooking something simple, my apologies :) Thanks, Les -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: chroot: firefox browser plugins
Les Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But, for the life of me, I am unable to create any symlinks in /usr/local/firefox/plugins to the currently installed plugins in the chroot (acrobat and java, atm). Each time I try, it results in a dangling symlink (and, yes, I am issuing each command from within the chroot). Maybe you should explain in more detail what you are doing. Did you install Firefox in the chroot? If yes, do you run it from within the chroot? If you don't you should not create the symlinks from within. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: chroot: firefox browser plugins
Matthias Julius schrieb: Les Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But, for the life of me, I am unable to create any symlinks in /usr/local/firefox/plugins to the currently installed plugins in the chroot (acrobat and java, atm). Each time I try, it results in a dangling symlink (and, yes, I am issuing each command from within the chroot). Maybe you should explain in more detail what you are doing. Did you install Firefox in the chroot? If yes, do you run it from within the chroot? If you don't you should not create the symlinks from within. Matthias Yes, it's all from within the chroot. You don't /install/ this particular Firefox /per se/, you just unpack the archive to wherever you want, and run it from there. FYI I am using schroot to start Firefox from within the 64-bit environment, via a shell script dropped into /usr/local/bin. The browser starts up OK, but the problem with the symlinks exists before I get to that point. I'm just not being allowed to create symlinks to browser plugins or, for that matter, any other file or directory within /usr/lib/Adobe or /usr/lib/j2re1.5-sun . But I can link to any other file or folder within the chroot. And, yes, I'm trying all this from within the chroot, and as user root... Les
Re: chroot: firefox browser plugins
Les Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm just not being allowed to create symlinks to browser plugins or, for that matter, any other file or directory within /usr/lib/Adobe or /usr/lib/j2re1.5-sun . But I can link to any other file or folder within the chroot. And, yes, I'm trying all this from within the chroot, and as user root... So when you do 'ls -l /usr/lib/Adobe' from wherever you want to make the symlink you see the file and when you do 'ln -s /usr/lib/Adobe/filename .' you get a dangling symlink? Are you sure the path was right? The TAB key was mentioned before. What it does is to make sure the path you enter exists. If you type '/usr/lib/A TAB' and that 'A' doesn't expand to 'Adobe' this is a good indication that this directory isn't there where you think it is. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: chroot: firefox browser plugins
Matthias Julius schrieb: So when you do 'ls -l /usr/lib/Adobe' from wherever you want to make the symlink you see the file and when you do 'ln -s /usr/lib/Adobe/filename .' you get a dangling symlink? Are you sure the path was right? Yes, all the paths are right. I'm careful to make sure of that. The TAB key was mentioned before. What it does is to make sure the path you enter exists. If you type '/usr/lib/A TAB' and that 'A' doesn't expand to 'Adobe' this is a good indication that this directory isn't there where you think it is. Again, the paths aren't the problem. I'm pasting them in from a file browser. Perhaps it's something in the schroot profiling? This is what I have in /etc/schroot/schroot.conf - [etch32] description=Debian Etch i386 (etch32) location=/var/chroot/etch-ia32 priority=3 groups=my user,root root-groups=root aliases=default,testing,ia32 personality=linux32 type=plain run-exec-scripts=true run-setup-scripts=true It's basically the example given in the AMD64 HOWTO. It looks like I'm able to do everything I need to, though Les -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
chroot: firefox browser plugins
Hi, I just built myself a 64-bit AMD X2 desktop system and decided I'd give a 64-bit distro a shot. On my recently ebayed last system I was using 32-bit Sarge for just over a year and loved it. I am now happily running Etch RC1 64-bit. Happily? Well, almost For the relatively few 32-bit programs I need/want to run, I opted for the chroot method (as described in the Debian AMD64 HOWTO). I installed Firefox 2.0.0.1 by unpacking the archive from getfirefox.com into /usr/local in my chroot (I prefer not to use Debian-packaged firefox because I've found it to be more crash prone). The browser starts up without a hitch. But, for the life of me, I am unable to create any symlinks in /usr/local/firefox/plugins to the currently installed plugins in the chroot (acrobat and java, atm). Each time I try, it results in a dangling symlink (and, yes, I am issuing each command from within the chroot). I thought it might be a