Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4
On 05-Feb-03 13:50, Javier Kohen wrote: > > Thanks a lot. > > Any idea why cvs_1:1.12.9-10 compiled locally with "gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 > 20041218 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-7.0.0.1.gcc4)" works great (for me), > but the one in the gcc-3.4 repository segfaults frequently? Not yet. I can confirm that cvs segfaults, but I could not figure out why. I am still investigating this. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4
Michal Schmidt wrote: Andreas Jochens wrote: On 05-Feb-03 18:19, Michal Schmidt wrote: I recompiled libapt-pkg-perl with g++-4.0 and uploaded the new version to the gcc-3.4 archive on alioth. Could you try 'apt-get install --reinstall libapt-pkg-perl apt-src' to verify if it works now? No. When I do that, apt-src breaks again. Did you really upload it? I'm asking because I deleted /var/cache/apt/archives/libapt-pkg-perl_0.1.13_amd64.deb before doing the apt-get install --reinstall ..., and it was created again with the date 2004-10-15 09:43. The md5sum is 07c3c32ddeae535ba39a3dae934cfd29. And I made sure it was downloading from alioth and not from a mirror. OK, I noticed that you have now really uploaded it. The date is 2005-02-03. I reinstalled the new libapt-pkg-perl and apt-src works. Thanks. Michal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4
On 05-Feb-03 19:59, Michal Schmidt wrote: > Andreas Jochens wrote: > >Could you try 'apt-get install --reinstall libapt-pkg-perl apt-src' > >to verify if it works now? > > > > No. When I do that, apt-src breaks again. > Did you really upload it? I'm asking because I deleted > /var/cache/apt/archives/libapt-pkg-perl_0.1.13_amd64.deb > before doing the apt-get install --reinstall ..., > and it was created again with the date 2004-10-15 09:43. > The md5sum is 07c3c32ddeae535ba39a3dae934cfd29. > And I made sure it was downloading from alioth and not from a mirror. You are right, it was still the old version. I just tried to reupload it again and I think it worked this time. Could you try to 'apt-get install --reinstall' it once again please? Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4
Andreas Jochens wrote: On 05-Feb-03 18:19, Michal Schmidt wrote: I recompiled libapt-pkg-perl with g++-4.0 and uploaded the new version to the gcc-3.4 archive on alioth. Could you try 'apt-get install --reinstall libapt-pkg-perl apt-src' to verify if it works now? No. When I do that, apt-src breaks again. Did you really upload it? I'm asking because I deleted /var/cache/apt/archives/libapt-pkg-perl_0.1.13_amd64.deb before doing the apt-get install --reinstall ..., and it was created again with the date 2004-10-15 09:43. The md5sum is 07c3c32ddeae535ba39a3dae934cfd29. And I made sure it was downloading from alioth and not from a mirror. Thanks for reporting this issue. Regards Andreas Jochens Michal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4
Thanks a lot. Any idea why cvs_1:1.12.9-10 compiled locally with "gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 20041218 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-7.0.0.1.gcc4)" works great (for me), but the one in the gcc-3.4 repository segfaults frequently? Andreas Jochens wrote: On 05-Feb-03 11:17, Javier Kohen wrote: Hi, I wanted to update a couple packages that depend on the 2.4.1-2 version of the libglade2 package, but for some reason it hasn't been uploaded to the gcc-3.4 pool. I see it in the pure64 tree and according to the buildd logs in http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/buildd-logs/libglade2_2.4.1-2_amd64.log it's been built correctly. There are some warnings at compile time, but those seem to be the exact same warnings that -1 got, and that one is in gcc-3.4 already. The gcc-3.4 archive has the latest version (2.4.1-2) of libglade2 now. Thanks for the report. Regards Andreas Jochens -- Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4
On 05-Feb-03 18:19, Michal Schmidt wrote: > I reported the segfault with apt-src a week ago to this mailing list > with the subject "gcc-3.4: apt-src crashes with SIGSEGV". I also > described a workaround (recompile libapt-pkg-perl with g++-4.0). I recompiled libapt-pkg-perl with g++-4.0 and uploaded the new version to the gcc-3.4 archive on alioth. Could you try 'apt-get install --reinstall libapt-pkg-perl apt-src' to verify if it works now? Thanks for reporting this issue. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4
On 05-Feb-03 11:17, Javier Kohen wrote: > > Hi, > > I wanted to update a couple packages that depend on the 2.4.1-2 version > of the libglade2 package, but for some reason it hasn't been uploaded to > the gcc-3.4 pool. I see it in the pure64 tree and according to the > buildd logs in > http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/buildd-logs/libglade2_2.4.1-2_amd64.log > > it's been built correctly. There are some warnings at compile time, but > those seem to be the exact same warnings that -1 got, and that one is in > gcc-3.4 already. The gcc-3.4 archive has the latest version (2.4.1-2) of libglade2 now. Thanks for the report. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4
Javier Kohen wrote: Only that apt-src won't run, it aborts with a Segmentation Fault. I remember I reported this about 10 days ago regarding a similar problem with cvs. I reported the segfault with apt-src a week ago to this mailing list with the subject "gcc-3.4: apt-src crashes with SIGSEGV". I also described a workaround (recompile libapt-pkg-perl with g++-4.0). Michal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4
Only that apt-src won't run, it aborts with a Segmentation Fault. I remember I reported this about 10 days ago regarding a similar problem with cvs. Thanks anyway, I'll get the sources "by hand" with apt-get source. Michal Schmidt wrote: Javier Kohen wrote: Hi, I wanted to update a couple packages that depend on the 2.4.1-2 version of the libglade2 package, but for some reason it hasn't been uploaded to the gcc-3.4 pool. I see it in the pure64 tree and according to the buildd logs in http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/buildd-logs/libglade2_2.4.1-2_amd64.log it's been built correctly. There are some warnings at compile time, but those seem to be the exact same warnings that -1 got, and that one is in gcc-3.4 already. I'm not sure how the repository system works, but it's been more than a week since the package was built for gcc-3.4. As a side matter, do you think that, new bugs left aside, I could break something by installing the pure64 libglade2_2.4.1-2 package on a gcc-3.4 installation for now? Hi, A better solution will be compiling the package from source: apt-src install libglade2 cd libglade2-2.4.1 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot cd .. su dpkg -i libglade2-0_2.4.1-2_amd64.deb Michal -- Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4
Javier Kohen wrote: Hi, I wanted to update a couple packages that depend on the 2.4.1-2 version of the libglade2 package, but for some reason it hasn't been uploaded to the gcc-3.4 pool. I see it in the pure64 tree and according to the buildd logs in http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/buildd-logs/libglade2_2.4.1-2_amd64.log it's been built correctly. There are some warnings at compile time, but those seem to be the exact same warnings that -1 got, and that one is in gcc-3.4 already. I'm not sure how the repository system works, but it's been more than a week since the package was built for gcc-3.4. As a side matter, do you think that, new bugs left aside, I could break something by installing the pure64 libglade2_2.4.1-2 package on a gcc-3.4 installation for now? Hi, A better solution will be compiling the package from source: apt-src install libglade2 cd libglade2-2.4.1 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot cd .. su dpkg -i libglade2-0_2.4.1-2_amd64.deb Michal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]