Re: OOo and CUPS on AMD64

2005-05-10 Thread Giacomo Mulas
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Jerome Warnier wrote:
Is OOo (32bits, of course) supposed to work with CUPS on Debian for
AMD64?
Someone asked me the question, but I don't know myself and cannot test
it.
yes, it works fine here.
bye
Giacomo
--
_
Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI
Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA)
Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222
Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916
_
When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are
  (Freddy Mercury)
_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OOo and CUPS on AMD64

2005-05-10 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
Works like a charm without any additional configurations

--
Andrei

On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 13:40 +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
 Is OOo (32bits, of course) supposed to work with CUPS on Debian for
 AMD64?
 Someone asked me the question, but I don't know myself and cannot test
 it.
 
 It seems that printing from OOo does not work in Ubuntu for AMD64.
 
 Someone here already tested?
 -- 
 Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 BeezNest
 
 



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: OOo and CUPS on AMD64

2005-05-10 Thread John Baab
I had OOo working back when alioth was still the main server, but
cannot get it working from our current server.  Anyone have any luck
with the deb's on http://amd64.debian.net/debian/?  They all seem to
point as openoffice.org-bin (pulling this off the top of my head since
I am not at my box right now) as an unmet dependencie.

-John



Re: OOo and CUPS on AMD64

2005-05-10 Thread Giacomo Mulas
On Tue, 10 May 2005, John Baab wrote:
I had OOo working back when alioth was still the main server, but
cannot get it working from our current server.  Anyone have any luck
with the deb's on http://amd64.debian.net/debian/?  They all seem to
point as openoffice.org-bin (pulling this off the top of my head since
I am not at my box right now) as an unmet dependencie.
I had problems with the debs a long time ago, since then I just installed 
the original package from Openoffice.org and had no problems with it. I 
prefer to use debian packages, when they work, but in this case I made an 
exception and installed it all in /usr/local (in the 32bit chroot).

Bye
Giacomo
--
_
Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI
Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA)
Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222
Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916
_
When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are
 (Freddy Mercury)
_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: OOo and CUPS on AMD64

2005-05-10 Thread John Baab
The deb's on alioth used to run with out a 32bit chroot, I was trying
to avoid having one if I didn't need it and OOo is the only thing I
have come across which isn't 64bit compatable yet.

-John

On 5/10/05, Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, 10 May 2005, John Baab wrote:
 
  I had OOo working back when alioth was still the main server, but
  cannot get it working from our current server.  Anyone have any luck
  with the deb's on http://amd64.debian.net/debian/?  They all seem to
  point as openoffice.org-bin (pulling this off the top of my head since
  I am not at my box right now) as an unmet dependencie.
 
 I had problems with the debs a long time ago, since then I just installed
 the original package from Openoffice.org and had no problems with it. I
 prefer to use debian packages, when they work, but in this case I made an
 exception and installed it all in /usr/local (in the 32bit chroot).
 
 Bye
 Giacomo
 
 --
 _
 
 Giacomo Mulas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _
 
 OSSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO DI CAGLIARI
 Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA)
 
 Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248 Fax : +39 070 71180 222
 Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916
 _
 
 When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are
   (Freddy Mercury)
 _
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
Useful Software:
Mozilla Firefox -
http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliatesamp;id=15270amp;t=1
Mozilla Thunderbird - http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/
OpenOffice.org(OOo) - http://www.openoffice.org/
Gaim - http://gaim.sourceforge.net/
7-Zip - http://www.7-zip.org/

http://clusty.com/ - The David that takes down Goliath -Bartos



Re: OOo and CUPS on AMD64

2005-05-10 Thread A J Stiles
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 12:40, Jerome Warnier wrote:
 Is OOo (32bits, of course) supposed to work with CUPS on Debian for
 AMD64?
 Someone asked me the question, but I don't know myself and cannot test
 it.

 It seems that printing from OOo does not work in Ubuntu for AMD64.

 Someone here already tested?
 --
 Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 BeezNest

I think you would need to have a 32-bit cupsys-client running in the chroot 
and a 64-bit cupsys server.  But all this mucking around with a 32-bit chroot 
just sounds like teaching a cat to bark .  the real solution would be a 
64-bit version of OpenOffice.  According to the OO.org team, it's been done 
already; but I can't find the necessary files for love nor money.