permissions issue (even though I didn't change any), so I tried unpacking firefox in bind-mounted /home/user. No change. I also tried 3 methods of installing Sun Java - from the Debian repo, from sun.com, and building locally using java-package. Again, no ability to symlink to the java plugin. I don't get it. I can create symlinks to any other files/dirs in the chroot, just not browser plugins?? I have read permissions on all elements of the plugin path, and write permissions to where I want to create the symlink. I've also tried copying the plugins to the firefox plugins directory, but firefox still doesn't register them. Curiously (or not?), I don't have this problem if I use the firefox version from Debian. It's just 'getfirefox'. I don't want to use the Debian version, though, or another browser. I may use Iceweasel from unstable as a last resort, but I really shouldn't be having this problem in the first place. Any clues? It's the first time I've used chroot, so if I am overlooking something simple, my apologies :) Thanks, Les -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XMMS: No output plugins specified
Yeah, thanks a lot! apt-get update, apt-get install xmms and i can listen my favorite radio-stream in the office with xmms again :) Am Dienstag, den 15.08.2006, 21:39 -0700 schrieb Max A.: Eventually it has been fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-2. Hurray! Max On 7/31/06, Markus Neviadomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Sonntag, den 30.07.2006, 19:52 -0700 schrieb Max A.: I believe that is bug 380321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380321 They claim it fixed in xmms 1.2.10+20060729-1 but I still face it ;( Hi Max, same here after upgrading the package! Max On 7/28/06, Markus Neviadomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, after apt-get update apt-get upgrade on my amd64-box (debian unstable), xmms doesn't work. After startup and pressing play in xmms, the following message appears: no output plugins specified. Looking in the Settings-panel, the select-box for the output is empty. I searched the debian packages for any output-plugins, but I found nothing for alsa or so on. I'm using kernel 2.6.14-1-amd64-k8 with alsa, xmms has version 1.2.10 now and the sounchip is a ac97-chip from realtek (ALC850). Any ideas? -- -- Markus Neviadomski mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: www.dieitexperten.de Linux User #291181 GPG-Key: 0xF5226EB5 --- signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Re: XMMS: No output plugins specified
Eventually it has been fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-2. Hurray! Max On 7/31/06, Markus Neviadomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Sonntag, den 30.07.2006, 19:52 -0700 schrieb Max A.: I believe that is bug 380321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380321 They claim it fixed in xmms 1.2.10+20060729-1 but I still face it ;( Hi Max, same here after upgrading the package! Max On 7/28/06, Markus Neviadomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, after apt-get update apt-get upgrade on my amd64-box (debian unstable), xmms doesn't work. After startup and pressing play in xmms, the following message appears: no output plugins specified. Looking in the Settings-panel, the select-box for the output is empty. I searched the debian packages for any output-plugins, but I found nothing for alsa or so on. I'm using kernel 2.6.14-1-amd64-k8 with alsa, xmms has version 1.2.10 now and the sounchip is a ac97-chip from realtek (ALC850). Any ideas? -- -- Markus Neviadomski mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: www.dieitexperten.de Linux User #291181 GPG-Key: 0xF5226EB5 --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XMMS: No output plugins specified
Am Sonntag, den 30.07.2006, 19:52 -0700 schrieb Max A.: I believe that is bug 380321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380321 They claim it fixed in xmms 1.2.10+20060729-1 but I still face it ;( Hi Max, same here after upgrading the package! Max On 7/28/06, Markus Neviadomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, after apt-get update apt-get upgrade on my amd64-box (debian unstable), xmms doesn't work. After startup and pressing play in xmms, the following message appears: no output plugins specified. Looking in the Settings-panel, the select-box for the output is empty. I searched the debian packages for any output-plugins, but I found nothing for alsa or so on. I'm using kernel 2.6.14-1-amd64-k8 with alsa, xmms has version 1.2.10 now and the sounchip is a ac97-chip from realtek (ALC850). Any ideas? -- -- Markus Neviadomski mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: www.dieitexperten.de Linux User #291181 GPG-Key: 0xF5226EB5 --- signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Re: XMMS: No output plugins specified
