Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-22 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 07:54:39PM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
 I made the module with out any problem with m-a. I seem to have all the 
 same versions except for nvidia-glx
 
 wajig list nvidia
 ii  nvidia-glx1.0.8776-4  NVIDIA binary 
 XFree86 4.x driver
 ii  nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-3-amd64 1.0.8776-4+2.6.18-7 NVIDIA 
 binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18
 ii  nvidia-kernel-2.6.22-3-amd64 169.07-2+2.6.22-6   NVIDIA 
 binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.22
 ii  nvidia-kernel-common  20051028+1-0.1  NVIDIA binary 
 kernel module common files
 ii  nvidia-kernel-source  169.07-2NVIDIA binary 
 kernel module source
 ii  nvidia-settings   1.0+20060516-3  Tool of 
 configuring the NVIDIA graphics driv
 ii  nvidia-xconfig1.0+20070502-1  The NVIDIA X 
 Configuration Tool
 
 
 
 I now think nvidia-glx is the problem:
 
 The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   nvidia-glx: Depends: nvidia-kernel-169.07 but it is not installable

nvidia-kernel-169.07 SHOULD be provided by your
nvidia-kernel-2.6.22-3-amd64 169.07-2+2.6.22-6 package above.

   Depends: xserver-xorg-core (= 2:1.4) but 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12 
   is to be installed

This on the other hand needs updating.  You need version 1.4 not version
1.3 of the xserver-xorg-core to use the nvidia-glx driver from version
169.07

 How did you get nvidia-glx to install (or can I turn it off?)

nvidia-glx is the driver for X that talks to the kernel module.  The
kernel module is useless without the matching driver.

--
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-22 Thread Karl Schmidt

Stephen Cormier wrote:





It is definitely the problem you won't get it to install unless you rebuild 
the package source 


Which package source? please email me the corrected package - what ever it is (BTW there are 
ways to force installation - wouldn't that work?)


having modified it so that it will install with the X 
version being 2:1.3 

I have:

wajig list xorg
ii  xorg1:7.2-5 
X.Org X Window System
ii  xserver-xorg1:7.2-5 
the X.Org X server
ii  xserver-xorg-core   2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12 
X.Org X server -- core server



I think you are referring to the version of  xserver-xorg-core ?


as I mentioned in my first mail and yes you need the -glx 
package installed as well. If you do not want to rebuild the packages as I 
mentioned in my previous mail I have them here and can send them to you so 
you can get it installed.


Please send me the packages you think I need. (Thanks in advance!)

 You would only need to remove the currently 
installed ones install the source .deb I send you build/install the binary 
module then install the -glx and you are good to go.


Stephen



Did you send the patch to the package maintainer?




Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th StreetPh (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434

Misdirection is the key to being a good magician. Magicians tell
you they are doing something while they do something quite
different; much like politicians -- except we can afford magicians.
-KPS




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-22 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:56:46PM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
 Which package source? please email me the corrected package - what ever it 
 is (BTW there are ways to force installation - wouldn't that work?)

Using force pretty much always leaves you with a broken dependancy set
which will have to be fixed before you can install or upgrade anything
else.

So yes it might make the package be installed, but it won't leave things
working properly.

--
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-22 Thread Stephen Cormier
On January 22, 2008 04:07:58 pm Stephen Cormier wrote:
 On January 22, 2008 02:56:46 pm Karl Schmidt wrote:
  Stephen Cormier wrote:
   It is definitely the problem you won't get it to install unless you
   rebuild the package source
 
  Which package source? please email me the corrected package - what ever
  it is (BTW there are ways to force installation - wouldn't that work?)

 The package needing to be downloaded is nvidia-kernel-source with something
 like this apt-get source nvidia-kernel-source as normal user this after
 having made a new directory and changed into it as the source package is
 downloaded into the current directory where the command is run from. I
 would not force it installing it will probably just break your install
 until you upgraded to the newer X.

   having modified it so that it will install with the X
   version being 2:1.3
 
  I have:
 
  wajig list xorg
  ii  xorg1:7.2-5
  X.Org X Window System
  ii  xserver-xorg1:7.2-5
  the X.Org X server
  ii  xserver-xorg-core
  2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12 X.Org X server -- core server
 
 
  I think you are referring to the version of  xserver-xorg-core ?