Has anyone had any luck getting the OpenOffice.org sources to compile cleanly 
under 64-bit Debian?  I tried pulling the latest CVS, and had a partial 
success after doing some hacking.  But unfortunately, I got sidetracked; and 
now I can't get it to work at all .

Just what tricks did they pull to make OpenOffice.org so flaky anyway?!  I 
thought the whole idea of using C and C++ was that it shouldn't care if it's 
running on a 32-bit processor, a 64-bit processor or a 4-bit processor .

-- 
AJS
deb64 at earthshod dot co dot uk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OOo and CUPS on AMD64

2005-05-10 Thread John Baab
At some point there was a working deb of OOo, 1.1.2 I believe, on
alioth.  It installed fine other than forcing a shared file issue with
ia32-libs.  It was actually 32bit though not 64bit, that is the
closest I have seen anyone in here get.  As far as I know, I haven't
seen any other 64bit distros running OOo.  It has been said that 2.0
should be able to build 64bit cleanly.

-John

On 5/10/05, A J Stiles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tuesday 10 May 2005 12:40, Jerome Warnier wrote:
  Is OOo (32bits, of course) supposed to work with CUPS on Debian for
  AMD64?
  Someone asked me the question, but I don't know myself and cannot test
  it.
 
  It seems that printing from OOo does not work in Ubuntu for AMD64.
 
  Someone here already tested?
  --
  Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  BeezNest
 
 I think you would need to have a 32-bit cupsys-client running in the chroot
 and a 64-bit cupsys server.  But all this mucking around with a 32-bit chroot
 just sounds like teaching a cat to bark .  the real solution would be a
 64-bit version of OpenOffice.  According to the OO.org team, it's been done
 already; but I can't find the necessary files for love nor money.
 
 Has anyone had any luck getting the OpenOffice.org sources to compile cleanly
 under 64-bit Debian?  I tried pulling the latest CVS, and had a partial
 success after doing some hacking.  But unfortunately, I got sidetracked; and
 now I can't get it to work at all .
 
 Just what tricks did they pull to make OpenOffice.org so flaky anyway?!  I
 thought the whole idea of using C and C++ was that it shouldn't care if it's
 running on a 32-bit processor, a 64-bit processor or a 4-bit processor .
 
 --
 AJS
 deb64 at earthshod dot co dot uk
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
Useful Software:
Mozilla Firefox -
http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliatesamp;id=15270amp;t=1
Mozilla Thunderbird - http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/
OpenOffice.org(OOo) - http://www.openoffice.org/
Gaim - http://gaim.sourceforge.net/
7-Zip - http://www.7-zip.org/

http://clusty.com/ - The David that takes down Goliath -Bartos



Re: OOo and CUPS on AMD64

2005-05-10 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:15:01PM +0100, A J Stiles wrote:
 I think you would need to have a 32-bit cupsys-client running in the chroot 
 and a 64-bit cupsys server.  But all this mucking around with a 32-bit chroot 
 just sounds like teaching a cat to bark .  the real solution would be a 
 64-bit version of OpenOffice.  According to the OO.org team, it's been done 
 already; but I can't find the necessary files for love nor money.
 
 Has anyone had any luck getting the OpenOffice.org sources to compile cleanly 
 under 64-bit Debian?  I tried pulling the latest CVS, and had a partial 
 success after doing some hacking.  But unfortunately, I got sidetracked; and 
 now I can't get it to work at all .
 
 Just what tricks did they pull to make OpenOffice.org so flaky anyway?!  I 
 thought the whole idea of using C and C++ was that it shouldn't care if it's 
 running on a 32-bit processor, a 64-bit processor or a 4-bit processor .

But C and C++ allow casting things (both implicitly and explicitly)
between values and pointers and other stupid things, and that doesn
cause problems when you used the wrong type and move to 64bit.  So many
things have used int to store memory addresses when void* would have
been the right thing instead, and they will fail to work on 64bit
systems.

Also something mix pointer types back and forth and happen to work
because of the size of those types, and on 64bit systems they are often
different (ie int is 32bit on both 32 and 64bit linux systems in
general, while long is 32bit on 32bit systems and 64bit on 64bit
systems).

Well written and carefully written C/C++ code should just recompile and
work.  Sloppy code on the other hand (and there is quite a bit of that)
breaks.  If you are lucky the compiler can warn you about the problem,
but sometimes it has no idea what the programmer was trying to do.

Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]