I believe that is bug 380321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380321 They claim it fixed in xmms 1.2.10+20060729-1 but I still face it ;( Max On 7/28/06, Markus Neviadomski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, after apt-get update apt-get upgrade on my amd64-box (debian unstable), xmms doesn't work. After startup and pressing play in xmms, the following message appears: no output plugins specified. Looking in the Settings-panel, the select-box for the output is empty. I searched the debian packages for any output-plugins, but I found nothing for alsa or so on. I'm using kernel 2.6.14-1-amd64-k8 with alsa, xmms has version 1.2.10 now and the sounchip is a ac97-chip from realtek (ALC850). Any ideas? -- -- Markus Neviadomski mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: www.dieitexperten.de Linux User #291181 GPG-Key: 0xF5226EB5 --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XMMS: No output plugins specified
#380115? Regards Harri Markus Neviadomski wrote: Hi, after apt-get update apt-get upgrade on my amd64-box (debian unstable), xmms doesn't work. After startup and pressing play in xmms, the following message appears: no output plugins specified. Looking in the Settings-panel, the select-box for the output is empty. I searched the debian packages for any output-plugins, but I found nothing for alsa or so on. I'm using kernel 2.6.14-1-amd64-k8 with alsa, xmms has version 1.2.10 now and the sounchip is a ac97-chip from realtek (ALC850). Any ideas? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
XMMS: No output plugins specified
Hi, after apt-get update apt-get upgrade on my amd64-box (debian unstable), xmms doesn't work. After startup and pressing play in xmms, the following message appears: no output plugins specified. Looking in the Settings-panel, the select-box for the output is empty. I searched the debian packages for any output-plugins, but I found nothing for alsa or so on. I'm using kernel 2.6.14-1-amd64-k8 with alsa, xmms has version 1.2.10 now and the sounchip is a ac97-chip from realtek (ALC850). Any ideas? -- -- Markus Neviadomski mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: www.dieitexperten.de Linux User #291181 GPG-Key: 0xF5226EB5 --- signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Re: XMMS: No output plugins specified
install xmms-arts. I just fixed the exact same problem. Chris W. On Friday 28 July 2006 2:30 am, Markus Neviadomski wrote: Hi, after apt-get update apt-get upgrade on my amd64-box (debian unstable), xmms doesn't work. After startup and pressing play in xmms, the following message appears: no output plugins specified. Looking in the Settings-panel, the select-box for the output is empty. I searched the debian packages for any output-plugins, but I found nothing for alsa or so on. I'm using kernel 2.6.14-1-amd64-k8 with alsa, xmms has version 1.2.10 now and the sounchip is a ac97-chip from realtek (ALC850). Any ideas? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XMMS: No output plugins specified
Am Freitag, den 28.07.2006, 02:39 -0700 schrieb Chris Wakefield: install xmms-arts. I just fixed the exact same problem. Chris W. But you have to use the artsd, right? I don't want to do this :) Now it seems, that xmms is broken completely. I installed xmms-arts and xmms-crossfade and both plugins could be selected. Trying to add a new title to the playlist fails without any message box or in the terminal. As root, the crossfade-plugin works with an old playlist very nice, arts-output makes some error, because no artsd is installed. Purging all xmms pakets, reinstall only xmms, xmms-arts, xmms-crossfade and deleting the .xmms directory in user-home didn't solve the problem. The plugins are available, but creating a playlist failed without any message. I have to wait for an upgraded package, i think. On Friday 28 July 2006 2:30 am, Markus Neviadomski wrote: Hi, after apt-get update apt-get upgrade on my amd64-box (debian unstable), xmms doesn't work. After startup and pressing play in xmms, the following message appears: no output plugins specified. Looking in the Settings-panel, the select-box for the output is empty. I searched the debian packages for any output-plugins, but I found nothing for alsa or so on. I'm using kernel 2.6.14-1-amd64-k8 with alsa, xmms has version 1.2.10 now and the sounchip is a ac97-chip from realtek (ALC850). Any ideas? signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Re: XMMS: No output plugins specified
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Markus Neviadomski wrote: after apt-get update apt-get upgrade on my amd64-box (debian unstable), xmms doesn't work. After startup and pressing play in xmms, the following message appears: no output plugins specified. Yeah, same here. XMMS seems to be broken. No output plugins available. I didn't bother to investigate further, instead I just downgraded back to 1.2.10+20060701-1. -- .--- OAMK --- http://www.pyksy.fi/ --- pyksy @IrcNet -- `- Teh OTEqi Information Minister-- Linux/Amiga/c64 freak -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XMMS: No output plugins specified