 Yes I am referring to that version we have identical packages installed for
 these.

 apt-cache policy xorg xserver-xorg xserver-xorg-core
 xorg:
   Installed: 1:7.2-5
   Candidate: 1:7.2-5
   Version table:
  1:7.3+10 0
 600 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main Packages
  *** 1:7.2-5 0
 990 http://ftp.de.debian.org testing/main Packages
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 xserver-xorg:
   Installed: 1:7.2-5
   Candidate: 1:7.2-5
   Version table:
  1:7.3+10 0
 600 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main Packages
  *** 1:7.2-5 0
 990 http://ftp.de.debian.org testing/main Packages
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 xserver-xorg-core:
   Installed: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12
   Candidate: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12
   Version table:
  2:1.4.1~git20080118-1 0
 600 http://ftp.de.debian.org sid/main Packages
  *** 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12 0
 990 http://ftp.de.debian.org testing/main Packages
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

   as I mentioned in my first mail and yes you need the -glx
   package installed as well. If you do not want to rebuild the packages
   as I mentioned in my previous mail I have them here and can send them
   to you so you can get it installed.
 
  Please send me the packages you think I need. (Thanks in advance!)

 Done you should be getting four emails with a package attached to each.

You would only need to remove the currently
   installed ones install the source .deb I send you build/install the
   binary module then install the -glx and you are good to go.
  
   Stephen
 
  Did you send the patch to the package maintainer?

 Wouldn't be much of a patch it is only changing a single digit in the
 nvidia-glx section of the control file, it would probably be just be
 classified as a wishlist bug and not fixed anyways.

 PS: No need to CC me I read the list, thanks.

 Stephen

Oh also if your board is like mine and you get the fan running at 100% with 
this driver installed then install the nvclock program and use nvclock -f -F 
50 as normal user to lower it to 50% or you can go lower with the number if 
you wish.

Stephen

-- 
GPG Public Key: http://users.eastlink.ca/~stephencormier/publickey.asc


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-22 Thread Damon L. Chesser

Karl Schmidt wrote:
I think I shouldn't have updated to lenny -- I can't get nvidia 
working and I need it for a dual head setup (I don't think the nv 
driver can do this).


Not sure which way to go from here:

* Use the nvidia supplied drivers? (I've never done this)

* Is there a way to use the etch drivers?

* Get Some other card that has an open driver that supports dual head 
display?






Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th StreetPh (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434

If man's brain was simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple to understand it.




I have not been following this thread completely, but I am at a loss.  
Why not just follow these directions:


http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#head-ba6a83e61cea90c0e3e5e9d7b014618e35f65ec3

This has always just worked for me.  Most notable is the first method.  
With out fail, it just worked.  Of course, setting up dual head monitor 
takes some tweaking of your xorg. conf file but you can always try 
nvidia-settings or nvidia-xconfig and see if they can find the correct 
settings for you.


If this has been covered, please excuse the repost.

HTH

--
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-21 Thread Robert Isaac

 The versions abobe 100.14.09 must use Xorg7.3 and higher, due to a new ABI in
 the Nvidia drivers.


100.14.19 builds and works fine on Etch as did 100.14.09.  Only the
debian package requires Xorg = 7.3 which can easily be changed by
lowering the version numbers in the debian/control.in file in the
source package available from Sid.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-21 Thread Stephen Cormier
On January 20, 2008 11:53:33 pm Karl Schmidt wrote:
 Stephen Cormier wrote:
  HappyTux:/# uname -r
  2.6.23

 This seems to be where I have lost the trail. I have:

 # uname -a
 Linux singapore 2.6.22-3-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Nov 4 18:18:09 UTC 2007 x86_64
 GNU/Linux

 And; I don't see a 2.6.23 kernel to install?

 Where did you get it?


I built it myself from the kernel.org sources but I doubt that the .22 kernel 
would be a problem with the newer (169...) driver, although the latest nvidia 
I ran on my .22 kernel was the 100.14.11. I have the packages for those still 
laying around as well so if you want you can try both if your email address 
will accept attachments of around 5mb for the largest of the files.

Stephen

-- 
GPG Public Key: http://users.eastlink.ca/~stephencormier/publickey.asc


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-21 Thread Karl Schmidt

Stephen Cormier wrote:
I have the packages for those still 
laying around as well so if you want you can try both if your email address 
will accept attachments of around 5mb for the largest of the files.


Stephen



I made the module with out any problem with m-a. I seem to have all the same versions except 
for nvidia-glx


wajig list nvidia
ii  nvidia-glx1.0.8776-4  NVIDIA binary XFree86 
4.x driver
ii  nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-3-amd64 1.0.8776-4+2.6.18-7 NVIDIA binary kernel module 
for Linux 2.6.18
ii  nvidia-kernel-2.6.22-3-amd64 169.07-2+2.6.22-6   NVIDIA binary kernel module 
for Linux 2.6.22
ii  nvidia-kernel-common  20051028+1-0.1  NVIDIA binary kernel module common 
files

ii  nvidia-kernel-source  169.07-2NVIDIA binary kernel 
module source
ii  nvidia-settings   1.0+20060516-3  Tool of configuring the NVIDIA 
graphics driv

ii  nvidia-xconfig1.0+20070502-1  The NVIDIA X 
Configuration Tool



I now think nvidia-glx is the problem:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  nvidia-glx: Depends: nvidia-kernel-169.07 but it is not installable
  Depends: xserver-xorg-core (= 2:1.4) but 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12 is to 
be installed

How did you get nvidia-glx to install (or can I turn it off?)


Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th StreetPh (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434

99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-21 Thread Stephen Cormier
On January 21, 2008 09:54:39 pm Karl Schmidt wrote:
 Stephen Cormier wrote:
  I have the packages for those still
  laying around as well so if you want you can try both if your email
  address will accept attachments of around 5mb for the largest of the
  files.
 
  Stephen

 I made the module with out any problem with m-a. I seem to have all the
 same versions except for nvidia-glx

 wajig list nvidia
 ii  nvidia-glx1.0.8776-4  NVIDIA binary
 XFree86 4.x driver ii  nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-3-amd64 1.0.8776-4+2.6.18-7
 NVIDIA binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.18
 ii  nvidia-kernel-2.6.22-3-amd64 169.07-2+2.6.22-6   NVIDIA
 binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.22
 ii  nvidia-kernel-common  20051028+1-0.1  NVIDIA binary
 kernel module common files
 ii  nvidia-kernel-source  169.07-2NVIDIA binary
 kernel module source ii  nvidia-settings   1.0+20060516-3  
Tool of configuring the NVIDIA graphics driv
 ii  nvidia-xconfig1.0+20070502-1  The NVIDIA X
 Configuration Tool



 I now think nvidia-glx is the problem:

 The following packages have unmet dependencies:
nvidia-glx: Depends: nvidia-kernel-169.07 but it is not installable
Depends: xserver-xorg-core (= 2:1.4) but 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12
 is to be installed

 How did you get nvidia-glx to install (or can I turn it off?)


It is definitely the problem you won't get it to install unless you rebuild 
the package source having modified it so that it will install with the X 
version being 2:1.3 as I mentioned in my first mail and yes you need the -glx 
package installed as well. If you do not want to rebuild the packages as I 
mentioned in my previous mail I have them here and can send them to you so 
you can get it installed. You would only need to remove the currently 
installed ones install the source .deb I send you build/install the binary 
module then install the -glx and you are good to go.

Stephen

-- 
GPG Public Key: http://users.eastlink.ca/~stephencormier/publickey.asc


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-20 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2008 schrieb Karl Schmidt:
 I think I shouldn't have updated to lenny -- I can't get nvidia working and
 I need it for a dual head setup (I don't think the nv driver can do
 this).

 Not sure which way to go from here:

 * Use the nvidia supplied drivers? (I've never done this)

 * Is there a way to use the etch drivers?

 * Get Some other card that has an open driver that supports dual head
 display?




 
 Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
 3209 West 9th StreetPh (785) 841-3089
 Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434

 If man's brain was simple enough for us to understand,
 we would be too simple to understand it.

 

Hi ! 

To get the newest NVidia-packages installed and built, you can follow these 
steps:

1. delete all /usr/src/modules/nv*
2. delete /usr/src/nvidia-source*.tgz
3. delete all formerly built packages (i.e. nvidia-kernel-bla***.deb)
4. deinstall nvidia-source and reinstall the new nvidia-source
5. start module-assistant and choose nvidia-kernel and let it build and 
install
6. apt-get update, apt-get upgrade let you now install the newest package 
nvidia-glx
7. update all xserver-xorg* packages.
8. Have fun !