Hi Markus, Yes, I spoke too soon, I also have that playlist problem. I agree that an upgrade will fix it, hopefully soon. Chris W. On Friday 28 July 2006 3:14 am, Markus Neviadomski wrote: Am Freitag, den 28.07.2006, 02:39 -0700 schrieb Chris Wakefield: install xmms-arts. I just fixed the exact same problem. Chris W. But you have to use the artsd, right? I don't want to do this :) Now it seems, that xmms is broken completely. I installed xmms-arts and xmms-crossfade and both plugins could be selected. Trying to add a new title to the playlist fails without any message box or in the terminal. As root, the crossfade-plugin works with an old playlist very nice, arts-output makes some error, because no artsd is installed. Purging all xmms pakets, reinstall only xmms, xmms-arts, xmms-crossfade and deleting the .xmms directory in user-home didn't solve the problem. The plugins are available, but creating a playlist failed without any message. I have to wait for an upgraded package, i think. On Friday 28 July 2006 2:30 am, Markus Neviadomski wrote: Hi, after apt-get update apt-get upgrade on my amd64-box (debian unstable), xmms doesn't work. After startup and pressing play in xmms, the following message appears: no output plugins specified. Looking in the Settings-panel, the select-box for the output is empty. I searched the debian packages for any output-plugins, but I found nothing for alsa or so on. I'm using kernel 2.6.14-1-amd64-k8 with alsa, xmms has version 1.2.10 now and the sounchip is a ac97-chip from realtek (ALC850). Any ideas? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
transcode filter plugins
I'm experimenting with capturing television using transcode and getting very interesting results from the following: transcode -x v4l2 -o tv2.avi -f 30 -i /dev/video0 -y ffmpeg -F mpeg4 \ -p /dev/dsp -b 128 -g 720x480 -I 1 --print_status 20 -u 128 -H 0 \ -w 1500 -J hqdn3d=pre=1 -J smartyuv With Christian Marillat's new yasm package for Debian pure64, the machine keeps up with the 29.97 fps with an astounding 12% CPU usage (Opteron 240). (The aspect ratio must not be changed or you'll run out of capture buffers.) However, I get Command not found for both -J hqdn3d=pre=1 and -J smartyuv, also when I only include them one at a time. Does anyone have these transcode filter plugins working on amd64? Cheers, Dave ranscode v0.6.14 (C) 2001-2003 Thomas Oestreich, 2003-2004 T. Bitterberg [transcode] V: import frame | 720x480 1.50:1 [transcode] V: de-interlace | (mode=1) interpolate scanlines (fast) [transcode] V: bits/pixel | 0.145 (low) [transcode] V: decoding fps,frc | 30.000,0 [transcode] V: Y'CbCr | YV12/I420 [transcode] A: import format| 0x2000 AC3 [48000,16,2] [transcode] A: export format| 0x55MPEG layer-3 [48000,16,2] 128 kbps [transcode] V: encoding fps,frc | 29.970,4 [transcode] A: bytes per frame | 6408 (6406.40) [transcode] A: adjustment | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tc_memcpy: using libc for memcpy [transcode] V: video buffer | 128 @ 720x480 [import_v4l2.so] v1.3.4 (2004-08-25) (video) v4l2 | (audio) pcm [export_ffmpeg.so] v0.3.13 (2004-08-03) (video) FFmpegcvsb4736 | (audio) MPEG/AC3/PCM [import_v4l2.so]: v4l2 audio grabbing [import_v4l2.so]: v4l2 video grabbing [import_v4l2.so]: resync disabled [import_v4l2.so]: video grabbing, driver = bttv, card = BT878 video (AVerMedia TVCaptur [import_v4l2.so]: Pixel format conversion: YVU420 [planar] - YUV420 [planar] (no conversion) [import_v4l2.so]: driver does not support setting parameters (ioctl(VIDIOC_S_PARM) returns Invalid argument) [import_v4l2.so]: checking colour framerate standards: [NTSC] [import_v4l2.so]: receiving 30 frames / sec [import_v4l2.so]: driver does not support cropping (ioctl(VIDIOC_CROPCAP) returns Invalid argument), disabled [import_v4l2.so]: 32 buffers available [export_ffmpeg.so] Using FFMPEG codec 'mpeg4' (FourCC 'DIVX', MPEG4 compliant video). [export_ffmpeg.so]: WARNING: Interlacing parameters unknown, use --encode_fields [export_ffmpeg.so]: INFO: No profile selected [export_ffmpeg.so] Neither './ffmpeg.cfg' nor '~/.transcode/ffmpeg.cfg' [export_ffmpeg.so] found. Default settings will be used instead. [export_ffmpeg.so]: INFO: Starting 1 thread(s) [export_ffmpeg.so]: INFO: Set display aspect ratio to input Audio: using new version Audio: using lame-3.96.1 encoding frames [00-60], 29.97 fps, EMT: 0:00:02, ( 0| 0| 1) [transcode] (sighandler) SIGINT received [import_v4l2.so]: Totals: sequence V/A: 64/65, frames C/D: 0/0 clean up | frame threads | unload modules | cancel signal | internal threads | done [transcode] encoded 63 frames (0 dropped, 0 cloned), clip length 2.10 s ./tv-transcode: line 19: -J: command not found -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: 32bit plugins for 64bit konqueror