The latest version (167.07) is running stable !


Good luck !

Hans-J. Ullrich
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-20 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 08:59:37PM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
 I think I shouldn't have updated to lenny -- I can't get nvidia working and 
 I need it for a dual head setup (I don't think the nv driver can do this).
 
 Not sure which way to go from here:
 
 * Use the nvidia supplied drivers? (I've never done this)
 
 * Is there a way to use the etch drivers?
 
 * Get Some other card that has an open driver that supports dual head 
 display?

Usually I find the unstable nvidia drivers will install fine on testing,
at least most of the time.  The stable drivers often not install due to
updated libraries and X server versions and such.

Unfortunately non-free stuff never seems to move to testing in anything
resembling a timely manner.

--
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-20 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 05:21:59PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
 1. delete all /usr/src/modules/nv*

Fine.

 2. delete /usr/src/nvidia-source*.tgz

Deleting file beloging to packages is generally a bad plan.  Don't do
that.

 3. delete all formerly built packages (i.e. nvidia-kernel-bla***.deb)

Helps to clean up, although not really essential.

 4. deinstall nvidia-source and reinstall the new nvidia-source

This of course deletes the /usr/src/nvidia*tgz stuff for you since it
actually owns that file.

 5. start module-assistant and choose nvidia-kernel and let it build and 
 install

Except the current driver in unstable doesn't get along with
module-assistant due to a wrong filename.  A symlink or some manual
intervention helps.  I just manually do:
cd /usr/src;tar xjf nvidia-kernel.tar.bz2
then run:
m-a a-i -t nvidia-kernel

 6. apt-get update, apt-get upgrade let you now install the newest package 
 nvidia-glx
 7. update all xserver-xorg* packages.
 8. Have fun !

That usually works yes.

 The latest version (167.07) is running stable !

Once you get it installed it does work well.

--
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-20 Thread Karl Schmidt

Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:

Hi ! 

To get the newest NVidia-packages installed and built, you can follow these 
steps:


1. delete all /usr/src/modules/nv*
2. delete /usr/src/nvidia-source*.tgz
3. delete all formerly built packages (i.e. nvidia-kernel-bla***.deb)
4. deinstall nvidia-source and reinstall the new nvidia-source
5. start module-assistant and choose nvidia-kernel and let it build and 
install
6. apt-get update, apt-get upgrade let you now install the newest package 
nvidia-glx

7. update all xserver-xorg* packages.
8. Have fun !

The latest version (167.07) is running stable !


Good luck !

Hans-J. Ullrich
 


That didn't work for me - I got every thing compiled and installed - verified that the 
nvidia driver was loaded, but xorg could not see it and errors out.


I think it is a version thing - or something to do with AMD64.

If someone has this working under lenny and could list the following:

* kernel version running
* versions of all the nvidia packages
* version of xorg

This way I'm comparing apples to apples.



Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th StreetPh (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434

Cry a river, build a bridge, get over it.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-20 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2008 schrieb Karl Schmidt:
 Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
  Hi !
 
  To get the newest NVidia-packages installed and built, you can follow
  these steps:
 
  1. delete all /usr/src/modules/nv*
  2. delete /usr/src/nvidia-source*.tgz
  3. delete all formerly built packages (i.e. nvidia-kernel-bla***.deb)
  4. deinstall nvidia-source and reinstall the new nvidia-source
  5. start module-assistant and choose nvidia-kernel and let it build and
  install
  6. apt-get update, apt-get upgrade let you now install the newest package
  nvidia-glx
  7. update all xserver-xorg* packages.
  8. Have fun !
 
  The latest version (167.07) is running stable !
 
 
  Good luck !
 
  Hans-J. Ullrich

 That didn't work for me - I got every thing compiled and installed -
 verified that the nvidia driver was loaded, but xorg could not see it and
 errors out.

 I think it is a version thing - or something to do with AMD64.

 If someone has this working under lenny and could list the following:

 * kernel version running
 * versions of all the nvidia packages
 * version of xorg

 This way I'm comparing apples to apples.


 
 Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
 3209 West 9th StreetPh (785) 841-3089
 Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434

 Cry a river, build a bridge, get over it.

 

Hi Karl,

I am running Debian sid. Maybe you could start without kdm or gdm (just 
move /etc/init.d/kdm somewhere else), and stop it. If they are no running, 
you can start X with the command startx. The advantage is, you can see in 
stdout, what is not working, and why it is not working. Often this is helping 
to find reasons, why X will not start.

The versions abobe 100.14.09 must use Xorg7.3 and higher, due to a new ABI in 
the Nvidia drivers.

Just take care, nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx are the versions, which belong 
together. Sometimes it is necessary, to unload and load the nvidia-kernel 
module manually.

Good luck !

Hans


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-20 Thread Stephen Cormier
On January 20, 2008 09:05:32 pm Stephen Cormier wrote:
 On January 20, 2008 05:05:29 pm Karl Schmidt wrote:
  Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
   Hi !
  
   To get the newest NVidia-packages installed and built, you can follow
   these steps:
  
   1. delete all /usr/src/modules/nv*
   2. delete /usr/src/nvidia-source*.tgz
   3. delete all formerly built packages (i.e. nvidia-kernel-bla***.deb)
   4. deinstall nvidia-source and reinstall the new nvidia-source
   5. start module-assistant and choose nvidia-kernel and let it build and
   install
   6. apt-get update, apt-get upgrade let you now install the newest
   package nvidia-glx
   7. update all xserver-xorg* packages.
   8. Have fun !
  
   The latest version (167.07) is running stable !
  
  
   Good luck !
  
   Hans-J. Ullrich
 
  That didn't work for me - I got every thing compiled and installed -
  verified that the nvidia driver was loaded, but xorg could not see it and
  errors out.
 
  I think it is a version thing - or something to do with AMD64.
 
  If someone has this working under lenny and could list the following:
 
  * kernel version running
  * versions of all the nvidia packages
  * version of xorg
 
  This way I'm comparing apples to apples.

 Here are mine listed below as you can see from the version naming of the
 packages I needed to re-compile so that they would install using Xorg 7.2,
 if you want I can send you the packages so you can build your own kernel
 module to install. Or you can simply re-build the nvidia packages yourself
 having changed the debian/control file to xserver-xorg-core (= 2:1.3) in
 the nvidia-glx section.


 HappyTux:/# COLUMNS=125 dpkg -l | grep nvidia
 ii  nvidia-glx169.07-2.1NVIDIA binary Xorg
 driver
 ii  nvidia-glx-dev169.07-2.1NVIDIA binary Xorg
 driver development files
 ii  nvidia-kernel-2.6.23  169.07-2.1+2.6.23-10.00.C NVIDIA binary
 kernel module for Linux 2.6.23
 ii  nvidia-kernel-common  20051028+1-0.1NVIDIA binary
 kernel module common files
 ii  nvidia-kernel-source  169.07-2.1NVIDIA binary
 kernel module source
 ii  nvidia-settings   1.0+20070502-1Tool of configuring
 the NVIDIA graphics driver

 HappyTux:/# uname -r
 2.6.23

 HappyTux:/# lsmod |grep nvidia
 nvidia   8894372  34
 i2c_core   27072  6
 nvidia,eeprom,tuner,cx88xx,i2c_algo_bit,tveeprom

 HappyTux:/# X -version

 X Window System Version 1.3.0
 Release Date: 19 April 2007
 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 1.3
 Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12)
 Current Operating System: Linux HappyTux 2.6.23 #1 SMP Mon Dec 31 01:38:11
 AST 2007 x86_64
 Build Date: 09 August 2007
 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
 to make sure that you have the latest version.
 Module Loader present


 Stephen

And I should add that when using module-assistant you needed to have made a 
symbolic link 
(ln -s /usr/src/nvidia-kernel.tar.bz2 /usr/src/nvidia-kernel-source.tar.bz2) 
so that when using something like m-a a-i -f nvidia to build your binary 
module it will find the source file otherwise it just failed here building an 
old 100.14.11 if memory serves me correctly.

Stephen

-- 
GPG Public Key: http://users.eastlink.ca/~stephencormier/publickey.asc


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-20 Thread Stephen Cormier
On January 20, 2008 05:05:29 pm Karl Schmidt wrote:
 Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
  Hi !
 
  To get the newest NVidia-packages installed and built, you can follow
  these steps:
 
  1. delete all /usr/src/modules/nv*
  2. delete /usr/src/nvidia-source*.tgz
  3. delete all formerly built packages (i.e. nvidia-kernel-bla***.deb)
  4. deinstall nvidia-source and reinstall the new nvidia-source
  5. start module-assistant and choose nvidia-kernel and let it build and
  install
  6. apt-get update, apt-get upgrade let you now install the newest package
  nvidia-glx
  7. update all xserver-xorg* packages.
  8. Have fun !
 