-- Forwarded message -- From: Ernest jw ter Kuile [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:48:47 +0100 Subject: 32bit plugins for 64bit konqueror To: Karol Krizka [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sunday 27 February 2005 20:46, Karol Krizka wrote: I think I have read on this list that konqueror can use 32bit flash because of it's design? Not sure, you might want to check the archives. the Suse/Gentoo boys dreamed up this workaround: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=216959 might be worth a try. Ernest. -- Cheers, Karol Krizka -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fwd: 32bit plugins for 64bit konqueror
The proposed solution involves overriding parts of the system with 32-bit libraries and binaries. Debian cleanly supports 32-bit libraries (see package ia32-libs), but not binaries. You can still make a chroot jail and run the browser from there, as suggested in the How To. Unless you're really short in hard disk space, this shouldn't be a problem and it works great for most cases. For the rest, the proposed solution won't work better anyway. Karol Krizka wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Ernest jw ter Kuile [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:48:47 +0100 Subject: 32bit plugins for 64bit konqueror To: Karol Krizka [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sunday 27 February 2005 20:46, Karol Krizka wrote: I think I have read on this list that konqueror can use 32bit flash because of it's design? Not sure, you might want to check the archives. the Suse/Gentoo boys dreamed up this workaround: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=216959 might be worth a try. Ernest. -- Javier Kohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fwd: 32bit plugins for 64bit konqueror
Javier Kohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The proposed solution involves overriding parts of the system with 32-bit libraries and binaries. Debian cleanly supports 32-bit libraries (see package ia32-libs), but not binaries. You can still make a chroot jail and run the browser Sure it does. You just have to build them. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: swh-plugins package crashes gstreamer0.8-anything...
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:01:31AM +0100, Giacomo Mulas wrote: Bug report on amd64: for some time, I had been puzzled by the postinst of all gstreamer0.8 output plugins segfaulting, namely gst-compprep-0.8 would segfault. After getting sick at it, since my system works otherwise very well, I investigated this a bit further using strace, and found out that the segfault happened immediately after opening some ladspa libraries. Some digging later, to single out the culprit, I foud that if I uninstalled the swh-plugins package gst-compprep-0.8 would not segfault any more. Which version of swh-plugins? I upload 0.4.12-1 abot a month ago to fix some amd64 issues. On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:27:03AM +, Daniel James wrote: Hi Giacomo, I investigated this a bit further using strace, and found out that the segfault happened immediately after opening some ladspa libraries. Some digging later, to single out the culprit, I foud that if I uninstalled the swh-plugins package gst-compprep-0.8 would not segfault any more. That's really interesting, given the problems I've been having with Jamin, which depends on swh-plugins. I'll forward your mail to the Jamin developers list. Would you be available to investigate this problem further? Yes, if you can send back a traceback or other details it'd also help me as well. Anand -- linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux April 18th to 23rd - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - LINUX Canberra, Australia - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ -Get bitten! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
swh-plugins package crashes gstreamer0.8-anything...
Bug report on amd64: for some time, I had been puzzled by the postinst of all gstreamer0.8 output plugins segfaulting, namely gst-compprep-0.8 would segfault. After getting sick at it, since my system works otherwise very well, I investigated this a bit further using strace, and found out that the segfault happened immediately after opening some ladspa libraries. Some digging later, to single out the culprit, I foud that if I uninstalled the swh-plugins package gst-compprep-0.8 would not segfault any more. Now I have a fully working gstreamer, and do not miss much swh-plugins, but perhaps somebody will be interested in knowing about this problem, perhaps adding a note or a conflicts in the amd64 version of swh-plugins to avoid other people unneededly wasting time on the same problem or even digging into the code with a debugger, finding and correcting the underlying bug. Bye Giacomo -- _ Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA) Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222 Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916 _ When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are (Freddy Mercury) _ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