  The latest version (167.07) is running stable !
 
 
  Good luck !
 
  Hans-J. Ullrich

 That didn't work for me - I got every thing compiled and installed -
 verified that the nvidia driver was loaded, but xorg could not see it and
 errors out.

 I think it is a version thing - or something to do with AMD64.

 If someone has this working under lenny and could list the following:

 * kernel version running
 * versions of all the nvidia packages
 * version of xorg

 This way I'm comparing apples to apples.


Here are mine listed below as you can see from the version naming of the 
packages I needed to re-compile so that they would install using Xorg 7.2, if 
you want I can send you the packages so you can build your own kernel module 
to install. Or you can simply re-build the nvidia packages yourself having 
changed the debian/control file to xserver-xorg-core (= 2:1.3) in the 
nvidia-glx section.


HappyTux:/# COLUMNS=125 dpkg -l | grep nvidia
ii  nvidia-glx169.07-2.1NVIDIA binary Xorg 
driver
ii  nvidia-glx-dev169.07-2.1NVIDIA binary Xorg 
driver development files
ii  nvidia-kernel-2.6.23  169.07-2.1+2.6.23-10.00.C NVIDIA binary kernel 
module for Linux 2.6.23
ii  nvidia-kernel-common  20051028+1-0.1NVIDIA binary kernel 
module common files
ii  nvidia-kernel-source  169.07-2.1NVIDIA binary kernel 
module source
ii  nvidia-settings   1.0+20070502-1Tool of configuring 
the NVIDIA graphics driver

HappyTux:/# uname -r
2.6.23

HappyTux:/# lsmod |grep nvidia
nvidia   8894372  34
i2c_core   27072  6 
nvidia,eeprom,tuner,cx88xx,i2c_algo_bit,tveeprom

HappyTux:/# X -version

X Window System Version 1.3.0
Release Date: 19 April 2007
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 1.3
Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12)
Current Operating System: Linux HappyTux 2.6.23 #1 SMP Mon Dec 31 01:38:11 AST 
2007 x86_64
Build Date: 09 August 2007
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present


Stephen
-- 
GPG Public Key: http://users.eastlink.ca/~stephencormier/publickey.asc


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-20 Thread Karl Schmidt

Stephen Cormier wrote:



HappyTux:/# uname -r
2.6.23


This seems to be where I have lost the trail. I have:

# uname -a
Linux singapore 2.6.22-3-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Nov 4 18:18:09 UTC 2007 x86_64 
GNU/Linux

And; I don't see a 2.6.23 kernel to install?

Where did you get it?



Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th StreetPh (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434

If man's brain was simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple to understand it.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-19 Thread Karl Schmidt
I think I shouldn't have updated to lenny -- I can't get nvidia working and I need it for a 
dual head setup (I don't think the nv driver can do this).


Not sure which way to go from here:

* Use the nvidia supplied drivers? (I've never done this)

* Is there a way to use the etch drivers?

* Get Some other card that has an open driver that supports dual head display?





Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th StreetPh (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434

If man's brain was simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple to understand it.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2008-01-19 Thread Steve Dobson
Karl

On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 20:59 -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
 I think I shouldn't have updated to lenny -- I can't get nvidia working and I 
 need it for a 
 dual head setup (I don't think the nv driver can do this).

That depends.  Are you using a video card with two heads or two cards?
If your using two cards (like I am) then it's no problem.

 Not sure which way to go from here:
 
 * Use the nvidia supplied drivers? (I've never done this)

I've stopped using them.  I run lenny on both my workstation and laptop.

On my 64-bit workstation I had a disk problem and different kernels
coped better than others.  The system would run of a few days and the
just lock up.  I had to re-compile the nVidia driver every time I
swapped kernels (if I wanted to use X).

On my laptop the system suddenly became very sluggish after on upgrade
(inc kernel so re-compile of the nVidia driver required).  I can not
prove that it was the nVidia driver, but as far as I could tell it was
only the graphics that ran slowly.  Switch to a virtual console and the
speed was there.

My recommendation is to only use the nVidia drivers if you _need_ a
facility that the FLOSS driver doesn't support:
1). Duel head card, and/or
2). 3D acceleration, and/or
3). Better external display support [1].
If you don't use _need_ them (and I don't) the FLOSS one is much less
hassle.

 * Is there a way to use the etch drivers?

Yes.  Just pull the debs from the server and install them by hand:
   # dpkg -i deb [...]

 * Get Some other card that has an open driver that supports dual head display?

You could just buy a cheep PCI graphics card and do it that way.  That's
what I've done.  I managed to pick up cheep second hard graphics card
from a computer fair (£5):

00:0c.0 VGA compatible controller: Texas Instruments TVP4020
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV28

Steve

[1]
The nVidia driver will drive both the laptop screen and a projector at
the same time.  And you can plug the projector in at any time.  IIRC the
FLOSS driver has problems here and it is best to boot and shutdown with
the projector plugged in.
-- 
Steve Dobson

The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed
ideas in the mind at the same time and still retain the ability to
function.
-- F. Scott Fitzgerald



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2007-11-22 Thread Robert Isaac
 But they are NOT compatible.  That means they don't work.  The new xorg
 can't work with the old nvidia hence there should be a dependancy
 preventing you from having the old nvidia with the new xorg.  It's a
 good thing when packages prevent you from doing broken things.  The new
 version of xorg simply doesn't work with old driver files becase the ABI
 changed.  That's what an ABI change means.

And what the --ignoreABI switch is for.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2007-11-22 Thread Robert Isaac

 Best course of action:  stick to Intel graphics, or use the free nv driver.


The nv driver only works on some cards and intel cards are overpriced
POS that simply do not support some of more useful GL extensions.
AMD/ATi has recently released specs for their newer chips, and
promises to do so soon for their older chips, that is a better option
than an over priced intel card.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2007-11-22 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 06:25:05AM -0500, Robert Isaac wrote:

 The nv driver only works on some cards and intel cards are overpriced
 POS that simply do not support some of more useful GL extensions.
 AMD/ATi has recently released specs for their newer chips, and
 promises to do so soon for their older chips, that is a better option
 than an over priced intel card.

Erm, you wanted to say that will be a better option in 1-2 years from
now. Drivers won't just magically appear out of thin air because the
specs are available. Even more, AFAIK not all specs are available and
even the released ones have some holes. I'm sure these will be solved
over time but IMHO right _now_ the only fully supported Radeon family is
still the R200 generation. R300 and partly R400 is becoming pretty good
but it is not yet complete. Work on R500 has been started but is far
from being ready, and support for R600 is not on the horizont yet.

Of course you can use the fglrx driver but then you're back where you've
been with Nvidia.

Gabor

-- 
 -
 MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
 -


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2007-11-22 Thread Karl Schmidt

Adam Stiles wrote:


Best course of action:  stick to Intel graphics, or use the free nv driver.


It is my understanding that the ATI (now part of AMD) cards were going to be 
totally open?

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3108

Thank you AMD - I sure hope our driver people take the challenge and make the best driver 
available!


So, I think it will be a choice between Intel and ATI - not sure which is more open. For 
applications that don't need 3D like most desktop stuff, I read somewhere that ATI out 
performs Nvidia.


BTW, Intel has also better about making information available than they get credit for.  I 
think the day is rapidly approaching where they can no longer ignore the OSS community.



Karl Schmidt EMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transtronics, Inc. WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th StreetPh (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049 FAX (785) 841-0434

A patent provides one a license to enrich his lawyer. -kps




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2007-11-22 Thread Robert Isaac
 AFAIK not all specs are available and
 even the released ones have some holes. I'm sure these will be solved
 over time but IMHO right _now_ the only fully supported Radeon family is
 still the R200 generation. R300 and partly R400 is becoming pretty good
 but it is not yet complete. Work on R500 has been started but is far
 from being ready, and support for R600 is not on the horizont yet.

It's my understanding that the r500/600 libre driver is now in a
usable 2d state[1] thanks to the release of the specs and the existing
code from the Avivo driver, which should make the R500/600 chips a
viable desktop option if you do not require 3D support,  especially as
the R500 cards can be bought at a significantly less price than
intel's cards.

It is also my understanding that the release of specs for the r300/400
cards is being held up by the AMD legal department's audit of the
specs and has nothing to do with AMD/ATi's new policy towards
GNU/Linux.

[1] http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=921num=1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2007-11-21 Thread Nicolas
You can make it yourself!

Get the package:
apt-get -d xserver-xorg-core

Create a directory to unpack that package:
mkdir /path/to/a/directory (example /tmp/xserver)

cd /tmp/xserver/
dpkg -e xserver-xorg-core
dpkg -x xserver-xorg-core /tmp/xserver

cd /tmp/xserver/DEBIAN

Edit the control file and on the line beginning by Depends remove nvidia-glx
Save the file.
cd /tmp
dpkg-deb -b xserver
It will create a new package xserver.deb that you can install.

Hope it helps

Nicolas

On Nov 21, 2007 7:47 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear maintainers,
 it is not possible, to install the newest xorg-version without upgrading
 to a
 newer version of nvidia-glx. Yes, I know, this is because xorg 7.3 is
 using a
 new ABI for Nvidias new binary part and you need xorg7.3 for the newer
 drivers.

 But because of these dependencies, I have to get the newer version og
 Nvidias
 driver, which let freeze my system (reason is the binary closed source
 part
 of the package nvidia-glx)

 So it would be nice, if you could create a package xserver-xorg-core
 without the dependencies to nvidia-glx. So I can update to a newer version
 of
 xorg and keep my older Nvidia driver.

 Best regards

 Hans


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2007-11-21 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 07:47:46PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
 Dear maintainers, 
 it is not possible, to install the newest xorg-version without upgrading to a 
 newer version of nvidia-glx. Yes, I know, this is because xorg 7.3 is using a 
 new ABI for Nvidias new binary part and you need xorg7.3 for the newer 
 drivers.
 
 But because of these dependencies, I have to get the newer version og Nvidias 
 driver, which let freeze my system (reason is the binary closed source part 
 of the package nvidia-glx)
 
 So it would be nice, if you could create a package xserver-xorg-core  
 without the dependencies to nvidia-glx. So I can update to a newer version of 
 xorg and keep my older Nvidia driver.

But they are NOT compatible.  That means they don't work.  The new xorg
can't work with the old nvidia hence there should be a dependancy
preventing you from having the old nvidia with the new xorg.  It's a
good thing when packages prevent you from doing broken things.  The new
version of xorg simply doesn't work with old driver files becase the ABI
changed.  That's what an ABI change means.

Xorg changed the ABI in 7.3 and nvidia had to make a new driver using
the new ABI to get it working again.  It is not a case of nvidia
inventing a new ABI and xorg having to change to supprot it.  So old
driver means old ABI which means it only works with old versions of
xorg.

--
Len SOrensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Package xserver-xorg-core and Nvidia

2007-11-21 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Mittwoch, 21. November 2007 schrieb Nicolas:
 You can make it yourself!

 Get the package:
 apt-get -d xserver-xorg-core

 Create a directory to unpack that package:
 mkdir /path/to/a/directory (example /tmp/xserver)

 cd /tmp/xserver/
 dpkg -e xserver-xorg-core
 dpkg -x xserver-xorg-core /tmp/xserver

 cd /tmp/xserver/DEBIAN

 Edit the control file and on the line beginning by Depends remove
 nvidia-glx Save the file.
 cd /tmp
 dpkg-deb -b xserver
 It will create a new package xserver.deb that you can install.

 Hope it helps

 Nicolas

 On Nov 21, 2007 7:47 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Dear maintainers,
  it is not possible, to install the newest xorg-version without upgrading
  to a
  newer version of nvidia-glx. Yes, I know, this is because xorg 7.3 is
  using a
  new ABI for Nvidias new binary part and you need xorg7.3 for the newer
  drivers.
 
  But because of these dependencies, I have to get the newer version og
  Nvidias
  driver, which let freeze my system (reason is the binary closed source
  part
  of the package nvidia-glx)
 
  So it would be nice, if you could create a package xserver-xorg-core
  without the dependencies to nvidia-glx. So I can update to a newer
  version of
  xorg and keep my older Nvidia driver.
 
  Best regards
 
  Hans
 
 
  --
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi Nicolas,
yes, this helps a lot, thanks ! 

But it would not help, using apt-get dist-upgrade
(although I can use aptitude and set the package on hold)
If so, I have to do this every time, a new version is coming out.

I hope, the maintainers will change it though.

Cheers

Hans
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]